'You have to rely on the market': Trump shoots down 'equitable pay' argument for women's sports



President Donald Trump discredited the idea that women should be paid the same as men in sports, particularly in reference to the WNBA, where he said contracts were already in place.

During an interview on the "Let's Go!" podcast with hosts Jim Gray and legendary NFL coach Bill Belichick, Trump was asked about "equitable pay" in women's sports.

"Should there be more support, or supportive measures, to ensure equitable pay across sports?" Gray asked, before referring to WNBA star Caitlin Clark.

"You'd like to do that, but it's a very complicated thing," Trump replied, calling Clark a "phenomenon" in her sport.

While the former president compared Clark to Tiger Woods, he said he's seen new stars get locked into entry-level contracts many times and play them out until they get rewarded.

"It sounds unfair, but somebody agrees to a contract. Hopefully she'll keep it going and she'll make a lot of money," he continued.

"Maybe you could give her a bonus," Trump suggested for Clark.

Host Gray then referred to Clark's massive television ratings, which eclipsed typical NBA viewership many times throughout 2024.

"You have to rely on the market," Trump rebuffed. "You can't just say 'we'll break this contract because this person did well.'"

— (@)

Coach Belichick pushed Trump for his opinion on name, image, and likeness payments for NCAA athletes and wondered if there is a way to strike a balance between profit and willingness to play.

Trump responded by saying he was "surprised that the governing body didn't appeal" NIL payments more vehemently.

"I don't know that they appealed it at all," Trump laughed.

"Will college sports, as we know it, look the same in the next five to 10 years?" Belichick then asked.

"No, not really. ... It's not going to be the same," Trump predicted.

"You'll probably have some schools go to the top," he added, noting some of the more "wealthy schools" will likely do very well.

Trump went to say that inevitably the NCAA could act as a different professional sports league, with "some very rich athletes."

Read more about NIL payments in this Blaze News original..

Former President Donald Trump described the NFL's new Guardian Caps as "weird."Photo by Lachlan Cunningham/Getty Images

Still talking about football, the Republican commented on Guardian Caps, the exterior padding the NFL has allowed on players' helmets in the 2024 season.

"That thing looks weird!" Trump remarked, laughing with the hosts. He said he wasn't sure about the preventive aspects of the equipment, pointing out that there are still violent clashes between players.

"[It's] still a very violent game," he continued. "That's why people watch it. It's pretty risky, but you don't have to let your child play."

Trump also expressed disdain for the NFL's new kickoff rules, while adding that middle-class Americans are being "priced out" of sporting events.

"A fan will buy one ticket, for one game, sometimes a nothing game, and that's all they can afford," Trump claimed.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Blaze News original: Top 5 insane quotes from the WNBA's biggest — and weirdest — season ever



The WNBA has wrapped up its most notable season since its inception, breaking multiple viewership records while increasing attendance across the league.

The rookie season of Caitlin Clark saw ticket prices skyrocket wherever she played, with games even having to change locations to accommodate the fans who wanted to see her.

'I'm speaking on a particular group that is motivated by hate and destruction.'

But with more eyeballs came far more scrutiny of — and pressure on — the players. Not only did many players buckle under their newfound fame but so did owners and reporters.

What resulted from this historic season wasn't a showering of praise on the league's new fans or an increased appreciation for the sport but rather a historic series of blunders.

5. WNBA owner calls Clark fans 'racist'

Typically, sports franchise owners want to pull fans into arenas, not alienate them. That note seemingly didn't make its way to the desk of Renee Montgomery, former WNBA star and part owner of the Atlanta Dream.

Not only did Montgomery claim there was a prevalence of "bots" and "faux fans" within Clark's massive online following, but also the owner doubted that the new star's fans even watched her games.

"I'm speaking on a particular group that is motivated by hate and destruction," Montgomery said in a clip she posted to X.

"I like when our fans are so engaged and so passionate that they just don't like the other team. But being racist, sexist, and violent with your words — come on now, what are we doing? ... That's not acceptable," she added.

