Justice Dept. lawsuit puts US tech at China’s mercy
As shock and awe sweep the Department of Justice, undead Joe Biden policies shamble ahead with purposeful mindlessness.
A swarm of zombie lawyers within the department has launched a legal attack on two American tech companies whose merger would threaten Huawei, communist China’s global communications and technology giant.
The slow-moving American legal process only helps the Chinese surpass American companies.
The antitrust action centers around a 1914 law that is blind to Chinese hegemony. That law, the Clayton Antitrust Act, prohibits mergers that might create monopolies and stifle competition.
While antitrust action sometimes can be necessary, the federal government’s lawsuit stifles American competition — our most formidable weapon against foreign adversaries. And it directly contradicts President Trump’s national security-driven tech crackdown on Chinese companies, notably Huawei.
A counter to Huawei
The Department of Justice hatched the lawsuit more than a year ago under the Biden administration, though it is now predictably being blamed on Trump. In question is a $14 billion merger between Hewlett Packard Enterprise and Juniper Networks, which the companies say would accelerate the development of critical technologies like 6G and AI-driven networking.
HPE argues that combining its storage and computing strengths with Juniper’s expertise in data center routing and switching would create a formidable alternative to Cisco, which dominates more than half of America’s wireless communications market.
The company said in January that the merger would enhance “secure, unified, cloud and AI-native networking to drive innovation from edge to cloud to exascale.”
It would also counter Huawei, which controls 30% of the global telecommunications and 5G marketplace. Cisco controls just 7%.
In January, the Department of Defense labeled Huawei a Chinese military company. Many national security experts fear the company’s equipment contains back doors that aid and abet China’s People’s Liberation Army. Chinese law requires all companies to cooperate with and serve the regime’s intelligence services.
Increasing American competition can assist tremendously in mitigating Huawei’s global influence.
Playing into China’s hands
The lawsuit, which outlasted Biden’s tenure, was filed in federal court on Jan. 30, 10 days after Trump’s inauguration. The Federal Trade Commission joined in.
None of the Department of Justice’s statements indicate any concern that tying up the HPE-Juniper merger in litigation would aid the Chinese Communist Party’s goal of global information dominance, censorship, and espionage. Instead, the focus remains on the 1914 law.
The assault on the merger began under Attorney General Merrick Garland and was executed by Biden-appointed Jonathan Kanter, then-assistant attorney general for the antitrust division. Kanter had been in the position since 2021, implementing an aggressive antitrust agenda, which claimed to prevent further Big Tech consolidation that would allegedly harm competition and innovation. The agenda was part of a broader Biden economic policy to curb corporate monopolies and “protect” consumers.
Kanter built the case into the last days of the Biden administration.
Trump-appointed acting Assistant Attorney General for Antitrust Omeed A. Assefi signed off on Kanter’s action against HPE-Juniper.
Assefi represents a strange mix in Washington. He served with the White House Counsel during Trump’s first term but was later appointed by Biden as a federal prosecutor for the District of Columbia. Trump then named him the acting head of the antitrust division pending the Senate confirmation of Trump’s nominee, Gail Slater.
Slater is also an antitrust hawk regarding Big Tech, but she is no ideologue like the zombie lawyers driving the lawsuit. Her work on 5G and Chinese telecom suggests she views antitrust enforcement through a geopolitical lens — ensuring U.S. firms remain competitive against rivals like Huawei. She has not commented publicly on the HPE-Juniper merger.
The Justice Department’s narrowly focused action risks weakening HPE-Juniper’s ability to challenge Huawei’s pricing and technological advancements, particularly in AI-driven networking, which will be critical for future infrastructure. Huawei would likely exploit years of litigation against HPE-Juniper to the Chinese Communist Party’s advantage in vital international markets.
US vs. China in the tech race
The merger’s focus isn’t primarily on wireless local area networks where the Department of Justice is fixated but rather on enhancing data center capabilities — a sector vital for AI and cloud computing. A stronger HPE-Juniper could accelerate innovation and drive competition with the ever-innovative rival Cisco, but more importantly against Huawei.
Here, the Department of Justice’s narrow antitrust focus clashes with President Trump’s consistent, powerful stance since 2018 against Chinese dominance over American technology, particularly against Huawei.
The slow-moving American legal process only helps Chinese companies like Huawei surpass American companies at the breathtaking pace of technological advancement.
The FBI’s valuable but miniscule counterintelligence capabilities are no match for China’s economic and industrial espionage, which strips American companies of their innovations and beats them to market with cheaper, advanced technologies.
