Officer who shot and killed Ashli Babbitt had SHOCKING track record



On January 6, 2021, Capitol Police officer Michael Byrd shot and killed Ashli Babbitt, who was unarmed. Despite the lawsuit Babbitt’s family filed against Byrd and an eyebrow-raising disciplinary track record, Byrd has been repeatedly rewarded.

Not only was he given a “$36,000 retention bonus, more than $21,000 in security upgrades at his personal residence, and instructions that [he] not sit for a fitness-for-duty evaluation after Jan. 6, 2021,” Byrd was also “promoted from lieutenant to captain in 2023,” according to a recent article by Blaze News investigative journalist Joseph Hanneman.

Now Hanneman and fellow Blaze News investigative journalist Steve Baker join Jill Savage and Blaze News editor in chief Matthew Peterson on “Blaze News Tonight” to break it down.


Byrd has “a history of carelessness with weapons,” says Hanneman. The most notable of these is the incident when Byrd “fired his service weapon at fleeing vehicles near his home while his neighbor was in the line of fire,” which was recently reported by a congressional oversight committee.

Byrd also “left his service weapon on the toilet tank in the Capitol Visitor Center.”

However, there are “three more case files” on Byrd, but these have magically “disappeared.”

“The records are missing,” says Hanneman, adding that from what he understands, the contents of these missing reports make the incidents we already know about “look rather tame.”

But Byrd’s incomplete record isn’t the only mystery. There’s also the conundrum of Frick and Frack — “the unidentified men near Ashli Babbitt when she was shot.”

To learn more about the scandals surrounding the death of Ashli Babbitt, watch the episode above.

Want more from 'Blaze News Tonight'?

To enjoy more provocative opinions, expert analysis, and breaking stories you won’t see anywhere else, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Exclusive: How the Capitol Police were set up to fail on January 6



As part of Blaze Media’s three-part mini-documentary series “A Day in the Life of Harry Dunn,” we continue to update readers on how we arrived at this point in our “Truth About January 6” series. You can find part one here.

Despite denials from the U.S. Capitol Police and some congressional investigators, evidence quickly emerged after the January 6, 2021, protests and riots that Capitol Police officers were intentionally under-deployed.

Testimonies from Capitol Police officers in various Jan. 6 trials, along with radio transmissions and whistleblower statements, have provided many answers. These findings also suggest a coordinated cover-up to keep this information from the American public.

If the Capitol Police had been fully deployed that day, the breach likely would not have occurred. Ashli Babbitt and Rosanne Boyland might still be alive, and the Department of Justice’s 1,500 prosecutions — ranging from trespassing to seditious conspiracy — might never have happened. Additionally, members of the Capitol Police, D.C. Metropolitan Police, and several convicted Jan. 6 participants might not have died by suicide in the aftermath.

Although I have long suspected that trained provocateurs manipulated the events of January 6 under the watch of the Capitol Police command center, many believe that frontline, uniformed Capitol Police officers were knowingly complicit and even initiated the violence. Video evidence contradicts that claim.

Here’s a sample of the social media comments that followed my initial blog series — written before my time at Blaze Media — in which I referred to the Capitol Police as “sacrificial pawns” on January 6:

“The Capitol Police were willing participants by following those D.C. fascists’ orders. I have no sympathy for them or their families.”

“Don’t sign up to collect a paycheck defending a corrupt government.”

“They’re a disgrace to the uniform and America. How f***ing dare they.”

“You’re being played.”

These comments came from the political right, but the left wasn’t silent either. Some were quite bloodthirsty, suggesting that every Capitol Police officer should have replicated Lt. Michael Byrd’s gunshot and left us with “a thousand more Ashli Babbitts.” Many who called for defunding the police after George Floyd’s death in 2020 suddenly became strong supporters of “Back the Blue” following the events of January 6, 2021.

In my January 6 writings, I’ve often stressed that I had to reassess some of my initial assumptions as more evidence surfaced. For example, in my first article about January 6, published on January 13, 2021, I misidentified the officers in “fluorescent-sleeved jackets racing down steps toward the first upper tier above street level” as Capitol Police. They were actually members of the D.C. Metropolitan Police.