For some reason, the owner even brought Boston Celtics fans into the mix and accused them of "racist treatment of players."

The Dream finished 15-25 and were swept in the playoffs. Karma?

4. Reporter says a single MAGA hat made a WNBA game 'unsafe'

It wasn't enough in the 2024 season simply not to be a fan of Clark. Any connection to conservative politics that possibly could have been made was made — and then connected to some form of hatred.

Take WNBA writer Frankie de la Cretaz. The "they/them" journalist attended Game 2 of the playoff series between Clark's Indiana Fever and the Connecticut Sun.

De la Cretaz's reporting included citing the game's "vibe" as "horrendous" while also claiming she and her "partner" told off a "racist" fan sitting behind them. The fan's crime was daring to mock one of the Sun players for wearing fake eyelashes on the court.

The writer was even more outraged by "a man in a MAGA hat" and a woman wearing a "ban nails" shirt. The fan also sported props of giant fingernails on her hands.

When all was said and done, de la Cretaz said she'd be writing a scathing review about her horrible experience before adding, "I've never felt unsafe at a WNBA game & tonight I did."

3. Players complain their private planes are too small

After Clark was photographed on a luxury private flight — likely due to her being responsible for the massive attention the league was getting — players began demanding similar amenities.

Did they take their issues to WNBA brass and ownership? Of course not. Instead they took to their social media pages and press interviews.

Chicago Sky rookie Angel Reese was the first to complain, posting a photo of herself seemingly embarrassed to be on a commercial flight.

On her Instagram story, Reese showed herself in sunglasses and a paper mask with the caption: "Just praying that this is one of the last commercial flights the Chicago Sky has to fly." A second caption read, "Practicing gratitude & patience as the league introduces charter flights for all teams."

Phoenix Mercury guard Sophie Cunningham went about her request far more arrogantly, saying, "Butterflies and rainbows now that we got the charters" before adding that the private planes weren't big enough.

Photo by Christian Petersen/Getty Images

"We are so grateful to be able to start chartering, but with that, there's a lot of things that need to be adjusted," she said during an interview. "Our bags and some of our people can't fly with us because our charter is too small. While other teams get big planes."

Cunningham seems to be unaware that while the league is losing a reported $50 million in 2024, its private plane program is responsible for half that debt at $25 million.

2. A'ja Wilson claims black players don't get endorsements — and is immediately proven wrong

In what may have been a cruel joke by a reporter, Las Vegas Aces player A'ja Wilson made wild, racially charged accusations, only to be immediately proven wrong.

In an interview with the Associated Press, Wilson claimed that race has played a "huge" role in Clark's popularity while adding that black women aren't seen as marketable and, despite what they may accomplish, are still ignored.

"It doesn't matter what we all do as black women; we're still going to be swept underneath the rug," Wilson argued.

To the surprise of very few, Wilson's claims were completely destroyed before they were even published.

A week before the interview went public, Wilson signed a deal with Gatorade. Then, on May 11, Wilson and Nike announced that she would be endorsed and given her own signature shoe.

On May 12, Wilson's interview with the Associated Press was published, leaving egg all over her face.

Wilson called it a "dream" of hers to be able to work with such an iconic brand as Nike, but she failed to mention anything about being unmarketable due to her race.

1. Cameron Brink accidentally calls her teammates ugly

The most jaw-dropping quote of the season came from the right place — that is, if you believe woke culture and social justice are forces for good.

When Cameron Brink gave an interview about "tired narratives," she focused on the idea of breaking stereotypes and tropes. However, the 22-year-old actually just ended up calling her teammates ugly and manly.

'Some of my teammates go by they/them pronouns.'

In an attempt to spew woke dogma, Brink initially went with race as a factor in popularity: "I will acknowledge there's a privilege for the younger white players of the league. That's not always true, but there is a privilege that we have inherently, and the privilege of appearing feminine."

