Michigan's Republican House speaker will not allow impeachment vote against Gov. Whitmer



The Republican leader in the Michigan House of Representatives ended talk of impeachment proceedings against Gov. Gretchen Whitmer on Wednesday amid an ongoing debate about the governor's authority to issue coronavirus restrictions.

Earlier, three Republican members of the state House introduced a resolution for impeachment against Whitmer, charging that her executive orders were unconstitutional and accusing the governor of "using state resources to reward political allies."

"Today I introduced Articles of Impeachment against Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer," Rep. Beau LaFave tweeted Wednesday.

"The four articles of impeachment against Gov. Whitmer include failing to respect the separation of powers by exercising power granted to the legislative branch, violating the constitutional rights of the people of Michigan, issuing executive orders against the interests of the people and state, and using state resources to reward political allies," he wrote.

rights of the people of Michigan, issuing executive orders against the interests of the people and state, and using… https://t.co/WU1tNtBvht
— Beau M. LaFave (@Beau M. LaFave)1605741248.0

The Michigan Constitution's impeachment process is similar to how impeachment works at the federal level. The state House of Representatives would file articles of impeachment against the governor and hold a vote. If a simple majority of lawmakers votes to impeach, then the state Senate would conduct a trial. Two-thirds of state senators are needed to convict.

But according to House Speaker Lee Chatfield, a Republican, impeachment proceedings will not advance in the House while he is the leader.

"It's no secret that I have disagreed with this governor. I have debated a lot with this governor. I have many differences with how the governor has handled COVID. We have a time and place to deal with differences — that's at the ballot box. The voters of the state of Michigan will have a chance to choose in 2022," Chatfield said in a statement reported by WOOD-TV.

"Republicans are not the party of people who impeach just because they disagree with someone. We just saw that in Washington. We're not going to do that in the state of Michigan. With the facts that we have, the impeachment resolution is not going to get a vote on the House floor. It's not the right way to deal with this situation or this disagreement.

"The idea of impeachment would face another, likely insurmountable, obstacle even if it did proceed," Chatfield continued. "In the Senate there are 22 Republican and 16 Democrats. It would take 25 votes to convict. Even if the process was to make it out of the House, which it clearly will not, getting the votes in the Senate would be difficult if not impossible."

Democrats threaten violence if GOP fills SCOTUS vacancy: 'Burn the entire f***ing thing down'



Democrats, members of the media, and Hollywood figures threatened violence on Friday if the Republican-controlled Senate moves to fill the Supreme Court vacancy left by Ruth Bader Ginsburg's death.

Reza Aslan, a former CNN host, said, "If they even TRY to replace RBG we burn the entire f***ing thing down."

In response to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell's commitment to vote on President Donald Trump's nominee prior to the election, Aslan said, "Over our dead bodies. Literally."

Hollywood screenwriter Beau Willimon said, "We're shutting this country down if Trump and McConnell try to ram through an appointment before the election."

We’re shutting this country down if Trump and McConnell try to ram through an appointment before the election.
— Beau Willimon (@Beau Willimon)1600473560.0

Dr. Jessie Christiansen, an Australian astrophysicist who works at the NASA Exoplanet Science Institute, said, "IF THEY RAM THROUGH AN APPOINTMENT IN THE NEXT TWO MONTHS I WILL RIOT."

IF THEY RAM THROUGH AN APPOINTMENT IN THE NEXT TWO MONTHS I WILL RIOT.
— 🪐🛰 Dr. Jessie Christiansen 🪐 (@aussiastronomer) September 18, 2020

Emmett Macfarlane, a political science professor at the University of Waterloo in Canada, said, "Burn Congress down before letting Trump try to appoint anyone to SCOTUS."

Bruh. @EmmMacfarlane really letting it all out there, huh.https://t.co/1wL0NxhGwf pic.twitter.com/sm0xipzVtD
— L 🤺 (@SomeBitchIKnow) September 19, 2020

Author Aaron Gouveia responded to McConnell's commitment by saying, "F*** no. Burn it all down."

Laura Bassett — who has written for GQ magazine, the Washington Post, Rolling Stone, Cosmopolitan, among other outlets — tweeted, "If McConnell jams someone through, which he will, there will be riots."

She followed that tweet by saying, "*more, bigger riots." She has since deleted her clarification.

Thanks, Laura, for letting us know who has been behind the riots. https://t.co/32chOHcsmU https://t.co/ErSvDSd6dl
— Kitty Shackleford (@Kitty Shackleford)1600478791.0

What's the background?

With the 2020 election less than two months away, Democrats and Republicans disagree on whether the vacancy should be filled. Democrats advocated filling a high court vacancy in 2016 when Barack Obama was president, while the Republican-controlled Senate blocked Obama's nominee, Merrick Garland.

However, Democrats now say the vacancy should be filled after Election Day, while McConnell has already said the Senate will vote on Trump's nominee.

Meanwhile, Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) warned a "constitutional crisis" may unfold if the vacancy is not filled prior to the election, considering the increased likelihood of a legally contested election.

"We cannot have Election Day come and go with a 4-4 court," Cruz said Friday. "A 4-4 court that is equally divided cannot decide anything. And I think we risk a constitutional crisis if we do not have a nine justice Supreme Court, particularly when there's such a risk of a contested litigation and a contested election."

"Twenty years ago, I was part of the legal team that litigated Bush v. Gore and went to the Supreme Court. Thirty-seven days the country did not know who the president was going to be, and if we had a 4-4 court it could have dragged on for weeks and month," he explained.

Trump said Saturday that Republicans have an "obligation" to fill the Supreme Court vacancy "without delay."

"@GOP We were put in this position of power and importance to make decisions for the people who so proudly elected us, the most important of which has long been considered to be the selection of United States Supreme Court Justices. We have this obligation, without delay!" the president said.

.@GOP We were put in this position of power and importance to make decisions for the people who so proudly elected… https://t.co/qIVpFfJmpq
— Donald J. Trump (@Donald J. Trump)1600524627.0