Antitrust enforcement is essential, but not at the expense of empowering the Chinese Communist Party to overtake us in artificial intelligence and global communications.
How Biden’s Blank Check For Ukraine Disastrously Bounced
Why is the US funding China’s rise? End the student visa scam
Both parties are trying to sound tougher on China, but the reality is clear: The United States is engaged in asymmetric warfare with the Chinese Communist Party. Anyone not compromised by Beijing understands this. Yet despite China’s state-backed efforts to infiltrate our universities and technical fields, the U.S. continues to admit more than 300,000 Chinese students each year.
Asymmetric warfare relies on subversion, espionage, and intellectual property theft — all of which benefit from the very type of immigration China’s “Thousand Talents Plan” encourages. So why are we helping it along?
Continuing to allow China to flood our science and technology fields with hundreds of thousands of its nationals — often at little to no cost — is indefensible.
For decades, the United States has admitted between 270,000 and 350,000 Chinese students annually, making China one of the top two sending countries, alongside India. In the 2023-24 academic year, 123,000 Chinese nationals were enrolled in graduate programs, many in sensitive STEM fields. Another 62,000 participated in “optional practical training,” allowing them to work in those fields while still on student visas.
Beyond student visas, the U.S. grants over 20,000 H-1B visas to Chinese nationals each year, along with more than 12,000 J-1 visas for scholars and tens of thousands of additional work visas. Over the past 30 years, the U.S. has issued nearly 2 million green cards to Chinese nationals — more than any country except Mexico — despite clear evidence of China’s long-running campaign of economic and academic subversion.
Seed and subvert through immigration and espionage
In 2019, President Trump’s director of national intelligence warned in the Worldwide Threat Assessment that “China’s intelligence services will exploit the openness of American society, especially academia and the scientific community, using a variety of means.” Yet the U.S. continues to open its doors to China, allowing its nationals to infiltrate universities, dominate technical fields, work in government labs, engage in trade theft, and even operate as intelligence agents.
While some Chinese nationals coming to the U.S. may be fleeing the communist regime, there is no effective way to distinguish them from those working on behalf of Beijing. Every week, U.S. attorneys announce new indictments of Chinese students for espionage, surveillance, or trade theft. Many of these individuals go on to work in highly sensitive fields, further compromising national security.
In 2019, the Senate Homeland Security subcommittee on investigations released a bipartisan report detailing how 10,000 Chinese nationals were conducting research in the Department of Energy’s national labs. The report found that foreign-born researchers employed by U.S. scientific agencies were secretly funded by China. The report’s conclusion was blunt: “American taxpayer-funded research has contributed to China’s global rise over the last 20 years.” Beijing has ensured that the U.S. is paying for the very technology that could be used against us.
The report’s authors note that despite China publicly announcing in 2008 its intent to recruit overseas researchers with access to advanced research and technology, the FBI did not prioritize monitoring these efforts until mid-2018 — years into China’s mass migration pipeline. As the report puts it, this failure allowed China to shift “from brain drain to brain gain.”
While Beijing attempts to recruit talent of all nationalities, including by bribing native-born researchers, its most effective strategy is sending its own nationals to American universities and using the U.S. visa system to gain access to sensitive industries. According to the Senate subcommittee report, China’s Thousand Talents Plan manages 200 recruitment programs with the goal of bringing in 2,000 “high-quality overseas talents,” including scientists, engineers, entrepreneurs, and finance experts. The program operates under a highly organized administrative structure that coordinates its efforts, while the U.S. visa system continues to provide an open pipeline for espionage and recruitment.
Last fall, the FBI charged five Chinese foreign students at the University of Michigan with photographing a live-fire training exercise involving the Michigan National Guard and the Taiwanese military at Camp Grayling. In December, the Justice Department charged a Chinese national who had overstayed his visa with illegally shipping arms and ammunition to North Korea.
Visa overstays are a growing concern, particularly among Chinese nationals. Some estimates suggest that in 2022 alone, more than 9,000 Chinese students remained in the U.S. after their visas expired, raising further national security risks.
We need a moratorium, not bogus ‘vetting’
Some argue that instead of halting the flow of Chinese foreign students, we should focus on improving vetting measures. But how can we possibly determine who is being manipulated or controlled by the CCP? More importantly, why should that burden fall on us?
