TikTok trauma queens are scaring off decent men for good



Let’s stop pretending we don’t know why men are done with marriage. They’re not “afraid of commitment.” They’re not “toxic.” And they’re certainly not “intimidated by strong women.” No, men have just finally figured out what the rest of us should’ve admitted years ago: It’s a terrible deal. Not for women — oh no, we’ve gamed it beautifully. For men.

And now, they know it.

Any man who walks away from marriage isn’t afraid of commitment. He’s just smart enough not to sign up for a state-sanctioned mugging disguised as romance.

According to research from the Marriage Foundation, between 70% to 80% of divorces are initiated by women. Among college-educated women, that number jumps to 90%. Translation: The more educated she is, the faster she realizes she can exit stage left with the house, the kids, the 401(k), and a monthly check. All she has to do is say, “I’m not happy,” and a judge will handle the rest.

And what a show it is! He loses his kids, his paycheck, and often his sanity, trying to keep up with court-mandated payments while living in a sad little apartment, granted visitation rights so limited he needs a calendar app and a court order just to see his own kids. Meanwhile, she’s posting #SingleMomStrong like the children are accessories she won in the divorce. How exactly is this empowering for anyone?

Women’s emotional garbage cans

It’s not just the divorce itself — it’s what leads up to it. Modern women have traded femininity for feral instinct, egged on by a culture that rewards emotional instability and calls it “empowerment.”

Think I’m exaggerating? Just spend five minutes on TikTok. You’ll find women screaming into their phones about “healing energy” and “divine feminine rage,” sipping boxed wine in a bathtub surrounded by crystals and court summonses. These women don’t want to love a man — they want to fix their daddy issues with a living, breathing human wallet.

They call it love, but what they really mean is trauma alchemy: “If you loved me, you’d fix me.” No, sweetie. You fix you. Then maybe, just maybe, you’ll attract a man who doesn’t have to call his therapist after every date.

This epidemic of emotional dysfunction isn’t accidental. Many of these women were raised in homes where masculinity was vilified, fathers were absent, and mothers were so bitter they could curdle milk with a glance.

These girls were handed generational rage and told it was feminism. They didn’t heal; they weaponized their pain and waited for the first man dumb enough to step into range. And if he’s not dumb? He’s the enemy. Because how dare he not offer himself up as a sacrifice on the altar of her unprocessed trauma.

Courts eat men alive

Family courts, of course, are the handmaids of this dysfunction. The U.S. Census Bureau reports that less than 20% of custodial parents are fathers, despite all evidence that children need both parents. But try telling that to a judge who thinks “fatherhood” is a weekend hobby and “child support” is a government-backed extortion racket.

Many states rake in billions through Title IV-D incentives, meaning the more money the state extracts from fathers, the more it receives from the federal government. It’s not justice — it’s a racket. It's a taxpayer-funded kickback scheme that rewards broken families and punishes paternal love.

RELATED: Democrats can’t mock masculinity and expect men to vote for them

  Ivan Rodriguez Alba via iStock/Getty Images

Worse, child support is often calculated not on what a man actually earns but on what the court believes he should earn. That’s called “imputed income” — and it’s how you turn a plumber into a felon because he couldn’t pay child support based on the fantasy that he’s a brain surgeon. If he misses a payment, he goes to jail. If she violates a custody order, she might get a warning. Maybe.

This isn’t equality. This is Turner v. Rogers in action. The Supreme Court ruled in 2011 that authorities can lock a man up for not paying child support without providing him a lawyer. Land of the free, indeed.

Here’s what’s wild: Women still don’t get it. Men aren’t angry at women — they’re done with them. Like this woman said, men are done negotiating with feral energy. They’re not trying to win an argument anymore. They’re exiting the game. Quietly. Permanently. And still, the same women who created the chaos stand around wondering, “Where did all the good men go?”

Honey, they’re over there — dodging alimony, living in peace, and thanking God they never married you.

‘Empowered’ women, depressed men

Here’s the kicker: We’re not even ashamed of it. We brag about it. We meme about it. Divorce glow-up. Trauma bonding. “Soft girl era.” Meanwhile, the men are just trying to stay out of court and off antidepressants. Feminism? Please. This is narcissism with a publicist.

Men want peace. They want loyalty, partnership, and respect. They want what their grandfathers had — a woman who had their back, not a woman who records their fights for social media clout.

But those women are rarer than ever. We’ve traded homemaking for hot-girl summer, traded character for chaos, and traded companionship for control. And then we expect men to marry us?

Newsflash: Men don’t marry liabilities.

We told them they weren’t necessary. We told them masculinity was toxic. We told them they owed us emotional labor, financial support, and full-time access to their phones. And when they refused, we called them weak. Now, they’re gone. And we still have the audacity to act confused.

