Trump REVOKES security clearances from leading deep state operatives



In another move toward making America great again, President Donald Trump has stripped top security clearance from several prominent Democrat and deep state operatives, including Hillary Clinton and Joe and Hunter Biden.

“There are people who would say that President Trump’s just being vengeful and mean to Joe Biden,” Sara Gonzales of “Sara Gonzales Unfiltered” comments. “Actually Joe Biden did it to him first, because if you recall back in February of 2021, Joe Biden revoked Trump’s security clearances for what he called ‘erratic behavior.’”

“Because, you know, you look at Joe Biden and you’re like, ‘Boy, that is a paragon of stability; that is a stable man right there. He should definitely have the security clearances and read all of our top secret stuff,’” she continues.


While the panel members of “Sara Gonzales Unfiltered” are pleased, they’re a little confused as to how Hunter Biden ever had a top security clearance in the first place.

“I still don’t understand how Hunter Biden, with any stretch of the imagination, got security clearance. Like why?” Matthew Marsden asks.

“The left always tries to make it out to be some like vengeful enemies list, and I don’t think that’s right. Like these people were misusing our intelligence for their own political purposes, many of them, and breaking the law in many cases,” Stu Burguiere jumps in.

“I don’t know what Hunter Biden was doing, getting a discount at the local escort services? I don’t know what he was doing with this information,” he continues, adding, “I can’t imagine why he would have that clearance.”

Alvin Bragg and Letitia James also had their security clearances revoked — but again, no one knows why they had them in the first place.

“Why would they have security clearance for the entire country?” Gonzales asks.

Want more from Sara Gonzales?

To enjoy more of Sara's no-holds-barred take to news and culture, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

‘The biggest win’: Did Trump END the teachers' union mafia?



While liberals across the country are horrified, conservatives couldn’t be happier with President Donald Trump’s executive order to end the Department of Education.

The move will return education to the states, prioritize parents over bureaucrats, and protect resources for children with disabilities — and Erika Donalds, chair of America First Policy Institute’s Center for Education Opportunity, is thrilled.

“The biggest win, what Republicans have been looking for for the past 45 years, literally, is this executive order and Trump making good on his promise to the American people that he’s going to shut down the Department of Education,” Donalds tells Jill Savage and Matthew Peterson on “Blaze News Tonight.”


While the move is exciting, it won’t come without serious pushback.

“Some powerful interests are going to oppose that and have for a very long time. Teachers' unions and an entire colossus of, really, government is going to be against this,” Peterson says.

“Well, remember also, that the president put out an executive order regarding school choice prior to the executive order to shut down the department,” Donalds responds. “We’re going to also see some guidance from the Department of Education in the coming weeks on how some of these federal funds can also be used to enhance school choice.”

“Now, we know that in blue states, perhaps that are more controlled by teachers' unions, they’re going to continue to use that on bureaucracy. More union members, more administrative bloat, non-teaching positions, as they have done for decades,” she continues.

“But in red states, in states that have embraced school choice, parents are going to have more options and more funding to go along with it,” she adds.

What this will lead to, Donalds believes, are families migrating for school choice.

“Think about Florida, where if you have three children, you could get $9,000 per child to send them to a private school. Whereas just above the border in Georgia, you get zero dollars to help with private school,” she explains.

“If I live near the border in Georgia, I’m going to Florida to make sure that my kids can get a better education,” she adds.

Want more from 'Blaze News Tonight'?

To enjoy more provocative opinions, expert analysis, and breaking stories you won’t see anywhere else, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Gwyneth Paltrow’s controversial comments EXPOSE Hollywood's double standard



Gwyneth Paltrow has come under fire recently for the comments she made in an interview with Vanity Fair regarding her latest role in Josh Safdie’s “Marty Supreme,” in which her character was in a romantic relationship with the much younger Timothee Chalamet.

