Harris Repackages False ‘Happy Warrior’ Claims As Old As FDR

The corporate media's false happy talk surrounding the Harris-Walz campaign is a ploy to cover up misery and failure.

Media’s 2024 Pitch To America: Be Poor Because Democracy Depends On It

[rebelmouse-proxy-image https://thefederalist.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Screenshot-2023-11-15-at-3.02.20 PM-e1700078648271-1200x675.png crop_info="%7B%22image%22%3A%20%22https%3A//thefederalist.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Screenshot-2023-11-15-at-3.02.20%5Cu202fPM-e1700078648271-1200x675.png%22%7D" expand=1]Americans may be getting poorer under Joe Biden, but the corporate media insist that's the price to pay if we all want to 'save democracy.'

The Montgomery Brawl Isn’t What Race-Baiting Media Want It To Be

Two viral videos show vigilante justice, which wouldn't be necessary without the left's anti-police, pro-crime rhetoric.

Leftists Are Lying To You About Tommy Tuberville And ‘White Nationalists’

Tommy Tuberville wasn't dog whistling. He was telling the truth about Democrats spreading 'white nationalist' lies.

NYT Columnist: Laws Banning Child Sex-Changes Turn Trans Americans Into ‘Refugees’

Blow writes that LGBTQ people are "pushed to choose between the comfort of their chosen tribe and the safety of their families" Laws in Florida and elsewhere are "wicked" and "prey" on LGBTQ members, transgenders in specific, who cannot escape

New York Times lampooned for conspiracy theory that Hispanic Americans could be the new face of 'white supremacy'



A New York Times opinion writer proposed a new replacement theory. In the unfounded conspiracy theory, Hispanic Americans could replace white Americans in terms of engaging in campaigns of "anti-black racism." According to the New York Times article, Hispanic Americans would be the new face of white supremacy – but it would be deemed "lite supremacy."

New York Times opinion columnist Charles M. Blow wrote an article claiming that Hispanic Americans could soon be the main proprietors of anti-black racism. Blow's conspiracy theory is based on an incident that occurred last year in Los Angeles.

Last week, a secret recording from October 2021 between three Los Angeles city council members – all of whom are Democrats – and a labor union leader was leaked online. They are accused of making racist comments during a meeting about redistricting held at a labor federation office. The four individuals involved in the scandal are Latino, and they are Los Angeles County Federation of Labor president Ron Herrera and L.A. councilmembers Nury Martinez, Kevin de León, and Gil Cedillo

The New York Post reported, "The officials were discussing how to maintain political power in the city’s Latino communities when Martinez reportedly called the black son of white colleague Mike Bonin a 'little monkey' in Spanish and referred to her fellow Democrat — who is gay — as a 'little b***h,” while offering to give his adopted son a 'beatdown.'"

The Los Angeles Times reported, "Martinez also mocked Oaxacans and said 'F*** that guy … He’s with the blacks' while speaking about Los Angeles County Dist. Atty. George Gascón."

"'I see a lot of little short dark people,' Martinez said of that section of Koreatown, employing stereotypes long used against Oaxacans in Mexico and in the United States," the outlet added.

Herrera and Martinez resigned, but León and Cedillo have retained their positions on the Los Angles city council.

The New York Times opinion writer claimed that the incident was indicative of a future where Hispanic Americans could engage in white supremacy.

Blow began, "I have a theory about the future of America that I don’t want to come true."

"It is a theory that worries me and that I have written about: that with the browning of America, white supremacy could simply be replaced by — or buffeted by — a form of 'lite' supremacy, in which fairer-skin people perpetuate a modified anti-blackness rather than eliminating it," Blow penned in the New York Times.

Blow accused the Los Angeles councilmembers embroiled in the scandal of "doing the work of white supremacy."

"Intra-minority racism is complex in some ways, but simple in others," Blow conjectured.

"Racism is perpetuated by those who benefit from it," he continued. "Anti-black racism benefits those whose appearances are least black. White supremacy benefits those who are white, or those who are white-adjacent in both appearance, culture and affect."

Blow conceded, "The unfortunate reality is that anti-black white supremacy is not confined to white people or to Republicans, even though they court it and coddle it."

The official New York Times Opinion Twitter account shared Blow's article.

\u201cAs the U.S. becomes less white, white supremacy could simply be replaced by \u2014 or buffeted by \u2014 a form of \u201clite\u201d supremacy, in which fairer-skin people perpetuate a modified anti-Blackness rather than eliminating it, writes @CharlesMBlow. https://t.co/bkhSuPL6Hu\u201d
— New York Times Opinion (@New York Times Opinion) 1665884245

Twitter reactions lampooned the New York Times piece.

