'Terrible reporter': Trump eviscerates 'fake' news ABC — calls for FCC to consider yanking license



President Donald Trump called on Federal Communications Commission Chairman Brendan Carr to investigate ABC News and consider pulling its license for its “fake” reporting.

'I think the license should be taken away from ABC because your news is so fake and it’s so wrong.'

During Trump’s bilateral meeting with the crown prince of Saudi Arabia, an ABC News reporter pressed the president about the delayed release of files related to Jeffrey Epstein.

“Why wait for Congress to release the Epstein files? Why not just do it now?” the ABC reporter asked.

“It’s not the question that I mind; it’s your attitude,” Trump replied.

“It’s the way you ask these questions. You start off with a man who’s highly respected, asking him a horrible, insubordinate, and just a terrible question. You could even ask that same exact question nicely.”

“You’re a terrible person and a terrible reporter,” the president remarked.

Trump reiterated that he had “nothing to do with Jeffrey Epstein,” adding, “I threw him out of my club many years ago because I thought he was a sick pervert.”

RELATED: With Trump's blessing, House approves resolution to release the Epstein files: 'We have nothing to hide'

President Donald Trump, Crown Prince and Prime Minister Mohammed bin Salman of Saudi Arabia. Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images

He slammed the legacy media outlet for ignoring the relationships liberal political figures had with the sex predator.

“All these guys were friends of his. You don’t even talk about those people,” Trump said.

“I just got a little report, and I put it in my pocket, of all the money [Epstein has] given to Democrats. He gave me none. Zero.”

He called ABC a “crappy company.”

RELATED: Epstein emails SHAME Obama/Clinton ally: Larry Summers quits public life amid calls for Harvard to cut ties

Photo by Spencer Platt/Getty Images

“I think the license should be taken away from ABC because your news is so fake and it’s so wrong,” Trump declared, presumably referring to the news outlet’s broadcasting license obtained through the Federal Communications Commission.

“We have a great … chairman, who should look at that,” he added.

“I think when you come in and when you’re 97% negative to Trump and then Trump wins the election in a landslide, that means obviously your news is not credible and you’re not credible as a reporter.”

Trump told the ABC News reporter that she could not ask any more questions during the bilateral meeting.

ABC and the FCC did not respond to a request for comment.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Trucks destroy roads, but railroads — yes, rail! — can save taxpayers billions



Anyone who drives America’s highways knows the story: potholes, cracked pavement, and endless construction zones. States pour billions of tax dollars into road maintenance every year, yet the pavement always seems to crumble faster than it can be repaired. What most motorists don’t realize is that heavy trucks cause much of the damage — and pay almost nothing to fix it.

Federal estimates show that a single fully loaded 18-wheeler can inflict as much pavement damage as nearly 10,000 passenger cars. Fuel taxes and highway user fees from trucking companies cover only a small fraction of the destruction they cause. Taxpayers pick up the rest, footing the bill for constant repaving, bridge work, and the cycle of crumbling roads.

Every additional ton of freight shifted to rail represents pavement preserved and taxpayer dollars saved.

Trucking keeps the economy moving, and freight rail, shipping, and trucking together form the backbone of America’s supply chain. But shifting more freight to rail makes sense. The rail network is self-maintained by the companies that use it, and trains move goods more safely and efficiently than trucks. The more freight we move by rail, the less damage we’ll have to repair on the nation’s roads.

A merger serving Americans

The recently proposed merger of Union Pacific and Norfolk Southern offers an opportunity to improve both our roads and our supply chains simultaneously. By creating a more efficient coast-to-coast rail network, the merger would allow railroads to capture more freight that currently travels by truck — relieving taxpayers of billions of dollars in hidden subsidies for road repair.

Merging Union Pacific’s vast western network with Norfolk Southern’s eastern lines would create the nation’s first true transcontinental railroad — from the Pacific to the Atlantic. For shippers, that means single-line pricing instead of juggling multiple operators to move goods from point A to point B.

It also means faster delivery, fewer interchanges, and lower costs.

Railroads, unlike trucking companies, build and maintain their own infrastructure. Every mile of track, every bridge, and every switching yard comes from private capital, not public funds.

When freight moves from trucks to trains, taxpayers win twice: less highway damage to repair and more freight handled by a system that pays its own way.

The savings aren’t theoretical. Heavy trucks cause roughly 40% of the wear on America’s roads while accounting for only about 10% of total miles driven.

A North Carolina Department of Transportation study found that trucks with four or more axles underpay for road damage by anywhere from 37% to 92%. State budgets from Texas to Pennsylvania tell the same story: Highway repair costs soar while trucking fees barely make a dent.

