Pelosi’s head of security likely PERJURED himself with THIS bold Jan. 6 LIE
Steve Baker is one of only five journalists with access to the full 41,000 hours of January 6 tapes.
“He has been working on the January 6th puzzle for a while now, and his efforts have been frustrated over and over again by the politics in Washington when he is just trying to find the truth,” says Glenn Beck.
Today, Steve joins Glenn again to discuss a new piece of the puzzle: whether Pelosi’s head of security perjured himself in the Oath Keepers trial.
On October 3rd, 2022, “Jeffrey Nestler, assistant U.S. attorney, approached the lectern ... and said to Judge Amit Mehta, ... 'We have a rogue attorney that is about to release some FBI 302s,” which are confidential interviews kept under strict lock and key.
“Judge Amit Mehta did something that I have never seen before,” Steve tells Glenn. “He actually directed the media pool to put out a tweet and threaten this particular attorney and let him know that if he released those sealed documents, he would have him held in contempt of court.”
“And right then, I went, ‘What are in those documents?’” says Steve.
While the documents are still sealed, we do know that “the documents themselves were the actual FBI interviews of one of these Capitol Police officers, and the primary problem that the government has with those documents is that the testimony was changed.”
In the first testimony, the officer reported that his interaction with the Oath Keepers was positive.
He claimed that “the Oath Keepers lined up between him and the more agitated protesters and assisted him in keeping them off of him and helping him de-escalate,” Steve explains.
However, in a second interview that occurred only three months later, his “testimony was changed into an aggravated, contentious event with the Oath Keepers, as well as the creation of a second event to explain the first FBI interview that never happened,” continues Steve.
Because Steve has access to the tapes, he was able to pinpoint the exact moment when this alleged contentious encounter with the Oath Keepers occurred.
“Tell me about ... what the story was in the testimony and then what you found on the tape,” says Glenn.
To hear Steve’s shocking report, watch the clip below.
Want more from Glenn Beck?
To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.
London adding millions of Chinese CCTV cameras with facial recognition capability
The capital city of the United Kingdom has for years been quietly installing CCTV cameras, manufactured in China, which contain the capacity for facial recognition.
According to the U.K. Daily Mail, millions of cameras designed "to prevent crime and promote public safety" and built by one of two Chinese companies, Dahua and Hikvision, have been installed across all 32 London boroughs. The Daily Mail gives an unsettling description of the cameras made by Dahua: "It is a disturbingly anthropomorphic CCTV camera, with two lenses that resemble eyes and two other indeterminate features that serve as the nose and mouth; and it hangs from a pole ringed with spikes to protect its hardware from would-be thieves or vandals."
But perhaps even more unsettling than the supposed physical structure of the camera is its capacity for facial recognition. The technology used to collect biometric data about a person's face and head is so sophisticated that the Chinese Communist Party allegedly used it to identify Uyghur Muslim minorities on the streets so that they could be apprehended and sent to a concentration camp, according to the report. Dahua even promotes the feature as a "Real Time Uyghur Warning."
Because of the facial recognition capabilities in these cameras and the fact that they've been used to facilitate possible crimes against humanity upon Uyghur Muslims, the United States has banned the use of Dahua and Hikvision cameras. However, at least one U.S. facial recognition company, Clearview AI, still benefited from the Dahua and Hikvision cameras used in Britain. In May, Clearview AI was discovered to have illegally acquired the online images of millions of British nationals without their knowledge or consent. The U.K.'s Information Commissioner's Office has since ordered Clearview AI to destroy the images and pay a fine of £7.5 million.
Though the sheer number of CCTV cameras in Britain and their Chinese provenance have incited the ire of many civil and human rights advocates, most British municipal councils and police forces insist that the cameras are not currently utilizing the facial recognition feature. But this assurance has done little to temper the prevailing skepticism.
"Even if (the technology is) not being used for the most intrusive capabilities at the moment," said digital researcher Samuel Woodhams, "it wouldn’t be that much of a jump to do it."
London is currently the third most surveilled city in the entire world, and four of the top five most surveilled cities are all in China. The only other European city to crack the top 50 is Berlin, listed at No. 50.
www.theblaze.com
freebeacon.com