Former Senate Colleague Suggests Dianne Feinstein Should Step Aside

Former senator Barbara Boxer (D., Calif.) implied Thursday that her longtime colleague Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D., Calif.) should step aside because of age.

The post Former Senate Colleague Suggests Dianne Feinstein Should Step Aside appeared first on Washington Free Beacon.

Former Democratic Senator Mugged by Reality (And Actual Mugger) in Gavin Newsom’s Failed State of California

Nearly one year after predicting Joe Biden's victory in the 2020 election would bring about an end to violence in America, former senator Barbara Boxer (D., Calif.) was mugged by reality.

The post Former Democratic Senator Mugged by Reality (And Actual Mugger) in Gavin Newsom’s Failed State of California appeared first on Washington Free Beacon.

Former Democratic Sen. Barbara Boxer assaulted, robbed in broad daylight in Oakland amid soaring crime in the Bay Area



Former California Democratic Sen. Barbara Boxer became the latest victim of surging crime in California's Bay Area Monday afternoon.

The 80-year-old former lawmaker was reportedly assaulted and robbed in broad daylight while taking a leisurely stroll near her home in Oakland's Jack London Square, KTVU-TV reported. Boxer said that she was pushed from behind by a young man who snatched her belongings before hopping in a getaway car.

Earlier today former Senator Barbara Boxer was assaulted in the Jack London Square neighborhood of Oakland. The ass… https://t.co/r4DQ3tzQc5

— Barbara Boxer (@BarbaraBoxer) 1627337892.0

"I was walking around this neighborhood that I love so much," Boxer told the local news outlet after the attack. She reportedly added that she had noticed a black sedan double-parked roughly 30 seconds before the assault. Then she saw a young man get out of the car.

"I tried to cross the street and get away and he slammed me on the back and reached across me. He was behind me and grabbed my cellphone out of my hand," Boxer recalled. "I said how can you do this to a grandmother? I want to call my grandkids. Why are you doing this? He could care less and got into the car and sped away."

She said she was fortunate not to have fallen.

"My heart was pounding. My hands were shaking. I was glad I was on my feet," she said.

Boxer was able to walk to a nearby Verizon store and call the police. Through an investigation, law enforcement reportedly learned that the incident involving Boxer was part of a string of robberies in the area.

A law enforcement source reportedly told KTVU that the getaway car used in the assault was "the same one used in several vehicle break-ins in this area and in other parts of Oakland during a half-hour span prior to the attack on the former senator."

The Bay Area, which includes Oakland and San Francisco, has been rocked by a wave of violent crime in recent months. Many blame the progressive city council's decision to defund the city's police department for the rise in crime.

"[Criminals are] so bold. I just can't understand it. It'd be nice if we had foot patrol police down here walking the area," one Oakland resident said after news of the attack on Boxer broke.

Last month, the city's new "violence prevention" chief — who is tasked with replacing police with other public safety initiatives — was attacked by armed robbers while he discussed how to confront soaring crime with local reporters.

At around the same time, Oakland Police Chief LeRonne Armstrong delivered an impassioned rebuke of the city council's decision to cut the police budget, arguing that the progressive initiative would only result in a loss of lives.

Fmr. CA Senator Barbara Boxer Robbed, Assaulted In Oakland's Jack London Square www.youtube.com

Former Sen. Barbara Boxer Assaulted And Robbed In Oakland After Police Vow To Crack Down On Surging Crime

Amid an uptick in crime rates and a decision to defund the city's police, former senator Barbara Boxer was assaulted and robbed in Oakland, California.

Democrats set precedent for opposing Electoral College vote certification following Bush, Trump victories



Democrats are rebuking Republican lawmakers who plan to oppose the Electoral College certification of Joe Biden's election victory on Jan. 6 over concerns that election fraud tainted the outcome of the presidential contest.

But, as it turns out, Democrats, including some of those launching broadsides against their GOP colleagues, have a history of opposing the Electoral College vote certification.

What are Democrats saying?

After Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) announced this week that he will oppose the certification of the Electoral College results during next week's joint-session of Congress, Democrats blasted him.

Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) said, "The political equivalent of barking at the moon. This won't be taken seriously, nor should it be. The American people made a decision on November 3rd and that decision must and will be honored and protected by the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives."

Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) said, "Sen. Hawley's actions are grossly irresponsible. He's attempting to undermine our democratic process, fuel Trump's lies about voter fraud, and delay the certification of Biden's win. In the end, this reckless stunt will fail, and Joe Biden will become President on Jan. 20, 2021."

What did Democrats do before?

According to Fox News, Democrats have launched objections to Electoral College votes in the last three elections won by Republican presidents: George W. Bush's 2000 and 2004 victories and President Donald Trump's 2016 victory.

More from Fox News:

In early 2005 specifically, Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) along with Rep. Stephanie Tubbs (D-Ohio) objected to Bush's 2004 electoral votes in Ohio. That forced the chambers to leave their joint session and debate separately for two hours on whether to reject Ohio's electoral votes. Neither did.

At the time, Democratic senators, like Hillary Clinton, Ted Kennedy, and Harry Reid, praised then-Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) for raising objections. Durbin and Van Hollen were also among those celebrating Boxer.

Durbin said on the Senate floor at the time:

Some may criticize our colleague from California for bringing us here for this brief debate. I thank her for doing that because it gives Members an opportunity once again on a bipartisan basis to look at a challenge that we face not just in the last election in one State but in many States. Because of different electoral practices in States across America, voters who wish to cast a vote for President or Vice President cannot approach the polls with certainty that their vote will be counted or that they can vote in a fair and convenient manner. There are litanies of examples that could be cited. I do not challenge the legitimacy of the 2004 election outcome. I do not believe there is evidence of widespread fraud. I believe Senator Kerry was correct in announcing his concession, but let us concede on a bipartisan basis that we can and should do better.

Meanwhile, Van Hollen said in a press release in 2005:

I believe that Senator Barbara Boxer (D-CA) and Representative Stephanie Tubbs Jones (D-OH) have performed a very valuable public service in bringing this debate before the Congress. As Americans, we should all be troubled by reports of voting problems in many parts of the country. I have been particularly concerned about the lack of a verifiable paper record in connection with electronic voting systems. I am proud to be a co-sponsor of legislation to solve that problem.

In the end, Boxer was the only senator who voted against certifying Ohio's electoral votes, while a whopping 31 Democrats in the House voted against certifying 2004 Ohio's electoral votes.

At the time, the mainstream media also promoted stories about Ohio being "stolen" or that voting machine "glitches" marred election integrity.

Meanwhile, some House Democrats objected to the certification of Trump's Electoral College victory in 2017 over allegations of Trump-Russia collusion.

"I object because people are horrified by the overwhelming evidence of Russian interference in our election," Rep. Barbara Lee (D-Calif.) said at the time.

Specifically, objections were raised about the electoral votes belonging to Alabama, Florida, Michigan, Texas, Mississippi, North Carolina, and South Carolina, Reuters reported.

Anything else?

Indeed, Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), who announced Saturday that he and 10 other Republican senators will oppose the certification vote on Jan. 6, explained that Democrats have established the precedent for such action.

"[T]here is long precedent of Democratic Members of Congress raising objections to presidential election results, as they did in 1969, 2001, 2005, and 2017. And, in both 1969 and 2005, a Democratic Senator joined with a Democratic House Member in forcing votes in both houses on whether to accept the presidential electors being challenged," Cruz's statement explained.

"The most direct precedent on this question arose in 1877, following serious allegations of fraud and illegal conduct in the Hayes-Tilden presidential race. Specifically, the elections in three states-Florida, Louisiana, and South Carolina-were alleged to have been conducted illegally," the statement continued.

"In 1877, Congress did not ignore those allegations, nor did the media simply dismiss those raising them as radicals trying to undermine democracy. Instead, Congress appointed an Electoral Commission-consisting of five Senators, five House Members, and five Supreme Court Justices-to consider and resolve the disputed returns," the statement explained.