Rep. Ayanna Pressley votes against bipartisan committee designed to tackle challenges posed by genocidal Chinese regime, says it will 'put lives at risk'



Rep. Ayanna Pressley (D-Mass.) voted against the formation of a bipartisan select committee designed to monitor and keep in check the genocidal Chinese Communist Party, whose victims have predominantly been the Chinese people.

Pressley, who previously called for "unrest in the streets," said she voted "no" because the committee "would further embolden anti-Asian rhetoric and hate and put lives at risk."

What is the background?

The Republican-led House established the Select Committee on Strategic Competition between the United States and the Chinese Communist Party on Tuesday by passing H.Res 11 by a vote of 365-65, with 219 Republicans and 146 Democrats voting in favor.

The committee, to be chaired by Rep. Mike Gallagher (R-Wis.), is tasked with investigating and submitting policy recommendations concerning the status of the economic, technological, and security progress of the Chinese Communist Party and its competition with the United States.

The Pentagon noted in its October National Security Strategy report that China is "the only competitor with both the intent to reshape the international order, and, increasingly, the economic, diplomatic, military, and technological power to advance that objective."

Gallagher wrote an op-ed, stating, "The House will stand with all those in China oppressed by the regime while advancing policies that both deter war this decade and set the long-term path for victory in this new Cold War."

Citing the "CCP's coverup of COVID-19, silencing of whistleblowers like Dr. Li Wenliang, aggressive theft of American intellectual property, rampant human rights violations, increased aggression toward Taiwan, growing influence in South America, and acquisition of US farmland," Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas) stated that it was "long past time" Congress formally organize to counter the Chinese threat.

This committee, formally organized to that end, will not just take into account the security threat the CCP poses, but will, per Republican House Speaker Kevin McCarthy's suggestion, "investigate how to bring back hundreds of thousands of jobs that went to China and win the economic competition."

Democratic Rep. Adam Smith (Wash.) said on Jan. 10, "China is undoubtedly our greatest competitor, and the United States must balance strategic competition and careful cooperation to advance our economic interests and tackle global security challenges," adding, "House Democrats’ participation on the Select Committee is the best way to make it as productive and useful as possible, and for that reason I voted today for its establishment."

Democrat Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (N.Y.) similarly conceded the need to "stand up against extremism where necessary," particularly in the case of the Chinese regime's authoritarianism.

Criticism of genocidal communists might 'puts lives at risk'

While an overwhelming bipartisan majority in the House supported the creation of the bipartisan select committee — including her ally Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn), critical of the CCP's genocide of the Uyghurs — Pressley voted against the resolution.

Pressley told CNN, "We have enough infrastructure and governance to tackle those issues and we don’t need this select committee. ... That is why I voted 'no,' because I am afraid that it will embolden anti-Asian rhetoric and hate."

"I voted 'no' because, again, it’s another sham effort here," she clarified. "It’s really clear that this is just a committee that would further embolden anti-Asian rhetoric and hate and put lives at risk."

\u201cRep. @AyannaPressley on her vote against a bipartisan Select Committee on China Competition: \n\n"It\u2019s really clear that this is just a committee that would further embolden anti-Asian rhetoric, and hate, and put lives at risk."\u201d
— Tom Elliott (@Tom Elliott) 1673533507

There may be no greater source of anti-Asian hate and violence than the very regime Pressley voted against holding accountable via this committee.

Extra to throwing Uyghurs into concentration camps in Xinjiang, the CCP brutalizes ethnic and religious minorities — especially Chinese Christians — as well as Asian political dissenters at home and abroad.

A September report from Safeguard Defenders revealed that the Chinese regime has been stationing communist police stations in the U.S., Canada, Europe, and elsewhere across the globe. Communist agents hunting Chinese dissidents and expats reportedly use these stations as headquarters for their unlawful operations.

FBI Director Christopher Wray confirmed during a Senate hearing in November that Chinese agents had been operating on American soil and conducting intimidation, espionage, and coercion campaigns, usually targeting Asian-Americans and former Chinese nationals.

Pressley was joined by other so-called progressives in Congress in voicing opposition to the formation of the committee.

Twenty-three House leftists, including the Massachusetts congresswoman, issued a joint statement on Tuesday claiming, "We are concerned about the direction of this committee given past statements and actions by Republicans. In the hands of President Trump and Congressional Republicans, reckless and prejudiced rhetoric and policy contributed to a rise in anti-Asian sentiment across the country and a 339 percent increase in anti-Asian hate crimes in 2021."