Your browser does not support the video tag. Video by Dave Tolley/Getty Images

After stating there is pressure for women to appear womanly, Brink attempted to explain why her more "masculine" teammates should be more popular despite their looks.

"Some of my teammates are more masculine. Some of my teammates go by they/them pronouns," she said. "I want to bring more acceptance to that and not just have people support us because of the way that we look. I know I can feed into that because I like to dress femininely, but that's just me. I want everyone to be accepted — not just paid attention to because of how they look."

Brink has since continued to dress like a woman.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

The REAL reason the WNBA hates Caitlin Clark fans



The Caitlin Clark effect is the term used to describe the skyrocketing ticket sales, viewership, game attendance, and economic impact the Iowa native has had on women’s basketball. It started in college when Clark played for the Iowa Hawkeyes, and now it’s followed her to the WNBA. With the touch of what seems like a magic wand, the league, having been inconsequential for years, is now widely popular.

Since Clark was drafted by the Indiana Fever, attendance across the WNBA has shot up 50% and ESPN ratings doubled since last year.

One would think that the WNBA would show gratitude toward Clark, who has drawn the public eye toward the league as a whole, but no – the legend responsible for viralizing women’s basketball is demonized by the very players, coaches, and commentators who should be thanking her.

“They get a gift sent to them called Caitlin Clark. She is sprinkling magic all around the WNBA, making a sport that no one likes likeable and watchable, and instead of showing any gratitude towards Caitlin Clark, they have sat out to destroy Caitlin Clark,” says Jason Whitlock.

Why the ingratitude?

For starters, “she's not black and she's not lesbian,” so she doesn’t “fit the demographics” the woke league wants to elevate.

Clark has “played this brilliantly,” though, says Jason. “She has said nothing; she hasn't been aggressive with any of these people; she hasn't done anything.”

Having nothing to pin against her, Clark’s critics and adversaries have opted to “complain about her fans” instead.

Clark has brought in a demographic that Jason says has long been uninterested in women’s basketball – heterosexual people.

“What they're really saying is we don't want heterosexual men and women and their children coming to our sex cult,” says Jason. “They don’t want the demographics inside the arena to change.”

“So rather than have this league turn a profit and … begin the process of being able to stand on its own two feet, the alphabet mafia is throwing a riot and a temper tantrum, and it's being very hostile towards Caitlin Clark because they'd like to break her and ruin her and destroy her so that they [can] install … preferably a black lesbian woman as the face of this league,” Jason predicts.

“In their delusional minds,” Caitlin Clark is undeserving of the notoriety and attention because “black lesbian women built [the WNBA]” and should therefore be the ones on the pedestal.

To hear more of Jason’s commentary, watch the clip above.

Want more from Jason Whitlock?

To enjoy more fearless conversations at the crossroads of culture, faith, sports, and comedy with Jason Whitlock, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Sue Bird’s rant about long-standing racism in WNBA highlights the league’s REAL problem



Caitlin Clark, despite being for the most part apolitical, has been a lightning rod for controversy. As the most adored female player to have ever graced the basketball court, Clark’s fanbase is huge — and they’re vocal.

When a rivalry between Clark, who at the time played for the University of Iowa, and LSU’s Angel Reese sparked in 2023, many of Clark’s fans were accused of hurling racial insults at Clark’s competitors.

According to mainstream outlets, Clark’s fans and their racism have followed the athlete into the WNBA, creating a hostile environment for many of the athletes.

Former WNBA player Sue Bird, the partner of radical leftist retired professional soccer player Megan Rapinoe, recently spoke on this subject.

In her podcast “A Touch More,” the former athlete told Rapinoe that “racism has been impacting the WNBA well before this year,” meaning Clark’s fans are merely exacerbating a pre-existing problem.

“I do think Caitlin is being used as a pawn. Caitlin didn’t bring racism to the WNBA,” said Bird, who went on a long rant about how she never could just focus on being a basketball player because she was forced to be a social justice warrior.

