Forbes stealth-edits article explaining 'yes, the vaccine changes your DNA'



A Forbes article that takes aim at "anti-vaxxers" for claiming that the COVID-19 vaccine "changes your DNA" — arguing that technically it does and that's a good thing — had its headline changed without explanation to emphasize that the vaccines "don't alter your DNA."

In a column published Monday that was originally titled, "Yes, The Vaccine Changes Your DNA. A Tiny Bit. That’s A Good Thing," Steven Salzberg explains how a person's immune system slightly alters their DNA after taking any vaccine, in the same way the body responds to any infection, like the common cold. Salzberg is a computational biologist and computer scientist with Johns Hopkins University and co-founder of the influenza virus sequencing project.

However, sometime after publication, the article's headline was changed to, "Covid Vaccines Don’t Alter Your DNA – They Help Choose Cells To Strengthen Your Immune Response."

After releasing this article today, Forbes scrubbed it and changed the headline.pic.twitter.com/SWn4T0ac1l
— Echo Chamber (@Echo Chamber) 1638241690

No editor's note or other explanation for the change was given by Forbes. While the original headline summarized Salzberg's argument, the new headline appears to slightly contradict what he wrote.

Salzberg wrote the article in response to what he called "one of the common tropes" about the vaccines popularized by those opposed to taking them: That the vaccines can change or interact with your DNA.

The CDC lists this claim as a common "myth" about the vaccines, explaining:

COVID-19 vaccines do not change or interact with your DNA in any way. Both mRNA and viral vector COVID-19 vaccines deliver instructions (genetic material) to our cells to start building protection against the virus that causes COVID-19. However, the material never enters the nucleus of the cell, which is where our DNA is kept.

Salzberg explained that technically the CDC "got it wrong" in its attempt to give a simple refutation of the DNA claim. He described how the body's immune system responds to pathogens like the SARS-CoV-2 virus, selecting antibodies that can recognize the pathogen, bind to it, and destroy it.

"The way it does this is really rather extraordinary: many little pieces of your DNA are cut and pasted together, in millions of combinations, each making a different antibody. Eventually, one of these antibodies 'recognizes' the pathogen (by binding to it)," Salzberg wrote.

Continuing, he explained that successful antibodies are "remembered" by the immune system as special cells — called B-cells — that have slightly altered DNA.

"The DNA in these B-cells encodes just the right antibody to recognize the invader–the Covid-19 virus, that is. Once you recover from the infection, some of those immune cells (B-cells and T-cells–it’s complicated) persist in your lymph nodes, constantly looking for any reappearance of the virus," Salzberg wrote.

He further explained that the altered DNA in these B-cells is a normal response to recovering from infection or to receiving a vaccine.

The DNA in these special “memory” B-cells is a little bit different from the DNA in all of your other cells, and it’s different because of the vaccine. (Or to be more precise, as an immunologist colleague explained to me: the vaccine doesn’t change any DNA, even in your immune cells, but it causes the proliferation of certain immune cells that have have already undergone genetic rearrangement.) The vaccine itself doesn't stay around, but it "shows" the immune system a few copies of the spike protein from SARS-CoV-2, the Covid-19 virus, and the immune system remembers. And, I should note, a similar change to your DNA happens if you’re infected by the Covid-19 virus itself.

But B-cells are just a tiny, tiny portion of your body. Every other cell type, from skin to heart to lungs to brain, is completely unaffected by the vaccine. And if we didn’t have any way of “remembering” how to fight off infections, then we’d never become immune to anything, in which case the human race would quickly go extinct.

The point is this: COVID-19 vaccines don't directly alter your DNA, but they do trigger an immune response that creates antibodies and B-cells with altered DNA to fight off infection. "The only change is in the DNA of a tiny number of immune cells, which hang around as guardians against future infections. And that's a good thing," Salzberg wrote.

So the old headline was accurate. COVID vaccines do alter your DNA — indirectly, by triggering the body's natural response to fight off disease. It's not harmfull; in fact, it helps people by reducing the chance that you'll become seriously ill from COVID-19.

Why the need for a change?

Previous COVID-19 infection protects against Delta better than Pfizer shot: Report



People who were previously infected with COVID-19 are reportedly better protected from the highly contagious Delta variant when compared to those without previous infections and who have received the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, according to research shared on medical journal medRxiv.

The study, which was completed by researchers in Israel — one of the most highly vaccinated countries in the world — has not yet been peer-reviewed.

What are the details?

People who recovered from a bout with COVID-19 may face lower risk from the Delta variant when compared to those who have not been infected with coronavirus at all and have just the two-dose Pfizer vaccine, Bloomberg reported.

According to a Friday report from Science magazine's Meredith Wadman, "The natural immune protection that develops after a SARS-CoV-2 infection offers considerably more of a shield against the Delta variant of the pandemic coronavirus than two doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, according to a large Israeli study that some scientists wish came with a 'Don't try this at home' label."

Researchers' findings argue that people who received both doses of the Pfizer vaccine and who had not previously contracted COVID-19 were 13 times likelier to contract the highly transmissible Delta variant, compared to those who previously suffered an infection, when either the vaccination or the infection occurred in January or February 2021.

In those who were infected "at any time before vaccination (from March 2020 to February 2021), evidence of waning natural immunity was demonstrated"; however, people who had not had COVID-19 previously were still nearly six times likelier get a breakthrough case of the Delta variant and over seven times likelier to have symptomatic illness than those who had previously been infected.

Researchers concluded, "This study demonstrated that natural immunity confers longer lasting and stronger protection against infection, symptomatic disease and hospitalization caused by the Delta variant of SARS-CoV-2, compared to the BNT162b2 two-dose vaccine-induced immunity. Individuals who were both previously infected with SARS-CoV-2 and given a single dose of the vaccine gained additional protection against the Delta variant."

What are other experts saying about this?

Infectious diseases experts, however, warn that while the study is generally good news, all COVID-19 vaccines remain highly protective against "severe disease and death."

Michel Nussenzweig, immunologist at Rockefeller University, told Wadman, "What we don't want people to say is: 'All right, I should go out and get infected, I should have an infection party.' Because somebody could die."

Charlotte Thålin, a physician and immunology researcher at Danderyd Hospital and the Karolinska Institute, added, "It's a textbook example of how natural immunity is really better than vaccination. To my knowledge, it's the first time [this] has really been shown in the context of COVID-19."

Study Finds Greater Antibody Response In Recovered COVID-19 Patients Than Vaccinated Ones

A new study has found that individuals that have previously contracted COVID-19 show a more potent antibody response than those who were solely vaccinated for the respiratory virus.

To Protect The Vulnerable, These Politicians Put Themselves At The Back Of The COVID Vaccine Line

'The mere suggestion that Members of Congress are in any way more important than the very people who gave us the privilege of serving in Congress is appalling.'

Politico Makes Up Devin Nunes COVID Diagnosis, Twitter Follows Suit Amplifying The Fake News

Politico writer Carla Marinucci reported that Devin Nunes tested positive for COVID-19 Friday following an interview with a local California radio station, but the California congressman said no such thing.