Pedal Commander: A plug-and-play solution to throttle lag



As a car enthusiast who's spent decades wrenching on everything from classic muscle cars to modern vehicles, I love gadgets that deliver real results without voiding warranties or requiring a trip to the shop.

That's why the Pedal Commander caught my eye — it's a plug-and-play throttle controller that promises sharper acceleration, better fuel efficiency, and customizable modes, all without touching your engine.

I clocked a solid 0-60 improvement of about 0.8 seconds using a simple app timer, though your mileage will vary by vehicle.

I installed one on my daily driver, a 2016 Porsche Cayenne Diesel, and tested it over 500 miles of city, highway, and spirited backroad driving. Spoiler: It lives up to the hype for most drivers, but it's not a magic bullet for everyone.

Installation: easier than an oil change

Right out of the box, the Pedal Commander feels premium — compact aluminum unit with a wired controller and a mobile app. Hooking it up took me under 10 minutes: Unplug your stock throttle connector under the dash, plug in the device, and mount the controller wherever it's handy (I stuck mine near the steering column on the carpet). No tools, no cutting wires, and crucially, no permanent mods to your car.

The included app (iOS/Android) pairs instantly via Bluetooth, letting you tweak settings on the fly. For tech-averse folks, the physical buttons on the controller handle 90% of adjustments or use the phone app — it's simple.

Performance punch: bye-bye throttle lag

The star of the show is how it eliminates that infuriating "dead pedal" delay you get in so many modern drive-by-wire cars. Hitting the gas in my Cayenne used to feel like mashing a soggy sponge; now, in Sport+ mode, it's like flipping a switch — immediate torque surge without drama.

Merging onto highways? Effortless. Overtaking slowpokes? Pure grin-factor. I clocked a solid 0-60 improvement of about 0.8 seconds using a simple app timer, though your mileage will vary by vehicle.

On the flip side, it's not adding actual horsepower — it's just optimizing what your ECU already delivers by remapping throttle sensitivity. It gives a one-to-one pedal response. If you're chasing dyno-proven gains, look elsewhere (like a tune). But for stock cars, this is a low-risk way to wake up your ride.

RELATED: This affordable dashcam may just pay for itself

Lauren Fix

Fuel economy boost: ECO mode delivers (mostly)

Here's where it shines for efficiency chasers: Switch to ECO mode, and it smooths out aggressive throttle inputs, encouraging gentler acceleration that pays off at the pump. Over my test loop (mixed 60/40 city/highway), I saw MPG jump from 32 to 34 — that's a legit fuel savings, especially noticeable in stop-and-go traffic. The app's real-time data graphs helped me dial in habits, like easing off sooner for coasting.

That said, gains aren't universal. If you're a lead-foot who ignores the modes, don't expect miracles — especially if you live in Sport mode. Pedal Commander's no substitute for proper driving technique or maintenance.

Modes and customization: tailored to your drive

With eight modes (ECO, City, Sport, Sport+, and its plus variants) plus fine-tuned sensitivity sliders, it's incredibly versatile. I toggled between ECO for commutes and Sport+ for fun runs via the app's clean interface — think drag-and-drop sliders and mode presets.

The verdict — a must for pedal lag-haters

If throttle lag bugs you and you want snappier response plus bonus MPG without drilling holes or flashing your ECU, grab a Pedal Commander. It's transformed my Cayenne from appliance to enthusiast tool, proving you can get more pep and efficiency stock. Perfect for hybrids, crossovers, diesel-powered, or any drive-by-wire daily.

Just drive responsibly — this thing makes power feel addictive. Highly recommended for anyone tired of waiting for their car to wake up.

The company profiles and product recommendations that Align publishes are meant solely to inform and edify our subscribers. Unless explicitly labeled as such, they are neither paid promotions nor endorsements.

Quick Fix: Is a flood-damaged car worth the savings?



Hi, I'm Lauren Fix, longtime automotive journalist and a member of the Society of Automotive Engineers. Welcome back to "Quick Fix," where I answer car-related questions you submit to me.

Today's question comes from Paul in Pennsylvania.

Hi Lauren:

What is the deal with flood-damaged cars?

Should I take a chance? The deals sound great, but am I buying a nightmare?

