Vindictive researcher at high-security NIH lab risked deadly outbreak over petty dispute with coworker: Bhattacharya



A contractor working at one of the highest-security infectious disease research labs in North America recently risked an outbreak of deadly disease in order to exact retribution over a "personal dispute," National Institutes of Health Director Jay Bhattacharya claims.

According to a Health and Human Services official who spoke with Fox News, the contracting researcher poked holes in a colleague's personal protective equipment following a lovers' quarrel. The incident occurred at the Integrated Research Facility at Fort Detrick Army base in Frederick, Maryland, in early March, though Bhattacharya said he did not learn of it until weeks later.

At 5 p.m. on April 29, all experimental work at the facility was suspended indefinitely.

"NIH has implemented a research pause—referred to as a safety stand-down—at the Integrated Research Facility at Fort Detrick," Bradley Moss, communication director for the office of research services at NIH, wrote to WIRED in an email. "This decision follows identification and documentation of personnel issues involving contract staff that compromised the facility’s safety culture, prompting this research pause. During the stand-down, no research will be conducted, and access will be limited to essential personnel only, to safeguard the facility and its resources."

The investigation into the PPE incident 'revealed a pattern — going back to the Biden administration — of safety not taken as seriously as it ought.'

The suspension of experiments, authorized by Bhattacharya in coordination with HHS Sec. Robert Kennedy, was a wise decision. The Integrated Research Facility conducts some of the highest-risk research on some of the deadliest pathogens in the world, including Lassa fever, SARS-Cov-2, and Eastern equine encephalitis. It is one of only a handful of facilities conducting such research involving "high consequence" infectious diseases in North America.

The Integrated Research Facility employs 168 workers, including contractors. The contractor who, according to Bhattacharya, "deliberately" sabotaged the coworker's PPE has since been fired.

Connie Schmaljohn, the director of the facility, has also been placed on administrative leave. The HHS official told Fox News Schmaljohn failed to report the incident up the chain of command immediately, thereby delaying the remediation process.

Schmaljohn did not respond to a request for comment from WIRED.

In a tweet thread on Wednesday, Bhattacharya characterized the incident as "serious," adding that "this is how lab leaks can happen!"

No timeline has been given for when research at the facility will resume. "I won't reopen the lab until I am satisfied that it can be done with zero risk to public safety," Bhattacharya pledged. "No more lab generated pandemics!"

"The sacrifice to research is immense," said Gigi Kwik Gronvall, a senior scholar at the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security. "If things are unused for a period of time, it will cost more money to get them ready to be used again."

The HHS official indicated to Fox News that breaches in safety protocol occurred repeatedly at the facility during the Biden administration, including as recently as November. Bhattacharya likewise claimed that the investigation into the PPE incident "revealed a pattern — going back to the Biden administration — of safety not taken as seriously as it ought."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

50 Years After Vietnam, Our Troops Remain Demoralized By Defeat

We would do well to consider how our choices in Vietnam affected our military and society in ways still felt today.

Military members swept up in raid of shady club teeming with illegal aliens, MS-13 and TDA gangsters



Hundreds of federal agents descended upon an allegedly illegal nightclub in Colorado Springs early Sunday morning, resulting in the detention of more than 100 illegal aliens.

At around 3:45 a.m., officers with the Drug Enforcement Administration and at least nine other federal agencies raided the club, located inside a strip mall. Prior to forcing their way in, they announced via loudspeaker in both English and Spanish that they had a warrant and demanded that all occupants exit the building in an orderly fashion.

In all, more than 200 people were inside, and 114 were arrested for alleged federal immigration violations, the DEA said. Most of the illegal immigrants came from Central and South American countries, and all are now in ICE custody.

'It’s obviously concerning to have active-duty military involved.'

Jonathan Pullen, the special agent in charge at the DEA Rocky Mountain Division, indicated to reporters that federal and local agencies had spent months investigating a maelstrom of unsavory behaviors going on inside the "underground, illegal" nightclub.

"What was happening inside was significant drug trafficking, prostitution, crimes of violence," Pullen said. "We seized a number of guns in there."

Pullen also noted that known members of violent gangs like MS-13 and Tren de Aragua were likewise at the club that night, though whether any of them were arrested is unclear.

