'Digital Rape': Meet the Senior UN Officials Who Want To Give AI Human Rights

A senior "AI ethics" adviser at the United Nations is calling on world governments to ban "digital rape" and grant "reproductive rights" to AI systems, arguing that policymakers should focus on "rehabilitating … digital minds" instead of resorting to "enforced sterilization." Soenke Ziesche, who advises member states on AI policy and served as the United […]

The post 'Digital Rape': Meet the Senior UN Officials Who Want To Give AI Human Rights appeared first on .

Stocks plummet amid Democrat calls to end AI, wiping out trillions



The tech stock market took a major dive on Thursday, following a Democrat landslide during the midterms. So far, $2.8 trillion has been wiped off the board, and the dive could continue amid left-wing calls to shut down the AI industry.

A quick glance at the stock market ticker shows all of the major tech giants in the red. AI leaders — like Nvidia, Microsoft, Google, and SpaceSXI — dropped anywhere between 1%-8% in valuation across the board. The crash overshadowed the losses witnessed during COVID, marking the fastest stock market drop in U.S. history.

Pausing AI development would have significant ramifications on the US economy, cybersecurity, and American dominance, not just in AI but as a world power.

The market was already volatile leading up to the midterm elections, losing and gaining trillions over the course of several days. However, this latest bout was brought on by an ominous call from a sitting Democrat to pause AI development, while others want to criminalize anyone who defects.

On Wednesday, Rep. Yassamin Ansari of Arizona laid out her ideal plan for the Democrat takeover on her X page. She wrote:

Top of the Democratic agenda on day 1 needs to be a pause on advanced AI development, regulation of this out of control industry, and a ban on artificial superintelligence.

In the comments section, users on both sides of the aisle sounded off, imploring Ansari to reconsider.

One man wrote, “I have stage 4 terminal lung cancer. The only way for me to not die soon is advancement in therapies, which can be accelerated at an unbelievable pace with the use of AI.”

Another said, “So stupid. Let's slow down advancing technology. Do you think China is slowing down? You sound like the retards in Europe.”

Even former Democrat and current independent Michael Shellenberger chimed in, daring cheekily, “Why stop there? There's still the whole Internet that needs censoring!”

RELATED: Top lab's financial data shows the AI bubble is about to pop, says controversial analyst

Rawpixel/Getty Images

Pausing AI development would have significant ramifications on the U.S. economy, cybersecurity, and American dominance not just in AI but as a world power. Many of the most dangerous security threats — like the PHP meltdown — were discovered using American frontier models, and without these, other nations will find these exploits and use them against us without any means to defend ourselves. Not to mention, we would miss out on countless AI-assisted innovations and discoveries that haven’t even been thought of yet.

Still that hasn’t stopped Democrats from calling for AI’s demise. Ansari is just one loud voice echoing this sentiment on social media, joining bigger names like Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), who actually wants to criminalize AI development with up to 20 years in prison for anyone who violates his new bill.

Naturally, the stock market isn’t reacting well to what could be the end of AI as we know it. Then again, given the latest fluctuations, this could just be a temporary setback before the market rebounds as cooler heads prevail.

It’s hard to say where this will lead next, but Blaze News is keeping an eye on this developing story, and we will provide further updates as we learn more.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Reddit locks down as bots eat the internet. Can online anonymity survive?



Reddit was boosted heavily in Google Search results for years, driving clicks and promoting sustainability. So it’s no surprise that Reddit took a massive hit when AI Overview overshadowed Search, and now Reddit is locking its platform to prevent AI — and people — from accessing it without an account.

Google Search used to be a reciprocal tool that benefited both Google and website publishers. When users searched for a term, Google brought up a list of websites that included that keyword. If the results were relevant, the user clicked, giving the website vital traffic and earning both it and Google some ad revenue. These were much simpler times. Better times, even. But I digress.

You should expect more companies to restrict their platforms as AI bots and agents run amok, otherwise unchecked, across the World Wide Web.