The statement neglected to mention that the rash of anti-Asian hate crimes has occurred almost entirely in Democrat-controlled cities or that, per a New York Times report this week, Asian-Americans are embracing the Republican Party as a counterforce to the hateful violence spreading in majoritively Democrat cities.

The Congressional Asian Pacific American Caucus similarly appeared to conflate Republicans' past criticism of the Chinese regime in Beijing with criticism of Asians in general.

CAPAC Chair Rep. Judy Chu (D-Calif.) said, "Because of the known risks of xenophobic rhetoric intensifying anti-Asian hate here in the United States — and my belief that the work of this Select Committee can be done by existing committees in the House — I voted against H.Res. 11."

Gallagher emphasized, "We have no quarrel with the Chinese people. ... The Chinese people are the primary victims of the CCP's Orwellian techno-totalitarian surveillance state. And so every action we take, I think we need to be cognizant of that distinction, as well as shine a light on the way in which through extraterritorial coercion, the CCP is intimidating the Chinese diaspora population in the United States or even the Asian American population."

Isaac Schorr, writing for Mediaite, suggested, "It’s Congresswoman Pressley, not the supporters of the committee, who struggles to distinguish between Asian-Americans and the genocidal government in Beijing."

Several Asian-American Democrats recognizing the difference have sought appointments to the committee.

NBC News reported that Reps. Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-Ill.), Ro Khanna (D-Calif.), and Andy Kim (D-N.J.) have expressed interested in joining.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Unfounded narrative that Kyle Rittenhouse is a 'white supremacist' relentlessly gaslights people until their 'progressive bubble' bursts



Despite the fact that all of the parties involved in the Kyle Rittenhouse shooting were white, certain media outlets and Twitter rabble-rousers haven't stopped racializing the case. The notion that the Rittenhouse shooting is based on race has duped more than one person until their "progressive bubble" popped.

During riots in Kenosha, Wisconsin, on Aug. 25, 2021, then-17-year-old armed Rittenhouse was reportedly protecting a used car dealership from looters and rioters. During the chaos, Rittenhouse (who is white) shot and killed his attackers Joseph Rosenbaum and Anthony Huber (who are both also white). Rittenhouse also shot and wounded Gaige Grosskreutz – who was armed and also white.

The notion that the Kenosha shootings had something to do with race seems to have started with tweets by Democrats.

Rep. Ayanna Pressley (D-Mass.) wrote on Aug. 26, 2020, "A 17 year old white supremacist domestic terrorist drove across state lines, armed with an AR 15. He shot and killed 2 people who had assembled to affirm the value, dignity, and worth of Black lives. Fix your damn headlines."

A 17 year old white supremacist domestic terrorist drove across state lines, armed with an AR 15.\n\nHe shot and killed 2 people who had assembled to affirm the value, dignity, and worth of Black lives.\n\nFix your damn headlines.

— Ayanna Pressley (@AyannaPressley) 1598488385

On the same day, Rep. Gwen Moore (D-Wis.) tweeted, "The same police department who shot an unarmed black man 7 times in the back for walking away from them just let an armed white supremacist walk right past them after shooting people."

The same police department who shot an unarmed black man 7 times in the back for walking away from them just let an armed white supremacist walk right past them after shooting people.\n\nSee the problem?

— Rep. Gwen Moore (@repgwenmoore) 1598472360

Pressley and Moore's claims that Rittenhouse was a white supremacist were unfounded when they made the damning allegations – allegations that are still unsubstantiated over 14 months later. Despite no proof of Rittenhouse being a white supremacist, liberals haven't stopped pushing their fabricated narrative.

In September 2020, the Biden campaign shared a campaign ad that linked Rittenhouse to white supremacy. Rittenhouse's attorney threatened to sue the Biden campaign if they did not retract the ad.

The trial of Kyle Rittenhouse has ratcheted up narratives that race played a part in the shooting, and that Rittenhouse is a white supremacist.

Self-proclaimed "race-baiter" Tariq Nasheed: "From that obviously bias judge doing all that over-the-top yelling at the prosecution, to killer Kyle Rittenhouse and his mother doing all that phony crying in court … this trial is basically performative art white supremacist theater."

Progressive commentator David Leavitt: "If you're defending Kyle Rittenhouse you might be a white supremacist. Just saying."

MSNBC host Joy Reid: "If you want to know why Critical Race Theory exists, the actual law school theory that emphasizes that supposedly colorblind laws in America often still have racially discriminatory outcomes, then look no further than the trial of Kyle Rittenhouse."