"Only those here illegally or those on warrants were taken into custody. Most partygoers were eventually released," the DEA noted on social media, along with pictures of several attendees who made questionable clothing choices that night.

"We're not the fashion police," the agency joked.

Active-duty service members were rounded up at the club, however, and some of them even allegedly abetted the illegal activity.

"We had active-duty service members who were running security at the club and involved in some of these crimes," Pullen claimed. "It’s obviously concerning to have active-duty military involved."

Fort Carson, an Army base, is located in Colorado Springs. The Army confirmed that some members had been at the club that night and that it would partner with the DEA in conducting an investigation, ABC News reported.

"As this is an ongoing investigation, we are unable to provide additional information at this time," a spokesperson for the Army Criminal Investigations Division told CNN.

Whether any of the service members have actually been arrested or charged with a crime is unclear.

Thankfully, no agents were injured during the raid, though one partygoer apparently sustained life-threatening injuries jumping through a window in an attempt to escape.

'Colorado without question has been a hub for illegal immigration due to the sanctuary policies of the city of Denver.'

President Donald Trump celebrated the news of the raid on Truth Social: "A big Raid last night on some of the worst people illegally in our Country — Drug Dealers, Murderers, and other Violent Criminals, of all shapes and sizes."

Attorney General Pam Bondi likewise expressed satisfaction about the success of the operation: "This morning @DEAHQ apprehended over 100 illegal aliens at an underground night club frequented by Tda and MS-13 terrorists. Cocaine, meth, and pink cocaine was seized. 2 people were also arrested on existing warrants."

State and local officials likewise gave at least tepid support for the enforcement of alleged weapons and drug offenses, though some sidestepped the immigration issues involved.

Colorado Springs Police Department Chief Adrian Vasquez noted that the raid was the result of a "months-long" investigation into "serious criminal activity." "Arrests for these criminal violations are expected," he stated.

Vasquez also emphasized that his department focused solely on "criminal violations affecting the safety of our community" since it "is not authorized to conduct immigration enforcement under Colorado law."

Mayor Yemi Mobolade, who was briefed on the raid before it occurred, was likewise circumspect in his language.

"Let me be clear: Criminal activity of any kind, from anyone, will not be tolerated in Colorado Springs. This investigation and the execution of these warrants are the result of clear evidence of serious criminal conduct," Mobolade said.

A spokesperson said that Colorado Democrat Gov. Jared Polis "is focused on making Colorado safer for everyone, and that includes cracking down on illegal drugs and firearms. We await the details from the DEA and federal government on this action."

Douglas County Sheriff Darren Weekly touted his office's "support role" in some of the drug and weapons operations, KDVR said, then took aim at the sanctuary policies that have allowed illegal immigration to fester in the state.

"Colorado without question has been a hub for illegal immigration due to the sanctuary policies of the city of Denver in conjunction with radical legislation (including this session) from the State Capitol affirming Colorado’s sanctuary status," Weekly said.

"As the Sheriff of Douglas County, I will do everything I can within Colorado law to support our federal partners. This, in turn, helps keep my community safe."

Mike Moon, who owns the property where the club was operating, by contrast, expressed "shock" at what had apparently been going on under cover of darkness. "It's pretty shocking, considering our political environment and all the news that's happening around the country, that they thought that this was even a wise idea to do something illegal like this," he said.

Moon added that the underground club is a violation of the terms of the lease agreement and that the property does not have a liquor license. However, the apparently derelict tenants were expected to be out of the building by the end of the month anyway.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Female Black Hawk pilot didn't follow orders before horrific crash: Report



An Army VH-60M Black Hawk helicopter on a training exercise collided with a PSA Airlines plane operating an American Airlines flight near D.C.'s Ronald Reagan National Airport on Jan. 29. Sixty-seven people were killed, including three Army soldiers, 60 airline passengers, and four airline crew members.

As emergency responders futilely searched the frigid Potomac River for survivors, questions began to proliferate about how such a crash was possible, especially when Black Hawk helicopters routinely operate flights in the highly controlled air corridor around the airport without incident. Many suspected human error — and when the Army initially refused to name the female Black Hawk pilot, some critics hypothesized that DEI hiring practices might be indirectly at fault.