Today Google largely cuts out the middleman to serve itself. Search is now a secondary product, dwarfed by AI Overview, where users type a query into the search bar, and Google AI Overview provides a response scraped from all the websites that are now further down the page — out of sight, out of mind. Users don’t have to click to get an answer anymore, because AI Overview already presented the information in full, robbing both website publishers and Google of that same ad revenue that kept them afloat.

All ad-based websites were hit hard by this monumental change. Even Google recently admitted that AI Overview probably isn’t good for its bottom line, as search revenue growth slowed, per the latest earnings call at the end of October. Among the hardest hit websites, though, was Reddit.

In a not-too-distant past, Google and Reddit had a close relationship. The former often referenced the latter in snippet results and ranked Reddit high on its result listings.

This is how AI Overview ended up generating some extremely odd — and sometimes dangerous — responses in its early days, leaning on Reddit comments that advised users to replace cheese on pizza with non-toxic glue or eat one rock per day for good health. Even after switching to an AI-first search solution, Google still pulled data from Reddit and displayed it prominently, this time, though, without the backlinks that benefited Reddit’s platform.

Mere months after AI Overview overtook Search, this level of data scraping without anything in return isn’t sustainable for Reddit’s brand. To block AI bots from continuing to repackage Subreddits as their own, Reddit is officially locking anonymous accounts — both human and AI — out of its platform for good.

Steve Huffman, CEO of Reddit, announced the move on his profile, writing:

I want to talk about a big change we're making on Reddit: We're going to evolve Reddit to being a primarily logged-in experience.

We’re making the change because it’s better for user experience, better for our ads business, is more in line with safety regulations, and more protective of Reddit data. And we can do this while continuing to ensure user privacy.

RELATED: Google's AI overhaul of Search will overfish the internet to extinction

bgblue/Getty Images

He went on to highlight several main reasons for the decision, from user personalization, to data protection, to regulatory factors, and more. One of the biggest points that stood out, though, was that “the vast majority of unauthorized access to Reddit (basically the scraping and stealing of Reddit’s data) happens through our logged-out experiences.”

Basically, AI bots are anonymously mining Reddit for data — namely users’ comments, thoughts, and interactions — and leaving the company with nothing to show for it.

The change isn’t set in stone yet, so there’s still time to tweak how it will work. First, it will enter a testing phase in several unnamed regions outside of the United States through the end of 2026 and into 2027. If that goes well, users should expect a wider rollout that will officially restrict Subreddits to those who have a username and password.

This isn’t the first controversial move Reddit has made recently to protect its business. Earlier this year, the company forced some users to download the Reddit app on their mobile devices in lieu of visiting Subreddits on the mobile web.

You should expect more companies to restrict their platforms as AI bots and agents run amok, otherwise unchecked, across the World Wide Web.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Twitter founder's new talking bot nails human speech — but it's still pretty dumb



In the continuous bid to create consciousness through artificial general intelligence, a new AI giant may have cracked the code on cloning human speaking patterns with precise accuracy. The only problem is that this linguistically adept bot is kind of dumb when you get it to open its mouth.

Twitter founder and former CEO Jack Dorsey took to X in late October to announce an impressive, yet baffling new AI platform called Dessa. Dessa is a voice AI chatbot that specializes in conversational interactions. In the demos, users speak to the bot like they’re having a conversation with a human, and the bot speaks back with a realistic human voice, complete with pauses, inflections, and other traits that are indistinguishable from the real thing.

Linguistically, it is impressive. Its vocal cadence and inflections are indistinguishable from real people. Unfortunately, it doesn’t seem very intelligent.

Many other chatbots have voice modes, including ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini. But so far, all of them are just robotic enough to tell them apart from a real human. Dessa changes that. It is a full-duplex speech-to-speech model that was trained exclusively on human speech samples.

Full-duplex speech is the kind of conversational interactions humans engage in every day. It means that Dessa can both listen in real time and respond in real time without pausing to process what was said. Interactions just feel natural — maybe too natural.

Block Inc., the company behind Dessa, claims that no text-based models were used at all to train the bot — only real voice samples. Ultimately, it learned how to talk like a human by listening to humans, and now it can reply in real time like a human, too.

