Here’s The Truth About Georgia’s Election Integrity Bill You Won’t Hear From The ACLU

The left is apoplectic over the bill. That’s a good sign for anyone who values election integrity in Georgia.

Soldier who lost his legs in Afghanistan climbs Everest: 'Just had to carry on'



Gurkha veteran Hari Budha Magar lost both his legs in Afghanistan while serving with the British Army. Though maimed, Magar was never defeated. On Friday, the 43-year-old successfully soldiered up the world's tallest mountain.

Two double amputees have previously climbed to the top of Mount Everest in the Mahalangur Himal sub-range of the Himalayas: Mark Inglis of New Zealand in 2006 and Xia Boyu of China in 2018. Magar is, however, the first person with above-the-knee amputations to have successfully summited the peak.

The Guardian reported that Magar, a father of three, left his native Nepal to serve as a corporal in the Gurkha regiment in the British Army. The Gurkha soldiers, whose motto is "Better to die than be a coward," are known for carrying their 18-inch kukri knife into battle even to this day.

After losing his legs to an improvised explosive device in 2010, Magar had figured his life was "completely finished."

"I grew up in Nepal, up to age of 19, and I saw how the disabled people were treated in those remote village," said Magar. "Many people still think that disability is a sin of previous life and you are the burden of the earth. I believed this myself because that is what I saw. That is how I grew up."

The veteran, who now lives in Canterbury, England, battled alcoholism and depression after the explosion. Nevertheless, Magar persevered.

The veteran, whose motto has been "no legs, no limits," eventually helped strike down a ban on both double amputees and blind people climbing Everest, thereby ensuring he would have a chance at simultaneously surmounting nature and his injuries.

The BBC reported that Magar, hoping to "inspire others" and "change perceptions on disability," set off on May 6 with a team of Nepalese climbers, lead by Krish Thapa, a fellow Gurkha veteran and British special forces mountain troop leader.

According to Magar's Twitter account, he "stood victorious" atop Everest around 3 p.m. on May 19, noting, "Disability is no barrier to reaching the 8,849 metre peak."

Magar told his team down below via satellite phone, "That was tough. Harder than I could have ever imagined."

"We just had to carry on and push for the top, no matter how much it hurt or how long it take," said Magar. "If I can climb to the top of the world, then anyone, regardless of their disability, can achieve their dream. No matter how big your dreams, no matter how challenging your disability, with the right mindset anything is possible."

The former soldier indicated that when things got particularly tough climbing the mountain, where temperatures can plunge to -117.4°F and winds can gust around 175 mph, he thought about his family and everyone who helped him get onto the mountain.

"As long as you can adapt your life according to the time and the situation, we can do anything we want," stressed Magar.

Since returning safely to base camp, Magar has redirected his energies to raising money for five veterans' charities. The climber is expected back in Kathmandu on Monday.

\u201cOn May 19th 2023, @hari_budha_magar and his team made history by becoming the first double above-knee amputee to reach the top of Mount Everest. Despite losing his legs in Afghanistan 13 years ago, he proves that disability is no barrier. #Everest70 #HariBudhaMagar #Inspiration\u201d
— Everest 70 (@Everest 70) 1684616604

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Alabama Rep. Mo Brooks plans to challenge Electoral College votes in Congress



Republican Alabama Rep. Mo Brooks said Wednesday that he is planning to challenge the Electoral College votes next month when Congress meets to certify the election for Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden.

What are the details?

Brooks told Politico, who first reported the news, "In my judgment, if only lawful votes by eligible American citizens were cast, [President] Donald Trump won the Electoral College by a significant margin, and Congress's certification should reflect that." He asserted, "This election was stolen by the socialists engaging in extraordinary voter fraud and election theft measures."

The outlet pointed out that at least one member from both the House and Senate would need to contest the results "in order to force deliberation on the matter." But even if Brooks finds an ally in the upper chamber join in his cause, successfully overturning the election for Trump in Congress would be a tall order — particularly with Democrats in control of the House.

The Trump campaign has attempted to challenge the results of the election through litigation in dozens of suits in states across the nation. A number of Trump allies have also launched lawsuits challenging state results separate from the campaign, including Rep. Mike Kelley (R) of Pennsylvania, who has filed an appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court after the state's high court threw out the order.

From Brooks' perspective, he says, "A lot of time is being wasted in court," and he argues that "the Supreme Court does not have the lawful authority to determine whether to accept or reject a state's Electoral College submissions."

"Under the United States Constitution and U.S. law, that is the job and duty of elected officials," he told Politico. "And so it's the United States Congress that is the final judge and jury of whether to accept or reject Electoral College submissions by states, and to elect who the president and vice president of the United States might be."

According to The Hill, Brooks "said he may still object to the vote if no others decide to join him, acknowledging it would serve as a symbolic protest rather than a forceful challenge to the election result."

Norman Ornstein of the American Enterprise Institute told the press Wednesday that even if at least one Senator joins Brooks in challenging the Electoral College results, as he suspects could happen, "the likelihood of having a sizable number who would vote against a slate of electors making a difference in the outcome I think is extremely unlikely."