On the basis of government documents, interviews with relevant experts, and audio recordings of the air traffic controllers leading up to the collision, the New York Times delineated the "missteps" that led to the fatal January crash in a damning report on Sunday.

'PAT two-five, do you have the CRJ in sight?'

It turns out that Captain Rebecca Lobach — the doomed helicopter's pilot whose name was withheld at the outset — failed to heed her instructor's orders moments before flying into the inbound jet, and there is no indication she was suffering any health issues that may have been to blame.

The liberal publication appeared keen to displace the reason for the crash across multiple factors and mistakes, noting, for instance, that:

  • the relevant tower controller was working double duty;
  • the controller was unable to watch the helicopter's movements in real time via the Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast Out because the confidentiality of the Army aircraft's mission precluded the use of the system;
  • the controller made the uncustomary decision of asking the ill-fated jet to land at Runway 33, one of the airport's ancillary runways;
  • the vertical distance between the landing slope for a jet making its way to Runway 33 and the maximum permissible altitude for a helicopter along the route taken by the doomed Army aircraft would be a measly 75 feet;
  • the helicopter was flying well over the mandated maximum altitude;
  • the Army crew may have failed to catch a critical piece of information provided by the tower;
  • the helicopter crew requested, then bungled a "visual separation" exercise, where the "pilot is meant to see neighboring air traffic, often without assistance from the controller, and avoid it by either hovering in place until the traffic passes or by flying around it in prescribed ways"; and
  • the tower's alleged failure to notify both aircraft they were on a collision course.

Lobach, the highest-ranking soldier on the helicopter but far from the most experienced pilot aboard, was behind the controls as the helicopter neared the airport.

Cockpit voice recordings revealed that sometime after assuming control, Lobach announced an altitude of 300 feet. Chief Warrant Officer 2 Andrew Lloyd Eaves, her instructor, responded within a space of 39 seconds that they actually had an altitude of 400 feet — not only double the maximum height permissible near Runway 33 but 100 feet over the altitude mandated by the Federal Aviation Administration for that part of the route.

The Times indicated that as the helicopter approached the Key Bridge, from which the Army aircraft would head south along the river, Eaves indicated the helicopter was at 300 feet and descending to 200 feet.

Eaves apparently saw the need to repeat his instruction, telling Lobach that the chopper was at 300 feet and needed to descend.

'It could have well changed the outcome of that evening.'

While Lobach reportedly said she would comply, over two and half minutes later, she still had the helicopter at an altitude of over 200 feet — "a dangerously high level" according to the Times.

Moments later, the tower notified the Army crew that the inbound jet was "circling" to Runway 33 — a piece of information investigators believe was missed because someone aboard the helicopter was allegedly holding down the microphone key to speak, thereby blocking incoming communications.

Roughly two minutes before the collision, Eaves noted, "PAT two-five has traffic in sight." He then requested and was granted visual separation.

Nearly 20 seconds before impact — as doomed Flight 5342 made its turn toward Runway 33, flying at roughly 500 feet and now within a mile of the helicopter — the tower asked the Army crew, "PAT two-five, do you have the CRJ in sight?"

There was no response from the Black Hawk.

The controller then told the helicopter crew to "pass behind" the airplane, but Lobach kept flying directly at the inbound jet.

Two seconds after the controller's "pass behind" directive, Eaves said, "PAT two-five has the aircraft in sight. Request visual separation."

Inside the helicopter, Eaves told Lobach 15 seconds before the collision that air traffic control wanted her to turn left, toward the river — which would open more space between the Black Hawk and the jet, now at an altitude of approximately 300 feet.

Lobach reportedly did not heed the instruction, thereby guaranteeing the deaths of 66 people and herself.

At the time of the collision, one air traffic controller can reportedly be heard in a recording taken at the time saying, "Crash, crash, crash, this is an alert three."

"I just saw a fireball, and then it was just gone," said a controller. "I haven't seen anything since they hit the river, but it was a CRJ and a helicopter that hit. I would say maybe a half-mile off the approach end of 33."

Brig. Gen. Matthew Braman, the Army's director of aviation, told the Times, "I think what we'll find in the end is there were multiple things that, had any one of them changed, it could have well changed the outcome of that evening."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Hegseth Is Right To Hold Military Men And Women To The Same Fitness Standards

The entire point of a standard is that it should be, well, standard.