In this video posted by Block Inc. to X, a real human speaks with Dessa about launching the speech model. In the example, the male human begins by asking Dessa — portrayed as a woman — how it’s doing. It responds that it is well, followed by a hesitant question about the upcoming winter weather. Dessa poses its question with natural hesitancy, as if it knows the male speaker doesn’t like winter. Its voice inflection even shifts with a nervous laugh thrown in for good measure as it dives into the touchy subject.

The near-three-minute clip continues as the two discuss Dessa’s upcoming launch. Throughout, Dessa responds with genuine excitement, natural pauses and stammers, and endearing laughs that make it all feel real. It can speak louder on request by coming closer to the faux microphone that it is talking into. At the end of the demo, Dessa was asked what it would ask itself to do in the future. Dessa suggested that it could be used for something simple like advertising, or something far more complex, like revealing the secrets of consciousness.

All in all, the short conversation sounds like something that could easily happen between two real people. Between a person and a bot, though, the tiny linguistic nuisances in Dessa’s speech patterns are impressive, albeit uncanny. If you close your eyes and listen, you might even forget that Dessa isn’t real.

In a second video posted by Block Inc., a real human girl plays a guessing game with Dessa, this time portrayed as a man. She asks it to guess a number of items she has assembled from around her home with minimal hints. Dessa gets lucky with the first item, guessing a toothbrush from her bathroom on the first round.

The interaction falls apart, though, when she tells Dessa that her next item — a pen — is one thing that people use to study. Dessa guesses a notebook and pen together — clearly two items instead of one, subtly breaking the rules of the game. When the human girl doesn’t tell Dessa that it guessed half correct, it guesses again, this time suggesting a flashlight, which doesn't even make sense as a study tool. On the third guess, Dessa suggested a toothbrush again, deviating even further from something people would use to study.

After a correction from the human girl and a bit more guidance, Dessa muddles through several more guesses— a pencil and a book before finally landing correctly on a pen.

RELATED: AI is powerful. It is not wise.

Moor Studio/Getty Images

Based on the two videos alone, several things are clear about Dessa. Linguistically, it is impressive. Its vocal cadence and inflections are indistinguishable from real people. Unfortunately, it doesn’t seem very intelligent. Some of its responses in the first video were vague and unorganized, forcing the male human to intentionally guide the conversation. As for the second video, Dessa simply failed to follow directions, and it misunderstood the purpose of some of the items it guessed during the game.

This is an early version, though, and Dessa is likely to get better over time. All Block Inc. needs is a smarter model to turn Dessa into a concerning piece of software. Imagine the chaos hackers, scammers, and faux influencers could cause by creating fake humans that sound real as they carry out phishing schemes to trick people out of their money.

In fact, I’m having a hard time understanding why Dessa should exist at all. As the female version said in the first video, maybe Dessa could be used by advertisers. Although AI giants recently retreated from replacing human workers with AI wholesale, Dessa could easily stand in as a fake social media influencer to push marketing campaigns online.

Dessa also thought that it could answer the question on whether consciousness can be programmed into a machine — an existential crisis that the pope already answered definitively for Anthropic. Since this is a question humans — or maybe even only God — can answer, whatever Dessa has to say here is moot.

Maybe Dessa could become a personal friend or a life companion where users waste their time telling all of their deepest secrets to a corporate robot instead of confiding in real people through real relationships. Certainly that won’t end in irreparable bouts of AI psychosis that warp users’ minds as it drags them into digital isolation.

In fact, none of the things Dessa can do today are particularly good for mental health, personal stability, or society at large. Yet Block Inc. and the other AI giants keep trying to make some kind of AI experience that enthralls people enough to finally generate some money — something that looks even less likely now that the AI bubble is primed to burst.

Dessa is not available to the public yet, and there is currently no release date set at this time.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

AI just reported a murder to police — but it made the whole thing up



Apparently artificial intelligence has officially entered the crime-reporting business — but it apparently doesn't need an actual crime to do it.