“We're still not allowed to be focused on our basketball play,” Bird lamented.

However, where Bird sees social justice issues, Jason Whitlock sees a pathetic cry for attention.

- YouTubewww.youtube.com

“You couldn't get any traction based on your basketball, and so you decided, ‘Hey, we got to talk about racism and sexism to draw attention; we have to kneel during the national anthem to draw attention,”’ he says, comparing the WNBA’s social justice activism to “a kid who can’t get attention from their parents.”

And now that Caitlin Clark has entered the chat, people are finally able to focus on basketball because she’s brought the right kind of attention to the league.

“Someone showed up here who plays good enough basketball to draw attention and now people are actually evaluating [women’s] basketball,” says Jason.

According to him, before Clark, the WNBA fandom was lacking because it had “too many women tatted up and looking like men.”

“People don’t want to see that,” he says.

Then, “Caitlin Clark shows up with her ponytail and no tattoos and plays a brand of basketball that's exciting and fun to watch and voila — a crowd shows up,” Jason explains.

To hear more of his analysis, watch the clip above.

Want more from Jason Whitlock?

To enjoy more fearless conversations at the crossroads of culture, faith, sports, and comedy with Jason Whitlock, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Meet the four titans spearheading the 'cis rights movement' that just might 'save America'



Some of the biggest names in the sports industry are leading a movement to protect female athletes against men competing in women’s sports, and yet the story is getting a shocking lack of coverage.

While he’s appalled that this revolution isn’t making headlines, Jason Whitlock is thrilled that the movement is gaining momentum anyway.

“[Riley Gaines] is the leader of the cis rights movement. She is the Rosa Parks, the first woman to take a major stand,” he says.

As for Caitlin Clark, Jason says, she “isn’t outspoken” but is nonetheless “unintentionally being a leader.”

“Caitlin Clark has stood her ground, taken the blow, the arrows, the smearing of her and her fan base” in a league that is “hostile ... to cisgender women.”

“She's dealt with all the racist comments from Sheryl Swoopes ... she hasn’t bowed to A’ja Wilson and all the people that [say], ‘Admit your white privilege,”’ says Jason, adding, “I don't know where Caitlin Clark stands ... but I know what she represents.”

“Caitlin Clark is the Jackie Robinson of the cis rights movement,” he says.

- YouTubewww.youtube.com

According to Jason, the other two women spearheading the movement are Sage Steele and Samantha Ponder.

“Sage Steele and Samantha Ponder [are] two titans of the media, two heavyweights at ESPN. They sacrificed their jobs and their careers to stand up for women,” Jason praises, adding that these two women were let go “because they wouldn't bow to the LGBTQIA+ transgender insanity.”

“Sage Steele, Samantha Ponder — they're John Carlos and Tommie Smith,” he adds, referencing two Olympic athletes who competed at the 1968 Summer Olympics and used their platforms to stand against racism.

While the cis rights movement is geared toward preventing biological men from competing in women’s athletic divisions, Jason says, “It is so much bigger than sports.”

“I do think that this is the movement that could save America,” he says.

To hear more, watch the episode above.

Want more from Jason Whitlock?

To enjoy more fearless conversations at the crossroads of culture, faith, sports, and comedy with Jason Whitlock, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Megan Rapinoe, WNBA players attack veteran sportswriter over her Caitlin Clark coverage, claiming it fuels racism, homophobia



USA Today's Christine Brennan — a respected veteran sports columnist — is feeling the wrath not only from the WNBA players union but also from outspoken former women's soccer star Megan Rapinoe.

Brennan's sin? Asking questions they don't like about Indiana Fever sensation — and nearly unanimous WNBA rookie of the year — Caitlin Clark.

'Hearing it initially, my visceral reaction was, "That’s not good, that doesn't feel good, that feels racist, to be honest."'