Great question, Paul, and I think this is something a lot of people get confused about.

Remember Hurricanes Rita and Katrina? Combined, they resulted in some 500,000 flood-damaged cars, many of which ended up on the used market.

I'll say now the same thing I said then: Don't buy a car with flood damage. It's not worth the risk.

Why?

Number one, there is no warranty. I don't care if the car is brand new, you lose your warranty right out of the box. No manufacturer is going to stand behind it. And they can tell if the car is flood-damaged; even if it's not obvious upon inspection, the insurance companies will report it.

Secondly, water can do unseen damage to a car's passive safety features. This includes airbags, forward collision warning, even seat belts.

If the water got into the base of the car, like where your feet go onto the carpet, that could rot out everything underneath — including the various computerized sensors that keep these safety features working.

Even worse, corrosion from water could actually cause an airbag not to deploy or deploy with no reason. Not good.

The third thing that people often fail to consider is the health hazards a flood-damaged car can present. If its in the ductwork, you're breathing it: anything from mold to mildew to E. coli.

Think about it: You don't know where the car was. It was underwater, yes, but was it salt water? Sewer water?

Now — if you suspect a car you're looking at is flood-damaged, the best thing to do is take it to an ASE-certified technician. If he confirms the damage, walk away. No matter how good the deal may seem, you do not want that car.

Even without a mechanic, there are a few tell-tale signs to look for.

  • Excessive air freshener: If they've doused the car with perfume in the interior ... yeah, that's a clue they're covering something up.
  • Rust in weird places: Rust is never good, of course, but in some places on a car it's understandable. In other places — on the hood hinges, for example — it's a very bad sign.
  • Moisture in the fuse box: If you see any signs that water's gotten under that plastic cover, that means it's been in a flood.

Finally, watch out for "washed" titles. Unscrupulous sellers will move a title from state to state to try to hide flood damage or a car's totaled status. Don't rely on the title alone; companies like Carfax can help protect.

Ultimately, its better to trust your gut than to snap up a too-good-to-be-true deal. Flood-damaged cars are nothing to play around with, and they can be very dangerous.

Got a car-related question? Email me at getquickfix@pm.me.

84-month car loans: Smart move or financial trap?



Car buying has never been more complicated — or more expensive. The average new car price has climbed to nearly $49,000, compared to just under $34,000 a decade ago, according to Kelley Blue Book. That kind of sticker shock leaves many buyers asking: “How can I possibly afford this?”

Dealers are quick to provide an answer: the 84-month car loan.

For years, the buyer will owe more than the vehicle is worth. If they try to sell or trade in the car, they’ll need to pay the bank just to get out of the loan.

It sounds simple at first, but it’s a trap. Spread across seven years, the monthly payments shrink to a number that feels manageable to most people. A $50,000 vehicle suddenly seems affordable when the cost is sliced into smaller installments, but is this really a smart solution, or does it carry consequences that can trap buyers in years of financial frustration?

No accident

The rise of 84-month loans is no accident. Dealerships benefit enormously from pushing buyers into longer financing terms. Smaller monthly payments make it easier for salespeople to convince customers to move up to pricier trims, tack on optional packages, or select luxury features that would otherwise be out of reach.

For the financing office, stretching out the term makes it easier to close deals with so-called payment shoppers — those who focus only on whether they can afford the monthly bill, not the total cost of the vehicle. In addition, a lower monthly car payment improves the buyer’s debt-to-income ratio, which helps more customers qualify for loans they might not have secured under traditional 36-month terms.

On the surface, this seems like a win-win arrangement. The buyer gets the car they want at a payment they can afford, while the dealer locks in a bigger sale. But what feels like an opportunity on day one quickly becomes a burden as the true cost of the loan takes shape. And in the end, you will pay a bigger price.

Costly trade-off

Why? The most obvious issue is interest you pay. When a car loan stretches across seven years, there are far more months for interest charges to accumulate. Only the finance company wins.

Consider a buyer who finances $40,000 at 7% interest with a traditional 60-month loan — they’ll pay roughly $7,500 in interest. With an 84-month loan, that interest expense number climbs to more than $10,700.

In other words, the buyer pays over $3,000 more for the privilege of lowering their monthly bill. For most households, that’s a costly trade-off.

