Watch Nancy Pelosi get VISIBLY UNCOMFORTABLE when she's asked about Joe Biden/Hunter allegations



When Andrea Mitchell of MSNBC broached the subject of potential impeachment proceedings related to President Biden’s alleged involvement in his son Hunter’s businesses, Nancy Pelosi couldn’t hide her grimace.

“How do you feel about the push by the House Republicans” who are “[flirting] with this idea of impeachment proceedings against, you know, President Biden because of unfounded allegations that he was involved in his son Hunter’s businesses?” Mitchell asked.

Pelosi, clearly irritated by the question, spouted back, “With all due respect to your question, this is frivolous; this is a diversionary tactic.”

“They just can’t stand the fact that we had a job report of over nearly 200,000 jobs today — that unemployment is 3.5%. ... We’re talking about 13.4 million jobs created with Joe Biden in the White House,” she ranted.

Then, in a moment of perfect irony, she said, “They have to change the subject,” as if she didn’t just do the exact same thing by rambling about jobs when she was specifically asked about Biden’s potential impeachment.

“I’m so proud of the Democrats,” she said. “We fully intend to take back the House the next time, so we don’t have to deal with the frivolity, the waste of time of the Congress for them to go down this path.”


Want more from Dave Rubin?

To enjoy more honest conversations, free speech, and big ideas with Dave Rubin, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

James Comer fires back at reporter who defends FBI — then new report seemingly confirms his suspicions



House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer (R) suggested Monday that he does not trust the FBI.

After meeting with FBI Director Christopher Wray and viewing an FBI document that allegedly contains evidence of a "criminal bribery scheme" in which Joe Biden participated as vice president, Comer fielded questions from the media.

One reporter asked Comer why he plans to move forward with contempt of Congress proceedings despite Wray meeting with him and showing him the document.

"Why do you need the document in hand? You just got a chance to review it. Why move forward with contempt when the FBI says they're cooperating in good faith?" the reporter asked.

In response, Comer said the dominant media narrative, which aligns with the White House's narrative, is reason enough to question whether the FBI is taking seriously the allegations in the document.

"Let's just look at what I've read in a lot of the media accounts, and with statements that [White House spokesperson] Ian Sams has made from the White House that 'there's no merit to this, this is crazy, this is a conspiracy theory, and you're just supposed to take my word, or the FBI's word,'" Comer began.

"I'm supposed to take the FBI's word that they're investigating this?" he questioned.

"Remember the main reason they're not wanting to make this public is because they're concerned about the source," he emphasized.

\u201cReporter: \u201cWhy do you need the document at hand? You just got a chance to view it \u2026 Why move forward with contempt when the FBI says they\u2019re cooperating in good faith?\u201d\n\nHouse Oversight Chair James Comer: \u201cI\u2019m supposed to take the FBI\u2019s word that they\u2019re investigating this?\u201d\u201d
— The Recount (@The Recount) 1685985055

After meeting with the FBI, Comer said the FBI confirmed to him that the allegations have "not been disproven," and he claimed bureau officials told him the information is "currently being used in an ongoing investigation."

Though he is not certain, he said he assumes "that ongoing investigation is in Delaware."

Comer's apparent distrust of the FBI may be understandable because hours after the meeting, the Washington Post published a story, citing its own sources, that there is no investigation into the allegations. House Oversight Committee Ranking Member Jamie Raskin (D), who participated in the meeting with Comer and the FBI, also said there is no ongoing investigation.

In a statement, the FBI did not deny anything Comer said but rather took issue with his promise to pursue contempt charges.

The FBI has continually demonstrated its commitment to accommodate the committee’s request, including by producing the document in a reading room at the U.S. Capitol. This commonsense safeguard is often employed in response to congressional requests and in court proceedings to protect important concerns, such as the physical safety of sources and the integrity of investigations. The escalation to a contempt vote under these circumstances is unwarranted.

Meanwhile, Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-Fla.), a member of the House Oversight Committee, claimed the FBI is afraid for the safety of the confidential human source whose information is contained in the document.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!