Senators grill aviation leaders over 15,000 close calls at DC airport before deadly collision



Senators on Thursday grilled several aviation leaders during a hearing concerning the January midair collision between an America Airlines commercial jet and an Army Black Hawk helicopter that resulted in the deaths of 67 people.

Sen. Jerry Moran (R-Kan.), the chairman of the Subcommittee on Aviation, Space, and Innovation, cited a preliminary report from the National Transportation Safety Board in his opening statements, noting that the agency’s investigation found thousands of close-call incidents near the Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport over a three-year period.

'Specifically, even since the crash, certain safety measures that could have been simply implemented still have not been.'

“Sixty-seven lives that were lost on January 29 were taken prematurely in an accident that by all indications should have been avoided,” Moran stated.

He called the statistics in the NTSB’s preliminary report “alarming.”

“In a 13-year period, not a single month went by without at least one ‘close call’ between a helicopter and a commercial jet operating at DCA,” Moran continued. “Between October ’21 and December ’24, there were 85 incidents where the lateral separation between a commercial jet and helicopter was less than 1,500 feet and the vertical separation was less than 200 feet.”

The NTSB’s report stated that during the same period, of the 944,179 operations, 15,214 were considered “near midair collision events” between commercial planes and helicopters. The report defined those close calls as instances where two aircraft were “less than 1 [nautical mile],” or roughly 6,000 feet, of lateral separation and “less than 400 ft” of vertical separation.

The NTSB also found that “a helicopter operating over the eastern shoreline of the Potomac River would have about 75 ft of vertical separation from an airplane approaching runway 33, and this distance decreases if the helicopter is operated farther from the shoreline.”

Jennifer Homendy, the chair of the NTSB, told senators, “There’s virtually no margin of error.”

Chris Rocheleau, the Federal Aviation Administration’s acting administrator, was pressed about how the agency failed to address the safety concerns.

“How did we get to this point?” Sen. Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.) asked Rocheleau. “It’s like it’s a series of errors here.”

“What office said this is a safe pathway in agreement when the NTSB is telling us today it never really was safe? It was an intolerable risk,” she stated.

Rocheleau explained that the airspace was redesigned several times in the past.

“When you talk about how did we get there, I think we’re going to learn more of that through the investigation,” he replied.

Rocheleau stated that the FAA’s air traffic system requires “modernization as soon as possible.”

“I can assure to the flying public: to fly is safe. We have the safest, most complex system in the world, and it is safe to fly. I would also say the air traffic system is in dire need of upgrade,” he said.

Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) questioned Brigadier General Matthew Braman, the U.S. Army aviation director, about a controversial policy that allows flights to operate with the automatic dependent surveillance-broadcast, a key safety system, turned off.

“I find that shocking and deeply unacceptable. And I want to encourage the Army right now to revisit that policy and to revisit that policy today,” Cruz told Braman. “I can tell you, if the Army chooses not to, I have a high level of confidence that Congress will pass legislation mandating that you revisit the policy.”

Family members of the victims also attended the Senate hearing.

Dailey Crafton, the brother of 40-year-old Casey, a husband and father of three who died in the collision, told the Daily Caller that he was “surprised” by the safety lapses.

“Specifically, even since the crash, certain safety measures that could have been simply implemented still have not been. Accountability is still not being taken by parties who should be held responsible,” he said.

Tracy Brammeier, a partner at Clifford Law Offices, which is representing the families, stated, “The failure to share details about near-midair collisions, or to perform trend analysis on the history of such incidents, or otherwise take action to address the high number of occurrences is completely unacceptable.”

“All entities who failed to take action must be held accountable to the victims’ families and to the flying public,” Brammeier added.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Tariffs aren’t just taxes — they’re national defense



It’s easy to mock Europe for relying on the United States for its defense, but we face the same predicament: outsourcing critical components of our military arsenal overseas — and often not to friendly allies. Trump’s tariffs could help bring them back home.

Tariffs are not merely a way to repatriate and rebuild America’s industrial strength; they are also a tool to rebuild America’s military self-sufficiency. A harrowing amount of our critical military components aren’t produced domestically, making the United States dangerously reliant on foreign countries, including adversaries like China. It’s almost comical how some war hawks would go to war with the Chinese to defend Taiwan, while we still rely on them for the material that fuels our war machine.