And higher interest rates themselves don’t remain equal. Lenders know that a seven-year loan carries more risk than a five-year loan, so the rate is higher. Over that longer period, economic conditions could change, inflation could rise, or the borrower’s financial situation could deteriorate. To protect themselves, banks and credit unions often attach higher rates to longer loans. That means buyers aren’t just paying interest for more years — they’re paying higher interest rates, and the only one that makes out is the financial institution.

RELATED: Introducing 'Quick Fix': Practical answers to all your car questions

Blaze Media

Much depreciated

The financial pitfalls don’t stop there. Vehicles are depreciating assets. The moment a new car leaves the dealership, it loses about 20% of its value. Within the first year, that loss can climb to 30%.

With long-term loans, the first several years of payments go mostly toward interest, with very little progress made on the loan principal. The result is what’s known as negative equity, or being “upside down.” For years, the buyer will owe more than the vehicle is worth. If they try to sell or trade in the car, they’ll need to pay the bank just to get out of the loan. This forces you to keep the vehicle for a longer period of time or take the big financial penalty.

Warranty warning

This problem is compounded by warranties. Most new vehicles come with a bumper-to-bumper warranty that lasts three years or 36,000 miles, and a powertrain warranty that typically extends to five years or 60,000 miles.

Those timelines don’t come close to covering a seven-year loan. That means a buyer still making monthly payments could face a transmission or engine failure with no warranty protection. They would be paying for expensive repairs on top of paying down the car itself, a double hit that can wreck household budgets. And these extended warranty companies are not worth the money either, which would increase your monthly payment on top of the car payment.

With prices rising for both new and used vehicles, long loan terms are more than just a temptation — they are, for many families, the only way to fit a car payment into the monthly budget.

But while the appeal is easy to see, the long-term risks are just as clear. Stretching a loan to seven years often leaves buyers paying thousands more in interest, trapped in negative equity, and financially vulnerable if their circumstances change. In the event of job loss, medical bills, or an unexpected expense, they may be stuck with a car they can’t afford to keep but also can’t afford to sell.

Making it make sense

This doesn’t mean long-term loans are never justified. There are a few situations where they can make sense. Some automakers offer 0% financing for qualified buyers, which eliminates the concern over accruing interest. Others may find themselves on a fixed budget where the choice is either a longer loan or no car at all. And in cases where a buyer plans to keep a reliable, higher-quality vehicle for a decade or more, the extra interest paid over time may balance out in the long run. You have to be honest and consider the true costs.

Still, for the majority of consumers, financial experts consistently recommend avoiding 84-month loans. The smarter move is to aim for 48- or 60-month loan terms, which not only save on interest but also keep buyers closer to a car’s actual value throughout the life of the loan. Car shoppers should also consider more affordable vehicles, make larger down payments, or explore certified pre-owned options to keep their finances in check.

Cars may be getting more expensive, but debt traps don’t have to be part of the deal. Buyers who look beyond the monthly payment and focus instead on the total cost of ownership will be far better positioned to protect both their wallets and their peace of mind.

The finance manager at any dealer is going to try and close the sale. That’s their job. Yours is to understand just what you’re getting into when you sign a long-term loan.

My 1966 Plymouth Belvedere let her 225 Slant-6 do the talking



“The door is ajar. The door is ajar. The door is ajar.”

That’s where it started in 1984, in the driver’s seat of a Chrysler. I was 10 years old when I saw my first “talking car” and thought it was wicked cool. Boys my age grew up pretending our banana-seat bikes were the jacked-up talking Trans Am called “KITT” on "Knight Rider." Go on, click that link. You know you want to hear the theme song.

Our first Slant-6 lived in a 1969 Dodge Dart — white, four-door — that my mother bought for $200 in 1982.

That’s what we thought “smart” cars were. Had we known that by 2015 our automobiles would morph into steel mommies that made all our decisions for us, we might not have been so eager for “progress.”

Motor mouth

It started with the “helpful alerts” like Chrysler’s door-open warning. It’s reached its ... zenith? ... today with squawking digital touchscreens that beep, chime, blare, blink, cajole, and do just about everything except what you want a car to do.

