Career feds act like they’re the ones running the country



It shouldn’t have to be said, but here we are: No, it is not normal for federal employees — whether career staff, political appointees, or otherwise — to defy the direction of the president of the United States.

It doesn’t matter which party is in power. It doesn’t matter if you disagree with the president on a certain policy. Short of a murderous dictatorship or truly Constitution-threatening administration (and regardless of what they say on Bluesky, this isn’t that), the powers of the executive branch are vested in a president. All federal employees work for the president and have a duty to the American people to see their will enacted through each new administration.

Those who are fearful of losing their coveted and protected government jobs are gnashing their teeth at the sight of real accountability.

You wouldn’t know it, however, watching the second Trump administration.

Amid the streamlining of the federal government, many federal employees have taken aim at Trump’s policies mandated by the American people. Some may actually be motivated by their understanding of the Constitution or their love of country. But given the years of malfeasance in the Beltway, few deserve the benefit of the doubt.

Most are federal employees looking to save their comfortable jobs and pampered skin. These employees are so entrenched that they believe they are entitled to their jobs on the taxpayers’ dime — with one recently going as far as to claim that the Trump administration shows “disrespect” to federal employees.

Entitlement runs deep

Their resistance goes beyond Trump-era deregulation. Many of these same employees continue to complain about returning to the office after COVID-era stay-at-home orders — something the private sector largely resumed years ago. They claim that going back to their federal workplace is an “arbitrary punishment.”

Worse, the corporate left-wing media is attempting to spin the lack of resources at these bloated offices on the Trump administration, as if the previous president hadn’t allowed wanton remote work.

At the center of this bureaucratic backlash is President Trump’s push to reinstate Schedule F — a policy that would reclassify certain federal employees to make them more accountable to the executive by placing them more directly under the president’s purview.

Naturally, the federal employees ringing alarm bells about this policy are the same ones who want to retain the litany of job protections not afforded to people in the private sector. Redesignating certain staff as Schedule F employees ensures that those working in the government aren’t phoning it in and collecting a paycheck for decades on end.

RELATED: When bureaucrats rule, even red states go woke

cmannphoto via iStock/Getty Images

This isn’t a new problem. Both Trump administrations have faced internal resistance from the civil service. But so did the Biden administration. Though Joe Biden didn’t see nearly as much resistance as Trump, the scenarios were just as egregious.

Arguably the most high-profile issue that spurred federal workers to buck Biden was Israel’s war against the Palestinian terrorist group Hamas after the deadly anti-Semitic attacks in Israel on October 7, 2023. Some federal employees didn’t just protest the Biden administration’s stance on Israel’s war outside the White House; they staged a walkout in support of the war-fighting Islamic terrorists who hate America. A U.S. airman even immolated himself in protest.

These instances underscore a significant problem facing the federal government: federal employees who believe themselves both above the policies of the presidents they serve and more knowledgeable than the American people who decide our leadership.

It doesn’t matter which party or president is in power — those who are fearful of losing their coveted and protected government jobs are gnashing their teeth at the sight of real accountability.

When bureaucrats act like they’re above democratic accountability, they not only weaken presidential authority, but they also jeopardize the nation’s credibility on the world stage. In doing so, they erode the trust Americans place in their government.

While it’s imperative that federal workers speak out in the face of actual constitutional danger from any administration that seeks to upend our nation, the actions undertaken by federal employees in the current and previous administrations severely run the risk of the American people viewing all federal workers as boys and girls who cry wolf.

Perhaps some of these individual revolts are emotional reactions to perceived injustices or policy blunders. It’s tempting to see a pattern in their occurrences and the media lionization of the malcontents. But wisdom says never to attribute to malice what you can to incompetence.

JD Vance joined liberal Twitter knockoff Bluesky. Things went off the rails REALLY fast.



Vice President JD Vance is not exactly a shrinking violet. The Marine veteran who rose from relative poverty to become second in command of the world's greatest nation has a habit of seeking out fruitful confrontation.

At the Munich Security Conference in February, for instance, Vance told European officials to their faces that they were stepping toward tyranny and turning their backs on the values they once shared in common with the United States. Just weeks later, he bashed the U.K.'s censorship regime with leftist British Prime Minister Keir Starmer seated right next to him in the Oval Office.