Every ton of freight shifted to rail means less pavement destroyed and more tax dollars saved.

False cries of monopoly

Naturally, critics of the merger will cry “monopoly,” as they always do when industries consolidate. But that misses the real competitive landscape. In addition to competing with other railroads, rail competes vigorously with trucks, which dominate American freight today.

Trucks control roughly 70% of domestic freight volume — subsidized in part by taxpayer-funded roads. Allowing railroads to offer a stronger alternative isn’t anti-competitive — on the contrary, it’s pro-market. It creates stronger competition for taxpayer-subsidized trucking.

RELATED: DOT withholds $40M from blue state for flouting English requirements for truckers

Photo by Eric Lee/Bloomberg via Getty Images

At its heart, this merger is a test of whether the Trump administration trusts the free market to deliver solutions. Union Pacific and Norfolk Southern are not asking taxpayers to fund their merger. They are not asking for subsidies, grants, or carve-outs. They are investing their own capital to create a system that reduces public costs, strengthens supply chains, and keeps America competitive.

If policymakers are serious about preserving America’s battered roads, as well as strengthening our supply chain infrastructure, the choice is obvious. Let the free market work, and let railroads take more freight off the highways.

Pot, Meet Kettle: Dan Rather, Fired for Peddling Fake Bush Documents, Describes 'Dark Day' As CBS Hires Bari Weiss

Former CBS News anchor Dan Rather, who was fired in 2006 for peddling fake documents about then-President George W. Bush, on Thursday condemned the network’s hiring of Free Press founder Bari Weiss and its parent company Paramount’s merger with Skydance. Paramount’s decision to appoint Weiss as CBS editor in chief, and to merge with Skydance, […]

The post Pot, Meet Kettle: Dan Rather, Fired for Peddling Fake Bush Documents, Describes 'Dark Day' As CBS Hires Bari Weiss appeared first on .

Woke CEOs mocked conservatives. Now the joke’s on them.



Corporate America is bending to conservatives’ market influence. Not out of sudden ideological sympathy, but because conservatives have more economic power than the left — and they’ve stopped pretending not to notice.

For years, corporations ignored conservative concerns. Worse, they often went out of their way to antagonize them, stripping away team mascots like the Redskins and Indians, embracing diversity quotas, and saturating entertainment with left-wing tropes. The squeaky wheel got the grease, and the left made all the noise.

Free markets punish bad bets more effectively than Washington ever could. Let them.

Conservatives, meanwhile, were taken for granted. Corporate leaders assumed they would keep buying no matter how many insults were thrown their way. For a long time, they were right.

That ended when conservatives started fighting back. Bud Light’s Dylan Mulvaney stunt turned into a disaster. Victoria’s Secret collapsed under its “new image” campaign. Cracker Barrel’s woke makeover backfired so badly its chairs stopped rocking. And when employees mocked Charlie Kirk’s assassination, corporations finally began to realize that “the customer is always right” still applies.

Numbers don’t lie

Corporations aren’t embracing conservatives because they’ve had a change of heart. They’re doing it because they need to survive.

The 2024 election was a wake-up call: Conservative voters outnumbered liberals 35% to 23%. Add moderates, and non-liberals outnumbered liberals more than three to one.

Conservatives overwhelmingly vote Republican. Ninety percent cast ballots for Trump. Pew data shows a majority of middle- and upper-middle-income Americans lean Republican — and 51% of Americans identify as middle class. That’s a lot of disposable income.

Family size makes the math even stronger. The Institute for Family Studies reports that counties where Trump won big also have higher birth rates: 1.76 compared to the national average of 1.63. Harris counties, by contrast, averaged just 1.37. Republicans also want bigger families: half want three or more kids, compared to only 31% of Democrats.

Bigger families and higher incomes mean bigger market clout. And the left’s most extreme advocates — the loudest drivers of corporate wokeness — are a small minority inside an already shrinking ideological bloc.

Why the shift happened

So why did corporations bow to the left for so long? Two reasons.

First, executives themselves lean left. Pew Research found upper-income Americans tilt Democrat, and CEOs have marched steadily leftward over the last two decades. Second, conservatives tolerated it. They didn’t punish woke messaging, making it appear costless for companies to indulge their leadership’s politics.

That illusion is gone. Conservative consumers are awake. And companies are finally capitulating to reality.

RELATED: The right message: Justice. The wrong messenger: Pam Bondi.

Photo by Andrew Harnik/Getty Images

Don’t let government ruin it

This is why Republicans should resist the urge to meddle. FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr made a mistake threatening ABC over Jimmy Kimmel. “We can do this the easy way or the hard way”? Let’s not.