Try finding a modern automobile that isn’t an iPad on wheels. Like the annoying, never-shuts-off “your food is ready” repeating chirp from the microwave, modern cars have been designed to irritate you to death instead of letting you perish naturally in a wreck like God intended.

My car is a 2012 Prius. Nope, I didn’t buy it for “environmental” reasons (pfft). I bought it because when it comes to cars, I prioritize value and reliability over the long term, and these things are tanks that go as many miles as the vaunted Toyota Camry. And as far as modern cars go — yes, 2012 is “modern” to me — it’s not that bad.

2012 Toyota Prius/Heritage Images/Getty Images

But still, a warning chime in middle C goes off 50 times in a row (yes, I counted) if I don’t buckle my seatbelt fast enough.

Even if I do, the same note dings for the first 10 seconds for no reason that I can discern, except to tell me the car is on. As if I couldn’t see the fireworks display of orange triangles and stupid pictograms that dance around on the projected dashboard every time it starts.

Nanny Camry

And like all contemporary cars, the Prius believes it knows better how to drive than I do, and the engineers at Toyota have decided that I don’t get to make decisions about the gear range, torque, or wheel spin.

Because the car is engineered for fuel efficiency, the transmission is continuously variable — it’s the sloppiest, softest gearbox I’ve ever driven, and it’s painfully slow to change ranges when needed.

Getting up my snow-covered driveway in Vermont is a challenge because the car “features” traction control. It cannot be turned off, even temporarily. Despite the best intentions of the designers, my Toyota simply cannot be parked on any incline in winter because it won’t ever grab the road the right way to get unstuck in snow.

You can’t rock it back and forth the way you could with a manual with a clutch, or even with an old-fashioned column-mounted automatic shift. The gear shift is literally an electronic joystick that gives zero physical-world feedback and operates on a digital timer, rather than in sync with the motion I apply to the stick.

Sunday drivers

More recent cars are even worse. My friend bought a 2022 BMW SUV. This friend loves high technology and automation to the degree that I loathe it. He couldn’t wait for me to drive this beast and experience it driving itself.

And it does. It keeps the lane, it brakes if something enters the road ahead. It’s impressive and uncanny, but I don’t like it. And while not even my age contemporaries will listen, this is going to contribute to further degradation of human driving skills.

It’s like what happens to commercial airline pilots. Modern passenger jets are so highly automated that most pilots spend only about 10% of total flying time actually flying the plane manually. “Stick skills,” as they’re called, get lost, leaving pilots unprepared for the weight and feel of the craft when they have to take over in an emergency.

Built tough

Now, it’s true that modern automobiles are far more reliable than they ever were. I have to admit how pleased I am with the fact that my Toyota has never failed to start and has never “run rough” or stalled.

Neither did my old Toyota. This is my second, and the only reason I don’t have the first one still is that a 17-year-old rear-ended me at 20 miles an hour.

Anyone old enough to remember standing over a carburetor spraying ether and praying the engine would catch in the dead of winter appreciates the reliability of modern internal combustion engines. Modern cars don’t rust like they used to either. My childhood in the '80s featured cars that were less than 10 years old limping along, nothing but a lattice of rust held together with Bondo long enough to get to the junkyard.

Overall, modern-build quality is far superior to what we used to have.

No passing Caprice

But I don’t like modern cars, and I long for some of the simple, straightforward, and attractive autos I grew up with and had the pleasure of owning. The full-sized, V8, comfort-suspension American sedan, for example, desperately needs to make a comeback.

My 1986 Chevrolet Caprice Brougham was a Cadillac at a working man’s price. That silver beast with a black vinyl top and crushed velour bench seats was a hotel lobby on wheels. You could drive over a railroad crossing at 50 miles per hour and not even notice.

A custom 1988 Chevrolet Caprice LS Brougham/Julia Beverly/Getty Images

On my first night in Vermont, I brought the car down off a tow-dolly and made my way to my friend’s house on a dark country road, up a hill, in a place I’d never been. Naturally, I hit a doe at 35 miles an hour. She went flying into the ditch, but the Chevrolet didn’t even swerve off course. When I got to my friend’s house and checked out the front end, there was no damage.

Slanted and enchanted

The cars I miss the most, though, weren’t the biggest or plushest. But they were the best mechanical engines Americans could buy for decades: the fabled Chrysler Slant-Six. The Slant-Six engine is so called because the six-cylinder motor block is canted 30 degrees off true in order to fit under the lower, sleeker hoods introduced in the 1960s.