While he has long participated in fiery exchanges with Democratic lawmakers and other antagonists, both in person and on Elon Musk's X, Vance evidently wanted to bring the conversation to leftists on their own turf.

The vice president created an account Wednesday on the liberal Twitter knockoff Bluesky. Things went off the rails pretty quickly.

Vance kicked off his Bluesky residency by writing, "Hello Bluesky, I've been told this app has become the place to go for common sense political discussion and analysis. So I'm thrilled to be here to engage with all of you."

'I might add that many of those scientists are receiving substantial resources from big pharma to push these medicines on kids.'

Accompanying his initial post was a screenshot of the Supreme Court's majority decision in United States v. Skrmetti, in which the court upheld Tennessee's ban on sex-change genital mutilations and sterilizing puberty blockers for minors — clearly a touchy subject for the Bluesky crowd.

RELATED: Sacrificing body parts and informed consent to the sex-change regime

Photo by Ethan Miller/Getty Images

Vance highlighted a portion of the decision in which Chief Justice John Roberts wrote, "There are several problems with appealing and deferring to the authority of the expert class. First, so-called experts have no license to countermand the 'wisdom, fairness, or logic of legislative choices.'"

Roberts noted further in the excerpt, "Contrary to the representations of the United States and the private plaintiffs, there is no medical consensus on how best to treat gender dysphoria in children. Third, notwithstanding the alleged experts' view that young children can provide informed consent to irreversible sex-transition treatments, whether such consent is possible is a question of medical ethics that States must decide for themselves."

Vance added in a follow-up message, "To that end, I found Justice Thomas's concurrence on medical care for transgender youth quite illuminating. He argues that many of our so-called 'experts' have used bad arguments and substandard science to push experimental therapies on our youth."

"I might add that many of those scientists are receiving substantial resources from big pharma to push these medicines on kids," continued Vance. "What do you think?"

— (@)

Regardless of whether Vance's intention was to troll the netizens of Bluesky, the result was the same.

Apoplectic leftists immediately piled into the comments various smears and accusations. Many threatened to report Vance in hopes of getting him banned for some perceived offense or another.

The attacks were, however, interrupted roughly 12 minutes after Vance's first post when the platform suspended him, according to Axios reporter Marc Caputo.

Leftists looking to vent were confronted with a message that read, "Not found. Account has been suspended."

RELATED: Runaway judges, rogue rulings — and JD Vance is having none of it

Photo by Kayla Bartkowski/Getty Images

Despite the appearance that Vance's account may have been suspended because of his politics or perhaps because he shared a court ruling that struck at the heart of the sex-change regime, Bluesky claimed in a statement obtained by Forbes, "Vice President Vance's account was briefly flagged by our automated systems that try to detect impersonation attempts, which have targeted public figures like him in the past."

"The account was quickly restored and verified so people can easily confirm its authenticity," continued the statement. "We welcome the Vice President to join the conversation on Bluesky."

As of Thursday morning, Vance's initial posts were buried in negative comments, although he had netted over 7,500 followers. According to the user tracker Clearsky, he had been blocked by over 81,000 users at the time of publication.

Blaze News reached out to the vice president's office for comment but did not immediately receive a response.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

SURVEY: 55% Of Self-Identified Leftists Say Killing Trump Is Justifiable

The more troubling trend is the rising violent rhetoric isn’t just coming from the 'fringe' left, it's being 'normalized' by the left.

Journalists Outraged After WaPo Owner Endorses Freedom

Many journalists and other liberal activists freaked out on Wednesday after Jeff Bezos, the Amazon founder and compassionate steward of the failing Washington Post, expressed his support for "personal liberties" and "free markets." The billionaire's remarks came in a bland memo to Post staff announcing changes to the paper's opinion section, as well as the departure of opinion editor David Shipley, who evidently did not share Bezos's view that freedom is good.

The post Journalists Outraged After WaPo Owner Endorses Freedom appeared first on .

UPDATE: Democratic Aide Fired for Backdoor Love Romp in Senate Hearing Room Finds New Role as Bottom-Tier Sex Worker

Aidan Maese-Czeropski, the former legislative aide to Sen. Ben Cardin (D., Md.) who lost his job after filming a backdoor sex romp in a Senate hearing room, has launched a new career as an independent sex worker. Before his retirement this year, Cardin served alongside notorious Democratic pervert Ted Kennedy as well as convicted felon Bob Menendez, also a Democrat.

