How to block distractions on your phone



Smartphones have often been called the new cigarettes due to their addictive nature. Yet smartphones aren’t as easy to restrict as cigarettes (nor half as cool). They’re jam-packed with distractions like games and social media, but they’re also darn useful. Many of us rely on our smartphones to look up important (and not-so-important) information, contact friends, find directions, take photos, and even pay for goods and services. How do we balance the benefits of smartphones and the demonic distractions that fill our heads with nonsense and steal time away from those around us?

The market has responded with a slew of solutions.Some products like the Light Phone aim to replicate the best parts of a smartphone while discarding the distractions. Some even try going back to flip phones. Many of my friends have tried things like this, but they never seem to stick. Smartphone ecosystems are chock-full of useful tools that these products can’t hope to imitate, and many of them are also great cameras. I have many lovely photos of my kids that I wouldn’t otherwise have if not for my iPhone.

Apple and Google have introduced their own solutions. Apple’s answer is called Screen Time, but it’s a feature designed to look good on paper and not work in reality. If you set a daily limit on an app like Facebook, bypassing it is as easy as tapping Ignore Limit. Whatever intentions Apple may have, the company is incentivized to have you using your iPhone as much as possible.

Screenshot

One startup hopes to improve upon Apple’s foundation by creating self-imposed screen restrictions that aren’t so easy to ignore: Brick. Brick is both a hardware and software product:

  • The Brick app ties into Apple’s Screen Time feature to lock you out of distracting apps.
  • The Brick, well, brick, which is a $49 hardware device you use to “brick” and “unbrick” your iPhone.

The app is free, subsidized by purchasing the required Brick hardware. The device itself is incredibly simple. It’s a small 3D-printed box with an NFC tag and a magnet inside — the magnet is there so you can stick the Brick to your fridge.

Josh Centers

When you want to lock out distracting apps, you open the Brick app, tap the Brick button, and then place the tip of the iPhone against the Brick. Likewise, you repeat the process when you want to unbrick your iPhone.

You can bypass this lockout without the Brick hardware, but there’s a catch: It uses one of your five emergency unbricks. And the app is clever enough to detect if you did something like turn off Screen Time to bypass Brick, and it counts against your emergency unbricks.

I asked the company what happens when you run out of emergency unbricks: You can delete the Brick app entirely. Unless, that is, you put the Brick app into Strict Mode, which removes all of the workarounds. In that case, you can either contact Brick for help or buy another Brick device to unlock your iPhone. TJ at Brick said that they’ll probably offer additional emergency unlocks as an in-app purchase in the future.

You can use the same Brick for every iPhone in your home. In fact, the company says that all Bricks are interchangeable, so you could brick your iPhone at home and then unbrick it at a friend’s house.

I’ve been testing the Brick for a few weeks, and it’s quite effective. I can brick my iPhone before going to bed and lock myself out of my usual doom-scrolling apps like Facebook and X. I can no longer mindlessly scroll through these apps in bed unless I get up, walk downstairs, go to the fridge, and unbrick my iPhone, which usually isn’t worth the trouble, so I end up doing something more constructive like reading from my Bible app.

However, the Brick has some catches and downsides to be aware of.

Setup is a pain

To set up the Brick, you select 50 apps, and those apps can either be the only apps you can use while your iPhone is bricked (allow list), or the only apps not allowed when your iPhone is bricked (block list). You can create multiple app lists, but the allow/block list distinction applies to all of them, though you can change whether you’re allowing or blocking apps in your list at any time.

screenshot

The block list option is okay if you want to block a handful of particularly distracting apps. The other upside of the block list option is you can also block out websites, which is something you can’t do if you choose an allow list.

However, if you truly want to turn your iPhone into a semi-dumb “brick,” the allow list is the only way to go. But then the problem is figuring out exactly which 50 apps you need, which is a process of trial and error. I couldn’t tell you how many times I bricked my phone only to realize I needed an important app, like a banking app, and had to go unbrick my iPhone so I could add it to my app list.

Eventually, I think I got this figured out, but then the other problem is that distracting websites are still a problem.

Blocking Safari isn’t easy

You can’t block websites when using the allow list option, and even worse, you can’t add Safari to your list of apps because of Apple’s restrictions. Many social networks have pretty rich mobile web apps these days, like X, so they’re every bit as addicting in Safari as they are in their native apps. This is another example of how Apple’s Screen Time almost seems designed to be ineffective.

Thankfully, the Brick developers offer a workaround to block Safari, but it’s a bit thorny: You have to use the built-in Shortcuts app to add automation that detects when your iPhone is bricked, then sends you to the Brick app when you open Safari.

Unfortunately, this is probably intimidating to the less technical. And there’s another problem: What if you actually need a web browser to look something up?