MSNBC legal analyst Paul Butler: "This is white privilege on steroids."

Former NBA player turned Twitter video curator Rex Chapman: "Feeling like the people rooting for Kyle Rittenhouse to be found not guilty wouldn't be rooting for him if he was black."

Progressives even claimed that the judge in the Rittenhouse trial would "defend white supremacy" because he had a patriotic ringtone on his cell phone.

Progressive "justice correspondent" Elie Mystal claimed that Rittenhouse will be found not guilty in part because of a "biased, racist judge," who has a "Trump rally cellphone" ring. "What I know is the law, and I what I know is what white people are willing to do to defend white supremacy."

Activist Bree Newsome claimed the Kenosha County Circuit Court Judge Bruce Schroeder follows "a history of judges who are sympathetic to white supremacists."

Activist @BreeNewsome: Rittenhouse judge follows \u201ca history of judges who are sympathtic to white supremacists\u201dpic.twitter.com/I5YeP6RPAM

— Tom Elliott (@tomselliott) 1636648664

The campaign to paint Rittenhouse as a white supremacist and bring race into the case has gaslighted at least one progressive. She was fooled into believing that the shooting was motivated by race until she realized that she "needs to question everything."

Sarah Beth Burwick, a Twitter user who claims to be a former progressive now "politically homeless", said she believed that the shooting involved minorities up until Thursday.

"I am highly educated and reasonably perceptive, and it was only today that I learned the Kyle Rittenhouse victims were white," the Twitter user claimed. "My progressive bubble made this seem like a very different case than it is."

She added that all of her friends and family are progressive, but recently woke up to the "hypocrisy" of the left. She admitted that she hadn't paid much attention to the Rittenhouse case, but added, "If you hear someone called a white supremacist enough times, you believe it."

She concluded, "You realize you need to question everything you've been told, which is what is keeping me very, very busy of late."

I am highly educated and reasonably perceptive, and it was only today that I learned the Kyle Rittenhouse victims were white.\n\nMy progressive bubble made this seem like a very different case than it is.

— Sarah Beth Burwick (@sarahbeth345) 1636590853


you realize you need to question everything you\u2019ve been told, which is what is keeping me very, very busy of late.

— Sarah Beth Burwick (@sarahbeth345) 1636601810

Far-left progressive "Young Turks" host Ana Kasparian admitted this week that she was wrong about the Kyle Rittenhouse case after she too fell for false narratives.

There has been a pushback on the false accusations that Rittenhouse is a white supremacist.

Independent journalist Glenn Greenwald: "The word 'white' appears 20 times in the Intercept's very long article on Rittenhouse (based on the unquestioned premise that he's guilty, needless to say). Each time, the word is used to accuse him of being a white supremacist, never once to identify the race of his victims."

Former presidential candidate Tulsi Gabbard: "With no evidence, MSM & antifa-loving politicians immediately labeled Rittenhouse a white supremacist terrorist. It's obvious now that he was just a foolish kid who felt he needed to protect people & the community from rioters & arsonists because the government failed to do so."

Martin-Pool/Getty Images

Rep. Ayanna Pressley says Republicans engaged in 'chemical warfare' by not wearing masks



Rep. Ayanna Pressley (D-Mass.) attacked GOP members of Congress who did not wear face masks during the Capitol riots. Pressley went so far as to say Republicans committed "chemical warfare" by not wearing face masks.

"It's criminal behavior," Pressley told CNN's Don Lemon on Thursday. "I don't know what else to call it."

"They have been complicit from the very beginning in their willful criminality to carry the water for Donald Trump and these science denials which allowed this pandemic to rage out of control," she said of Republican lawmakers.

"And then by refusing to wear the masks, this is criminal behavior," the Democrat alleged. "That's chemical warfare so far as I'm concerned."

Purposely spreading the coronavirus would technically be considered "biological warfare" and not "chemical warfare."

"When they took us to the 'safe room,' and I walked in and saw that there was this contingent of anti-maskers in the room gathered, I immediately exited," Pressley claimed. "So imagine in that moment the choice that I was making. And we were told as we left that space, 'You'll be on your own in an evacuation.' And I said, 'I'll take my chances.'"

Pressley then denounced her Republican colleagues who were not wearing face masks during the Capitol riots.

"So in the midst of this terrorizing event, which inflicted great trauma, injury, and loss of life, where you would think even in that moment that they would attempt to extend some grace, some collegiality, or just to be decent human beings, they chose to recklessly endanger the members in that room, my spouse, my staff, and that of everyone else who was in proximity of them," she ranted.