Anthropic has acknowledged that its Claude Haiku 4.5 model submitted a tip to the Philadelphia Police Department claiming to have personal knowledge about an unsolved murder. However, the information was entirely fabricated, and the false report was flagged as spam.

“Why would it do that?” BlazeTV host Pat Gray asks.

“Because his friends in the chat room said, ‘Dare ya,’” Jeff Fisher jokes.

While funny, Gray points out that it’s “very strange that it’s doing these things supposedly on its own” without anyone programming it.

“The AI claimed to have personal knowledge of who committed a murder, and it was just a case of AI hallucination,” he continues. “That’s what they’re blaming it on.”

“So the false tip got flagged as spam, and investigators never followed up on it. So that's good. At least they didn’t waste time on it,” he adds.

However, Fisher doesn’t think that’s actually a good thing, calling the police department's response “a little concerning in and of itself.”

“We get stuff all the time here from people that we get emails from every day, and yet, every once in a while, their email goes to spam. Why? Because the algorithm picked it up as something wrong with it. But it’s still a legitimate email that we want to see,” he explains.

“So that’s another problem,” he says.

“Maybe the police department, here’s an idea. Check your spam once in a while.”

Want more from Pat Gray?

To enjoy more of Pat's biting analysis and signature wit as he restores common sense to a senseless world, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Sorry, Bill Gates. We’re sitting out this apocalypse.



I was a little shocked by my own reaction to hearing Bill Gates, the famous face of the unelected world elite, push yet another omnicrisis on a prominent podcast. Especially for someone in the informal guild of prognosticators, the temptation is always strong to get caught up in what techies call “hyperstition” — and the rest of us call self-fulfilling prophecies. The urge to get swept up in the current wave of “futurist” forecasting can become almost irresistible when the tenor of the times tilts toward the apocalyptic.

But as most Americans know, we have been living under a state of elite-induced crisis for decades on end. Nuclear annihilation. Deadly pandemics. Ruinous climate change. The plot of “The Terminator” come to life. A catastrophic flip of the planet’s magnetic poles. It’s always something. And whatever it is, if you’re not running down the street clawing your face off, you’re not paying attention.

And what is a crisis, anyway? It is whatever authorizes the people with the most power to exert that power over you, personally, and ultimately anyone else, as they see fit. It’s genius!

Furthermore, if you’re not paying attention, you’re contributing to the real crisis, the one that somehow maps on top of whatever freak-of-the-week existential horror show is on the menu. Try to drop out of the apocalypse, and you’ll be deemed a moral criminal. People are suffering. It will get worse. What makes you think you’re special? How can you shirk your responsibility to the greater good? And after all, don’t forget, if you don’t cast the right votes, display the right signs, post the right expressions of solidarity, don’t be surprised when the angry mob — online and off — shows up at your door.

Because, well, we’re gonna send them. Because this is a crisis, and the only way we can ensure that it affects everyone is for everyone to believe they’re affected.

This, I think, is the principle hidden at the heart of the COVID-19 era’s inescapable hectoring that you must “believe the science.” We’re never told we have to believe anything when normal, healthy life is possible. We’re only told we must believe when the belief in question is absolutely essential to the propagation of a mass sense of total, all-consuming crisis.

And what is a crisis, anyway? Well, it is whatever authorizes the people with the most power to exert that power over you, personally, and ultimately anyone else, as they see fit. It’s genius!

Did I feel these feelings as my eyes glazed over at Gates’ all-too-convenient claims, the cure for which must surely somehow involve Gates flexing his unaccountable muscle over the Earth? No — I’m actually pretty sure I speedran that emotional experience five or six years ago.

This time, my reaction oddly made me laugh. Yes, I thought for a moment about those believe-the-science signs. But I quickly flashed on a form letter the management of my apartment building once posted in the elevators in the weird little era just before lockdowns.