Maybe it’s time we stop blaming men for not wanting us and start asking if we’re actually worth wanting. Until we clean up the emotional landmines, stop weaponizing the courts, and remember what being a woman actually means, we’re not a risk worth taking.

And any man who walks away from this mess isn’t afraid of commitment. He’s just smart enough not to sign up for a state-sanctioned mugging disguised as romance.

Not Even Elon Musk’s Money Can Buy A Kid The Benefits Of Married Parents

[rebelmouse-proxy-image https://thefederalist.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Screenshot-2025-04-01-at-8.47.09 AM-e1743515308701-1200x675.png crop_info="%7B%22image%22%3A%20%22https%3A//thefederalist.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Screenshot-2025-04-01-at-8.47.09%5Cu202fAM-e1743515308701-1200x675.png%22%7D" expand=1]The biggest loser in Elon Musk’s baby mama drama is the kid whose parents think money can buy the benefits of having kids within marriage.

Biden’s HHS Wants To Nuke The Definition Of Nuclear Family From Its Regulations

The government’s bid to use Orwellian ‘newspeak’ resembles the Marxist push to destroy the definition of the nuclear family.

Texas law goes into effect requiring drunk drivers who kill a parent to pay child support



A Texas law requires drunk drivers to pay child support if they cause the death of a parent. The commonsense measure took effect on Friday after being signed by Lone Star State Gov. Greg Abbott earlier this year in June.

"Any time a parent passes is tragic, but a death at the hands of a drunk driver is especially heinous," Abbott tweeted in July. "I was proud to sign HB 393 into law this year to require offenders to pay child support for the children of their victims."

— (@)  
 

The payments will be required of individuals convicted of intoxication manslaughter involving the death of a child's parent or guardian. The court will consider various factors when deciding the amount of the monthly payments, and the payments will be required until the child turns 18 or graduates from high school, whichever occurs later.

In the event that the guilty party cannot make the payments while incarcerated, he or she will be required to start shelling out the money no later than the first anniversary of the date of release.

"The defendant may enter into a payment plan to address any arrearage that exists on the date of the defendant's release. The defendant must pay all arrearages regardless of whether the restitution payments were scheduled to terminate while the defendant was confined or imprisoned in the correctional facility," the text of the measure states.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Judge admonishes Hunter Biden over allegations he is hiding financial docs to reduce child support payments



An Arkansas judge admonished Hunter Biden in court on Monday as the first son seeks to reduce his monthly child support payments for his 4-year-old daughter.

What is the background?

In 2020, a paternity test revealed that Hunter Biden fathered a child with Arkansas woman Lunden Roberts. At the time, Biden agreed to pay child support payments to his daughter, Navy Joan, in monthly installments of $20,000.

But last September, Biden asked a court to reduce his payments, arguing there had been a "substantial material change" to his financial circumstances despite previously having made millions of dollars in overseas business deals.

The request allowed Roberts to request documents and information related to Biden's finances. But in December, attorney Clinton Lancaster, who represents Roberts, accused Biden of "attempting to stifle discovery into his financial affairs." Finally, Roberts asked the court last week to hold Biden in contempt of court for allegedly withholding evidence and ignoring court orders.

What is happening now?

On Monday, Independence County Circuit Judge Holly Meyer presided over that contempt hearing.

At the hearing, Biden's high-dollar attorneys essentially painted their client as destitute, arguing that his only form of income comes from a New York art gallery. But they don't have records showing who bought his art or at what price it was purchased.

From the Washington Free Beacon:

Biden's lawyers objected to attempts by Roberts's team to frame him as privileged and wealthy, arguing that he has only traveled on Air Force One one time and "stayed on a cot in his dad's room in Dublin" during their recent Ireland visit. Biden no longer owns a Porsche, and his lawyer Brent Langdon indicated it was repossessed. Biden now drives an unspecified car given to him by celebrity lawyer Kevin Morris.

But Meyer had zero patience for games. She told both parties to comply with records requests and stop obstructing the legal process. She also told Biden he needed to prove his case and ordered him to comply with requests for financial documents by May 12.

"If you come saying you want to reduce your child support, you need to show me why," Meyer said, according to the Free Beacon.

Additionally, Meyer told Biden's attorneys that the "ability to redact is somewhat being abused," referring to the alleged concealing of certain information in ficnancial documents.

Meanwhile, Meyer ordered Biden and Roberts to attend all future court dates in person. The issue of whether Biden is in contempt of court will be decided at a later date, the judge said.

Biden has reportedly never met his daughter.

 Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Hunter Biden ordered to appear in court and explain why he seeks to pay less in child support for the 4-year-old daughter he's neglected to meet



President Joe Biden announced Tuesday he is running for re-election. An Arkansas judge announced Monday the president's son is done running from accountability.