The 2019 Senate subcommittee report highlights the challenges in vetting individuals on F-1 and J-1 visas. A case from the Southern District of New York revealed that Chinese government officials exploit weaknesses in U.S. visa screening, particularly for students and research scholars. In 2019, Chinese national Zhongshan Liu was charged with conspiring to fraudulently obtain U.S. visas for Chinese government employees. According to the complaint, Liu facilitated visas for individuals posing as research scholars, but their true purpose was to recruit scientists and researchers for China’s talent recruitment programs.
Clearly, this has become a ubiquitous problem. We have no way of distinguishing who is here for nefarious reasons from those who pose no threat.
Even if some individuals on student, scholar, or worker visas are entirely well intentioned, they remain vulnerable to CCP blackmail. Nearly all of them have family members in China, giving Beijing leverage over their actions.
As the 2024 DNI threat assessment warned, “The PRC monitors Chinese students abroad for dissident views, mobilizes Chinese student associations to conduct activities on behalf of Beijing, and influences research by U.S. academics and think tank experts.” Given that level of surveillance and coercion, it is easy to imagine how the CCP could pressure even those working in U.S. research labs who hold deep antipathy toward the regime.
A recent report from Freedom House observed: “The biggest threat to international students and scholars studying and working in the United States is the government of China.” But the CCP is not just a threat to students — it is a threat to the American people as a whole.
Continuing to allow China to flood our science and technology fields with hundreds of thousands of its nationals — often at little to no cost — is indefensible. This is not simply an educational exchange; it is a long-term strategy by Beijing to infiltrate critical industries, collect intelligence, and gain a decisive advantage over the United States.
China’s tech infiltration poses an urgent national security risk
Totalitarian regimes cannot tolerate criticism, and China is no exception. The Chinese Communist Party’s Great Firewall is not just about restricting information within its borders — it is a deliberate effort to suppress dissent worldwide.
Now, China has a new tool for repression: DeepSeek, an AI model built using U.S. chips. Weak export controls under the Biden administration allowed China to achieve an artificial intelligence breakthrough once thought to be years away.
Competition with China isn’t a game. It’s time to stop letting Beijing gain an unfair advantage, whether through illicit means or simply by ceding ground.
Like TikTok, DeepSeek is poised to become a propaganda tool for the CCP. The model is already censoring content deemed a threat to “state power,” including references to Tiananmen Square, Hong Kong’s Umbrella Revolution, and even Winnie the Pooh. This level of content control — extending beyond information to influence minds — poses a direct and urgent threat to U.S. national security.
The Chinese Communist Party has repeatedly used technology to target U.S. interests. For years, Americans have downloaded TikTok, unaware that the app functions as Chinese spyware. This malware collects and shares user data with the CCP, tracking contacts, photos, search histories, and even keystrokes. As a result, Beijing has access to vast amounts of Americans' metadata. From a national security standpoint, this is alarming. The CCP now holds data on military installations, population centers, and critical infrastructure — essentially a detailed map with targets marked.
Even more troubling are the cybersecurity risks uncovered in DeepSeek. An Epoch Times investigation found that DeepSeek stores user data on China-based servers. One company discovered the AI model transmits information to China Mobile, a state-owned telecom giant. A separate analysis by cybersecurity firm Wiz revealed that DeepSeek suffered a major data breach, exposing chat histories, secret keys, and other sensitive information. These security failures make clear that China cannot be trusted with our advanced technology.
The threat doesn’t stop there. ByteDance, TikTok’s CCP-affiliated parent company, uses the app to promote pro-China propaganda while suppressing anti-CCP content. A Rutgers University study confirmed that TikTok amplifies content favorable to the CCP while down-ranking videos that contradict its agenda. Another CCP-linked app, RedNote, is gaining traction in the U.S. and will likely follow the same pattern. This psychological warfare must end. The U.S. cannot allow Beijing to continue exploiting American users through predatory technology.
That’s why I’ve introduced the China Technology Transfer Control Act, which would prevent China’s military from acquiring sensitive U.S. technology and intellectual property through export controls. My bill would also sanction foreign entities that sell prohibited U.S. technology to the PRC.
We can’t continue to let our foremost foreign adversary perform psychological manipulation on Americans or allow it to collect troves of our sensitive, personal information. My bill puts up guardrails to keep the CCP from acquiring increasingly advanced U.S. technologies and developing more software like DeepSeek R1.
The Biden-Harris administration did not do enough to protect America’s most sensitive technology. The CCP knows that, which is why any U.S. technology that ends up in the hands of the CCP can be weaponized against us. We must protect our advancements and ensure Americans — not the CCP — reap their benefits.
