The smoke from the White House reveals the fires of Biden’s criminality



Former President Donald Trump has been indicted — again — and Mark Levin is not having it.

Levin believes the Espionage Act used by Biden’s DOJ to indict former President Trump is not only unprecedented but likely wrong.

“Tell me,” Levin says, “how many people have been prosecuted under the Espionage Act since 1917 who were president or vice president up until today? Zero,” Levin says.

However, Trump isn’t the first former president to take classified information with him.

“Lyndon Johnson took classified information with him,” Levin explains. “He had one of his aides keep it. They put it in an envelope. Johnson said, ‘Not till I die give it to my library.’ And then the library got it and they were sitting on it for 50 years, they were told to, involving top secret information about Vietnam and tapping the phone of Richard Nixon.”

But apparently, no one remembers that.

Levin brings up Hillary Clinton as an example as well.

“Hillary Clinton was never investigated for obstruction,” Levin continues, “they didn’t investigate her for perjury and there was plenty of false statements — they didn’t even investigate her for that.”

“The evidence is beyond anything that we’ve seen with a former secretary of State,” he adds.

Even when Bill Clinton kept highly classified information “in his sock drawer” after leaving office, he was met with much less scrutiny.

“Judicial Watch brings a lawsuit and says, ‘Hey, National Archives go get those. We want to see some of those.' So it gets in front of this Clinton judge,” Levin explains.

The judge then reads the law.

Levin says the judge reads “the Presidential Records Act, not the Espionage Act. Or Clinton would be doing 50 years with his wife by now.”

Frustrated, Levin notes that President Joe Biden is “a former segregationist and racist” who is “using the Espionage Act to try and destroy our country.”


Want more from Mark Levin?

To enjoy more of "the Great One" — Mark Levin as you've never seen him before — subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Why is Karine Jean-Pierre REFUSING to say THIS?



Despite President Joe Biden being 80 years old, he has announced his run for re-election in 2024 — and many Americans are wondering if it’s a good idea.

A reporter recently asked White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre if Biden plans on serving all eight years if re-elected.

Her response?

“I’m just not going to get ahead of the president. That’s something for him to decide. I’m just not going to get ahead of it.”

She directed the reporter to the 2024 campaign and said “anything related to that, I would refer you to that.”

Sara Gonzales of "The News & Why it Matters" wonders aloud, “How is she so bad at this?”

Jean-Pierre later backtracked on Twitter, tweeting, “As you know, we take following the law seriously. So I wanted to be sure that I didn’t go into 2024 more than is appropriate under the law. But I can confirm that if re-elected, @POTUS would serve all 8 years.”

“Can you?” Gonzales mocks.

Ian Crossland of TimCast Media joins Gonzales to comment on Biden’s re-election campaign.

“Did they actually say they’re not going to have debates? They’re not even going to have Joe Biden debate? Even though there’s other candidates that are ready to debate and throw, you know, their hat in to make a better country, a better nation?”

Gonzales explains that the establishment would not want to put Biden on a debate stage with someone like Robert F. Kennedy Jr. — who has also recently announced his bid for the 2024 presidency.

She adds that Biden’s being protected for “the same reason that they were fine electing John Fetterman.” She continues, “These two men are vegetables, but they at least serve as a figurehead and a puppet” who will “check the boxes that we need checked and sign the legislation we need signed.”


Want more from The News & Why It Matters?

To enjoy more roundtable rundowns of the top stories of the day, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

National Archives misses deadline to turn over info about possible 'political bias' in its handling of Biden document scandal



The National Archives and Records Administration failed to meet the deadline to turn over documents to Congress relevant to an investigation into whether political bias played a role in its soft and quiet approach to President Joe Biden's handling of classified documents.

This failure comes amid concerns that the NARA may be providing deferential treatment to Biden, particularly when compared to how it approached a similar matter involving former President Donald Trump. After all, acting NARA head Debra Steidel Wall was reportedly one of the leading figures who triggered the FBI raid on Trump's residence over allegedly mishandled documents.

What is the background?

Committee Chair Rep. James Comer (R-Ky.) wrote to acting Archivist Wall on Jan. 10 concerning "a political bias" at the NARA.

"For months, NARA failed to disclose to Committee Republicans or the American public that President Biden—after serving as Vice President—stored highly classified documents in a closet at his personal office. NARA learned about these documents days before the 2022 midterm elections and did not alert the public that President Biden was potentially violating the law," wrote Comer.

"Meanwhile, NARA instigated a public and unprecedented FBI raid at Mar-a-Lago—former President Trump’s home—to retrieve presidential records. NARA’s inconsistent treatment of recovering classified records held by former President Trump and President Biden raises questions about political bias at the agency," he added.

Comer noted that unlike in the case of Trump, whose residence was raided by armed FBI agents, no search warrant was executed after classified Obama-Biden administration documents were discovered to still be in Biden's possession. Instead, the president's attorneys "quietly" handled the situation with the Department of Justice.

Republicans on the committee wrote to NARA in August, stating, "The seeming weaponization of the federal government against President Biden’s political rivals cannot go unchecked, and if NARA is working to further these efforts, it will be only the latest agency to lose its credibility in the eyes of the American people under the Biden Administration."

Committee member Rep. Lisa McClain (R-Mich.) echoed these statements in an op-ed this week, writing, "We can see several systemic failures in oversight that have led to widespread deception," including "the weaponization of a federal agency to hide information from Congress and using the power of the presidency to hide a story until after the midterms."

The committee requested that, by no later than Jan. 24, NARA turn over all documents and communications:

  • between NARA and the White House related to classified documents at the Penn Biden Center;
  • between and among NARA employees related to such classified documents;
  • between NARA and the DOJ related to the documents; and
  • between NARA and any outside entity, including Biden's attorneys.
In his Jan. 10 letter, Comer also clarified that the "Committee on Oversight and Accountability has specific jurisdiction over NARA under House Rule X."

NARA comes up with nada

Jan. 24 came and went, but NARA did not provide the committee with any of the requested documents.

A committee spokesman told Axios, "The National Archives has not produced the requested documents to the Committee at this time," adding that "Chairman Comer's request still stands and anticipates moving forward with a transcribed interview with NARA’s general counsel soon."

Committee Chair Rep. Comer told Newsmax that "there's a problem with how the National Archives does things."

Jonathan Turley, a law professor at George Washington University, told Fox News Digital that the NARA has been "far less prominent" during the Biden scandal than during the DOJ's apparent Trump fault-finding mission, underscoring that it "will need to be more transparent with Congress or risk contempt sanctions."

Derrick Morgan, once staff secretary to Vice President Dick Cheney, suggested NARA's silence on Biden and aggressiveness towards Trump indicates a "double standard."

For its possible double standard, the NARA is now facing double scrutiny from both chambers of Congress.

Ahead of the NARA's failure to meet its deadline, Republican Sens. Ron Johnson (Wis.) and Chuck Grassley (Iowa) penned a letter to head archivist Debra Wall demanding "full transparency regarding its involvement, knowledge and role with respect to the existence of these classified and unclassified documents."

The letter cited various instances where the NARA previously declined to provide records that the Biden administration might otherwise want to keep under wraps, including records pertaining to the Biden family's "financial dealings and potential conflicts of interest" as well as records "about then-Vice President Joe Biden's use of non-government email for government business, the transmission of government information to his son, Hunter Biden, and compliance with federal records laws."

The Republican senators indicated they are conducting an "objective review of NARA's involvement" in these matters as well as its "interactions relating to the discovery of records, including those marked classified" found in Biden's homes and offices.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!