Caregiving decisions begin in the bathroom



The holidays have a way of forcing conversations many families would rather postpone.

Every year, as adult children come home and aging parents gather around the table, familiar signs emerge. Someone struggles with stairs. Someone tires more easily. Someone forgets what was once routine. And with those observations come discussions caregivers know well.

The promise.

“I’ll never put Mom or Dad in a nursing home.”

It is often spoken years earlier, in healthier days, and always with sincerity. At the time, it feels like a declaration of love and loyalty. Assisted living seems distant, unnecessary, and meant for other families, not ours.

The problem is not the promise. The problem is that life keeps changing.

Circumstances change. Strength ebbs. What once worked may no longer work safely or wisely.

Over time, what began as devotion can quietly become more than one person can manage alone. Needs grow. Safety becomes a concern. Medical issues multiply. Caregivers often find themselves trying to do, by themselves, what normally requires trained professionals, proper equipment, and constant oversight.

At that point, the issue is no longer love or loyalty. It’s capacity.

That reality came into focus during a recent conversation with a friend. He had offered a small cottage on his property to help a friend relocate aging parents closer to family. The mother now uses a walker. The father has been her caregiver for years, but serious heart problems have begun to limit what he can safely do.

Still the conversation kept circling back to the same refrain: Neither would ever go into assisted living or a nursing home.

Their adult son is caught in the middle, trying desperately to make everyone happy. That is a fool’s task. In my work with fellow caregivers, I call this the caregiver FOG — fear, obligation, and guilt — because it blurs perspective, narrows options, and makes even familiar paths hard to see. No one wins.

It is like driving into actual fog. Visibility drops. Muscles tense. Judgment narrows. We try to peer miles ahead when we can barely see the hood of the car.

Every highway safety officer gives the same advice: Slow down, turn on the low beams, and stop trying to see five miles down the road.

Caregiving requires the same discipline.

My friend asked what I thought.

I suggested we lower the emotional temperature and start with one concrete issue.

Not the promise. Not the arguments. Not the guilt.

Start with the toilet.

Laugh if you like. It sounds abrupt. But it has a way of clarifying reality quickly.

RELATED: When the soul flatlines, call a ‘Code Grace’

PeopleImages via iStock/Getty Images

The bathroom is often ground zero for caregiving challenges. If the toilet is not safe and accessible, the demands on the caregiver escalate immediately. Transfers become harder. Fatigue compounds. Falls become more likely.

Once the toilet is addressed, you move outward.

The shower. The bedroom. Doorways, lighting, entrances.

Sometimes modest changes are enough — grab bars, a raised toilet seat, a walk-in shower. None of these are exotic ideas. But determining needs honestly requires facing the limits of strength, balance, and endurance as they exist today, not as we wish they were.

While politicians and toilets often deal with similar subject matter, toilets remain refreshingly honest. They simply reveal what actually works.

When families do this, reality follows. Cost. Time. Budgets weighed against needs. Timelines measured against declining strength. What once felt like a moral standoff becomes a practical evaluation.

Fear, obligation, and guilt begin to loosen their grip. In their place come planning, stewardship, and direction.

This matters because emotional decisions often rush families into choices that create larger — and sometimes far more expensive — problems later. We see this dynamic everywhere, including politics. While politicians and toilets often deal with similar subject matter, toilets remain refreshingly honest. They do not respond to intentions, promises, or speeches. They simply reveal what actually works.

Families do not choose assisted living or nursing homes in the abstract. Toilets always have a seat at the decision table.

RELATED: Christian, what do you believe when faith stops being theoretical?

fotojog via iStock/Getty Images

Surveys consistently show that most older Americans want to remain in their own homes as they age. That desire is sincere and understandable. But staying home without meaningful accommodations transfers an enormous burden onto the caregiver. The home may remain familiar, but the cost — physical, emotional, and relational — often rises exponentially.

Most promises are made sincerely. They are also made without a full understanding of how disease progresses, how bodies change, or how deeply caregiving reshapes everyone involved. Honoring a promise does not mean freezing it in time. It means continually asking how we can care well, given today’s realities.

Assisted living is not a surrender of care. In many cases, it is an extension of it. It allows families to return to being sons, daughters, and spouses, rather than exhausted amateur medical staff running on guilt and fumes.

We are not obligated to preserve every arrangement exactly as it once was. We are called to steward what has been entrusted to us — finances, time, energy, relationships, and the caregiver as well.

Circumstances change. Strength ebbs. What once worked may no longer work safely or wisely.

Important decisions are best made with clear heads, honest assessments, and wise counsel — not under the duress and resentment that so often accompany them. The days after the holidays are not a verdict. They are an invitation to slow down, think clearly, seek experienced guidance, and choose what is best not just for one individual but for the whole family.

The path forward is rarely determined by emotion, decades-old promises, or guilt.

More often, it is clarified by something far more unassuming — and far more truthful.

The appliance in the nearest bathroom.

Illegal aliens can’t vote, so they won’t impact the election, right? WRONG



While there’s plenty of talk regarding the possibility of Biden’s millions of illegal immigrants being granted mass amnesty that will allow them to vote in the upcoming election, as of right now, they can’t legally vote.

“They can [vote] in some places in local elections, but federally [they can’t]. People say, ‘Oh well, they're not allowed to vote, don't you be spreading conspiracy theories; they can't vote, therefore everything is fine,”’ mocks Sara Gonzales.