The post UPDATE: Democratic Aide Fired for Backdoor Love Romp in Senate Hearing Room Finds New Role as Bottom-Tier Sex Worker appeared first on .

'Why the f*** are you laughing?' Piers Morgan unloads on Taylor Lorenz after she expresses 'joy' over CEO's execution



Former Washington Post writer Taylor Lorenz frequently concern-mongers about theoretical harms, such as those supposedly generated by unmasked Americans "raw dogging the air." It appears that Lorenz's compassion runs dry in the face of real harm and tragedy.

After a masked man walked up and fatally shot UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson Wednesday, Lorenz posted on the liberal X knockoff Bluesky an apparent justification for the killing of the father of two. Despite significant backlash, Lorenz then followed up with more controversial commentary, underscoring in a blog post titled "Why 'we' want insurance executives dead" that "it's normal" to wish death on executives in the health insurance sector.

Lorenz — a blogger who has peddled plenty of fake news, doxxed Libs of Tiktok in 2022, and called President Joe Biden a war criminal for supporting Israel's war on Hamas terrorists — doubled down on her comments Monday, telling Piers Morgan of "Piers Morgan Uncensored" that she "felt, along with so many other Americans, joy" upon learning of Thompson's slaying.

"Joy? Seriously?" said Morgan. "Joy at a man's execution?"

'It feels like justice in this system.'

Lorenz suggested that if not joy, then the feeling was "certainly not empathy."

"We're watching the footage. How can this make you joyful? This guy is a husband. He is a father," said Morgan. "And he has been gunned down in the middle of Manhattan."

Lorenz tried justifying her schadenfreude by accusing the deceased of committing mass murder, then broadening her smear by suggesting that tens of thousands of Americans "died because greedy health insurance executives like this one push policies of denying care."

"So should they all be killed, then?" responded Morgan, taking his guest's argument down the rails. "Would that make you even more joyful?"

Laughing, Lorenz said that the extermination of health insurance executives would not make her more joyful. The blogger suggested that the execution of the unarmed executive was, however, useful, stating, "It is a good thing that this murder has led to ... the media elites and politicians in this country paying attention to this issue for the first time."

Toward the end of the segment, Lorenz interrupted to clarify that she was not joyful about the slaughter but "celebratory."

"I take that back. 'Joyful' is the wrong word, Piers," said Lorenz. "Vindicated, celebratory — because it feels like justice in this system when somebody responsible for the deaths of tens of thousands of Americans suffers the same fate as those tens of thousands of Americans who he murdered."

'We should not necessarily go around shooting people in the street.'

Another guest on the show, conservative commentator Tomi Lahren, suggested that to "celebrate the murder of a husband and a father simply because you disagree with his position at a company, or you disagree with the company, or you disagree with the system of health care that we have in the U.S., is, quite frankly, sick, twisted, and disgusting."

"It also goes to show that the left and many on the left have a tendency to believe that violence like this, political violence, is necessary, it's a means to an end," continued Lahren.

A poll conducted by Scott Rasmussen's RMG Research for the Napolitan News Service in September highlighted this politically charged bloodlust on the left.

The survey asked, "While it is always difficult to wish ill of another human being, would America be better off if Donald Trump had been killed last weekend?" While 69% of respondents said no, a staggering 28% of Democrats answered "yes."

Lorenz appeared to chuckle while Lahren spoke, prompting a response from Morgan: "Taylor, I don't mean to be rude, but why the f*** are you laughing all the time? I don't get it. Sorry, apologies for my language, but honestly, I find it unbelievable."

The leftist blogger suggested that she found Lahren's characterization amusing, then noted, "I agree we should not necessarily go around shooting people in the street."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

WATCH: Biden Humiliates Aides and Media Allies With Hunter Pardon

When President Joe Biden and his White House aides repeatedly promised Biden wouldn't pardon his son, their allies in the media didn't push back—they ate it up.

The post WATCH: Biden Humiliates Aides and Media Allies With Hunter Pardon appeared first on .

Want To Exchange Ideas With Annoying Liberals Like Yourself? Here's How To Delete Your X Account and Join Bluesky.