The Honorable Holly L. Meyer of the 16th Judicial Circuit Court of Arkansas has ordered Hunter Biden, 53, to appear at the Independence County courthouse in Batesville on May 1 as well as for all subsequent hearings pertaining to his ongoing paternity case, reported the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette.

"From now on ... I want both of your clients at every hearing I conduct," Meyer said. "I will no longer allow us to excuse clients ... because it is interfering with the progress of litigation, which is taking way too long to get over simple points."

The matter at hand is Hunter Biden's apparent desire to pay less in child support for the daughter he sired out of wedlock in 2018 with former stripper Lunden Roberts.

The long road to Arkansas

Following the birth of the Navy Joan Roberts, Biden denied being the father (a paternity test later proved his parentage "with near scientific certainty") and refused Roberts' pleas to help care for the child. Consequently, Roberts sued him in an Arkansas court.

TheBlaze reported that Biden defied the resulting court order to turn over financial information relevant to the case, refusing also to provide a list of the companies he owned or had an ownership interest in (e.g., Rosemont Seneca Partners, the "$2.4 billion private equity firm" he founded with former Secretary of State John Kerry's stepson Christopher Heinz) and a list of all of his sources of income.

To avoid a contempt charge, Biden agreed to pay child support retroactive to November 2018, and in January 2020, Roberts and Biden agreed on temporary child support.

Judge Meyer subsequently ordered that these payments were to continue indefinitely and to be paid on the first of each month.

The court order setting Biden's monetary obligations to Roberts and their daughter were filed under seal on March 12, 2020, approximately one year after he reportedly resigned from the board of Burisma, the energy exploration holding company based in Ukraine, where he was making roughly $50,000 per month.

Biden disturbed the status quo in September 2022, figuring he might be able to strike a new deal — one in which he would pay less in child support for the daughter that neither he nor his father, Joe Biden, have ever met.

The president's middle-aged son asked Judge Meyer to recalculate his child support payments, citing "a substantial material change" in his "financial circumstances, including but not limited to his income."
Clint Lancaster, Roberts' lawyer, suggested that Biden's efforts to pay less might prove costly, saying, "Ultimately, this is going to require us to look deeply, more deeply, into Hunter's finances."

Court or prison

Lawyers for Roberts argued in a Friday filing that Biden should be thrown in the Cleburne County Detention Center until such time as he complies with a court order to hand over documents pertaining to his financials, reported the Daily Mail.

According to Lancaster, Biden has been "[flouting] the dignity and authority of the court" by failing to satisfy discovery rules and deadlines, specified at a Feb. 22 hearing.

"In those two months, the defendant has provided no additional discovery — not so much as one single item or word — and has failed to supplement his answers at the court’s directive," Lancaster added in the filing. "There is no valid excuse or justification for the defendant’s failure to provide the required disclosures as the court has granted every single protective order the defendant has asked for since the inception of this case … the defendant is playing games with this court."

If the court would not lock Biden up, Roberts' lawyers wrote that it should instead "sanction the defendant as appropriate and just," noting that the first son should be ordered to appear.

An episode during a Zoom hearing Monday with attorneys for Biden and Roberts appears to have made Meyer's decision easier to make.

On the call, Brent Langdon, Biden's attorney in the case, tiptoed around the matter of the controversial Hunter Biden laptop, whereon income tax records are allegedly saved.

The Democrat-Gazette reported that Langdon referenced the laptop Biden abandoned at a Delaware computer shop in 2019 in relation to a potential expert witness in the case, Garrett Ziegler, a self-proclaimed experts on the device's contents.

"There has never been, to my knowledge, an acknowledgment that this so-called laptop — he continuously calls it Hunter Biden's abandoned laptop ..." said Langdon.

Judge Meyer interjected: "Well, let's clear that issue up right now. ... Is it your client's laptop or not?"

Langdon responded, "Your honor, I'm not involved in all of that stuff. ... It's not my client's laptop as far as I know."

The judged pressed Langdon on the matter, emphasizing that she holds clients to what their lawyers say in court.

"Is it your client's position, you're representing to this court, that it is not his laptop?" asked Judge Meyer.

Langdon answered, "Your honor, I am not in a position to even begin to answer that question."

Evidently tired of playing cat and mouse, Judge Meyer thereafter ordered Biden to Arkansas and indicated that both parties have to comply fully with discovery requests by May 22.

The trial is scheduled for July 24-25. Biden will also face grilling in a June deposition about his foreign entanglements and various business ventures.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

How Illogical Child Support Rules Can Force Kids Into Poverty

Child support guidelines have serious logical design flaws that sometimes generate child support amounts that ‘starve’ rather than ‘feed’ children.