“I mean, we have a lot of sex in this movie,” Paltrow said in the interview. “There’s a lot — a lot.” However, Paltrow was not familiar with what is called an “intimacy coordinator,” which she didn’t know existed.

“I was like, ‘Girl, I’m from the era where you get naked, you get in bed, the camera’s on,’” Paltrow recalled telling the coordinator when filming sex scenes for the new movie.


“How did you not know this existed?” Dave Landau comments to Stu Burguiere on “Stu Does America.” “Harvey Weinstein gave her the career she has. You don’t know why there’s an intimacy coordinator on set now? It’s because of what he did to you.”

Paltrow also recalled telling the intimacy coordinator to “step back a little bit.”

“I don’t know how it is for kids who are starting out, but … if someone is like, ‘Okay, and then he’s going to put his hand here,’ I would feel, as an artist, very stifled by that,’” she told the reporter. Paltrow also then joked that she’s “109 years old” while Chalamet is “14.”

“That’s an interesting way to put it,” Stu comments, noting that there is a “bizarre double standard” when it comes to predatory older men and the glorified older woman.

“Now, maybe in comparison to the horrible things that were done by so many in Hollywood, it doesn’t stand up. Probably, Timothee Chalamet is like, ‘Yeah, this is great,’” he continues.

“You see the parallels throughout life, like when the hot 27-year-old teacher hooks up with the student, everyone kind of just jokes about it and it’s hilarious, and we don’t say ‘statutory,’ those words don’t come out of anybody’s mouth,” he adds.

Want more from Stu?

To enjoy more of Stu's lethal wit, wisdom, and mockery, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

SCANDAL: Texas DEMOCRAT holds SECRET meetings on how to spend YOUR taxpayer money



Rep. Armando Walle isn’t just a Democrat; he's also the chairman of a subcommittee in Texas that helps determine how taxpayer dollars are spent in the state — and a radical leftist.

“In fact, on his own website, he boasts being an active member of not just the Democratic caucus, also the Women’s Health caucus and the LGBTQ caucus,” Sara Gonzales of “Sara Gonzales Unfiltered” comments.

Walle has also been posting on X about his meeting with Planned Parenthood advocates.

“Received a visit from Planned Parenthood @PPFA advocates who are urging Texas to prioritize women’s health. I am a strong advocate and ally for women’s healthcare,” he wrote in the post, which was accompanied by pictures of him with the advocates.


“Strong advocate for women’s health care, which we all know is really just code for women killing their babies in the womb. Somehow, we’re calling that health care now. I would call it anything but,” Gonzales says.

“But this is who Republican Dustin Burrows, the speaker of the House, has empowered as a chairman. Does this look conservative to you? Does this sound like something that you voted for? A radical leftist in charge of giving reports on how Texas should spend our taxpayer money? Is that what you voted for?” she continues.

Walle has also allegedly violated the Texas House rules three separate days just this month, when he arranged committee meetings for a total of over 15 hours without any audio or video recordings of those meetings — despite House rules requiring those recordings to be available to the public.

“That isn’t asking the Texas House to go above and beyond, to say, ‘Hey guys, Texas taxpayers, we are paying for you guys to be here right now. All that we ask is that whenever you hold your little meetings that you press record on the camera, you press record on the audio, you got your microphones on, and you speak into the microphone so all of the taxpayers across the state can come in and watch,’” Gonzales says.

“Because that is how the government should be,” she says, adding, “It should be 100% fully transparent.”

Want more from Sara Gonzales?

To enjoy more of Sara's no-holds-barred take to news and culture, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Stephen A. Smith: Prophet of Biden’s demise or political fraud?



When ESPN's Stephen A. Smith was on “The Megyn Kelly Show” this past Monday, he was quick to point out that he was the first person on the left to call out Joe Biden.

“When I called out President Biden at the time, it was a year before the debate – a year. I said, ‘Yo, something's missing, he's not there; he's not going to make it to the Democratic National Convention,”’ he said. “I was excoriated; I was raked through the coals ... but look at you now because I was right.”