See, Rapinoe and the union are vexed by a particular set of questions Brennan recently directed to another player who gave Clark a black eye. Rapinoe called Brennan's line of questioning "racist"; the players union said Brennan's questions "fuel racist, homophobic, and misogynistic vitriol on social media."

Believe it or not, the players union wants Brennan's press credentials revoked over her questions.

What were the questions?

DiJonai Carrington, a guard for the Connecticut Sun, hit Clark in the eye during a recent playoff game, leaving Clark with a black eye. Brennan asked Carrington if she hit Clark in the eye on purpose; Carrington said no.

Brennan then asked Carrington if she was laughing about it later in the game, the Washington Post reported. Carrington replied, “I just told you I didn’t even know I hit her."

Soon the Sun’s DeWanna Bonner called out Brennan in person and asked her to treat her teammates like humans, the paper added.

More from the Post:

Brennan, who is working on a book about Clark and routinely appears on TV, approached the other reporters and remarked that something like that wouldn’t happen in the NFL. She asked why the WNBA was so sensitive and told multiple reporters that if anyone had questions about her awareness of the racial dynamics at play, they should read her coverage of former NFL quarterback and activist Colin Kaepernick, among other work stretching back decades. (Brennan is White; Carrington is Black.)

Three days later, the Women’s National Basketball Players Association issued a statement calling for the league to revoke the credential of Brennan, one of the most recognizable sports journalists in the country.

The statement reads: “To unprofessional members of the media like Christine Brennan: You are not fooling anyone. That so-called interview in the name of journalism was a blatant attempt to bait a professional athlete into participating into a narrative that is false and designed to fuel racist, homophobic, and misogynistic vitriol on social media. You cannot hide behind your tenure. You have abused your privileges and do not deserve the credentials issued to you.”

Megan Rapinoe rips Brennan, too

During a Wednesday episode of her podcast "A Touch More with Sue Bird and Megan Rapinoe," the former soccer star said Brennan's line of questioning with Carrington was "loaded" and "feels racist," Fox News reported.

"Hearing it initially, my visceral reaction was, ‘That’s not good, that doesn't feel good, that feels racist, to be honest. That feels like you're putting DiJonai in an impossible situation,'" Rapinoe said, according to the cable network.

She added, "I think it is so disingenuous for Christine Brennan and other media members to say, ‘I’m just asking the question,' but really what's happening is your natural instinct to protect and narrate white players versus go after and narrate black players. That to me is really the issue."

Rapinoe dismissed the notion that Carrington could have intentionally hit Clark in the eye: "The premise of the question relies on the belief that DiJonai is targeting, that DiJonai specifically swatted or swiped into Caitlin's eyeball. First of all, the square-footage of her eyeball is very small. Do you know how hard it is to poke someone in the eye?"

'The WNBA and its players keep fumbling their golden opportunity with a string of ill-advised decisions and PR gaffes exposing them as not being ready for prime time.'

Bird and Rapinoe also said it's "disingenuous" to claim opposing players have been targeting Clark this season.

More from Fox News:

Many of Clark's fans have expressed outrage in her rookie year over instances in which she was physically handled by opposing players.

Clark took an illegal hip check from Chicago Sky forward Chennedy Carter on June 1 when the Sky player charged right into the Fever rookie and knocked her down during a stoppage in play. Clark said after the game that Carter's hit 'was not a basketball play.'

Sky rookie and Clark's longtime rival, Angel Reese, slammed her arm onto Clark's head while trying to block a layup in a game between the two teams on June 16. Then in August, Sky player Diamond DeShields sent Clark flying and then sliding across the hardwood on a play that was later upgraded to a flagrant-1 foul.

Anything else?

Brennan in an interview called her questions “journalism 101," the Post reported.

“It’s something that I have done in the entirety of my career,” she said, “and I think every other journalist has done the entirety of his or her career.”

USA Today executive sports editor Roxanna Scott said in a statement regarding Brennan's questions, “We reject the notion that the interview perpetuated any narrative other than to get the player’s perspective directly."

