Glenn Beck: Insider REVEALS USAID was working against US policy



Foreign aid programs historically operated largely out of the public eye.

Now, according to State Department spokesperson Thomas Pigott, that era is over — and for good reason.

In an interview with Blaze Media co-founder Glenn Beck, Pigott explained that USAID previously “had a fundamental complete lack of accountability.”

“That’s why we wanted to bring USAID under the State Department, identify those programs,” he says.


“We would have circumstances where USAID was doing a program in a certain country that ran counter to the policy of the duly elected president of the United States, ran counter to the foreign policy in that country. You had a tremendous amount of USAID programs that were simply fueling an NGO industrial complex,” he explains.

“And this NGO industrial complex wasn’t actually addressing many of the problems we want to address, but instead was funding things that were counter to the United States,” he adds.

According to Pigott, they would fund organizations that wanted open borders and were trying to pressure the U.S. against adopting policies that would secure the border.

“So we’re addressing this and making sure that when we have programs, we’re actually having programs that further our foreign policy. It’s common sense. It’s how our system should work,” he says.

Fundamental to ensuring our foreign policy is prioritized, Pigott says, is “accountability.”

“We know where the money is going. And also, we’re able to spend it faster. If you look at our disaster response in Venezuela, for example, we are seeing a massive response to Venezuela, showing the effectiveness of a program when you have it aligned with your foreign policy and in the State Department,” he explains.

The State Department is also tackling censorship, as Pigott tells Glenn that going after the censorship industrial complex is another one of the State Department’s priorities.

“We have actually eliminated certain organizations from the beginning within the State Department that were actively censoring the American people. We’ve also taken action at the State Department for when other countries pass laws that do what’s called extra-territorial censorship,” he explains.

“So they pass a law, but their laws end up censoring American speech. That is unacceptable,” he says, adding, “So we’re going to protect freedom of speech.”

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis, and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Biden’s COVID censorship machine takes a hit: Missouri wins landmark ban on federal threats to Big Tech



A landmark settlement delivered a blow to the censorship industrial complex that silenced Americans during the COVID era.

Sen. Eric Schmitt (R-Mo.) announced Tuesday that Missouri had reached a settlement agreement with the U.S. government in its Missouri v. Biden lawsuit, which accused the Biden administration of violating Americans' First Amendment rights by directing social media companies to censor speech challenging the government's COVID messaging.

'For every working Missouri family tired of being silenced by their own government: this victory is yours.'

Schmitt filed the lawsuit against the Biden administration while serving as Missouri attorney general, before securing his Senate seat.

The agreement included a 10-year Consent Decree that enforces a narrow permanent injunction on the surgeon general, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency. The injunction prevents them from threatening social media companies with any form of punishment if those companies fail to remove or suppress content that contains protected speech.

However, this ban applies only to posts made on Facebook, Instagram, X, LinkedIn, and YouTube by the specific plaintiffs in the case, including Missouri and Louisiana government officials and agencies acting in their official capacity. It does not extend to other social media networks or content posted by the general public.

"The Parties also agree that government, politicians, media, academics, or anyone else applying labels such as 'misinformation,' 'disinformation,' or 'malinformation' to speech does not render it constitutionally unprotected," the agreement reads.

The court must first approve this settlement agreement.

RELATED: BlazeTV's 'The Coverup' exposes how the censorship industrial complex silenced Americans during COVID

Eric Schmitt. Photo by Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images

"We just won Missouri v. Biden," Schmitt wrote in a post on X. "As Missouri's Attorney General, I sued the Biden regime for brazenly colluding with Big Tech to silence Missouri families — censoring the truth about COVID, the Hunter Biden laptop, the open border, and the 2020 election. They tried to turn Facebook, X, YouTube, and the rest into their private speech police, labeling dissent 'misinformation' while they pushed their narrative on the American people."

Schmitt called the Consent Decree the "first real, operational restraint on the federal censorship machine."

He explained that it "directly binds the Surgeon General, the CDC, and CISA: no more threats of legal, regulatory, or economic punishment. No more coercion. No more unilateral direction or veto of platform decisions to remove, suppress, deplatform, or algorithmically bury protected speech."

"For every working Missouri family tired of being silenced by their own government: this victory is yours. The heartland fought back, and the heartland delivered," Schmitt concluded.

RELATED: 'Karma is a b***h': Trump taps epidemiologist targeted by Biden admin and censored online to run NIH

Photo by Matt Cardy/Getty Images

Benjamin Weingarten, a senior contributor at the Federalist, addressed the victory's narrow application.

"This decree is limited to the plaintiffs, but as precedent, and practically, its impact may prove orders of magnitude more powerful in protecting disfavored speech," Weingarten wrote, calling it "a momentous blow for the First Amendment."

National Institutes of Health Director Jay Bhattacharya, who had to withdraw as a plaintiff in the case after being appointed by the Trump administration, called the settlement "a huge win for all Americans."

"Huzzah! The consent decree in Missouri v. Biden is a historic victory for free speech in the US. Though I had to switch to the government side in the case after I became NIH director, I've never been more pleased by 'losing' in my life," he wrote.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Brazil Threatens Citizens With Years In Prison For Saying Men Aren’t Women

Isadora Borges, a Brazilian veterinary student, faced trial last month for a post stating 'trans women are not women.'

State Department Works To Revoke Visa Of U.K. Operative Who Allegedly Censored The Federalist, Other Americans

The State Department announced its intention to revoke the visas of five foreign individuals who have allegedly censored Americans.

Google Admits To Choking Conservative Speech, Offers Zero Compensation For Damages

The parent company admitted to censoring conservative voices and claimed pressure from the Biden administration to silence expression online.

Here’s A Pile Of Evidence Lockdowns Would Never Have Happened Without Corporate Media

Our government and media coordinated to lie to us about reality and thereby light millions of lives on fire.

Mastercard Backtracks After Getting Caught Using Ad Dollars To Censor Conservatives

The $500 billion corporation that was 'instrumental in the formation' of the GARM censorship machine has apparently reversed course.

Free Speech Does Not Guarantee Media Con Artists A Seat At Every Table

After AP said it would not use Gulf of America, why should it have a seat in the press room? AP suffered cause and effect, not censorship.