Smith went on to list all the things he called the left out on: Kamala Harris, woke culture, cancel culture, transgender nonsense, and the border.

Megyn Kelly may have been impressed with Smith’s criticism of the Democrat Party, but Jason Whitlock says he’s “a fraud.”

He argues that the idea that Smith was “so ahead of the curve” and was “super insightful and courageous” is just ridiculous.

“Stephen A. Smith is beating his chest” by claiming that he was the first to say “Joe Biden is cooked,” he says. “Anybody with a brain had already said that months and months and years ago.”

This calling out Joe Biden and the Democrat Party is all part of his plan to run for president, Whitlock speculates.

Long before Smith publicly floated the idea of running for president, Whitlock knew that his 2023 book “Straight Shooter: A Memoir of Second Chances and First Takes” was “written to launch his presidential career.”

How did he know Smith was gearing up to run for president?

“There's a pattern to these planted imbeciles that the Democrats use. ... His book read just like Obama’s book – a book of fiction written to cover all the talking points necessary to be a Democrat candidate for president,” he says.

If Stephen A. Smith was a true leader, he wouldn’t have been up there “preaching about the [COVID] vaccine and shaming people that wouldn't take the vaccine.”

“I need something more authentic than Stephen A. Smith,” says Whitlock.

To hear more of his commentary, watch the clip above.

Want more from Jason Whitlock?

To enjoy more fearless conversations at the crossroads of culture, faith, sports, and comedy with Jason Whitlock, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

The Department of Education is on Trump’s chopping block



The money going into the education system may have increased, but test scores have taken a serious nosedive. Which is why President Donald Trump is not set on reforming the Department of Education but on disbanding it in its entirety.

“This is another promise made, promise kept,” Sara Gonzales of “Sara Gonzales Unfiltered” says, adding, “What a turning point in American history.”

“I mean, we fought a war for far less than what they’re doing to us now, and you look at the bloat, and you look at how big they’ve become, how powerful they’ve become, how much power they’ve taken away from you, and how much say they have in every aspect of your life,” she continues.


And it’s not just what the Department of Education has become, but what it’s always been.

“They’ve burned $3 trillion of taxpayer money. You’ve had this government education that has led to poorly educated students in a system that is designed for social conformity, not individual excellence,” Gonzales says.

And White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt is in full agreement.

“The Department of Education was founded in the 1970s, and since then, we have spent more than $3 trillion on this federal bureaucracy. What has been the return on that investment for the American taxpayer? Levels that are less than ideal, less than proficient,” Leavitt said in a statement.

“Our children’s test scores are incredibly concerning when it comes to reading rates, literacy rates, math, and science test scores. The numbers prove that, and this president is finally taking much-needed action to return education to where it belongs, and that’s to educators closest to students in their classrooms, in their respective states,” she added.

“We’re sending this back to the states,” Gonzales comments. “It’s going to be up to you now. We’re going to relinquish the power that we have stolen from the states and return it where it belongs.”

Want more from Sara Gonzales?

To enjoy more of Sara's no-holds-barred take to news and culture, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Cristiano Ronaldo just said the saddest thing about marriage



Most people know who Cristiano Ronaldo is even if they’ve never seen him play. Many consider him the GOAT of soccer or just a notch below Argentina's Lionel Messi. Between his size, speed, and power, Ronaldo is an athletic, goal-scoring machine who remains one of the most celebrated names in the world of sports.

Unfortunately, when it comes to his personal life, there are fewer kind things to say about him. For example, he’s been dating the same woman, Argentine-Spanish model Georgina Rodríguez, since 2016. The couple have children together.

Is marriage on the horizon? As of now, no. Ronaldo addressed this in the 2024 Netflix docuseries “Saudi Pro League: Kickoff.” The interview has since gone viral.

Allie Beth Stuckey plays the clip.