Some kind of sorcery went into the Slant-Six engine because these things would not die. Ever. Our first Slant-Six lived in a 1969 Dodge Dart — white, four-door — that my mother bought for $200 in 1982.

1974 Dodge Dart on the set of "Friday Night Lights"/NBC/Getty Images

We went all over Southern California in that car until the day it was too rusted to pass inspection. The junkyard tow driver showed up and started the engine out of curiosity. It fired right up and made that sound that you are hearing in your head right now if you’ve ever owned a Slant-Six. These engines ran with a soft and regular tick-tap-tick-tap like a well-oiled Singer sewing machine. There’s no sound in the world like it.

My mother cried when the Dart disappeared around the corner and so did I.

Eventually, I bought my own 1975 Dart, and it carried me around rural Virginia as a cub crime reporter for years, with air conditioning that would have chilled a penguin. All that for $500.

Ode to Francine

Years later, I bought the car I now miss the most: a 1966 Plymouth Belvedere II with a 225-cubic-inch Slant-Six, retrofitted with the Super Six double-barrel carburetor for extra oomph. In darkest navy blue and chrome, Francine was in near mint condition with only 46,000 miles when I bought her in 2010. She started with a mere half-second flick of the ignition switch and never faltered or stalled.

Francine was so perfectly preserved that guys stared on the street, and a couple of teenagers begged me to drive them to the prom so they could be seen in a car from the era when automobile romance was still alive.

As a bonus, Francine was virtually theft-proof. Not only was this large sedan a manual shift with a clutch, but it was a three-on-the-tree; a three-gear manual shifted by a stick on the steering column. Put this column in front of your Gen Z grandson and watch his puzzled expression.

I wish I’d better tagged the photos in my old phone, but here she is, a few days before I sold her:

Josh Slocum

Now that is a car.

Tell me about the cars you’ve loved and lost in the comments!

Quick Fix: Can I repair a rusted-out underbody myself?



Hi, I'm Lauren Fix, longtime automotive journalist and a member of the Society of Automotive Engineers. Welcome back to "Quick Fix," where I answer car-related questions you submit to me.

Today's question comes from Stephanie in Michigan.

Hi, Lauren:

Is it possible for a car owner to repair a rusted-out bottom of their automobile without a professional?

Well, Stephanie, unless you've got a lot of collision experience, I would recommend not doing this yourself.

Now, here's what the pros do at the collision shop. They blast the underbody using compressed air and some type of abrasive: sand, walnut shells, baking soda.

Or these days, they may also use laser rust removal.

Theoretically, you could probably rent the equipment and do it yourself. And then you could take your car to a place like Ziebart for rust protection.

But keep in mind the safety considerations. You want to wear protective gear — and you want to know what you're doing.

And not just for your own safety, but also for your car's. Remember, there is a lot of stuff down there: brake lines, fuel lines, rubber hoses, driveshaft transmission. If you damage one of those, you could end up with a much bigger problem.

So you want to make sure it's done correctly. If the rust damage is so severe that you actually have holes in your floor pan (which used to happen a lot in 80s cars), then you get into replacing sections, and it's probably a good idea to leave it to a collision shop.

Got a car-related question? Email me at getquickfix@pm.me.

Trump’s EPA set to scrap Biden’s $1 trillion EV mandate



The Environmental Protection Agency has just set off what may be the most consequential policy shift in the auto industry in over a decade.

On Tuesday, EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin announced a proposal to rescind the controversial 2009 Endangerment Finding, the legal foundation that has been used for 16 years to justify greenhouse gas emissions regulations impacting every car, truck, and bus sold in the U.S.

If you’re concerned about start-stop technology, EV mandates, or the regulatory costs built into the price of your next vehicle, now is the time to speak up.

If finalized, this proposal would dismantle more than $1 trillion in regulatory mandates, including President Biden’s aggressive electric vehicle requirements, and restore consumer choice to a market long constrained by unelected bureaucrats. It would also put the brakes on unpopular mandates like engine start-stop systems and costly EV infrastructure requirements that automakers say have driven up vehicle prices.