I found a good solution for that: I simply use the Google and Perplexity apps to look up random things. Their in-app browsers aren’t suited to web apps, so it gives me access to instant knowledge while preventing me from getting sucked into online drama.

You actually have to remember to use it

Other than Apple’s own limitations, the drawback of the Brick is you. You actually have to remember to brick your iPhone, and that can be difficult. It’s not intuitive to purposelly cripple a device for which you spent hundreds or even thousands of dollars. And these social media apps, games, and other distractions are fun and enjoyable, which is why we can’t escape them.

The Brick is trying to do something very difficult: overcome our own lack of discipline. If we had better control of ourselves, such a device wouldn’t be necessary, or we could at least use Apple’s Screen Time to keep tabs on how much time we’re spending with screens.

The Brick certainly makes things easier — at least after the initial setup. But ultimately, the flaw is us and our passions, which are preyed upon by tech companies with teams of psychologists tasked with making their apps as addictive as possible.

Devices like the Brick give support where we’re weak, and I applaud the team behind that, but it’s ultimately a crutch. Crutches are helpful, but you’re not meant to fumble around on them forever. Rather, they’re a tool to help a broken part heal. At best, perhaps the Brick can be your crutch to help relieve the burden of your own passions until you’re strong enough to walk on your own.

Somali activist raised over $42,000 claiming she fell victim to a brick attack. Surveillance footage says otherwise.



Roda Osman, a 33-year-old Somali activist, claimed in a viral video in September that she had been viciously assaulted with a brick by a man whose advances she shot down. Osman claimed further that the assault went unanswered before a crowd of black men who all supposedly watched the incident unfold with total indifference.

On the basis of her claims of victimhood and trauma, Osman ended up raising over $42,000 on GoFundMe.

While the Washington Post's Karen Attiah, the Root's Candace McDuffie, and other leftists bought into Osman's claims hook, line, and sinker, many critics figured there was more to the story than the activist initially let on.

The skeptics appear to have been vindicated by surveillance footage revealing Osman's claims to be likely untrue. Osman has, in turn, been slapped with charges of felony theft by deception. She has yet to be located and arrested.

The incident, according to Osman

Osman posted a video to social media in September, which has since been reshared by the Shade Room and other accounts, wherein she claimed a man smashed her face with a brick in Houston, Texas, after she refused to give him her phone number.

Osman says in the video, "Yo, this man just hit me in my face with a brick and all these black men just watched and they don't give a f***."

The supposed victim berated men nearby, screaming, "Why don't you be a man?"

KPRC-TV reported that Houston police officers responded to the scene of an aggravated assault incident on Sept. 3 and met with Osman and her female friend. Officers indicated in their report that Osman was drunk and hostile during the encounter.

Osman, whose Instagram account is littered with anti-white racism and twerking videos, reportedly told police that she was walking on Schumacher Lane when a stranger whose advances she rejected threw a brick at her.

According to the charging document obtained by the Daily Beast, Osman specified that the suspect was an Uber driver whom she initially had summoned. Osman reportedly went so far as to suggest the Uber driver tried to kidnap her, was involved in human trafficking, and had a car full of women.

A profitable tale

The next day, a GoFundMe campaign with a $25,000 goal appeared called, "Help Roda Recover." Osman was listed as the beneficiary.

"Because of this vicious attack she will have to manage hospital bills, therapy, and time away from work, school and childcare while she heals mentally and physically. Unfortunately, no one stepped in to help her that night - it would mean so much if we could step up and help her as she heals," said the campaign, allegedly created by a friend of Osman named Kiara Davis.

Thousands of donations quickly began pouring in. As of Oct. 25, 2023, the campaign had raised over $42,300.

In addition to sympathetic donors, various leftists and liberal publications took Osman at her word.

The Root, among them, reported Osman "could have been killed — her injuries are unbelievably horrific — and the moment that she needed to be safeguarded the most is when she was left to fend for herself."

Not everyone bought the story, however.

Some critics dredged up various social media posts and videos Oman had previously shared, which they believed undermined her credibility — including a video where she appears to slap a stranger in the face, then proceed to dance provocatively.

Additionally, the Harris County District Attorney's Office indicated she might have previously perpetrated another assault hoax in Minneapolis for which she fundraised nearly $5,000 on GoFundMe.

In the face of mounting skepticism, Osman told NBC News, "First they're like, where's the police report?' You don't have a police report.' I show the police report. Then they're like, 'Oh, it's a fake police report.'"

"Then they're like 'Show us the hospital records. You don't have hospital records.' I show them the hospital records. 'It's fake hospital records,'" continued Osman. "The goal posts will never be met."

Uju Anya, an associate professor of second language acquisition at Carnegie Mellon University, suggested that Osman's critics were "Black men literally using white supremacist tactics to discredit and dehumanize a Black woman."