That kind of government action obscures the real shift — a market correction, not a political one.

Markets speak louder than regulators. If conservatives let economics do the work, corporations will continue adjusting out of necessity. But if government steps in, companies will chalk the change up to political coercion, not consumer demand, and drift back toward the left as soon as administrations change.

Already the left is trying to spin it that way, casting Jimmy Kimmel as a martyr for “free expression” instead of what he is: a bad business decision. The left wants companies to believe government, not consumers, forced the pivot.

Conservatives know better. Free markets punish bad bets more effectively than Washington. Let them.

Megyn Kelly reminds America: Jimmy Kimmel wore blackface — yet she was the one canceled



Jimmy Kimmel’s brief suspension from ABC for his vile comments regarding Charlie Kirk after his passing began a free-speech discussion on the left — but Megyn Kelly isn’t buying it.

“I think I’m in the minority, but I’m totally in favor of what Brendan Carr did last week. 100% in favor,” Kelly tells Blaze Media co-founder Glenn Beck on “The Glenn Beck Program.”

“They have to feel our pain. Why, whenever we’re in control, do we take the high ground only to get beaten to a pulp again once they’re back in control, and we continue to say, ‘Oh, these are our principles. We’re going to live them in order to make clear to everybody we really hold them,’” Kelly explains.

“And then they just get used against us,” she adds.


Now, people on the left are losing their minds over censorship, big government, and free speech.

“You and I haven’t moved at all on our principles,” she tells Glenn. “We hate lawfare. We hate government censorship. We don’t believe hate speech is problematic. It’s perfectly legal. It’s constitutional. It’s kind of why the First Amendment was invented.”

“However, it’s the left that’s drifted from those principles, not us. And now the question is, how do we wrestle the country back to stasis — back to the old stasis prior to the left losing its mind? And I am really just firmly of the belief now that they must be brought to heel. Again, not with physical violence, but with the same tactics in terms of policy and approach in governing that they use against us,” she explains.

And while Kimmel wasn’t even fired, she can’t think of anyone who deserved the warning more.

“Those tears out on that stage were for him. What a joke. That crying, whiny baby. He has celebrated everyone on the right’s cancellation. He danced on our professional graves, and he has the nerve to want us to feel sorry for him because he had a five-day paid vacation,” Kelly says.

“When I got canceled at NBC for literally asking a question about blackface Halloween costumes ... and why, when I grew up in the 70s and 80s, you could wear those like if you wanted to honor Diana Ross or Michael Jordan and not get canceled, but clearly in, you know, the 2000s, things had changed. And that was my question,” she explains.

“It got me canceled at NBC. Did Jimmy Kimmel at the time come out and say, ‘You know what? This is BS. I’ve got to admit, I wore blackface many times.’ Jimmy did, not me. ‘That I’ve worn it repeatedly as Karl Malone. I wore it as Oprah in a fat suit,’” she continues, noting that Kimmel was openly “mocking black people.”

“He didn’t say a word. He let me twist in the wind. ... Why should any of us feel sorry for him? He’s totally pro the cancellation of anybody whose politics he doesn’t share,” she says, adding, “so I’m thrilled he felt some pain last week.”

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis, and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Here’s Proof Democrats Are Lying About Protecting Jimmy Kimmel Over ‘Free Speech’

Democrats have exactly zero credibility to stand on when attacking Chairman Carr for supposedly politicizing the FCC.

Kimmel Backers Accusing FCC Of ‘Authoritarianism’ Silent On Democrats’ Threats Against Carr, Broadcasters

Private TV station owners are not obligated under federal law to publicize certain content. Democrats accused them of quid pro quo anyway.

Smug Jimmy Kimmel Returns To Late Night More Insufferable Than Ever

Meanwhile, a new poll shows a majority of voters believe it's appropriate to fire employees who celebrate Charlie Kirk's murder online.

66 ABC Affiliates Won’t Air Jimmy Kimmel After Nexstar Holds Firm

Nexstar, the owner of numerous local ABC affiliate stations, is holding firm on its pledge not to show Jimmy Kimmel’s late night show after the host lied about Charlie Kirk’s assassin. Nexstar’s announcement comes one day after Sinclair, another owner of local affiliates, made the same move, bringing the total number of affiliates that will […]

Jimmy Kimmel’s Defenders Are Gaslighting Americans On Free Speech

Kimmel’s nightly bacchanal of leftist politics puts Disney, ABC and its affiliates in regulatory peril under long-standing broadcast laws.