This may seem like a minor distinction — especially to the “all cops are bastards” crowd — but these details are crucial as we work to uncover and present the full truth of that day. Most importantly, who in the command chain set up or allowed these events to unfold?

When it comes to the many unanswered questions, odd circumstances, and unindicted figures, we don’t need to agree on every detail. We also don’t need to agree on each event, video, or police officer’s actions to find common ground on one key point I’ve emphasized about January 6: I saw bad people doing bad things, good people doing good things, and even otherwise good people doing really stupid things.

This observation applies to both individual protesters and police officers. There were heroes and villains on both sides of that thin blue line on January 6.

My questions about the Capitol Police’s deployment, orders, and actions on January 6 began with my first published article. From the moment my Uber driver dropped me off at the Washington Monument around 9:30 a.m. until I reached the lower west terrace of the Capitol Building at exactly 1:19 p.m., neither I nor my camera saw a single law enforcement officer.

My video captured no police presence at the Washington Monument lawn on January 6.Screenshot/Steve Baker

As the crowd swelled from tens of thousands to hundreds of thousands, it was hard to imagine not seeing any police presence among such a massive group in the nation’s capital. Police and Secret Service officers heavily guarded the Ellipse stage, where President Trump was set to speak, but the crowd’s density kept me from entering that area. When I eventually started walking from the Washington Monument lawn toward the Capitol Building again, I still didn’t see or capture on camera a single police officer.

As I approached the Peace Monument, sirens signaled the arrival of D.C. Metro Police units. At the Reflecting Pool, I finally spotted Metro Police officers in fluorescent jackets streaming down the Capitol steps toward the lower west terrace.

I then heard the first flash-bang grenades and saw tear gas released on the lower west terrace. No barricades or police lines blocked my way — initial agitators and provocateurs had removed them about 20 to 25 minutes earlier — so I ran to the terrace and began recording the violence at exactly 1:19 p.m., just three minutes after President Trump left the Ellipse stage, more than a mile away.

A screenshot from my video as I approached the Capitol on January 6, 2021.Screenshot/Steve Baker

For a year, I publicly asked: "Why wasn’t there a police presence on the Washington Monument lawn? Why didn’t I see any police on the mile-long walk to the Capitol?" and "Why were so few Capitol Police officers on duty at the Capitol, considering the planned rallies, marches, and legally permitted events on the Capitol lawn that day?"

I initially estimated that fewer than 200 Capitol Police officers were at the Capitol on January 6. A year later, on the anniversary of the event, I returned to D.C. to seek answers. I asked patrolling Capitol Police officers those questions, and I also wanted to know what orders they received that day. I was particularly interested in what seemed like a "stand-down" or "pull-back" order at around 2:00 p.m.

None of the officers I approached on the streets or at the Capitol would answer. At the time, I didn’t know about the nondisclosure agreements Capitol Police had signed under Yogananda Pittman during her seven-month tenure as acting chief of police.

On December 16, 2021, Forbes made a convoluted attempt to answer the question about Capitol Police deployment on January 6:

USCP documents show that at 2 p.m. on that day, only 1,214 officers were “on site” across the Capitol complex of buildings. Congressional investigators concluded, however, that USCP could only account for 417 officers and could not account for the whereabouts of the remaining 797 officers.

In late 2022, when I first met with former Capitol Police officer turned whistleblower Lt. Tarik Johnson, he confirmed that my initial estimate of “fewer than 200” Capitol Police officers at the Capitol Building during the first wave of violence on January 6 was accurate.

Johnson explained that during previous protest events, the standard operating procedure required an “all hands on deck” approach for Capitol Police. On those days, officers working the night shift were required to stay and work a double shift through the next day. But on January 6, Capitol Police command sent those officers home after their shifts, treating it like a routine day at the office.

In a follow-up phone conversation, Johnson revealed more about the deceptions Capitol Police leadership spread regarding force deployment on January 6. Addressing internal department and congressional investigations that claimed officials “could not account for the whereabouts of the remaining 797 officers,” Johnson said, "It's a bald-faced lie, and you can quote me on that."

