‘The cheat factor’: Don’t ignore Bret Weinstein’s election warning to Joe Rogan



There’s no doubt Donald Trump is a popular candidate among patriotic Americans — but is he popular enough to win the election?

In a clip on “The Joe Rogan Experience,” Rogan asked Bret Weinstein this question, and Weinstein’s answer came in the form of a warning.

“Let’s imagine it is dirty, and you really can manipulate elections,” Rogan says to Weinstein. “How much can you manipulate it by? Can you manipulate it by 30%?”

“To your point about how much can they cheat? I call that factor, which none of us can put a number on,” Weinstein answers, “I call it the cheat factor.”

“One of the things that I’m trying to convince people of is that it’s not hopeless because they can cheat, but it means that you have to succeed at a level that exceeds their capacity to erase it,” he continues.

“Like, maybe they can cheat by 10%,” Rogan responds.

“Right. And what we know, and I think actually we owe Trump a huge debt of gratitude for proving something that I couldn’t have told you if it was true because he won the presidency, which is, is there still enough democracy left in the system for something to upend the plan,” Weinstein explains.

Vivek Ramaswamy agrees with Weinstein and tells Dave Rubin of “The Rubin Report” that “we need a landslide” in order to win the election in the face of potential cheating.

“We are skating on thin ice. I think that 50.1 is not a sufficient margin, but even for the purpose of governing, I think we’re going to need to do a lot better than that in order to really have decisive change in this country,” he adds.


Want more from Dave Rubin?

To enjoy more honest conversations, free speech, and big ideas with Dave Rubin, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Dr. Jay Bhattacharya names the single biggest mistake of the COVID pandemic



Dr. Jay Bhattacharya joins Dave Rubin on “The Rubin Report” to discuss what he believes the gravest mistake of the COVID pandemic was.

And it has nothing to do with masks, vaccines, or quarantine policies.

Dr. Bhattacharya, a Stanford professor of medicine, economics, and health research policy, agrees with Rubin that a huge problem during COVID was “the censorship machine that was silencing ... virtually anyone that was outside mainstream groupthink.”

“I think the centrally important issue that caused the problems is that we silenced people ... qualified people — from expressing their thinking, and as a result, the decision-making at the top of the country was absolutely abysmal,” he explains.

“Science doesn’t work unless you have freedom,” he continues. “Science can only happen and can only occur when there isn’t that censorship because ... the powerful people [who] control the sensor — control what you can or can’t say — and it doesn’t matter if they’re right or wrong; it just matters that they’re powerful. Science needs to have David and Goliath stories.”

The field of science, he explains, “needs to have people at the top being overthrown in their ideas by the young Turk ... the mathematician, who’s like, ‘No, ... you’re wrong,’ and then [they’re] wrong because that’s what the evidence says.”

But “you can’t have that unless you have free speech,” Dr. Bhattacharya laments.

Bret Weinstein, evolutionary biologist and theorist, agrees with Dr. Bhattacharya but thinks the road to free speech in the world of science is much easier talked about than walked. Watch their discussion here:


Want more from Dave Rubin?

To enjoy more honest conversations, free speech, and big ideas with Dave Rubin, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Mourning Betty White In A High Tech World

White is a symbol of everything we're losing, from popular sitcoms to water cooler conversations to the shared experiences those reinforced.

Bret Weinstein is being censored by big tech — CancelThis

His take on the current political climate and upcoming election is deeply valuable and scientific.