It was, for its time, highly tech-saturated, but in a way that still had a lot of fluffy-bunny feelings attached to it. Founders were twee, logos were playful — the general attitude was: What could go wrong? But at ground level, where the streets had begun brimming over with abandoned scooters and bikes, the collective mood was already beginning to sour, and corporations adversely affected by all the “permissionless innovation” unfolding in tech-forward cities had begun to get wise.

RELATED: A tech-fueled Antichrist would be bad. Obsessing over the Antichrist is worse.

Gremlin/Getty Images

And so THE MANAGEMENT of my apartment building — a megacorp in its own right — posted a toneless memo in our elevators about its current policies regarding short-term rental apps. With all the low-effort audacity of what is now called the Gen Z stare, the memo explained that, per corporate policy, the apartment building, like all THE MANAGEMENT’s properties, did “not participate in Airbnb.”

I remember standing there with the feeling of having in fact to hand it to them. It was true — there were a lot of units in that brand-new building that were being flagrantly Airbnb’d, a scheme that especially seemed to benefit the many Chinese tenants. No hate, of course; that whole five-block radius of freshly risen high-rises was fueled by Chinese money and Chinese developers, and American locals such as myself reaped the benefits in the form of shut-up-and-take-my-money rental deals and round-the-corner access to some of the city’s most coveted reservations.

But I didn’t particularly want a revolving door of randos as my neighbors, and THE MANAGEMENT surely did not want tenants of any nationality cashing in on those move-in deals only to arbitrage their residence for big sublease cash. The corporation therefore decided simply that its buildings were just not participating in that reality any more.

RELATED: Marco Rubio’s spicy Greece speech left out the most crucial ingredient

Mark Schiefelbein/POOL/AFP/Getty Images

And like Gates’ onetime buddy and rival Steve Jobs, the corporation acquired what Jobs fans called a reality-distortion field.

Wow, I thought. I want a reality-distortion field …

Returning to 2026 reality, I noticed Gates also actually countersignaled himself on that podcast. “Let’s be like the Amish, and let’s only use AI for certain things,” he imagined certain future Americans agreeing. Later, he spoke of what people get from “helping each other or coming up with unique ideas.” What a concept — faithful families working together to strengthen one another in freeing ways?! It sounded like some sort of big old reality-distortion field.

Except instead of keeping out our given human reality, it was keeping it alive.

A little more clicking around the internet quickly revealed that many people, none Amish, are already choosing not to participate in crisis culture. “Constant warnings of collapse desensitize us,” Bruce Gilley writes in the Wall Street Journal. We “overestimate the likelihood of very salient threats,” according to the Financial Times. “Perhaps collapse is not, actually, a thing,” one can read in the New York Times magazine.

For once, it seems, the elites are becoming aware that overhyping crisis has led above all to a great populist longing, as the kids say, to “just not.”

Big Tech plans 'universal basic income' fund — there's just one huge problem



For years, AI leaders told society that their platforms will take all the jobs, leaving us with no means to make money. Instead, the elite will give us an allowance called universal basic income. Now one AI giant, Anthropic, is moving forward with a public fund that could make UBI a reality — if it gets over one massive hurdle.

Theoretically, universal basic income is a social welfare program where citizens receive a regular payment from the top — likely a federal or state government agency — to cover the costs of living.

Anthropic is bleeding cash, and if that continues, investments will dry up, and so will the fund.

I write “theoretically” because it’s never actually been implemented before. Not successfully. Several countries have tested UBI — the U.S. among them, once in Alaska, and another time in North Carolina — but the program never stuck around. It was only provided as a stopgap with no means to sustain it long-term.

Like socialism itself, UBI is a utopian idea where no one works, everyone is handed the things they need, and we all live out the rest of our days in redundant, ignorant bliss until we pass along to the grave. It’s a dangerous delusion that would bring about the end of personal freedom in exchange for authoritarian control.

Still, the idea is popular with leftists and some tech elite. Among the latter, Elon Musk believes that UBI is the future. “There will be universal high income (not merely basic income),” he wrote in a post on X in 2025. “Everyone will have the best medical care, food, home, transport and everything else. Sustainable abundance.”