Competition with China isn’t a game. It’s time to stop letting Beijing gain an unfair advantage, whether through illicit means or simply by ceding ground. We need decisive action now to safeguard our leadership in technological innovation — not just for today but for generations to come.
No, China Won’t Swoop Into The Void USAID Leaves Behind
China and Iran wage war on faith, culture, and free expression
Freedom of religion and expression forms the foundation of human dignity, yet authoritarian regimes continue to suppress these fundamental rights. Two of the world’s most oppressive governments, China’s Chinese Communist Party and Iran’s Islamic Republic, follow the same playbook — silencing anyone who challenges their ideological control. The persecution of Shen Yun and the Bahá’í community serves as chilling proof of this shared agenda.
Shen Yun, a globally acclaimed performing arts group, is dedicated to reviving traditional Chinese culture through music and dance. To most, this mission seems harmless — maybe even admirable. But not to the CCP. For the regime, Shen Yun represents defiance. The group celebrates China’s rich spiritual and cultural heritage, aspects the CCP has spent decades trying to erase. Worse still, Shen Yun dares to expose the CCP’s human rights abuses on the world stage.
We cannot allow regimes like China and Iran to decide who gets to exist, which cultures can flourish, and which beliefs are acceptable.
In response, the CCP has waged an aggressive campaign against the group. It spreads propaganda to discredit Shen Yun, sabotages performances worldwide, and launches relentless cyberattacks. Yet, despite lacking government funding or major corporate sponsorships, Shen Yun has defied all odds. It has become an underdog success story, standing strong against one of the most powerful regimes in the world.
This story resonates deeply with me because I have experienced firsthand what it means to live under a regime that fears freedom of thought. I was born into a Bahá’í family in Iran, where the Islamic Republic has waged a decades-long campaign of persecution against the Bahá’ís, the country’s largest non-Muslim religious minority. For the “crime” of practicing their faith, Bahá’ís have been imprisoned, tortured, executed, and systematically denied education and employment.
When I was 11, my family fled Iran, leaving behind our home, community, and everything familiar. We were not activists or threats to the state — we were ordinary people whose only “offense” was believing differently.
That persecution continues today. Just recently, Iranian authorities arrested 13 Bahá’ís, charging them with “proselytizing,” a vague and unfounded accusation the regime routinely uses to justify brutal crackdowns. The message from the government is clear: There is no room for diversity and no tolerance for beliefs that challenge its imposed ideology.
The hypocrisy of these regimes is staggering. The CCP has interned over one million Uyghur Muslims in concentration camps, subjecting them to forced labor, sterilization, and “re-education.” Yet its close ally, the Islamic Republic of Iran — which claims to defend Muslims worldwide — remains silent. This refusal to condemn China’s abuses exposes Iran’s duplicity, proving that its priority is not protecting Islam but consolidating power.
What unites the CCP and the Islamic Republic is their shared fear of cultural and spiritual diversity. Authoritarian regimes thrive on control — of minds, beliefs, and narratives. They target groups like Shen Yun and the Bahá’ís because these groups represent what tyrants fear most: the resilience of the human spirit.
Shen Yun’s performances celebrate the beauty and depth of Chinese civilization, a deeply spiritual heritage the CCP has spent decades trying to erase in its pursuit of ideological conformity. Likewise, the Bahá’í Faith, with its emphasis on unity and justice, challenges the Islamic Republic’s relentless suppression of any belief that could undermine its authority. In both cases, these regimes see cultural and spiritual expression as direct threats to their absolute control.
The stakes in these battles extend far beyond China and Iran. Freedom of religion and expression are universal values, and any erosion of these rights anywhere threatens them everywhere. When authoritarian regimes suppress dissent without consequence, they embolden others to do the same.
I do not write this as an outsider with abstract concerns. My life was uprooted by tyranny. I still remember the fear of living under a regime that hated my family for our beliefs. I will never forget the strength it took to flee that oppression and rebuild a life in freedom.
We cannot allow regimes like China and Iran to decide who gets to exist, which cultures can flourish, and which beliefs are acceptable. Their playbook relies on fear and control, but history has shown that these tactics ultimately fail in the face of courage and solidarity.
Sen. Mike Lee introduces resolution to safeguard Panama Canal from China's growing influence
Senator Mike Lee (R-Utah) introduced a resolution on Tuesday celebrating America's achievement in creating the Panama Canal and calling for measures to safeguard it from China's growing influence in the region.
Senators Rick Scott (R-Fla.), Tommy Tuberville (R-Ala.), and Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.) co-sponsored the resolution, which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
'It would require the United States to take measures necessary to protect its rights under the Treaty.'