Johnson explained that all Capitol Police officers clock in and clock out electronically at the start and end of each shift. Once clocked in, each officer is tracked throughout the tour of duty, making it impossible for their commanders not to know their whereabouts. This information should still be available in the computer logs — assuming the logs haven’t been erased.

When asked why Capitol Police leadership would cover up information about force deployment, Johnson responded, “Because they don’t want to tell you where the officers were or what they were doing. They don’t want anyone to know how many of our officers were on administrative leave that day.”

My investigations, which include interviews with Capitol Police officers and congressional investigators, revealed further embarrassment, as several officers went into hiding once the violence began, locking themselves in offices and closets.

Another key issue involves the “diversion events,” when two pipe bombs were coincidentally discovered within minutes of the first provocateurs breaching the west side Capitol barricade. The pipe bombs were found at both the Republican National Committee and Democratic National Committee headquarters — two of nearly 20 buildings under the Capitol Police’s security purview.

Johnson couldn’t estimate how many officers were diverted to the RNC and DNC after the bombs were discovered. However, he emphasized that the emergency response still doesn’t account for the missing whereabouts of 797 officers. He noted that exact records of how many officers were diverted, and precisely who, should be easily retrievable from Capitol Police computer records.

Set up to fail?

The first Oath Keepers trial featured the testimony of Stephen Brown, a Florida-based event planner hired by the controversial figure Ali Alexander, a Trump supporter and founder of Stop the Steal. Brown’s job was to secure permits from the Capitol Police for an event on the Capitol grounds. He was also responsible for organizing the rental of the staging and public address system and coordinating the scheduling of VIP speakers and stage security, handled by members of the Oath Keepers.

Brown testified that he had previously planned many protest events in the nation’s capital, with attendance ranging from as few as 5,000 to as many as 300,000 protesters.

Under direct examination by Oath Keeper Kelly Meggs’ defense attorney Stanley Woodward, Brown described the surprisingly small presence of Capitol officers during the delivery and setup of the staging and PA system. He noted that at previous events he’d organized on Capitol grounds, he had seen “three, four, even five times the size of police presence, including SWAT teams,” compared to what was present on January 6.

The inconvenient truth is that my camera, Stephen Brown’s testimony, and statements by Lt. Johnson and other Capitol Police officers suggest a deliberate under-deployment of officers that day — a day in which we now know, and as I have previously written:

Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund, Asst. Chief Yogananda Pittman, head of protective and intelligence operations, the D.C. Metro Police, the United States Park Police, the White House, the Pentagon, the National Guard, both the Senate and House of Representative Sergeants-at-Arms, Nancy Pelosi, Mitch McConnell, the FBI, and other federal agencies all knew that tens of thousands of protestors would be descending upon the Capitol grounds that day.

An unnamed Capitol Police officer, just days after the melee, told the Associated Press, “During the 4th of July concerts and the Memorial Day concerts, we don’t have people come up and say, ‘We’re going to seize the Capitol.’ But yet, you bring everybody in, you meet before. That never happened for this event.”

According to the Washington Post, only a week after the Capitol was breached, “an FBI office in Virginia issued an explicit warning that extremists were preparing to travel to Washington to commit violence and ‘war,’ according to an internal document reviewed by The Washington Post.”

Instead of “all hands on deck,” frontline Capitol Police officers were somewhere between one-tenth to one-fifth strength when it came time to respond to what was coming their way. Whether an operational failure or deliberate under-deployment, this set up the circumstances enabling the breach of the Capitol Building by a relatively small number of aggressive and violent rioters.

Ultimately, it remains inexplicable why only 200 to 300 violent perpetrators wielding sticks, flagpoles, clubs, and bear spray were able to overpower two fully armed law enforcement agencies, the tactical units of nearly every three-letter federal agency, and an unknown number of undercover law enforcement assets to breach what is supposed to be one of the most secure government facilities in the world.

Unless, of course, they were set up to fail. Most Capitol Police officers on duty that day believe that to be the case.

This would explain why Capitol Police union members gave then-acting Chief Yogananda Pittman a 92% “no-confidence” vote only five weeks after her curiously absent leadership from their command center on January 6.