Let’s bring home America’s military supply chain and let’s use tariffs to help get it done.

“Principled free traders” argue that “tariffs are a tax on consumers,” favoring offshore manufacturing because it lowers consumer costs. But the cracks in their “free trade” argument become evident as American taxpayers foot a higher bill from their hawkish policies than from Trump’s tariffs.

Here are some other “taxes on consumers.”

Defense spending

Every cent that goes toward America’s national defense is part of the taxpayer’s burden. The U.S. annual defense budget is about $850 billion, which costs each U.S. resident about $2,500 — although this number is, in practice, much higher, given that not all residents pay taxes. Eliminating defense spending would provide consumers with a huge tax break.

If “free traders” are consistent in their argument, shouldn’t they advocate eliminating defense spending? Though extreme, this example demonstrates the inconsistency in the “no taxes without qualification” argument against tariffs.

If tariffs are a tax on consumers, they are a tax that also supports our national defense and self-reliance. Opposing tariffs necessary for America to have the industrial self-sufficiency to source our war machine domestically is akin to opposing a permanent standing army.

Funding foreign wars

Every cent spent sending munitions to Ukraine is a tax on U.S. consumers. Ask the typical American whether he’d rather see more of his money go toward rebuilding American manufacturing via tariffs or have it go to the Ukrainian war effort that is killing off a generation of men. The typical American would prefer the former, yet we engage in the latter.

Deficit spending

Consumers pay for the massive federal budget deficit through inflation — a cruel and direct tax on consumers. Whether it be foreign aid, domestic waste, or any other gratuitous government project, every penny of deficit spending is a tax paid for consumers in the form of inflation. Most Americans would likely prefer tariffs that produce American manufacturing jobs over wasteful, ideologically charged deficit spending, such as funding transgender operas in Colombia.

Foreign sanctions

Sanctions that block a country from exporting to the U.S. serve the same purpose as high tariffs. Ironically, free traders don’t get worked up over sanctions like they do with tariffs. Current sanctions imposed on Russia are technically a “tax on consumers,” driving up prices on goods that Russia would otherwise export.

If China is just as much — if not more — of a threat to U.S. national security as Russia, why aren’t “free traders” in favor of blocking Chinese exports in the same manner?

A recent report on military spending revealed that the Army and Navy are reducing their reliance on China for critical technology. At the same time, the Air Force has increased its use of Chinese suppliers.

While the Army and Navy’s efforts to distance themselves from China are a positive step, any reliance on a foreign adversary for critical military infrastructure poses a serious risk. The U.S. must prioritize returning military supply chains to American soil to ensure national security and self-sufficiency.

Even the most passionate “free traders” will sometimes acknowledge that some products critical to national defense should be manufactured stateside. But rather than giving so-called “experts” and “technocrats” the power to determine which components of the military-industrial supply chain are “most essential,” we shouldn’t leave any part of our national security apparatus on foreign soil — and certainly not that of foreign adversaries like China.

Vice President JD Vance understands the issue, recently posting on X that “the bitter irony of America’s present predicament is that the very people who cheer for permanent arms shipments to Ukraine also supported the de-industrialization of America. The very things you want us to send are things we don’t make enough of.”

The vice president is correct. Let’s bring home America’s military supply chain, and let’s use tariffs to help get it done.

Report: U.S. Army Special Operations Issues Threat Advisory Over Leftist Attacks On Tesla Owners, Vehicles

The U.S. Army Special Operations Command (USASOC) reportedly issued a “threat advisory” on Thursday warning of “possible threats” from radical left-wing activists against the command’s Tesla owners. In screenshots of the alert obtained by Federalist contributor and retired Army ranger John A. Lucas, the USASOC informed service members of increased “concerns” regarding recent attacks against […]

7 Trump Orders Congress Should Codify To Keep Wokeness Out Of The Military

The Trump administration’s bold executive actions will not be permanent unless Congress codifies them in law.

The Pentagon’s $850B Nightmare Will Be DOGE’s Biggest Challenge Yet

The Pentagon doesn’t appear to have a battle plan to turn around seven straight years of audit failures.