Why this proposal is so significant

The Endangerment Finding gave the EPA unprecedented power to regulate six greenhouse gases under Section 202(a) of the Clean Air Act. It asserted that these gases — carbon dioxide among them — posed a threat to public health and welfare, opening the door for sweeping emissions mandates on the auto industry.

Since then, the EPA has used the finding to justify a series of regulations designed to force automakers toward electric vehicles and away from gasoline-powered cars. Biden’s 2024 standards, for example, require automakers to cut tailpipe emissions in half by 2032 and predict that between 35% and 56% of all new vehicles sold will be electric within the next decade.

California and 11 other states have piggybacked on these standards with even stricter rules, including outright bans on gasoline-only cars by 2035.

Critics say these mandates amount to a de facto EV requirement that Congress never approved. They also argue that the Endangerment Finding was based on flawed legal reasoning and exaggerated climate risk assumptions.

Under Obama and Biden, the EPA "twisted the law, ignored precedent, and warped science to achieve their preferred ends and stick American families with hundreds of billions of dollars in hidden taxes every single year,” Zeldin said at the announcement, which was held at a truck dealership in Indiana.

$1 trillion at stake

According to EPA estimates, rescinding the Endangerment Finding would roll back regulations totaling more than $1 trillion in compliance costs. Automakers have spent years re-engineering vehicles to meet complex emissions targets, often passing those costs on to consumers.

The American Trucking Associations estimates that Biden’s electric truck mandate alone would have “crippled our supply chain, disrupted deliveries, and raised prices for American families and businesses.” ATA President and CEO Chris Spear welcomed the EPA’s move.

Indiana Governor Mike Braun (R), who joined Zeldin at the event, echoed that sentiment: “We can protect our environment and support American jobs at the same time."

Legal foundations and next steps

The EPA argues that recent Supreme Court rulings — including West Virginia v. EPA and Loper Bright v. Raimondo — make it clear that major regulatory decisions of this scale must come from Congress, not federal agencies. These decisions limit the ability of the executive branch to unilaterally impose sweeping economic mandates without explicit legislative approval.

Here’s what happens next.

Public comment period: The proposal is now open for public comment until September 21, 2025. Americans, automakers, environmental groups, and industry stakeholders can weigh in via regulations.gov (Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2025-0194).

Final rulemaking: After reviewing comments, the EPA will finalize the rule. This process must also pass through the White House Office of Management and Budget for approval.

Legal challenges: Environmental groups and states like California are expected to sue, arguing that rescinding the Endangerment Finding violates the Supreme Court’s 2007 decision in Massachusetts v. EPA, which affirmed the agency’s authority to regulate greenhouse gases.

It’s likely the issue could end up before the Supreme Court again, prolonging uncertainty for automakers and consumers.

RELATED: $8 gas: The real cost of the EV agenda

Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

What this means for you

If the proposal is finalized and withstands legal challenges, it would reshape the entire automotive landscape.

The end of Biden’s EV mandate: Automakers would no longer be forced to prioritize EV production at the expense of gasoline-powered vehicles.

Lower vehicle costs: With fewer costly compliance requirements, manufacturers could pass savings on to consumers.

Restored consumer choice: Drivers could decide for themselves whether they want to buy EVs, hybrids, or gasoline-powered vehicles.

The end of California's outsized influence: The EPA could revoke California’s ability to set stricter emissions rules than federal standards, affecting 11 other states that follow California’s lead.

However, the process will take time. Automakers must plan years in advance, and environmental groups and states are are expected to fight every step of the way.

How to make your voice heard

The public comment period gives everyday Americans a rare chance to influence federal policy. If you’re concerned about start-stop technology, EV mandates, or the regulatory costs built into the price of your next vehicle, now is the time to speak up.

You can submit your comments directly through the Federal eRulemaking Portal by searching for Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2025-0194. Comments must be received by September 21, 2025.

The EPA will also hold a virtual public hearing on August 19 and 20, with an additional session on August 21 if needed. Details are available on the agency’s website.

The bigger picture

This isn’t just about EVs. The Endangerment Finding has been the legal backbone for every major greenhouse gas rule in the last 16 years. Rolling it back would not only upend Biden’s climate agenda but also shift power back to Congress and the states.