“Well, no, because then they’re included in the census that is taken later on down the road, and then what happens? All of these blue areas – these sanctuary cities – get more and more representation in Congress, so they can skew the numbers in that way,” she explains.

Ohio Rep. Warren Davidson (R), “who is co-leading legislation” to prevent illegal aliens impacting the census, shares similar sentiments.

Davidson is working to pass the Equal Representation Act, which he says “is legislation that creates a law that requires the census to count U.S. citizens and then only use the count of U.S. citizens when doing the apportionment of representation.”

“We have twenty extra members of Congress who are represented by Democrats because states like California have seven extra members of Congress, and not just anywhere randomly. They have them in sanctuary cities. That's where they draw all the illegal population into and that overstates the population in these cities,” he tells Sara.

While leftists love to use the phrase “threat to democracy” when talking about anything that stands in the way of their agenda, Sara finds it interesting that they’re now “turning a blind eye” to what is actually a real threat.

“Well, they’re not turning a blind eye to it,” says Davidson. “They’re designing these policies on purpose. … They don’t like the policy in spite of the outcome; they like the policy because of the outcome.”

He points to California as evidence.

“California is the most left state in the country, not just politically, but people wise up to what's going on there, and they leave, so they need non-citizens to come in,” he explains. “Whenever we try to say, ‘You should only count citizens,’ they act like that’s somehow abhorrent.”

The truth is: “Every foreigner does have representation in America; it's at an embassy or a consulate. That's your representative if you're not an American, and if you're an American, you should be represented by someone in Congress, and that you can't do unless you do the census the right way.”

To learn where the Equal Representation Act is in the process, watch the clip below.


Want more from Sara Gonzales?

To enjoy more of Sara's no-holds-barred take to news and culture, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Next time someone cries about 'climate change,' put them to shame with THESE historical facts



If there’s one thing the left and the right can agree on, it’s that the string of disasters occurring recently across the globe is tragic.

Between the Maui fires, the hurricane in Florida, the earthquake in Morocco, and the flooding in Libya, far too many people have lost their lives.

However, the left and right clash when it comes to the origins of these catastrophes.

“The goofballs on the left are screaming, ‘See? Climate change! Climate change!’” mocks Pat Gray.

“But you know what?” he continues. “Natural disasters are not new.”

The truth is, “fewer people die from them now than ever before in world history.”

And if you don’t believe us, here are the numbers to prove it:

  • “Four million people died in China in floods” in 1931.
  • “Two million [died] in the 1887 Yellow River flood” in China.
  • In “1976, 655,000 Chinese people died in the Tangshan earthquake.”
  • “500,000 died from an earthquake in 1970 in Bangladesh.”
  • 9,500 people died as a result of “the eastern United States heat wave of 1901.”
  • “The French heat wave ... killed 41,000 people in 1911.”
  • “5,000+ died in a North American heat wave" in 1936.
  • “100,000 people died in a landslide in 1786” in China.

“These natural disasters go on and on and on,” says Pat, “and you can break it down by century, by decade.”


Want more from Pat Gray?

To enjoy more of Pat's biting analysis and signature wit as he restores common sense to a senseless world, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

Biden vows to tackle America's 'systemic racism' following guilty verdict in death of George Floyd



President Joe Biden hailed the jury's decision Tuesday finding former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin guilty on all counts in the murder of George Floyd, but says it is just the start in fighting the "systemic racism" in America.

What are the details?

Following the verdict, the president promised Floyd's family their victory was only the beginning, vowing to push for further policing reforms and "much more."

Floyd family attorney Ben Crump took a call from Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris after the verdict was announced, and the lawyer put the phone on speaker for the family gathered around.

"Nothing is gonna make it all better, but at least...now there's some justice," the president began. "I think of Gianna's comment, 'My daddy's gonna change the world," Biden said, referring to Floyd's daughter, before declaring, "He's gonna start to change it now."

Crump told the president he hopes "this is the momentum needed" to pass Democrats' proposed George Floyd Justice in Policing Act. Biden replied, "You got it, pal. That, and a lot more. Not just that — a lot more."

Biden added, "This can give us a shot at dealing with genuine systemic racism."

“I think of Gianna’s comment ‘my daddy’s going to change the world’—he’s going to start to change it now,” Presiden… https://t.co/jgd6FpurGC
— Ryan Brooks (@Ryan Brooks)1618956413.0

During an address to the nation following the call, Biden reiterated his message, saying Floyd's death "ripped the blinders off for the whole world to see the systemic racism" in America. He added, "There's systemic racism that's a stain on our nation's soul."

"The knee on the neck of justice for black Americans, the found fear and trauma, the pain, the exhaustion that black and brown Americans experience every single day," Biden continued, according to dictation from The Daily Wire. "The murder of George Floyd launched a summer of protests we hadn't seen since the Civil Rights Era in the 60s, protests that unified people of every race and generation in peace and with purpose, to say enough, enough, enough of the senseless killings. Today, today's verdict is a step forward."

Biden went on to plug the George Floyd Justice in Policing Act, and concluding his speech before saying, "We have a chance to change the trajectory in this country."

President Biden and VP Harris address nation regarding Derek Chauvin verdict | USA TODAY www.youtube.com