'Why the f*** are you laughing?' Piers Morgan unloads on Taylor Lorenz after she expresses 'joy' over CEO's execution



Former Washington Post writer Taylor Lorenz frequently concern-mongers about theoretical harms, such as those supposedly generated by unmasked Americans "raw dogging the air." It appears that Lorenz's compassion runs dry in the face of real harm and tragedy.

After a masked man walked up and fatally shot UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson Wednesday, Lorenz posted on the liberal X knockoff Bluesky an apparent justification for the killing of the father of two. Despite significant backlash, Lorenz then followed up with more controversial commentary, underscoring in a blog post titled "Why 'we' want insurance executives dead" that "it's normal" to wish death on executives in the health insurance sector.

Lorenz — a blogger who has peddled plenty of fake news, doxxed Libs of Tiktok in 2022, and called President Joe Biden a war criminal for supporting Israel's war on Hamas terrorists — doubled down on her comments Monday, telling Piers Morgan of "Piers Morgan Uncensored" that she "felt, along with so many other Americans, joy" upon learning of Thompson's slaying.

"Joy? Seriously?" said Morgan. "Joy at a man's execution?"

'It feels like justice in this system.'

Lorenz suggested that if not joy, then the feeling was "certainly not empathy."

"We're watching the footage. How can this make you joyful? This guy is a husband. He is a father," said Morgan. "And he has been gunned down in the middle of Manhattan."

Lorenz tried justifying her schadenfreude by accusing the deceased of committing mass murder, then broadening her smear by suggesting that tens of thousands of Americans "died because greedy health insurance executives like this one push policies of denying care."

"So should they all be killed, then?" responded Morgan, taking his guest's argument down the rails. "Would that make you even more joyful?"

Laughing, Lorenz said that the extermination of health insurance executives would not make her more joyful. The blogger suggested that the execution of the unarmed executive was, however, useful, stating, "It is a good thing that this murder has led to ... the media elites and politicians in this country paying attention to this issue for the first time."

Toward the end of the segment, Lorenz interrupted to clarify that she was not joyful about the slaughter but "celebratory."

"I take that back. 'Joyful' is the wrong word, Piers," said Lorenz. "Vindicated, celebratory — because it feels like justice in this system when somebody responsible for the deaths of tens of thousands of Americans suffers the same fate as those tens of thousands of Americans who he murdered."

'We should not necessarily go around shooting people in the street.'

Another guest on the show, conservative commentator Tomi Lahren, suggested that to "celebrate the murder of a husband and a father simply because you disagree with his position at a company, or you disagree with the company, or you disagree with the system of health care that we have in the U.S., is, quite frankly, sick, twisted, and disgusting."

"It also goes to show that the left and many on the left have a tendency to believe that violence like this, political violence, is necessary, it's a means to an end," continued Lahren.

A poll conducted by Scott Rasmussen's RMG Research for the Napolitan News Service in September highlighted this politically charged bloodlust on the left.

The survey asked, "While it is always difficult to wish ill of another human being, would America be better off if Donald Trump had been killed last weekend?" While 69% of respondents said no, a staggering 28% of Democrats answered "yes."

Lorenz appeared to chuckle while Lahren spoke, prompting a response from Morgan: "Taylor, I don't mean to be rude, but why the f*** are you laughing all the time? I don't get it. Sorry, apologies for my language, but honestly, I find it unbelievable."

The leftist blogger suggested that she found Lahren's characterization amusing, then noted, "I agree we should not necessarily go around shooting people in the street."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

WATCH: Biden Humiliates Aides and Media Allies With Hunter Pardon

When President Joe Biden and his White House aides repeatedly promised Biden wouldn't pardon his son, their allies in the media didn't push back—they ate it up.

The post WATCH: Biden Humiliates Aides and Media Allies With Hunter Pardon appeared first on .

Want To Exchange Ideas With Annoying Liberals Like Yourself? Here's How To Delete Your X Account and Join Bluesky.

What's happening: Obnoxious liberals (many of them journalists) are performatively fleeing X, the social media app formerly known as Twitter, and signing up for Bluesky, an inferior copycat app that caters almost exclusively to obnoxious liberals who think it's absurd to suggest that people like them exist in a bubble and are hopelessly out of touch with normal Americans.

