Juan Williams tries to blame Kamala loss on racism, sexism — then entire Fox News panel silences his narrative



As it became clear Donald Trump would become the next president, Democrat Juan Williams tried to blame Kamala Harris' humiliating loss on sexism and racism.

But his fellow Fox News panelists refused to let that excuse slide.

'To suggest that somehow black men are racist because they supported a white man is just too far.'

After first accusing Trump of having "led an insurrection against the United States government" — a crime for which Trump has never been charged — Williams doubled down on the media's most trite narrative to explain away Harris' loss.

"I'm not sold on this idea that it was the cost of eggs," Williams said. "I worry that it was, 'Well, I'm not voting for this woman.' Or, 'I'm not voting for this black woman.'"

Fox News anchor Bret Baier immediately fact-checked Williams.

"Well, no, that's not what we see in our data," he pointed out.

When Williams tried defending his position, anchor Martha MacCallum interjected to point out that many black male voters feel "that Democrats and elites put immigrants before" them. Undeterred, Williams responded by attributing Trump's win to a "bro strategy and the white male turnout and white grievance politics."

"He's trailing among his prior 2020 numbers with whites," Brit Hume shot back, putting a dagger in Williams' narrative.

Former House Speaker Kevin McCarthy then noted that Trump increased his share of support among black men and Hispanics, more evidence disproving Williams' narrative that Harris is a victim of political racism.

Finally, Karl Rove prescribed Williams a dose of reality.

"I just think it is extremely odd to suggest that black men are somehow prejudiced because they vote for a white candidate who says, 'I want to make certain that everybody has an opportunity to succeed in our great economy. I want you to be more prosperous, and I will do things that will make it possible for you to make a better life,'" Rove said.

"That is an appeal to their best instincts," he explained. "He did not go out and say, 'Vote for me because I'm not a woman. Vote for me because I'm a white man.' That would not have attracted those votes. They got attracted to him because they thought he was a strong, effective leader, and they thought he would do something about the issues they cared the most about, which is an economy in which they think they get the short stick, inflation, which has decimated their purchasing power, and illegal immigration, which has affected their communities deeply."

"And to suggest that somehow black men are racist because they supported a white man is just too far, Juan," Rove chided.

Unfortunately, Williams refused to budge. In the end, he claimed that men supported Trump because he talks about "women in the most disparaging way."

"I think they supported him in spite of that — not because of it. They supported him because he offered to make their life better," Rove fact-checked.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Brit Hume delivers scorching rebuke of Jan. 6 committee, says he's never seen anything like this in his 50 years covering DC



Brit Hume delivered a scathing rebuke of the January 6 committee this week. The Fox News senior political analyst noted that in 50 years of covering Washington, D.C. politics, he's "never seen a committee all of whose members were chosen by one party."

Hume was responding to a tweet by Washington Examiner chief political correspondent Byron York.

"There's a long tradition of adversarial process in congressional hearings/investigations," York wrote on Friday. "You don't have to compare it to a trial to know something is wrong with the J6 committee."

Hume tacked on to York's post, "I've covered Washington for more than 50 years, including 11 years covering Congress specifically. I’ve never seen a committee all of whose members were chosen by one party, and where there is no cross-examination or any attempt to present both sides."

\u201cI\u2019ve covered Washington for more than 50 years, including 11 years covering Congress specifically. I\u2019ve never seen a committee all of whose members were chosen by one party, and where there is no cross-examination or any attempt to present both sides.\u201d
— Brit Hume (@Brit Hume) 1656689019

Rep. Adam Kinzinger (R-Ill.) pushed back against Hume's assertation.

"Hey Brit. It’s been all Republicans testifying. Definitely one-sided, just not in how you think it is," the "never-Trump" Republican tweeted. "And as you well know, Kevin McCarthy took his ball and went home. You all sound nervous."

Hume had previously hammered the Jan. 6 committee for being partisan.

On June 11, Hume labeled the primetime hearing as an "utterly one-sided presentation."

On June 7, he tweeted, "It is not normal for a supposedly bipartisan committee to have its members all chosen by one party."

Hume included a video clip of his appearance on Fox News' "Special Report."

Hume pointed out that the Jan. 6 committee is comprised of Democrats Adam Schiff, Jamie Raskin, Bennie Thompson, Zoe Lofgren, Pete Aguilar, Stephanie Murphy, and Elaine Luria. He also noted that the "one-sided" committee had anti-Trump Republicans Liz Cheney and Adam Kinzinger hand-selected by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.).

Hume called Cheney and Kinzinger are "Republican members who could be counted on to agree with the conclusions already reached by" Pelosi.

"This is very much a partisan hearing, which is not to say that interesting facts won’t come out and they won’t make an interesting presentation in primetime but, look, this is only partially a hearing to determine the facts," Hume told host Brett Baier. "It is as much as anything else an effort to give the Democrats an issue that they can run on when nearly all the other issues that people care about are working against them."

\u201cIt is not normal for a supposedly bipartisan committee to have its members all chosen by one party. https://t.co/aJL0tvyBHW\u201d
— Brit Hume (@Brit Hume) 1654618782

Rasmussen Reports noted that the Capitol riot or the January 6 committee did not make the top nine midterm issues for U.S. voters. However, issues that are hurting Democrats make up the top four: rising gas prices, inflation, the economy, and violent crime.

\u201cNote to @brithume on The Jan 6th Committee Hearings:\n\nYou are certainly not alone in noticing inconsistencies of due process, balance and basic fairness. And perhaps more than anything, their complete disconnect with what most national likley voters are actually concerned about.\u201d
— Rasmussen Reports (@Rasmussen Reports) 1656707118

Hume conceded that President Donald Trump's behavior following the 2020 election was "outrageous" and "utterly disgraceful." However, he doesn't believe that the Jan. 6 committee will be able to prove that the United States was close to losing its democracy, as Democrats have blustered.

Hume said on June 23, "The 1/6 committee is pounding home the point that Trump tried to overturn the 2020 election. He certainly did. But the testimony has not come close to establishing Chairman Bennie Thompson's claim that we came 'critically close to losing our democracy' that day."

"That's because, as the testimony has shown, Trump's scheme was utterly half-assed," he continued. "The legal theory on which it rested was ridiculous. Its linchpin was refusal by vice president Pence to refuse to count the 2020 electoral votes showing Joe Biden the winner. When Pence refused, the scheme collapsed."

"All this happened in the context of an ugly riot, which Trump had triggered, not by what he said on 1/6 but by the stolen-election bs he had been feeding his supporters for two months," he stated. "In the end, the electoral vote count was delayed for several hours, but went forward that day. Outrageous behavior by a president unable to admit error or defeat to be sure. But the near-death of American democracy? Not even close."

Last July, Pelosi rejected two appointees chosen by Republican Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy to serve on the House Select Committee to investigate the Jan. 6 riot at the U.S. Capitol. In response to Pelosi rejecting House Judiciary Committee ranking member Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) and Rep. Jim Banks (R-Ind.), McCarthy yanked all five of the Republicans he had selected to sit on the January 6 committee.