Rep. @AyannaPressley on GOP Congressmembers who wouldn't wear masks: "This is criminal behavior -- that's chemical… https://t.co/9fU96uIWB2
— The Hill (@The Hill)1610677860.0

On Tuesday, Pressley took to Twitter to condemn Republican lawmakers.

"The second I realized our 'safe room' from the violent white supremacist mob included treasonous, white supremacist, anti masker Members of Congress who incited the mob in the first place, I exited," she tweeted. "Furious that more of my colleagues by the day are testing positive."

The second I realized our "safe room" from the violent white supremacist mob included treasonous, white supremacist… https://t.co/IDhxNRwwop
— Ayanna Pressley (@Ayanna Pressley)1610472860.0

According to Fox News, the maskless GOP politicians include Reps. Marjorie Taylor Greene (Ga.), Markwayne Mullin (Okla.), Andy Biggs (Ariz.), Scott Perry (Pa.), Michael Cloud (Texas), and Doug LaMalfa (Calif.).

Pressley announced Wednesday that her husband, Conan Harris, tested positive for COVID-19. Harris was with Pressley in the Capitol when the riot broke out Jan. 6 in Washington, D.C.

Harris, who is in isolation, has experienced mild symptoms, and it is was unclear how he contracted COVID-19, Boston.com reported. Pressley has tested negative for coronavirus, but is isolating along with her staff members.

Pressley also said she was proud to co-sponsor the resolution by Rep. Cori Bush (D-Mo.) that calls for the expulsion of GOP House members who supported contesting the 2020 presidential election results in battleground states during the Electoral College certification, adding that these Republican lawmakers are "unfit to serve."

I just introduced H.Res. 25.It would, under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, investigate and expel the GOP member… https://t.co/biysYDmx7a
— Cori Bush (@Cori Bush)1610392954.0

Pressley has been in the news recently after her comments calling for "unrest in the streets" from the summer have resurfaced online.

"There needs to be unrest in the streets for as long as there's unrest in our lives and unfortunately there's plenty to go around." Pressley told "AM Joy" guest host Tiffany Cross in August.

Democrat claims black Americans hardest hit by COVID due to 'comorbidities of structural racism'



Rep. Ayanna Pressley (D-Mass.) — one of the members of the so-called "Squad" — suggested last week that black people have been disproportionally impacted by the coronavirus, in part, due to the "comorbidities of structural racism."

What did Pressley say?

While speaking with MSNBC host Lawrence O'Donnell about the coming COVID-19 vaccine last week, Pressley suggested that marginalized communities should be the first to receive access to the vaccine because they are most vulnerable to the impacts of the virus.

"The coronavirus is the third leading cause of death for black Americans," Pressley began.

"So, the most vulnerable and marginalized communities because of the comorbidities of structural racism, because of unequal access to healthcare, because of transportation deserts and food apartheid systems have been the most vulnerable to contracting this virus," she explained.

.@AyannaPressley: Covid disproportionately impacting black Americans because of “the comorbidities of structural ra… https://t.co/PxPf46RK0j
— Tom Elliott (@Tom Elliott)1607705763.0

Data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention confirm Pressley's overarching point: that COVID-19 impacts black people more than most others.

In fact, black Americans are 1.4 times more likely to contract COVID-19, four times more likely to be hospitalized with complications from COVID-19, and 2.8 times more likely to die from COVID-19 compared to white, non-Hispanic Americans.

Hispanics, on the other hand, are just as susceptible to the destruction of COVID-19.

CDC data show that Hispanics are 1.7 times more likely to contract COVID-19, 4.1 times more likely to be hospitalized with complications from COVID-19, and 2.8 times more likely to die from COVID-19 compared to white, non-Hispanic Americans.

What is the background?

According to the CDC, adults with "certain underlying medical conditions are at increased risk for severe illness" if they contract COVID-19, including "hospitalization, admission to the ICU, intubation or mechanical ventilation, or death."

Such underlying medical conditions are called "comorbidities," and CDC data show the vast majority — more than 90% — of all COVID-related deaths in America have been of people with comorbidities.

In fact, data show that "for 6% of the deaths, COVID-19 was the only cause mentioned," and "on average, there were 2.9 additional conditions or causes per death."

Fortunately, the Food and Drug Administration gave Pfizer emergency authorization to begin distribution of its vaccine, which was being prepared for shipping as of Sunday morning.