Hunter Biden wants to pay less in child support for the 4-year-old daughter he has never visited



President Joe Biden's 52-year-old son Hunter has asked a judge in Independence County, Arkansas, to recalculate his child support payments to former stripper Lunden Roberts, a former employee and the mother of the 4-year-old child he sired out of wedlock in 2018.

According to a court filing obtained by the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Biden cited "a substantial material change" in his "financial circumstances, including but not limited to his income," as justification to lower the amount to be paid in support.

Biden similarly suggested he was hard up for cash in November 2019, when he stated in an affidavit: "I am unemployed and have had no monthly income since May 2019." Debts and obligations resulting from his divorce, he alleged, had proved "significant."

The first son moved out of a $5.4 million mansion in Venice Beach in 2021, out front of which he would park his six-figure-priced Porsche Panamera, and into a $20,000-a-month rental home in Malibu. Biden converted the three-car garage in his palatial new home into an art studio where he made some of the prints he sold last year for $75,000 each.

The court order setting Biden's monetary obligations to the Arkansas child and mother were filed under seal on March 12, 2020, approximately one year after he reportedly resigned from the board of Burisma, the energy exploration holding company based in Ukraine, where he was making roughly $50,000 per month.

As the order is under seal, it is unclear whether the calculation took into account the $4.8 million sent by the communist Chinese-affiliated CEFC China Energy company to a entity controlled by Biden and his uncle James Biden.

Roberts' lawyer, Clint Lancaster, suggested that Biden's efforts to pay less might prove costly. "Ultimately, this is going to require us to look deeply, more deeply, into Hunter's finances."

Before Biden's fight to pay less, he fought not to pay at all

Biden reportedly first met Roberts at the Mpire Gentlemen's Club in Washington, D.C., where she worked as a stripper. Shortly after breaking up with his dead brother's wife, Biden got Roberts pregnant.

The NY Post reported that Roberts — whom Biden claimed he had "no recollection" of meeting — had been on the payroll at the first son's now-defunct law firm Owasco PC during her pregnancy. After Roberts gave birth to the child, named Navy Joan, Biden promptly had Roberts kicked off the firm's health insurance plan.

Biden denied being the father (a paternity test later proved his parentage "with near scientific certainty") and refused Roberts' pleas to help care for the child. Consequently, Roberts sued him in an Arkansas court.

Biden defied the resulting court order to turn over financial information relevant to the case, refusing also to provide a list of the companies he owned or had an ownership interest in (e.g., Rosemont Seneca Partners, the "$2.4 billion private equity firm" he founded with former Secretary of State John Kerry's stepson Christopher Heinz) and a list of all of his sources of income. To avoid a contempt charge, Biden agreed to pay child support retroactive to November 2018.

Judge Holly Meyer subsequently ordered that these payments were to continue indefinitely and to be paid on the first of each month.

Republican lawmakers push pro-life bill to allow women to receive child support for unborn children



A group of Republican lawmakers is backing a pro-life bill that would give mothers the opportunity to receive child support before a baby is born.

The Unborn Child Support Act reflects the reality that life starts at the time of conception, and therefore, pregnant mothers should be able to get child support as they carry their child.

The measure would insert language into the Social Security Act which states that "the start date for such obligations may begin with the first month in which the child was conceived, as determined by a physician (and shall begin with that month if the mother so requests)." The funds could "be retroactively collected or awarded," according to text.

GOP lawmakers in both chambers of Congress are pushing the proposal.

"Life begins at conception, and this bill is a straightforward first step towards updating our federal laws to reflect that fact. We are hopeful that Democrats will join this bicameral effort to provide mothers with child support payments while their child is in the womb," Rep. Mike Johnson of Louisiana said, according to a press release.

"Caring for the well-being of our children begins long before a baby is born. It begins at the first moment of life – conception – and fathers have obligations, financial and otherwise, during pregnancy. Mothers should be able to access child support payments as soon as she is supporting a child. Our bill makes this possible," Sen. Kevin Cramer of North Dakota said.

The lawmakers supporting the measure include Cramer, Johnson, Sens. Steve Daines of Montana, Jim Inhofe of Oklahoma, Cindy Hyde-Smith of Mississippi, Marsha Blackburn of Tennessee, Rick Scott of Florida, Roger Marshall of Kansas, James Lankford of Oklahoma, Roger Wicker of Mississippi, Marco Rubio of Florida, and Reps. Chris Smith of New Jersey, Jim Banks of Indiana, Doug Lamborn of Colorado, Ralph Norman of South Carolina, John Moolenaar Michigan, Doug LaMalfa of California, Randy Weber of Texas, Garret Graves of Louisiana, Jake Ellzey of Texas, Randy Feenstra of Iowa, and Claudia Tenney of New York.