Hunter Biden Pardon Backlash EXPOSES Corruption | Ep. 990
play icon

Hunter Biden Pardon Backlash EXPOSES Corruption | Ep. 990

Hunter Biden pardoned: Shop owner REVEALS what he discovered on his laptop



On April 12, 2019, John Paul Mac Isaac was running his laptop repair shop in Delaware when Hunter Biden — who was just pardoned by his father, Joe Biden — changed the course of his life.

“It was about two weeks before his father announced his candidacy, so to me, he was just an intoxicated guy, and at first, because I saw the Beau Biden Foundation sticker, I thought he was just trying to get memories off of his deceased brother’s laptop, because that’s often the case,” Isaac told Alex Stein of “Prime Time with Alex Stein” in an interview.

“That’s often the case. Customers will come in with these devices, and they’ll just want to get the memories off. Unfortunately, during the data recovery the next day, I had to verify the data, and during that verification process I realized that this was not Beau Biden’s laptop. This was Hunter’s, and it was gross,” he explained.


Hunter told Isaac to bill him electronically, when Isaac explained that if he didn’t pick it up after 90 days, it’s “forfeit.”

“At that point I just wanted him to pick it up, because I saw a lot of embarrassing material. But, again, his dad hadn’t announced his candidacy yet, so I figured just get this disgraced son of a politician out of my shop,” he said.

“It was about three months later when it became my property and Burisma and Hunter Biden and corruption was in the news cycle. I took a deep dive in the laptop, and it took me probably a couple weeks before I figured out that there was major threats to our national security on that laptop and it needed to get to the FBI,” he continued.

Isaac was concerned not only about the contents on the laptop but also the “collusion between our Big Tech or mainstream and social media to block the story.”

“The fact that they went to extreme lengths to repress the story from the time the FBI took possession of that laptop on December 9 of 2019. They had 10 months before the New York Post broke that story,” he said. “That’s a lot of effort to put into hiding something.”

Want more from Alex Stein?

To enjoy more of Alex's culture jamming, comedic monologues, skits, and street segments, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Mark Zuckerberg admits the TRUTH about government censorship — what now?



Americans were gaslit for years as they were told that information that was clearly being censored on social media was not being censored.

Now, in a letter to Congress, Mark Zuckerberg has admitted to caving to government pressure and shadow-banning certain viewpoints and accounts.

“In 2021, senior officials from the Biden Administration, including the White House, repeatedly pressured our teams for months to censor certain COVID-19 content, including humor and satire, and expressed a lot of frustration with our teams when we didn’t agree,” Zuckerberg wrote in the letter.

“Ultimately, it was our decision whether or not to take content down, and we own our decisions, including COVID-19-related changes we made to our enforcement in the wake of this pressure. I believe the government pressure was wrong, and I regret that we were not more outspoken about it,” he continued.

Zuckerberg went on to explain a warning the company received from the FBI regarding a potential Russian disinformation operation that involved the Biden family and Burisma in the lead-up to the 2020 election.

When the New York Post reported on corruption allegations involving the then-Democratic presidential nominee, Joe Biden, the story was temporarily demoted while waiting for a fact-check.

“It’s since been made clear that the reporting was not Russian disinformation, and in retrospect, we shouldn’t have demoted the story,” Zuckerberg wrote.

Glenn Beck is not exactly impressed by Zuckerberg’s admission.

“Well, Mark, that’s big of you,” Glenn says sarcastically. “Thank you, thank you very much. I appreciate that. I just would like to ask if I can get, you know, unbanned now. You know, can you not shadow-ban me now?”


Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis, and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Peter Schweizer explains how the Clintons paved the road of corruption for Joe Biden



While America’s founders were mostly concerned about Great Britain, they were also worried about elected officials being given commercial opportunities as a form of persuasion.

Investigative journalist Peter Schweizer believes that political attitudes began to turn on this issue under Bill and Hillary Clinton.

“It was really the Clintons that turbocharged this,” Schweizer tells Mark Levin.

“When Bill Clinton started accepting $750,000 to speak for 20 minutes overseas, everybody realized these weren’t speaking fees, these were bribes disguised as speaking fees,” he explains.