The post Want To Exchange Ideas With Annoying Liberals Like Yourself? Here's How To Delete Your X Account and Join Bluesky. appeared first on .

Liberals started a woke Twitter rival, and it's going down in flames



Our ancestors dressed up and attended public hangings. We can achieve the same thing by logging into Bluesky, the floundering social media platform that was supposed to embarrass Twitter.

The app’s elevator pitch reminds me of a recurring twist throughout Mike Judge’s HBO series "Silicon Valley," where nerds who fawn over the newest tech can’t understand why the rest of the world doesn’t get it.

Bluesky began as a pet project of some of the higher-ups at Twitter.

What do you expect from a social media platform designed by bubble boy Big Tech brainiacs, largely composed of dejected Twitter exiles who left the encampment to start their own digital civilization?

Twitter co-founder Jack Dorsey was the first to mention it publicly in 2019. From the start, it seemed as though his vision was somehow corrective, as if he had given up on Twitter’s enormously opaque machinations.

Dorsey’s goal seemed laudable enough: He wanted to create a decentralized microblogging social media platform. This would allow the user base to shape and adjust the algorithm. Unfortunately for Bluesky’s would-be sizzle hype, Mastodon has used this model for nearly a decade.

Dorsey was joined by Twitter's then-CTO, Parag Agrawal, who was pivotal in placing Lantian “Jay” Graber in Bluesky’s CEO chair.

The 32-year-old Graber was working on a platform called the Happening, a decentralized social network similar to Bluesky, when she was called to action. “Bluesky” is actually named after her, Lantian, the Mandarin word for “blue sky,” a name chosen by Graber’s mother as a way to inspire her to greatness.

Founded in 2021, Bluesky went from Jack Dorsey’s daydream to a platform of its own, and until six months ago, it was invite only.

For this reason, estimates for early user-base size are usually untrustworthy, if not objectionable. Today, the estimates range from 500,000 to six million, although that upper figure seems cartoonishly high.

Not long after Bluesky’s founding, in February of 2022, Trump launched Truth Social, which has since accrued somewhere between 600,000 and two million users, with an estimated 12% of “all U.S. social media users having used or visited the Truth Social platform.”

Then, in October 2022, Elon Musk finally bought Twitter, which now, as X, boasts an estimated 650 million users.

Claims that Bluesky would become Twitter’s rival were overblown on arrival. But Bluesky’s failures since have transcended the membership count.

Mastodon, the original safe space for whiny journalists escaping Elon, has a lower user base yet a much stronger reputation. Like Bluesky, Mastodon offers a decentralized approach to social media networking. But Mastodon came first — by far — and it did it better.

SOPA Images/Getty

Even still, its baggy slogan hints at its weakness: “Social media used to be fun. Be your unique self and create with your friends, all while keeping tabs on what's happening at a global scale.”

It certainly cannot perform on a global scale. But can it even “keep tabs on what's happening at a global scale”?

Many Bluesky users’ idea of keeping tabs is fixating on moderating “misinformation.” The app combines the ban-happy liberal hysteria of Reddit with all the showboating of Gab, a censorship-free social media platform whose reputation was impacted by many users living up to the unflattering caricature of the right-wing internet dweller.

Despite the political leanings of most journalists, Bluesky failed to gain the approval of any major news site, including the tech outlets that Bluesky must have assumed would be on its side.

As Wired so harshly put it, “Bluesky’s Future Is Social Media’s Past.” The Wired article criticizes Bluesky for what it lacks: “a harmony of difference.” That’s actually the nice way to say it.

What do you expect from a social media platform designed by bubble boy Big Tech brainiacs, largely composed of dejected Twitter exiles who left the encampment to start their own digital civilization, assuming that Twitter would fall and their new homeland would thrive?

Instead, these expatriates got stuck playing sock puppets with themselves.

Don’t tell Bluesky users, though. They’re raging like the old days on Twitter when they could throw a tantrum and write about it in an article on the same day. For fans of spectacle, you’ll be happy to witness all the stereotypical progressive killjoys as loud and proud as they were in pre-Elon Twitter. For just about everyone else, X.com marks the social media spot.

Meta’s Threads Won’t Revive The Magic Of Social Media

The days when one could exchange ideas with strangers online and get the thrill of new followers, likes, and shares are not returning.