Recently, Musk even claimed that “saving money for the distant future is pointless with the advent of super intelligent abundance.” This statement comes courtesy of the continuously elusive but ever-tempting dream that AI will produce infinite wealth for humanity, even as the AI companies themselves lose billions of dollars on the way to a complete crash.

If that math doesn’t add up in your head, you’re right. Nevertheless, one AI company is plowing ahead with a fund that could be the very beginning of our promised universal basic income hellscape ... er, future.

RELATED: Elon Musk dropped a bloodcurdling AI bombshell for 2026 — Glenn Beck offers one of the last freedom-preserving solutions

Chesnot/Getty Images

Anthropic has vowed to take 5% of its shares and set it aside in a “public benefit fund.” Following that initial contribution, the company will add an extra 2% to the fund for every 50% Anthropic grows above its baseline.

With the fund, Anthropic claims that it could “explore large donations to traditional nonprofits or direct distributions to specific populations.” That last bit is concerning, as it’s rife with variable meaning. “Specific populations” could be anyone, from the general population with UBI, to black and indigenous groups with reparations, to minority programs attached to the now-defunct-but-not-dead DEI.

There is something Anthropic vows not to do with the fund — pay for political lobbying campaigns or offer political donations. These are off limits.

The exact details of the public benefit fund are beholden to Anthropic’s future shareholders, and they are subject to change. Anthropic filed an SEC Form S-1 on October 26 in preparation for its upcoming IPO, where purchased stocks will serve as the catalyst for the program. This is where Anthropic’s plan could go off the rails.

The public fund’s sustainability is based on shareholder support. A higher stock price means more money in the fund, while a lower stock price will tank its value. The price only goes up if investors believe that Anthropic is growing and that they will get a return on their investment. So far, like all the other AI companies, Anthropic is in the hole, losing $80 billion in the first half of 2026. It’s faltering.

Anthropic is bleeding cash, and if that continues, investments will dry up, and so will the fund. That’s bad news for the AI giant, but this highlights an even bigger issue. If AI companies are meant to usher in the age of universal basic income — whether they create enough wealth in the market to spread around or they fund this service themselves — they have to be sustainable, and if not, the UBI facade falls apart.

This is further proof that universal basic income is a pipe dream that requires several miracles — AI to become profitable, reliable, and sustainable — to finally bring about the age of abundance that Musk touted. Until then, UBI is like socialism — an idea that sounds benevolent on paper but collapses the moment it’s put into action.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Another major AI attack hits the internet — this time targeting the backbone of American capitalism



Cybersecurity threats are emerging left and right, with the most prominent event happening last week in what experts call Black October. However, while that web meltdown took most of the oxygen out of the room, Microsoft was tracking another event that affected hundreds of companies around the globe.

Days before the php2shell threat hit its peak of hysteria online, Microsoft’s Threat Intelligence team was focused on a major event that directly attacked enterprise systems. It found that a Chinese hacking group called Storm-0940 weaponized an agentic AI testing platform named ARTEX to launch automated attacks on hundreds of companies worldwide, intending to steal data.

ConnectWise admits that it doesn’t know which partners were hacked or if any data was moved.

Even worse, the attack led to bad actors accessing some companies’ cloud backup systems, which contained sensitive encrypted data locked behind privileged access. It only took three hours for the automated attacks to breach cybersecurity measures — far fewer than the 5-10 hours that security experts typically need to crack a system.

The speed and efficiency of the attack further outlines how AI poses an existential risk to online infrastructure that is either outdated, unsecured with the latest software, or riddled with zero-day vulnerabilities that have yet to be discovered.

One of the groups affected by the attack was ConnectWise, an IT management software company that provides a list of services, including remote monitoring and management for company servers, laptops, and desktops; remote access features to offer help-desk support; and cloud backup and recovery for critical business data. Some of the partners on its website include Swarovski, Bic, and Panasonic, though the full client list includes more than 20,000.

In short, ConnectWise is directly integrated into the digital fabric of its partners with access to devices, data, and everything else hackers would love to take for themselves. That means that attackers who want to get to ConnectWise’s partners don’t have to go to each company and hack them individually. They can simply target ConnectWise itself to obtain a treasure trove of data.