Meanwhile, the Clinton Foundation began accepting $10 million donations from foreign governments while Hillary was secretary of state.

“If this stuff is allowed to happen,” Schweizer continues, “If the Clintons get away with it, and they largely did, other people are going to start doing the same thing.”

Now, the Bidens are following suit.

“The Bidens are even more blatant and direct about it than the Clintons were,” he says, noting that the foreign governments they’re dealing with are largely our greatest enemies.

“It’s going to get worse until enough people in Washington are prepared to stand up and say, ‘No, we’re not tolerating this anymore, this goes beyond the pale, it has to stop,'” Schweizer adds.

Levin is in agreement.

“Either you want to fight to save your country, or we’re going to lose it,” he says.


Want more from Mark Levin?

To enjoy more of "the Great One" — Mark Levin as you've never seen him before — subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Rep. Harriet Hageman: Hunter Biden Used Addictions As ‘A Sword And A Shield’

Hunter Biden confirmed putting his father in touch with his corrupt 'business associates' in closed-door testimony Wednesday.

Hunter Biden Spent HOW MUCH on 'women' and 'adult entertainment'?



Hunter Biden is one of the world’s most obvious criminals who has yet to face any consequences.

The president’s beloved son has been indicted for multiple felonies, including numerous tax evasion charges. But what was he doing while he was evading taxes?

Spending. A lot.

“Biden, did you know that your son was spending an awful lot of money?” Glenn Becks says, noting that when Biden didn’t pay his income tax, estimated at about $1.4 million, he was withdrawing even more from the ATM.

Hunter has reportedly taken $1,664,004 out of ATMs over the course of four years.

“I didn’t know you could get all of that money from an ATM, but apparently you can,” Glenn says.

In addition, Hunter went on to spend a whopping $23,567 on sports and recreation and $309,277 over a four-year period on education. He then spent $39,801 on home help, cleaning, and child care and $42,856 on home improvement and maintenance.

He spent $58,542 on credit card payments, $53,000 on Wells Fargo advisers, and $71,869 on rehab.

“Maybe some of those Wells Fargo’s people should have said, ‘You know what, maybe just stop drinking and stop going into rehab, you’d save $71,000,’” Glenn jokes.

But that’s not the worst of it.

Hunter Biden spent $118,440 on his telephone and utilities and $147,566 on legal and accounting fees.

And if you thought degenerate activities were lacking on this list, then you were right. There’s more.

Biden’s son spent $188,960 on adult entertainment, $683,212 on payments to various women, $397,530 on clothing and accessories, $236,634 on miscellaneous retail purchases, and $237,496 on health, beauty, and pharmacy.

Glenn is curious as to where Hunter got all this money and realizes that this is a massive issue in our world today.

“We are disconnected from the ruling class entirely. From the media and the ruling class. I don’t know who they’re representing besides themselves and the people who are even richer than them,” Glenn says.

“They’re not answering to the people really anywhere in the world.”


Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis, and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Poll: Nearly 7 In 10 Americans Understand Biden’s Role In Family Biz Is ‘Illegal’ Or At Least ‘Unethical’

The poll shows most Americans understand that Biden participated in the influence-peddling scheme that enriched his family by millions.

James Biden’s Role In The Biden Access-For-Hire Operation Shows It Was A Family Affair

James Biden's participation shows just how much of a family affair the scandal is, with Joe Biden, the family's 'only asset,' at the top.

Guest schools Bill Maher, Sam Harris over double standard media give Biden after speaking truth about Trump-Russia lie



Conservative commentator Mary Katharine Ham masterfully exposed on Friday the double standard the media are using to protect President Joe Biden from allegations of corruption.

The "original sin," Ham told Maher and Sam Harris on HBO's "Real Time," and why Republicans distrust the media and government institutions is the concerted effort to make Donald Trump guilty of Russia collusion when the evidence was, in the end, never there.

That distrust has been exacerbated, she explained, by institutions that hold a Democratic president to a different standard.