Boston Globe columnist Tara Sullivan wrote that "the WNBA and its players keep fumbling their golden opportunity with a string of ill-advised decisions and PR gaffes exposing them as not being ready for prime time,” the Post said.

The paper added that Michael Rosenberg — a Sports Illustrated columnist who has covered the WNBA — said in an interview, “Decline to answer someone’s questions, complain to them privately, or rip them publicly. That’s all fair. But I think credentials should only be pulled for clear violations of professional ethics.”

The Post also said anger over Brennan’s questions is mostly rooted in the climate in which they were asked.

More from the paper:

Carrington has been the subject of intense social media harassment. She posted a screenshot of an email she received in which she was called a racial slur and threatened with sexual violence. Someone else posted a picture of a police officer kneeling on George Floyd’s neck with a picture of Carrington superimposed over Floyd’s face and Clark’s superimposed on the officer’s.

According to a report in Andscape, the crowd in Connecticut during the playoff series was trafficking in racially coded trash talk, too. One fan’s shirt read 'Ban Nails,' and one fan shouted at Carrington when she fell, 'What, did you trip on your eyelashes?'

“In my 11-year career I never experienced the racial comments like from the Indiana Fever fan base,” Sun forward Alyssa Thomas said after the series, according to the Post.

“We certainly know that there are many people who are racist who attack black people on Twitter,” Brennan said, according to the paper. “That is a fact. It is horrible. ... In the case of asking the follow-up I did, it was giving ... DiJonai Carrington the chance to address an issue that was already on Twitter and being discussed by, what? Tens of thousands of people? Hundreds of thousands? Millions of people?”

Brennan said USA Today is planning to request a credential so she can cover the WNBA Finals, the Post added.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

WNBA ratings plummet to nearly a third after Caitlin Clark's Indiana Fever are eliminated from playoffs



WNBA ratings fell off a cliff after star player Caitlin Clark's first year in the league officially came to a close.

Clark's Indiana Fever managed to deliver the most-watched WNBA game on cable in history, at 2.5 million viewers for Game 2 against the Connecticut Sun on September 25. The game peaked at high of 3.4 million viewers.

After the Fever were eliminated, the first game of the next playoff round featuring the New York Liberty and the Las Vegas Aces brought in just 929,000 viewers on September 29. This, despite it being a rematch of the 2023 WNBA finals.

According to the New York Post, the semifinal was still the most-watched WNBA semifinals in the last 22 years.

Meanwhile, the first game of the Minnesota Lynx and Connecticut Sun semifinal had about 650,000 viewers on average, the Daily Mail reported.

Both semifinals pale in comparison to Clark's first playoff game, which drew 1.84 million viewers on September 22.

This mirrors the Clark effect that was present all season long in the WNBA; where she went, viewers and attendees followed.

The top 14 most-watched games of the WNBA season were all featuring Clark's Indiana Fever.

— (@)

Through the first weekend of June, Clark made headlines for tripling the average viewership of WNBA games whenever she played. Games that featured Clark had an average of 1.099 million viewers while games without her averaged only 414,000 viewers.

The latter was still an increase over the league's 2023 season average viewership of 301,000.

Clarke also caused stark increases in ticket prices when she played in other teams' arenas.

In May, Clark's presence sent the prices at the Sun's game skyrocketing by a shocking 469% when compared to the cheapest ticket price for the next Connecticut game.

A visit to the Barclays Center in Brooklyn to play the New York Liberty increased ticket prices by 300%, from $21 to $84.

In Seattle, prices increased from $26 to $70 (169%) when Clark came to town.

When Indiana visited the Las Vegas Aces on May 25, ticket prices were 2,200% more expensive than the Aces next home game; $92 before dropping to just $4.

At the same time, Clark's team led the league in attendance, averaging nearly 5,000 more attendees per game than the next highest franchise.