Supporters of the rescission say it’s about restoring accountability. Opponents, however, argue that eliminating these regulations would stall progress on climate change and undermine the transition to cleaner technologies. They vow to fight the proposal in court.

This move by the EPA could fundamentally change the future of the auto industry and the vehicles available to American drivers. Whether you support or oppose it, this proposal deserves your attention. Over the next 45 days, the agency is accepting feedback from the public — and your input can help determine whether these costly and controversial mandates remain in place or are rolled back for good.

You have a voice in this process. Make sure it’s heard.

For more information and to view supporting documents, visit the EPA’s official docket page.

Quick Fix: Why are there so many uninsured drivers — and how can I protect myself?



Hi, I'm Lauren Fix, longtime automotive journalist and a member of the Society of Automotive Engineers. Welcome back to "Quick Fix," where I answer car-related questions you submit to me.

Today's question comes from Bob in California:

Hi Lauren,

What is the current rate of uninsured motorists? I live in California, and it seems like 1 out every 6 drivers has no insurance. That has to have an enormous impact on insurance costs.

Furthermore, it doesn't seem like in CA they are impounding these cars or attempting to get people to pony up for insurance.

What are your thoughts?

You are correct, Bob: California has a significant issue with uninsured drivers.

According to estimates from the California Department of Motor Vehicles and the Insurance Information Institute, approximately 17% of California drivers are uninsured as of 2025. This translates to roughly 4.7 million uninsured motorists out of the state’s 27.65 million licensed drivers.

So your estimate that "1 out of every 6 drivers" lack insurance is spot-on.

It's a big mess, and it's hitting insured drivers hard, inflating premiums and leaving responsible drivers to foot the bill for others' negligence. California's new 2025 liability minimums are a step toward better protection, but they're also pushing premiums up, which could ironically increase the uninsured rate as low-income drivers get priced out. It's a tough cycle to break.

Fines and impoundment are on the books, but they're not aggressively enforced enough to deter the sheer volume of uninsured drivers.

Impounding vehicles sounds effective, but it's costly for authorities and politically sensitive, especially in poor communities. Electronic verification systems could help, but they're only as good as the follow-through — random checks or sting operations might catch more violators.

What can you do to protect yourself as a law-abiding California driver? Uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage, or UM/UIM, is a must. I'd recommend boosting your UM/UIM limits to at least $100,000/$300,000 or higher if affordable, as medical and repair costs can skyrocket.

To solve this problem, California needs a multipronged approach: tougher enforcement, more impoundments, stricter DMV checks, better access to affordable insurance, and public campaigns to stress the risks of driving uninsured.

Until then, insured drivers like you are stuck subsidizing the system. It's frustrating, but arming yourself with solid coverage and staying vocal about enforcement gaps can make a difference.

And unfortunately, it's not just a problem in California. Across the U.S., about 14% of drivers — roughly 1 in 7 — are uninsured, with states like Washington, D.C. (25%) and New Mexico (25%) leading the pack, driving up premiums for everyone else. Check your state’s uninsured motorist rate and consider adding UM/UIM coverage to protect yourself on the road.


Got a car-related question? Email me at getquickfix@pm.me.

Staying sober, one checkpoint at a time



I had my last drink 11 years and one day ago. I was on my way to detox at the local ICU.

With the amounts I was drinking, no rehab facility thought I'd survive detox, so they kept turning me away.

I really wanted to hit that checkpoint. I wanted the officer to ask 'Have you had anything to drink today?'

The ICU said they'd take me, but I needed to stave off the shakes and DTs until I could check in.

So I pounded a half-quart of Johnny Walker Black and drove myself to the ICU. And that was my last drink.

Next exit

I like being sober. And I don't miss the nightmare of alcoholism. But there's something missing.

There's a part of me that's empty, that can't be filled. I keep chasing it, but I never find it.

In the Program (AA), they call that "the God-shaped hole." They'll tell you that the only thing that can fill the emptiness is God and His love and following His plan.

Well ... I've got God in my life. And I'm following His plan to the best of my ability. There's a path. Sometimes it's faint and murky. Sometimes it's hard to find. But I'm on it.

I just keep doing the next right thing and the next right thing after that.