What's happening: Obnoxious liberals (many of them journalists) are performatively fleeing X, the social media app formerly known as Twitter, and signing up for Bluesky, an inferior copycat app that caters almost exclusively to obnoxious liberals who think it's absurd to suggest that people like them exist in a bubble and are hopelessly out of touch with normal Americans.

The post Want To Exchange Ideas With Annoying Liberals Like Yourself? Here's How To Delete Your X Account and Join Bluesky. appeared first on .

Liberals started a woke Twitter rival, and it's going down in flames



Our ancestors dressed up and attended public hangings. We can achieve the same thing by logging into Bluesky, the floundering social media platform that was supposed to embarrass Twitter.

The app’s elevator pitch reminds me of a recurring twist throughout Mike Judge’s HBO series "Silicon Valley," where nerds who fawn over the newest tech can’t understand why the rest of the world doesn’t get it.

Bluesky began as a pet project of some of the higher-ups at Twitter.

What do you expect from a social media platform designed by bubble boy Big Tech brainiacs, largely composed of dejected Twitter exiles who left the encampment to start their own digital civilization?

Twitter co-founder Jack Dorsey was the first to mention it publicly in 2019. From the start, it seemed as though his vision was somehow corrective, as if he had given up on Twitter’s enormously opaque machinations.

Dorsey’s goal seemed laudable enough: He wanted to create a decentralized microblogging social media platform. This would allow the user base to shape and adjust the algorithm. Unfortunately for Bluesky’s would-be sizzle hype, Mastodon has used this model for nearly a decade.

Dorsey was joined by Twitter's then-CTO, Parag Agrawal, who was pivotal in placing Lantian “Jay” Graber in Bluesky’s CEO chair.

The 32-year-old Graber was working on a platform called the Happening, a decentralized social network similar to Bluesky, when she was called to action. “Bluesky” is actually named after her, Lantian, the Mandarin word for “blue sky,” a name chosen by Graber’s mother as a way to inspire her to greatness.

Founded in 2021, Bluesky went from Jack Dorsey’s daydream to a platform of its own, and until six months ago, it was invite only.

For this reason, estimates for early user-base size are usually untrustworthy, if not objectionable. Today, the estimates range from 500,000 to six million, although that upper figure seems cartoonishly high.

Not long after Bluesky’s founding, in February of 2022, Trump launched Truth Social, which has since accrued somewhere between 600,000 and two million users, with an estimated 12% of “all U.S. social media users having used or visited the Truth Social platform.”

Then, in October 2022, Elon Musk finally bought Twitter, which now, as X, boasts an estimated 650 million users.

Claims that Bluesky would become Twitter’s rival were overblown on arrival. But Bluesky’s failures since have transcended the membership count.

Mastodon, the original safe space for whiny journalists escaping Elon, has a lower user base yet a much stronger reputation. Like Bluesky, Mastodon offers a decentralized approach to social media networking. But Mastodon came first — by far — and it did it better.

SOPA Images/Getty

Even still, its baggy slogan hints at its weakness: “Social media used to be fun. Be your unique self and create with your friends, all while keeping tabs on what's happening at a global scale.”

It certainly cannot perform on a global scale. But can it even “keep tabs on what's happening at a global scale”?

Many Bluesky users’ idea of keeping tabs is fixating on moderating “misinformation.” The app combines the ban-happy liberal hysteria of Reddit with all the showboating of Gab, a censorship-free social media platform whose reputation was impacted by many users living up to the unflattering caricature of the right-wing internet dweller.

Despite the political leanings of most journalists, Bluesky failed to gain the approval of any major news site, including the tech outlets that Bluesky must have assumed would be on its side.

As Wired so harshly put it, “Bluesky’s Future Is Social Media’s Past.” The Wired article criticizes Bluesky for what it lacks: “a harmony of difference.” That’s actually the nice way to say it.

What do you expect from a social media platform designed by bubble boy Big Tech brainiacs, largely composed of dejected Twitter exiles who left the encampment to start their own digital civilization, assuming that Twitter would fall and their new homeland would thrive?

Instead, these expatriates got stuck playing sock puppets with themselves.

Don’t tell Bluesky users, though. They’re raging like the old days on Twitter when they could throw a tantrum and write about it in an article on the same day. For fans of spectacle, you’ll be happy to witness all the stereotypical progressive killjoys as loud and proud as they were in pre-Elon Twitter. For just about everyone else, X.com marks the social media spot.