Despite all the added fanfare, 2024 is still expected to be the most costly season for the WNBA. The league was estimated to be preparing for a $50 million loss from the season, which often included players complaining about charter flights and private planes not being to their liking.

The league typically loses only $10 million, staying afloat as a subsidy of the NBA.

For Clark, she finished the season with an average of 19.2 points, 5.7 rebounds, and 8.4 assists per game. Her assists were the most in the league.

Resurfaced footage of WNBA MVP A’ja Wilson talking about white privilege goes VIRAL — 'It was a message being sent to Caitlin Clark'



WNBA MVP A’ja Wilson is going viral but not for anything she did on the court. The Aces center is currently under fire for a resurfaced clip from a year ago that’s already garnered over 20 million views on X.

Jason Whitlock and Steve Kim discuss the damning footage.

- YouTubewww.youtube.com

In the video, Wilson, who’s courtside, tells teammate Kelsey Plum the following:

“Us, as black women, Paige [Bueckers] reminds me a lot of you. Like you say, ‘It’s not really about me.’ She knows. And she knows how her privilege has gotten her to that point,” Wilson told Plum.

“And also, like, she’s good at basketball, obviously. Like, she understands her privilege. It’s, like, what pushes her over the top in a sense. It reminds me a lot of you, and I mean that as a compliment,” Wilson continued, “praising” Plum.

Steve translates Wilson’s comments: “Hey white girl. You know what, you cracker a** cracker, you have a lot of white guilt, and I approve.”

“This is the problem that a lot of people have with Caitlin Clark fans and supporters — they don't buy into [the white privilege narrative],” he explains, adding that “one of the more interesting aspects of this fan-hood is that some of the biggest supporters of Caitlin Clark are not whites; they're actually black males.”

“Many of these people, like A’ja, are so used to being able to dispense and force white guilt upon others that when people don't comply, then it becomes something they can't even handle,” Steve continues. “This [WNBA] playoff ratings dip post Caitlin Clark is the sports version of white flight and gentrification.”

Jason agrees, calling Steve’s comparison “a good analogy.”

Wilson’s comment “was a message being sent to Caitlin Clark,” he says, adding that it’s also “a message to Nike.”

“A’ja Wilson has a signature shoe and logo with Nike. No one's going to buy her shoe; no one cares, but Nike is bending over backwards trying to please A’ja Wilson and Dawn Staley and the whole BLM crowd by” acting like they have “to promote A’ja first.”

“So there's a mindset that A’ja has to adopt to justify getting treatment she knows she doesn't deserve,” says Jason, comparing Wilson to retired NBA player Tim Duncan, who he says was a great player but not one who sold shoes.

“She has to adopt this mindset of ‘I'm owed this, and you white girls need to back your a** up while I get what's owed to me,” he explains, calling it “endless reparations.”

Steve says the marketing of A’ja Wilson’s shoe is basically just suppressing Caitlin Clark’s up-and-coming shoe.

“They are marketing A’ja Wilson by suppressing anything having to do with the most popular player in the league by far,” he says, joking that Clark’s shoe needs to be named “Air Suppression.”

To hear more of the conversation, watch the clip above.

Want more from Jason Whitlock?

To enjoy more fearless conversations at the crossroads of culture, faith, sports, and comedy with Jason Whitlock, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

WNBA reporter says MAGA hat at Caitlin Clark playoff game made her feel 'unsafe'



A WNBA writer said that a MAGA hat made her feel unsafe while attending a WNBA playoff game and claimed the white women on one of the teams needed to control their tempers.

During Game 2 of the playoff series between the Indiana Fever and Connecticut Sun, which featured rookie star Caitlin Clark, a journalist who covers the WNBA described other fans as racist for their comments toward some players.

"I'm at the Sun/Fever game and the vibe is HORRENDOUS," Frankie de la Cretaz wrote. "The woman behind me was mocking DiJonai’s eyelashes & only stopped when my partner turned around & told her to stop being racist."

DiJonai Carrington is a guard for the Connecticut Sun.