Capitol Police were sacrificial pawns on Jan. 6: ‘They didn’t give a s**t about what happened’



In preparation for the first installment of Blaze Media’s three-part mini-documentary series, “A Day in the Life of Harry Dunn,” we decided to update readers on how we reached this point in our “Truth About January 6” series.

I had been writing about January 6 for nearly two and a half years before becoming a correspondent with Blaze Media. As a result, many of our readers may be unfamiliar with the background stories that led to our major revelations about the trial perjuries of Capitol Police Special Agent David Lazarus and Officer Harry Dunn. Our reports also exposed corruption within the leadership of the United States Capitol Police.

My interest in the Capitol Police began when I first witnessed the violence on the lower west terrace of the Capitol Building on January 6. Through my camera lens, I captured the fear in their eyes — not just from the attacks by a small group of violent provocateurs but from the overwhelming sight of thousands of protesters advancing on their position. The police were clearly caught off guard.

But why? Were they unaware of the scheduled marches and legally permitted protests on the Capitol grounds that day?

I needed to find the answers to these questions, and that curiosity sparked what has now become a three-and-a-half-year investigation into the inner workings of the Capitol Police.

No ordinary day

When I first met former Capitol Police Lieutenant Tarik Johnson, I told him that I had previously written about how he and his fellow officers were set up as “sacrificial pawns” on January 6. He pointed his finger at me and said, “That’s exactly right. They didn’t give a s**t about what happened to us that day.”

Now, imagine being a Capitol Police officer showing up to work on January 6, 2021, expecting a normal day at the office. Whether you were a rookie or had 20 years of experience with the agency — regardless of your specialized training and position — many officers had spent years performing what amounted to the duties of a glorified tour guide for VIP visitors and general tourists at the nation’s seat of government.

That’s an oversimplification, as the Capitol Police are made up of various specialized units, including long-gun-certified officers, a civil disturbance unit, the criminal investigation squad, the intelligence unit, dignitary protection, a SWAT team, the hazardous devices team, and several others.

Why didn’t the Capitol Police frontline officers know what was coming their way?

Skipping ahead to the initial breach of the west-side barricades — where Capitol Police Officer Caroline Edwards was knocked unconscious after being shoved down by the first violent perpetrators, hitting her head on the concrete steps — now imagine being one of the few dozen Capitol Police officers ordered to respond, redeploy, and defend the Capitol’s lower west terrace against the initial agitators and provocateurs. Many supposed protesters arrived wearing gas masks, carrying blunt instruments, and holding canisters of various types of pepper spray. And who knows what else might have been concealed under their thick winter clothing?

You’ve heard over Capitol Police radio that unexpected visitors have already overrun outer barricades. They’re now pushing and pulling against the barricade line you just arrived to defend. Some rioters are breaking apart permanent black-metal fencing, turning the pieces into clubs and projectile spears.

You’ve arrived on the battle line without protective gear — no helmet, eye protection, or gas mask. Still, your job is to prevent further incursion toward the Capitol Building, where Congress and the vice president of the United States are currently in session to certify the Electoral College vote.

Already outnumbered by both peaceful protesters and violent agitators, you look over the crowd and see thousands more protesters marching toward your position, their intentions unknown.

As you defend the third, hastily assembled bike rack barricade line, you're being shoved, hit with flagpoles and broken pieces of fencing, and assaulted with pepper spray. You have no idea whether the thousands approaching your position also intend violence or carry more dangerous weapons.

You might rightly assume you may never go home to your family again. Tarik Johnson told me exactly that. During the initial chaos and violence on January 6, Johnson called his wife to say he might not make it home alive.

Video verification

Two years later, many of my initial impressions were challenged by new and increasingly available evidence. For example, on the evening of Jan. 6, after returning to my Arlington, Virginia, hotel room, I posted a video on YouTube during which I said I had witnessed the majority of the violence being committed by Trump supporters. After returning home, I spent five days conducting a frame-by-frame analysis of my own footage, taken from the Capitol’s west terrace battle line and through the Capitol building.

During that video review, I repeatedly found myself asking, “Who is that?”