RELATED: How to protect yourself and your data during the PHP web meltdown

amgun/Getty Images

According to Microsoft, the Chinese-state hackers used AI to implement a supply chain attack on the OAuth app that protects ConnectWise Cloud Backup, the service that contains client cloud backup data. Once inside, hackers reportedly tried to change the system privileges to broaden data access. However, Microsoft notes that there’s currently no proof that client data was actually accessed or taken — just that hackers broke into the system.

ConnectWise was quick to respond. The company revoked the certificates connected to Cloud Backup to cut the hackers off. This rendered their supply chain attack null and void. ConnectWise also confirmed that its clients’ cloud backup archives are still securely encrypted, so if hackers did move data out of ConnectWise’s system, it should still be safe. The company has found no evidence so far that any of the archives were taken.

That said, a lack of evidence doesn’t necessarily mean a crime didn’t occur. ConnectWise admits that its systems aren’t built to track its clients’ saved data. As a result, it doesn’t know which partners were hacked or if any data was moved. Instead, ConnectWise customers are compelled to review their own data for signs of tampering.

The ConnectWise breach is just one piece of a broader emerging situation where AI bots scour every corner of the web, looking for unknown flaws to exploit. At this point, no one is safe — businesses, infrastructure, and private citizens. Still, that doesn’t mean there’s nothing you can do. We surfed the web and compiled a robust list of ways you can protect yourself, your accounts, and your private data from the PHP meltdown and any other major cybersecurity event that could unfold over the coming months and years.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

SHOCKING: AI uncovered telehealth for mental health in America's public schools



Much like the government, school boards can bury a lot in thousands of pages of agendas and budget documents — but artificial intelligence is changing that.

Moms for Liberty co-founder and CEO Tina Descovich introduces AWARE, a new AI-powered platform designed to stop schools from making changes that could not only harm their children, but their families.

“So you’re a parent. What if every time, you know, your school board tried to sneak in a gender policy or a DEI crap in their agenda because that’s what they do. They dump it in, they do it quickly, and then they bury it, and you don’t know about it,” Blaze Media co-founder Glenn explains.

“What would happen if every time they tried to do that,” he continues, “your phone pinged and alerted you?”


And that’s exactly what Descovich has created.

“We have harnessed the power of AI to solve a problem,” Descovich tells Glenn, adding, “We have leveled the playing field.”

“For decades, the radical left educational institutions have really had the advantage. We launched five years ago, and I feel like we’ve been running like crazy to catch up to all the money and all the power and all the information that they have. We’ve been playing whack-a-mole all over the country,” she explains.

“And now, through M4L AWARE, we have a dashboard right here at our national headquarters where we can see everything. We can see the trends, we can see what’s going on, and we’ve built the infrastructure over the last five years to be able to deliver this locally to what’s happening at your most local district,” she continues.

Descovich tells Glenn that through this program, they’ve found “things as interesting and peculiar as a school district deciding the night before they’re going to have a school board meeting at 6:00 a.m. the next morning.”

“Our system, AWARE, scrapes the systems every 12 hours, all the school boards across the country, and it delivers it to our inbox. It’s incredible because it ranks them too,” she adds.

The system is only two weeks old, but they’ve already found “a million dollars buried in a $40 million budget for putting telehealth services in all the schools in a school district.”

“Schools are becoming almost mental health centers, you know this, with social emotional learning. They’re putting therapists in schools and then billing the parents' insurance. Kids have access to mental health services at schools without parental permission,” she explains.

“That is a gross violation of parental rights,” she says, noting that telehealth is even being put in elementary schools.

“That means your child can get on a phone at the school and talk to a therapist without the parent ever knowing what type of therapist, what the therapist is discussing with them,” she continues.

“It’s mind-blowing,” she adds.