"The standard of evidence used for the Russia thing for three, four years vs. the standard of evidence used now in media for Biden and Hunter Biden's shenanigans and fairly obvious influence-peddling is worlds apart — worlds apart — and voters deserve fairness in how these two people are treated," Ham said. "They do not get it, and they sometimes don't get it from law enforcement."

Harris actually agreed that if "Hunter Biden had been Don Jr., if it had been Don Jr.'s laptop, everything would change in terms of the reception." He acknowledged the "unfair asymmetry" of the situation but blamed it on Trump because the former president, in his view, violated democratic norms.

In response, Ham quickly pointed out that Trump is not the only guilty party to violate the "norms."

"I agree with you about the norms, and here's the problem," she explained. "A bunch of people, including in the justice system, looked at Trump and said, 'He's going to bust all the norms, and you know what we need to do? Bust all the norms to stop him!' And that was a very, very unhealthy decision.

Once again, Ham forced Harris into agreement.

"It's unhealthy, I'll grant you that," he said.

Mary Katharine Ham challenges Bill Maher & Sam Harris on Russiagate www.youtube.com

Earlier in the segment, Ham sent Harris and Maher into a tizzy by calling out the Trump-Russia conspiracy.

"The reason that so many [Republicans] accept so much of Donald Trump's behavior is because the Russia stuff was a lie, and nobody paid for it," she said.

Both Harris and Maher immediately objected. They claimed it "wasn't all a lie" and alleged part of the infamous Steele dossier "was true." And despite special counsel Robert Mueller finding no collusion between Trump and Russia, Maher claimed the collusion was "unprecedented."

"This was always David Frum's line: Everything [Trump is] doing is in plain-view and it's not illegal. He's just violating every political norm we have," Harris rebutted.

"There were things that were illegal," Ham fired back. "Like using the FISA Court to spy on American citizens in ways they shouldn't have done. And the fact that the Hillary Clinton campaign was partially funding the dossier, which partially came from — oh, wait for it — Russian disinformation. And it started this cycle of media circle-jerk, and then we had four years of that."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Did Turley really say that? Dems, media desperately try to spin one sentence at impeachment inquiry hearing



Democrats and the media desperately tried to spin on Thursday Jonathan Turley's expert testimony about the House impeachment inquiry targeting President Joe Biden.

A professor at the George Washington University Law School, Turley is one of the most distinguished constitutional scholars of his generation. Congress regularly relies on his constitutional expertise, including at the impeachment hearings for Bill Clinton and Donald Trump and now at an impeachment inquiry for Biden.

On Thursday, Democrats and the media seized on one sentence of Turley's testimony at a House Judiciary Committee hearing on the Biden impeachment inquiry to make it appear as though he supports their position that the inquiry is unwarranted and unnecessary.

"I do not believe that the evidence currently meets the standard of a high crime and misdemeanor needed for an article of impeachment," Turley said.

The official social media account belonging to House Judiciary Democrats reposted the 7-second clip. The Daily Beast and congressional reporter Jamie Dupree amplified the quote, as did the Biden campaign and numerous others.

The problem, of course, is that quote is taken grossly out of context.

Yes, Turley said it. But here's the full quote, according to his pre-written testimony:

It is important to emphasize what this hearing is not. It is not a hearing on articlesof impeachment. The House has launched an impeachment inquiry, and I am appearing todiscuss the history and purpose of such inquiries. I have previously stated that, while Ibelieve that an impeachment inquiry is warranted, I do not believe that the evidencecurrently meets the standard of a high crime and misdemeanor needed for an article ofimpeachment. The purpose of my testimony today is to discuss how past inquiriespursued evidence of potentially impeachable conduct.

To summarize: Turley believes that, currently, there is not enough evidence to impeach Biden. But he also believes there is enough to launch an impeachment inquiry, the purpose of which is to investigate whether evidence exists to meet the Constitution's impeachment requirements.

"[T]he House has passed the threshold for an inquiry into whether President Joe Biden was directly involved or benefited from the corrupt practices of his son, Hunter, and others," Turley explained.

Democrats, meanwhile, attempted to tarnish Turley's credibility during the hearing.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!