By the time I published my first story about what I witnessed that day, all my initial preconceptions were challenged. I even adopted a new life rule: “I’ll never again believe anything I don't see with my own eyes ... but even then, consult the videotape.”

Our eyes can deceive us during a chaotic, violent event. That's why every law enforcement officer knows that a dozen eyewitnesses to a violent crime will give a dozen different accounts of what happened. Without ample experience in such events, the shock of unexpected violence makes people's minds register and process the episode in various and often contradictory ways.

I now know — beyond a reasonable doubt — that some of those frontline agitators and provocateurs, who I initially assumed were all Trump supporters, were anything but.

Right-wing militias were present. Left-wing anarchists and Antifa? Possibly. I definitely observed crowd manipulation tactics from professional provocateurs experienced in inciting violence and coordinating the movements of large groups.

Do I know for certain whom these provocateurs worked for? Not entirely, but our understanding is growing.

Secret commandos on scene

Senate Sergeant-at-Arms Michael Stenger, in his final testimony before Congress on February 23, 2021, stated: “There is an opportunity to learn lessons from the events of January 6. Investigations should be considered as to funding and travel of what appears to be professional agitators.”

During the January 2023 trial of Richard “Bigo” Barnett, who posed with his feet on Nancy Pelosi’s desk, defense attorney Bradford Geyer directly asked Capitol Police Captain Carneysha Mendoza whether the provocateurs she observed on January 6 operated as “highly trained violent people who work and coordinate together.” Mendoza confirmed, “Yes.”

In the lead-up to my second story about January 6 — published on February 24, 2021 — my investigations led me to discover and report that several federal agencies, including Army special forces operatives, were embedded in the crowd that day. This was later confirmed by a Newsweek story on January 3, 2022, headlined “Secret Commandos with Shoot-to-Kill Authority Were at the Capitol.”

Newsweek revealed that the mission of those tactical units from virtually every three-letter federal agency, along with “the role that the military played in this highly classified operation,” is “still unknown.” Yet those special operators and tactical forces were “seconded” to the FBI.

If the FBI had advance intelligence substantial enough to warrant deploying such a highly trained and well-armed secret force, why didn’t the Capitol Police frontline officers also know what was coming their way?

Or did only certain individuals within the Capitol Police leadership know what was coming that day?

BOMBSHELL: The CIA was at the Capitol on January 6 — doing what?



Judicial Watch has filed a federal lawsuit seeking to force the CIA to disclose any involvement in the January 6 Capitol riot — and President Tom Fitton of Judicial Watch isn’t giving up.

After coming across documents that showed that the CIA had teams present at the Capitol and responding to the alleged pipe bombs found near the RNC and DNC, as well as other agents on standby, Fitton believes there’s a lot more to the story than the public is being told.

“This was astonishing news to us,” Fitton tells BlazeTV hosts Jill Savage of “Blaze News Tonight” and James Poulos of “Zero Hour."

“We didn’t know the CIA had operators deployed on January 6 at the U.S. Capitol, and I’m sure it’s a surprise to Americans that the CIA was conducting law enforcement activities here in America,” he continues.

When Judicial Watch followed up with the comprehensive FOIA request for records explaining what the CIA was doing at the Capitol on January 6, Fitton tells Savage and Poulos they “got the proverbial hand to the face.”

“We’ve sued in federal court for the records,” he says. “Law enforcement personnel working for the CIA on the ground on January 6, certainly that ought to be disclosable or disclosed to the American people.”

Savage then notes the “six different areas involved” in the lawsuit. “Shots fired inside the Capitol, a person shot inside the Capitol, requests for CIA support or assistance to the Capitol, bomb technicians, and accelerating or explosive canine devices in any after-action reports about January 6 events in Washington, D.C.”

“So why are all those different areas mentioned here?” Savage asks Fitton.

“Those are the areas that we think the CIA was likely to be involved in, and given the prior documents we have, certainly with the explosive devices that were found, that was really specific to the CIA,” he explains.


Want more from Blaze News Tonight?