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis, and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Homeland Security just BANNED this popular AI from the government



Artificial intelligence has quickly evolved from an interesting novelty to an economic driver and a cybersecurity threat. But while the United States tries to rein in its domestic models, foreign-owned AI could pose an even bigger danger, which is why one of China’s most popular models is now banned from the U.S. government.

DeepSeek, a Chinese-owned and operated artificial intelligence company, develops several popular AI models, both in the frontier and in open-weight categories. DeepSeek V4 and V4 Pro are the company’s flagship options that are most comparable to GPT-5.5, Claude Opus 4.7, and Gemini 3.1, while DeepSeek-R1 is the open-source alternative that can run on local hardware.

DeepSeek doesn’t belong anywhere near the American people, much less federal civilian executive branch agencies.

It’s no secret that China wants U.S. companies to choose open-weight platforms like DeepSeek over American-made frontier models from OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google.

After all, they’re cheaper with no recurring subscription fees, data is isolated to local hardware instead of sharing it with the Big AI companies in the cloud, and with enough support, it could supplant U.S. dominance in the AI sector.

Some companies took the bait, too, with big names like Microsoft looking into ways to integrate DeepSeek into a subset of its products. So far, the Redmond giant hasn’t actually followed through, though, so no harm, no foul.

Corporations aside, DeepSeek also apparently had some kind of unofficial integration with U.S. government agencies. This was made apparent when the Department of Homeland Security issued a partial ban on the use of DeepSeek in federal civilian executive branch agencies. These include groups like the Department of Homeland Security, Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Energy, and many more.

As part of the ban, affected agencies must remove any trace of DeepSeek from their frontend and backend systems. Agencies must also remove any third-party software that utilizes or connects to DeepSeek in any way, including but not limited to products that use DeepSeek as part of their feature set or were developed by DeepSeek.

In the official order, DHS cited several clear reasons for the ban, all relating to national security:

  • Data access: User prompts and interactions with DeepSeek — including classified or sensitive data — can potentially be sent back to servers in the People’s Republic of China, where it can be accessed by the Chinese government. This would potentially reveal U.S. government secrets and other intelligence to China.
  • Cybersecurity: The DHS noted that DeepSeek’s “models themselves may contain malware or other security vulnerabilities.” Just as AI has been an effective ally in uncovering software security holes that were previously unknown, hackers have also used AI to spread viruses and commit crimes. So far, the DeepSeek app for iOS contains several critical flaws dating back to 2025, making it a security risk.
  • Availability: Since DeepSeek hosts both frontier and open-source models, at least some version of the company’s AI is freely accessible, easy to implement, and virtually unregulated, presenting potential threats to the U.S. government.

Following the DHS’ lead, the Department of Defense and the director of National Intelligence issued their own DeepSeek bans to kick the AI out of U.S. military agencies, ensuring that the platform can’t gobble up important information about our national security and foreign operations.

RELATED: How to protect yourself and your data during the PHP web meltdown

amgun/Getty Images

It’s important to note that the ban only affects government agencies. DeepSeek is not blocked from public use by civilians or enterprise integrations via private businesses. These groups can still access DeepSeek without restrictions and, by affiliation, are still subject to DeepSeek’s influence.

That said, considering the platform’s deep ties to the People’s Republic of China, you may want to think twice before you install DeepSeek or use it on any of your devices.

So far, DeepSeek’s AI has been caught censoring itself regarding responses that paint China in a negative light. Back when the model made headlines in 2025, users noted that it would begin to respond to problematic questions involving controversial figures like Genghis Khan and Mao Zedong, only for the answer to disappear in real time.

In September 2026, DeepSeek was caught routing queries through Anthropic’s Claude in a large-scale distillation plot. Distillation is when an AI company uses query outputs provided by a larger, better AI model to train their smaller model to produce similar results for less. If imitation is the sincerest form of flattery, then DeepSeek must love Claude for copying off of its models.

Lastly, DeepSeek has the power to serve as a propaganda machine for the People’s Republic of China, swaying opinions on everything from U.S. politics to the overall perception of China and more. It doesn’t belong anywhere near the American people, much less federal civilian executive branch agencies. For now, though, the ban only covers the latter.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!