When asked about marrying Rodríguez, Ronaldo said, “I always tell her — when we get that click, like everything with our life, and she knows what I’m talking about. It could be in a year, or it could be in six months, or it could be in a month. I’m 1000% sure that it’ll happen.”

“Spoiler alert: It’s not going to happen,” says Allie. “If he wanted to commit to you ... he would have already done it.”

She condemns this “stay-at-home girlfriend” trend, where men reap all the benefits of having a wife without having to make a commitment.

“Marriage is more than just a piece of paper; it is not just a commitment; it's not just a contract. It is supposed to be a covenant; it's supposed to be really difficult to get out of for a reason,” she says.

Women who agree to these kinds of long-term, commitment-free relationships are merely “[playing] house.” Not only are they “preparing [their significant other] for his wife,” but they’re also guaranteeing he’ll lose interest.

“If you give them everything they want easily and they have nothing to pursue, they eventually lose interest,” she says.

To Ronaldo’s girlfriend, she says, “It would be better to be single than this. At least you would be single and be able to preserve some self-respect instead of constantly worrying and thinking is he ever going to see me as good enough?”

To hear more of Allie’s commentary, watch the episode above.

Want more from Allie Beth Stuckey?

To enjoy more of Allie’s upbeat and in-depth coverage of culture, news, and theology from a Christian, conservative perspective, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Glenn Beck vs. Ohio AG: Is Clearview AI a crime buster or Big Brother's blueprint?



Clearview AI has stirred up quite a controversy, and when you see what the company has been up to, it’s easy to see why.

The corporation has built a robust online database of over 40 billion facial images, which it gathered from various online sources, including social media, news sites, and random corners of the web. This has been done without explicit consent from the people pictured.

The software is pitched primarily to law enforcement, private security, and some corporate clients who need to identify people quickly. Users can upload a photo of a face, and it scans the database for matches and links to where the images originated — like a LinkedIn profile or a Facebook post.

Glenn Beck says it’s trouble. While it may be useful in certain situations, put in the hands of a rogue government, Clearview AI becomes a tool for totalitarianism.

Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost, however, is fighting to expand Clearview’s use in court cases.

On a recent episode of “The Glenn Beck Program,” the two engaged in a debate.

In a recent Ohio case, law enforcement used Clearview AI to match a blurry surveillance photo to a suspect. This information was then used to obtain a search warrant, which resulted in cops locating a gun and arresting the suspect. The judge, however, threw out the evidence because the warrant paperwork didn’t mention Clearview’s role, its disclaimer about not being court-ready evidence, or other possible matches it flagged.

That’s when Yost’s team stepped in and filed an appeal, arguing that the police’s use of Clearview AI was legitimate and that the evidence should stand. As of now, the court’s decision is undecided.

While Glenn agrees that Clearview technology “is a great thing to get the bad guys,” it’s “exactly the kind of technology” China uses “to track everybody.”

“I worry about that, too,” says Yost.

However, he argues that Clearview AI technology is not a violation of the Fourth Amendment because the images it gathers are from the public domain. It’s different, he says, than the Supreme Court case Kyllo v. United States, in which the court ruled that the cop who used thermal imaging technology to scan for marijuana growing in Danny Kyllo’s home violated his privacy rights.

But Glenn isn’t convinced.

“I am very, very concerned about this slippery, almost straight-down slope to the cage that AI could build for people,” he says. “We can have all of the best intentions, but it falls into the wrong hands, we lose several elections in a row, and it’ll be a prison; it'll be a panopticon like it is in China.”

“I couldn't agree with you more. It scares me what the government can do about this. If you think back to the Biden administration and social media and what they were doing — you multiply that, make that geometrically larger and that's the potential. We've got to be vigilant,” says Yost.

To hear more of the debate, watch the clip above. Leave us a comment below. What do you think? Does facial recognition technology catch crooks or pave the way for tyranny?