'I've never felt unsafe at a WNBA game & tonight I did.'

The writer then continued her outrage as she described "a man in a MAGA hat" and a woman wearing a "ban nails" shirt, who had props of giant fingernails on her hands.

Cretaz went on to say what she witnessed at the game made her feel unsafe.

"I'm going to be writing about my experience tonight. I've never felt unsafe at a WNBA game & tonight I did."

After a viewer pointed out there were no MAGA hats in the photo Cretaz posted, she responded with a photo of a male fan in a MAGA hat in what appeared to be the lobby, holding a sign that read "Make Basketball Great Again #22," Clark's number.

"Here's one of them! There was another with a literal MAGA hat that I saw too," Cretaz captioned.

The Sun won the game 87-81.

Cretaz's X bio describes herself as a writer for topics like sports, "gender," and "queerness," while listing her pronouns as "they/them."

She has previously written for ESPN about nonbinary athletes in sports.

On her Substack page, Cretaz wrote about the incident and complained that "queer or trans or a person of color" are viewed as biased in their writing when covering their own "community."

It is not clear if Cretaz ever played professional basketball or if she simply feels the WNBA is her community due to the presence of lesbian players.

She expanded by saying the coverage Caitlin Clark has received in 2024 is "rooted not only in racism, but in the homophobic tropes of the predatory lesbian and the queer villain."

"The number of times I read WNBA coverage that seems like it was written by someone who, frankly, hates Black women is inexcusable—especially in a league that is over 80% Black," she continued.

After combining her WNBA coverage into a critique of race, sexuality, and journalistic ethics, Cretaz's argument closed by saying the white women on the Indiana Fever can't control their tempers.

"I am deeply uncomfortable with [the] dynamic on the Indiana Fever in which the Black players are responsible for de-escalating the white women who can't keep their tempers."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Jason Whitlock says his opinion about Angel Reese making Sports Illustrated’s 50 Most Influential Figures in Sports list is 'DANGEROUS'



Despite being in the WNBA for less than one season, Chicago Sky’s Angel Reese made Sports Illustrated’s list of the 50 Most Influential Figures in Sports and was even featured on the cover of the magazine.

Jason Whitlock is appalled.

- YouTubewww.youtube.com

“Are you kidding me — a woman that rebounds and shows up half naked to games?!” he says, exasperated, adding that he can’t believe that so many people on the list either play for or are affiliated with the WNBA.

“A league that didn't matter three months ago now has eight of the most influential people,” he sighs.

According to Steve Kim, “All of this has to do with Caitlin Clark.”

“The fact that you have Angel Reese on that cover is a direct result [of] two things” he says, the first being the reality that the magazine “can’t put the white girl on the cover.”

Instead, the magazine chose to “virtue signal and appease everybody by putting [Clark’s] main perceived rival,” Angel Reese, on the cover.

Second, of all of the other WNBA athletes, commentators, and analysts on the list, Steve says that the only reason anyone even knows about them is because of the attention Caitlin Clark has brought to the league.

“Caitlin is the common denominator,” he says.

Jason says he has an opinion on the matter that is “dangerous.”

“Caitlin Clark is the slave that's building the WNBA, and all these black women are climbing all over the top of her and piggybacking her to relevance and money. She's Kunta Kinte,” he says.

Steve says that nowadays any sort of list of “influential people in any industry” involves “a lot of virtue signaling, where you now start to basically do your own version of DEI.”

“You’ve got to have a certain amount of minorities, certain people of religion, color, sexual orientation. Those lists really are not honest; they're basically a rainbow coalition of, ‘Hey look at me, I'm progressive, I'm not one of the racists,'” he says.

To hear more about Jason’s dangerous opinion and his thoughts on the WNBA’s expansion plans, watch the clip above.

Want more from Jason Whitlock?

To enjoy more fearless conversations at the crossroads of culture, faith, sports, and comedy with Jason Whitlock, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.