To enjoy more provocative opinions, expert analysis, and breaking stories you won’t see anywhere else, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Tucker Carlson Tears Into House Republicans For ‘Rewarding’ FBI

‘It was one of the most corrupt things that’s ever happened in our lifetimes in this country’

Liz Cheney, Jan. 6 Committee suppressed key evidence of Trump pushing for 10,000 National Guard troops to protect Capitol: Report



Former Rep. Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.) and the January 6 Committee suppressed key evidence that former President Donald Trump pushed for 10,000 National Guard troops to protect the U.S. Capitol building ahead of the riots, according to a report.

Cheney and the Democratic-led House Select Committee on January 6 contended that there was "no evidence" to support Trump officials' claims the White House had pressed for 10,000 National Guard troops ahead of the protests in Washington, D.C., on Jan. 6, 2021.

However, a transcribed interview conducted by the committee from January 2022 appears to show evidence that Trump urged Democrat leadership to bring in thousands of National Guard troops to prevent any widespread violence on Jan. 6, according to a new report from The Federalist.

Then-Deputy Chief of Staff Anthony Ornato was interviewed by the committee on Jan. 28, 2022. The transcripts show that he told Cheney and other investigators that he overheard White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows urge Democrat D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser to request as many National Guard troops as she needed to protect the city before the demonstrations centered around the results of the 2020 presidential election.

Ornato testified that Meadows "wanted to know if she need[ed] any more guardsmen."

"And I remember the number 10,000 coming up of, you know, 'The president wants to make sure that you have enough.' You know, 'He is willing to ask for 10,000.' I remember that number," Ornato told the January 6 Committee. "Now that you said it, it reminded me of it. And that she was all set. She had, I think it was like 350 or so for intersection control, and those types of things not in the law enforcement capacity at the time."

Mollie Ziegler Hemingway wrote, "Not only did the committee not accurately characterize the interview, they suppressed the transcript from public review. On top of that, committee allies began publishing critical stories and even conspiracy theories about Ornato ahead of follow-up interviews with him. Ornato was a career Secret Service official who had been detailed to the security position in the White House."

Republican Rep. Barry Loudermilk – chairman of the Committee on House Administration's Subcommittee on Oversight – said in a statement on Friday, "The former J6 Select Committee apparently withheld Mr. Ornato’s critical witness testimony from the American people because it contradicted their pre-determined narrative."

"Mr. Ornato's testimony proves what Mr. Meadows has said all along, President Trump did in fact offer 10,000 National Guard troops to secure the U.S. Capitol, which was turned down," Loudermilk noted.

"This is just one example of important information the former Select Committee hid from the public because it contradicted what they wanted the American people to believe," he continued. "And, this is exactly why my investigation is committed to uncovering all the facts, no matter the outcome."

Also in Ornato's testimony, he explained how Trump's White House was frustrated with the response of a quick reaction force requested from the Department of Defense.

As the protests escalated into chaos, Meadows called on Acting Secretary of Defense Christopher Miller to deploy the quick reaction force.

"So then I remember the chief saying, 'Hey, I'm calling Secretary of Defense to get that QRF in here,'" Ornato told the committee. "And then I remember the chief telling Miller, 'Get them in here, get them in here to secure the Capitol now.' And that's where I remember the National Guard being, you know, ordered by the chief."

According to Ornato's testimony, Meadows had been constantly inquiring about when the QRF would arrive to secure the Capitol.

"Every time [Meadows] would ask, ‘What’s taking so long?’ It would be, like, you know, ‘This isn’t just start the car and we’re there. We have to muster them up, we have to’ — so it was constant excuses coming of — not excuses, but what they were actually doing to get them there," Ornato testified. "So, you know, 'We only have so many here right now. They’re given an hour to get ready.' So there’s, like, all these timelines that was being explained to the chief. And he relayed that, like, you know — he’s like, 'I don’t care, just get them here,’ you know, and ‘Get them to the Capitol, not to the White House.'"

As Blaze News previously reported in January, the Jan. 6 Committee has been accused of deleting password-protected files that contained "critical information" just days before Republicans seized the majority in the House of Representatives.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Trump Calls For Release Of Jan 6 ‘Hostages’

'Nobody’s been treated ever in history so badly as those people'