BlazeTV contributorT.J. Moe: "You didn’t think the race hustlers would just let their industry die, did you? Nah, they’ll find racism where it doesn’t exist until the money runs out."

Columnist Cory Morgan: "Good lord the race hustlers are really starting to stretch."

Conservative commentator Kurt Schlichter: "Remember, it’s important to manufacture racial strife to keep these useless pieces of s**t on the grift. Your response is to tell them to go to hell and mock them when you aren’t ignoring them."

Anarchist author Michael Malice: "A reminder that they don't believe what they say even as they say it, it's simply whatever weapon they can use at the moment to maintain their dominance and control."

Editor Kelly Sadler: "Hispanic white supremacists? Wtf is this garbage article?"

Journalist Mike Opelka: "How are these people not laughed out of the journalism business?"

Democratic socialist Bhaskar Sunkara: "Is there really a market for writing like this? Or are editors just confused?"

Researcher Oliver Jia: "Buzzfeed-tier articles like these are why people make fun of the New York Times."

Columnist Karol Markowicz: "Charles Blow is among the least interesting, least talented, least persuasive and most racist writers in public life. That the New York Times gives him a perch to write crap like this is gross."

Former Acting Director of the United States National Intelligence Richard Grenell: "Dr. King would criticize Blow as a racist. It’s never about anything but the color of skin with this guy."

Editor Brent Scher: "'Oh you guys don’t want to be Latinx…fine, how about white supremacists???'"

Coincidentally in the past year, the New York Times has published numerous articles sounding the alarm that Latino voters are migrating to the Republican Party:

  • A Vexing Question for Democrats: What Drives Latino Men to Republicans?
  • How Much Are Latinos Shifting Right?
  • How Immigration Politics Drives Some Hispanic Voters to the G.O.P. in Texas
  • The Rise of the Conservative Latina
  • Democrats Find Urgent New Reasons to Worry About Latino Voters
  • While Democrats Debate 'Latinx,' Latinos Head to the G.O.P.
  • Trump’s Latino Support Was More Widespread Than Thought, Report Finds
  • Dozens of Candidates of Color Give House Republicans a Path to Diversity

NYT opinion columnist Charles Blow declares that 'Republicans are the threat to our democracy'



New York Times opinion columnist Charles Blow penned a piece titled, "Republicans Are America's Problem," in which he described the GOP as "a threat to our democracy."

"We must stop thinking it hyperbolic to say that the Republican Party itself is now a threat to our democracy. I understand the queasiness about labeling many of our fellow Americans in that way. I understand that it sounds extreme and overreaching," he wrote. "But how else are we to describe what we are seeing?" he questioned.

"Republicans are the threat to our democracy because their own preferred form of democracy — one that excludes and suppresses, giving Republicans a fighting chance of maintaining control — is in danger," he declared. "For modern Republicans, democracy only works — and is only worth it — when and if they win."

"Republicans have searched for multiple election cycles for the right vehicle and packaging for their white nationalism, religious nationalism, nativism, craven capitalism and sexism," Blow claimed. He said that Trump provided a path for the Republicans to "run headlong" toward "their bigotries, intolerances and oppression."

\u201cRead my column, \u201cRepublicans Are America\u2019s Problem,\u201d and let me know what you think. https://t.co/FjUUZwmFjp\u201d
— Charles M. Blow (@Charles M. Blow) 1660786287

Former CIA director Michael Hayden recently declared that he agreed with a individual who described modern Republicans as "dangerous & contemptible." Hayden is a retired four-star general who also previously helmed the National Security Agency.

"I've covered extremism and violent ideologies around the world over my career. Have never come across a political force more nihilistic, dangerous & contemptible than today’s Republicans. Nothing close," Edward Luce of the Financial Times tweeted.

"I agree. And I was the CIA Director," Hayden replied.

In response to Hayden, Mary Katharine Ham tweeted, "SO STRANGE that people think intelligence community leaders might be extra-motivated to nail certain partisan actors and not always led strictly by the facts."

\u201cI agree. And I was the CIA Director\u201d
— Gen Michael Hayden (@Gen Michael Hayden) 1660774544

Democrats’ Culture War Is Destroying Their Ability To Govern Competently Enough To Fool Voters

The ideology making Democrats unpopular is also preventing them from understanding why they are unpopular.

The Death Of Marriage Proves Yet Again That Social Conservatives Were Right

Leftist changes to our understanding of marriage naturally make it seem less important, and unworthy of special status or consideration.

A Black Man Grabbed A Black Woman And Leftists Are Calling It White Supremacy

One minor detail complicates the cut and dry narrative that Young was removed at the hands of white supremacy – the man who put his hands on her is also black.