Not only do I have God, I have a career, and family, and friends, and hobbies. And amazing things are happening. For example, I wrote a book, and someone actually published it. That would never have happened when I was drinking.

Don't look back

But the emptiness remains. And I feel driven to fill it. Often I'm overcome by the urge to run. Just burn everything down and go — job, family, everything. Hit the road. Don't look back. Figure it out along the way.

Just go. Just run.

And maybe, I think, I'll find what I'm looking for if I unburden myself. Maybe I'll find a way to fill that hole.

From what I understand, this is a common feeling among recovering addicts and alcoholics. They never stop chasing that high, and everything else is just a letdown.

But I wonder ...

I wonder if that emptiness was always there. That it was ever-present before the drugs and the booze. And the addiction was just a result of me trying to fill that hole.

And maybe there's no way I can shake it. Maybe it's going to be with me forever. And I'm going to have to figure out how to live with it somehow.

But in the Program, they also tell you not to worry about these things. That you only need to live your life one day at a time, because if you don't, it's too overwhelming.

RELATED: Bill W.: Alcoholic who helped himself by helping others

Bettmann/Getty Images

Rules of the road

So that's what I do. That's how I proceed. I do it one day at a time.

And today I'm fine. Today is a good day. I've got everything I need.

And I'll worry about tomorrow when it comes.

I was coming back from a day of fishing this past weekend. Driving down a mountain road, I saw one of those flashing highway info signs. It flashed "Slow" and then "Sobriety Checkpoint Ahead."

I really wanted to hit that checkpoint. I wanted the officer to ask, "Have you had anything to drink today?"

And I wanted to say, "I haven't had anything to drink since July 7, 2014!"

And then he'd laugh and I'd laugh, and maybe he'd tell me congratulations and then he'd wave me through.

But I didn't get to say my line. Because by the time I got to the checkpoint, they were done for the day, packing up their cones and signs and tables with the breathalyzers.

Oh well. I guess I'll have to do it next year.

Route 66 Diner Owners Share What They Love About The All-American Nostalgic Road Trip

People don’t visit Route 66 to change America; they come to be changed by it.

Quick Fix: What's the safest used car for my teenager?



Hi, I'm Lauren Fix, longtime automotive journalist and a member of the Society of Automotive Engineers. Welcome back to "Quick Fix," where I answer car-related questions you submit to me.

Today's question comes from Sarah in Tampa, Florida.

Hi Lauren:

We are helping our teenager buy his first car so he can drive himself to his job this summer. We want something safe, inexpensive, and reliable.

Can you 1) recommend where to look for such a car? And 2) suggest any makes or models that buyers tend to have good luck with?

Thank you!

Great question, Sarah — and I think I've got some good answers for you.

When it comes to buying a used car, dealers are always a good bet: buy a certified pre-owned vehicle and you're protected by a warranty.

If you want buy from a private seller, I recommend you get the vehicle you're considering up on a lift so an ASE certified mechanic can look at. Have him or her give the car one of three rankings:

Green: This means "go," of course. It's well-maintained, no rust, the engine and brakes are in good working order. An easy decision to buy.

Yellow: Cars like this might have been in a minor fender-bender, or have some concerning but repairable issues to deal with. Worth a buy if you know what you're getting into.

Red: Avoid. This includes severe accidents, flood damage, a salvage title, and the kind of problems (transmission, for example) that can cost more than the value of the car.

As far as car safety goes, the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) maintains a wealth of ratings online.

Now for where the rubber meets the road. Here are a few of my car recommendations at different price points.

New

  • Kia K4
  • Mazda CX 30
  • Toyota Prius
  • Honda Civic

Used under 20k

  • 2017 Toyota RAV4
  • 2018 Mazda CX 5
  • 2017 Honda CR – V
  • 2021 Toyota Corolla

Used under 15k

  • 2018 Kia Sportage
  • 2019 Kia Soul
  • 2017 Toyota Corolla
  • 2018 Mazda3

And, for some real bargains (keep in mind, however, that with cars 10-15 years old you're sacrificing safety and/or reliability):

Used under 10k

  • 2009 Toyota RAV4
  • 2010 Honda element
  • 2011 Toyota Avalon

Much more information where that came from. Just click the video below:

Got a car-related question? Email me at getquickfix@pm.me.