Lee noted the canal's "vital importance" to the United States, particularly regarding trade, national security, and geopolitics.
The resolution explained that the U.S. government "funded, pioneered, and built" the Panama Canal from 1904 to 1914, adding that it cost $375 million and 10,000 lives.
Former President Jimmy Carter turned over control of the Panama Canal to Panama in 1977.
"The Treaty Concerning the Permanent Neutrality and Operation of the Panama Canal, signed at Washington September 7, 1977, otherwise known as the 'Neutrality Treaty,' reserved the right of the United States to use armed force to defend the permanent neutrality of the Panama Canal," Lee's resolution read.
However, despite the Neutrality Treaty, China's influence in the Panama Canal has grown substantially over roughly the past decade, "pos[ing] a high risk of intelligence-gathering and surveillance."
The U.S. is allowed to regain control of the canal if the neutrality agreement is violated.
"Now, therefore, be it Resolved, That the Senate," the resolution continued, "recognizes the ingenuity and labor of Americans that made the Panama Canal possible for future generations, with special regard for those Americans who lost their lives in pursuit of the Panama Canal project"; "expresses that the Panama Canal is vital to United States regional security, hemispheric hegemony, and economic interests"; "assesses that a pattern of Chinese-backed investment in port infrastructure and canal operations in Panama constitutes a violation of the Neutrality Treaty"; and "urges the Trump administration to ensure that the canal remains neutral and to take all appropriate measures to enforce the Neutrality Treaty."
Lee wrote in a post on X, "The Panama Canal is a great American achievement, and President Trump is right to re-assert the Monroe Doctrine and American dominance of our hemisphere's vital waterways."
Over the weekend, Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced that he met with Panamanian President José Raúl Mulino "to make clear that the United States cannot, and will not, allow the Chinese Communist Party to continue with its effective and growing control over the Panama Canal area."
State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce stated, "Secretary Rubio made clear that this status quo is unacceptable and that absent immediate changes, it would require the United States to take measures necessary to protect its rights under the Treaty."
Following Rubio's visit, Mulino declared that Panama would leave the Belt and Road Initiative, a Chinese global infrastructure project.
The State Department claims the initiative "preys on other countries via unsustainable and corrupt lending while ignoring global labor and environmental standards."
Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!
Exclusive: Chip Roy introduces key bill protecting American land from CCP influence
Republican Rep. Chip Roy (Texas) introduced legislation Tuesday that would bar members of the Chinese Communist Party from purchasing land in the United States, according to the bill text obtained exclusively by Blaze News.
The Securing America's Land from Foreign Interference Act would direct the president to "take actions as may be necessary" to prevent the purchase of public or private land in the United States by members of the CCP or under the influence of the CCP.
'If the Soviets were doing this 50 years ago, Congress would have already taken action; we need to look at the CCP with the same seriousness.'
China currently controls over 270,000 acres of land in the United States, with foreign investors overall controlling nearly 45 million acres of U.S. farmland, according to the latest data published by the Department of Agriculture.
"The Chinese Communist Party shouldn't be able to buy American land, and they especially shouldn't be able to buy our farmland or land near critical infrastructure like military bases, like we let them do now," Roy told Blaze News.
"If the Soviets were doing this 50 years ago, Congress would have already taken action; we need to look at the CCP with the same seriousness," Roy added.
In Texas alone, a Chinese-based energy company has purchased 130,000 acres of land close to Laughlin Air Force Base. Another Chinese company called Fufeng Group also purchased 300 acres of farmland just 12 miles from the Grand Forks Air Force Base in North Dakota.
"That's why I first introduced the original language of this bill back in 2021," Roy told Blaze News. "Now — with a federal trifecta in the House, Senate and White House — Republicans have no excuse not to force this issue and pass legislation barring the CCP from buying any American soil."
Roy's bill is co-sponsored by Republican Reps. Andy Ogles of Tennessee, Anna Paulina Luna of Florida, Tim Burchett of Tennessee, Brandon Gill of Texas, Eric Burlison of Missouri, Pat Fallon of Texas, Mark Green of Tennessee, Troy Nehls of Texas, Michael Guest of Mississippi, Jake Ellzey of Texas, Pete Stauber of Minnesota, Randy Weber of Texas, and Nathaniel Moran of Texas.
Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!
If The U.S. Government Doesn’t Ban TikTok, Parents Should
Get the Conservative Review delivered right to your inbox.
We’ll keep you informed with top stories for conservatives who want to become informed decision makers.
Today's top stories