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis, and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Big Soda paid MAGA influencers to defend junk food



Major soda companies attempted to secretly buy off conservative social media personalities to fight against SNAP benefit reforms — but social media users were too quick to catch on.

It all began with X user Nick Sortor, who posted evidence on the social media platform that a company called Influenceable was cutting big checks to MAGA-aligned influencers on behalf of Big Soda.

“Over the past 48 hours, several large supposedly MAGA-aligned ‘influencers’ posted almost identical talking points fed to them, convincing you MAHA was out of line for not wanting soda purchases with food stamps (SNAP),” Sortor wrote in a post.


“Some even slimely [sic] invoked PRESIDENT TRUMP as an emotional manipulation tactic, referring to his Diet Coke button. Not a SINGLE ONE of them disclosed they were paid for these posts, which led readers to believe a general SODA BAN was in the works,” he added.

X users like Eric Daugherty were accused of the grift, who wrote in a post: “Important: We cannot allow Make America Healthy Again messaging to be used to force needy Americans into not buying certain things. Some officials in DC are working on trying to prevent Americans on SNAP food stamps from using those benefits to purchase any soda.”

“Remember when New York City Democrats tried to prevent people from buying and consuming soda? It backfired big time. President Trump literally has a Diet Coke button in his Oval Office. Let people think and decide for themselves. Anyone can consume soda and be perfectly fine in moderation, unless we’re just going to ban every food with sugar in it for SNAP Americans,” he added.

While Daughtery was among those who took the cash, other influencers, like Riley Gaines, refused. Gaines wrote that they offered to pay her to post, but she gave them a “big fat heck no.”

Unlike the others, Stu Burguiere isn’t shocked in the slightest.

“This shouldn’t be that shocking to anybody, right? I mean, this is how the influencer industry sort of works, right? Like you get paid to post,” Burguiere says.

“Fact, a lot of times, I hire people to post for me, because I hate it so much. I actually pay to post. Who’s the real idiot here,” he jokes.

Want more from Stu?

To enjoy more of Stu's lethal wit, wisdom, and mockery, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Tesla terrorism escalates after BOMBS are discovered in Tesla showroom



The domestic terrorism aimed at Elon Musk’s Tesla is amping up. First, Tesla vehicles were keyed, graffitied, or set on fire. Then, entire dealerships were attacked. Then, Tesla owners were doxxed.

And now — bombs. Yesterday, at a Tesla showroom in Austin, Texas, several incendiary devices were discovered. Police are currently investigating the incident. Thus far, no arrests have been made.

Sara Gonzales can’t understand the hatred toward someone who is “[rooting] out waste, fraud, and corruption in our government.”

The idiots who are harassing Tesla owners and vandalizing dealerships clearly don’t understand that it’s “their money” Musk is trying to save, she says.

“They have this concept of ‘government money,’ and it's like no, that's just our money. He's actually helping you.”

“They're so dumb that they're actually attacking people on their own side,” adds BlazeTV contributor Matthew Marsden, pointing out that most of this vandalism is aimed at Democrat voters who bought Teslas in the name of climate change.

This domestic terrorism is evidence that the left is “on the ropes,” he says. “They are panicked.”

We shouldn’t be surprised that this panic is leading to violence.

“This is where it's always going to lead with the left. ... If you call someone a Nazi, if you call someone a white supremacist, if you call someone racist, then you can justify committing violent acts,” says Marsden, adding that he doesn’t think the Tesla terrorism is grassroots.

“This is absolutely coordinated and funded,” he tells Sara.

“We'll eventually track that down over some period of time and find out what organizations were funding all this because there's no way this is just organic,” agrees guest Stu Burguiere.

“They get manipulated by the people that are higher up that just want to move the needle by using useful idiots,” says Marsden.

To hear more of the conversation, watch the clip above.

Want more from Sara Gonzales?

To enjoy more of Sara's no-holds-barred take to news and culture, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.