Footage and charges

When detectives finally got in touch with Osman on Sept. 19, she reportedly stuck to the broad outlines of her initial narrative, alleging she got into a car she had mistaken for an Uber and was assaulted by a man named Olan Douglas.

Over the course of the interview, Osman made changes to her story, including the location where the supposed assault occurred. When her narrative began to crumble, KPRC reported Osman became upset, demanded to speak to the detective's supervisor, then hung up.

Houston detectives ultimately got their hands on surveillance footage in the area where the assault supposedly occurred.

Detectives indicated they observed Osman, her friend, and Olan Douglas chatting and walking toward TikTalk Garden Lounge, then go into the club together in the footage. After 20 minutes, they reportedly emerged from the club, then traipsed toward a white Maserati parked nearby.

Surveillance footage allegedly shows Osman dance on her supposed attacker while her friend was in the front of the vehicle with another man. After Osman concluded her dance, surveillance footage reportedly showed the remainder of the foursome get into the Maserati, with Douglas and Osman in the back seat.

The charging document indicates that minutes later, Douglas, Osman, and her friend exited the vehicle, at which time Douglas and Osman allegedly got into a spat.

A detective told NBC News that Osman can be seen slapping the man whom she had danced on. In response, he allegedly smacked Osman with a hand gripping a plastic water bottle. Douglas then reportedly departed in an Audi A3 that had pulled up, while Osman seated herself in the front passenger seat of the Maserati.

Keith Houston of the Harris County District Attorney's Office told KPRC the water bottle is likely "what left the mark on her, on her face. But it was mutual combat."

While KPRC indicated Osman has yet to respond to an request for comment, she noted in an Instagram story Wednesday, "I actually have things going on in my life. I actually have real ways to make money. I don't have to get a GoFundMe for money. I actually can earn income because I'm actually educated and I actually am talented."

Osman is wanted for theft in Harris County.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Biden used 'cheat sheet' during first press conference; Fox News host Chris Wallace knocks president for 'reading talking points'



After 65 days in office to prepare for his first press conference, President Joe Biden relied heavily on notes for certain questions from the media. The 78-year-old Democratic president also had a cheat sheet with photos of White House reporters, which he seemingly used to determine which reporters he would call on during Thursday's news conference.

The cheat sheet in question had the faces and names of White House reporters, as well as what news outlets they represented. The guide was organized to show where the reporters were sitting during the press conference. The reporters had numbers next to their faces, which many speculate apply to which reporters Biden was instructed to take questions from and in what order to take them.

Higher resolution #Scripted #CheatSheet https://t.co/poawebY9se
— Brick Suit (@Brick Suit)1616712268.0

On March 16, Newsmax host Greg Kelly revealed that the White House press office asked that reporters submit their questions for Biden's first press conference. According to Kelly, White House press secretary Jen Psaki "will get back to you about whether or not your [question] was approved."

MEMO FROM THE WHITE HOUSE PRESS OFFICE: please submit to us your questions for @joebiden's first press conference… https://t.co/L5XaJTsZ1U
— Greg Kelly (@Greg Kelly)1615936223.0

Philip Melanchthon, White House reporter for Real Clear News, said, "Biden appears to be calling on reporters from a prepared list."

Of the 25 reporters in attendance, Biden called on reporters from the Associated Press, PBS, Washington Post, ABC News, NBC News, CBS News, CNN, Bloomberg News, and Univision. PBS White House reporter Yamiche Alcindor was criticized heavily for her softball question prefaced with the sentiment that the border crisis may have been created because Biden has the perception of being a "moral, decent man."

Biden did not take a question from Fox News White House reporter Peter Doocy or any conservative-leaning outlet. Doocy said he had a "binder full of questions" for President Biden, including how he plans to transform the economy to be more green and where COVID-19 originated from.

Fox News' Peter Doocy shares his binder of questions and research that he planned to refer to when questioning Joe… https://t.co/qGk7NvkC7l
— TV News HQ (@TV News HQ)1616706779.0

Biden was asked about North Korea testing ballistic missiles, and he appeared to read a prepared response word for word.

Biden said that North Korea's tests violated U.N. Resolution 1718 and that the U.S. is talking with allies and part… https://t.co/eIDhrvLKnb
— POLITICO (@POLITICO)1616699712.0

Fox News host Chris Wallace said he was "struck" that when asked questions about foreign policy, Biden "went to his briefing book like Jen Psaki does sometimes in the briefings and was reading obviously White House guidance, White House talking points."

"Covering Ronald Reagan for six years, I never saw that," Wallace said. "Watching a lot of news conferences over the years, I've never seen that — a president in a news conference reading talking points. He did that on, it seemed, every foreign policy question."

Fox News' Chris Wallace: "I was also struck by the fact that it seemed on every foreign policy question... [Joe Bid… https://t.co/w1PxL3d7DL
— Steve Guest (@Steve Guest)1616698982.0