Horowitz: McConnell helps Dems pass $280 billion Big Tech corporate welfare bill. Schumer betrays him in return.



Few people in America were following the passage of the $280 billion handout for huge chip manufactures and the 5G industry, but the politics surrounding the bill, as well as the bill itself, perfectly exemplify the “uniparty” dynamic. To begin with, GOP leadership had no problem with this corporate welfare bill and worked together to craft it. However, McConnell promised to hold up the bill unless the Democrats committed to forgoing budget reconciliation, a process through which they can pass liberal priorities without the need for 60 votes. Well, McConnell and 17 other Republican senators eagerly provided the votes for the “chips-plus bill,” and Schumer responded by announcing his plans to pass budget reconciliation to remake our economy!

Leftists love over-taxing and over-regulating certain businesses while granting endless corporate welfare to other industries in order to create transnational monopolies. The semiconductor and 5G industries embody everything conservatives are worried about with the corporate masters – ties to China, privacy concerns, health concerns, outsourcing American jobs, creating monopolies, and funding woke global corporations that hate our values and use the funding as well as the technology against our best interests.

In comes the “chips and science” bill (HR 4346), a $280 billion package for the science and tech cartels that includes $54 billion in five-year grants for manufacturing and design of semiconductors and 5G wireless deployment, plus $24 billion in tax credits for new semiconductor manufacturing facilities through 2026 and funding authorizations to bolster U.S. scientific research. These are some of the wokest and wealthiest companies. Intel, which aggressively lobbied for the bill, already earned $79 billion in revenue last year. Yet 17 Republicans, including Leader McConnell, joined every Democrat sans Bernie Sanders and voted for this earth-shattering and expensive bill with lightning speed.

Even if one agrees there is a need to somehow pick winners and losers, we should have at least secured provisions ensuring that China can’t steal our technology, that the jobs and supply chain remain here in the United States, and that these companies can’t promote wokeness, and we should have addressed oversight issues of privacy and health concerns with 5G. Rather than addressing the insane regulatory burden that has broken our domestic supply chains, this bill will further incentivize and invest in the current globalist system that sells out America to China. Absent large-scale policy reforms, more funding of supposed “American” tech giants is tantamount to funding China. The GOP’s answer to everything we don’t like is to add more spending to it.


To make matters worse, in the final days, the bill added hundreds of pages and hundreds of billions of dollars to fund the broken “science” agencies that should be shuttered. This includes a five-year $102 billion authorization for the National Science Foundation, Commerce Department, and National Institute of Standards and Technology to increase investments, which represents a $52 billion increase in baseline spending of these bloated and unnecessary agencies. It also includes billions of extra funding for “basic energy sciences” and “environmental sciences.” It appears that McConnell and company still “trust the science.”

In other words, even in the minority under a very radical and unpopular Democrat regime, Republicans think that the base spending bills weren’t enough and desire to increase funding for everything that is wrong with government. Republicans will wax poetic today about inflation, yet when it came to the issues that mattered – COVID, Ukraine, and now a massive Big Tech bill – they not only fail to filibuster big budget bills, but they will even vote for new massive spending bills while in the minority. At least in the past they used to be righteous in the minority and screwed conservatives only after winning elections.

Although there are some House Democrats who are at least consistent in their hate for big business and will oppose this corporate welfare, Republicans plan to supply the votes.

\u201cA source on Capitol Hill tells me 10 Democrats are opposed to CHIPS\u2026\n\nBut 38 House GOP plan to vote yes & put this bill over the top. \n\nEven before the reconciliation announcement, @club4growth @Heritage_Action @FreedomWorks @AFPAction @taxreformer @NTU & others were opposed.\u201d
— Scott T. Parkinson (@Scott T. Parkinson) 1658964349

This is part of a broader betrayal of passing red-flag laws, flirting with gay marriage, and passing an NDAA funding the woke and broke military that is mandating the shots on soldiers.

To add insult to injury, McConnell originally promised that if Democrats didn’t give up on plans to pass budget reconciliation, he would block passage of the chips bill. A budget reconciliation bill is the only maneuver by which Democrats could attempt to ram through a transcendent policy change without facing a filibuster, assuming they keep every Democrat senator in line. Yet McConnell then votes for the bill, and within hours of its passage yesterday, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer announced plans to pursue a reconciliation resolution.

After months of a stalemate with Senator Joe Manchin, Schumer announced plans to pass a $370 billion “climate and energy” bill, funding the Great Reset, three years of subsidies for the health care cartel under Obamacare, and more handouts for Big Pharma. They are calling it “the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022” because it purports to pay for the spending with tax increases, and somehow that would reduce inflation.

\u201cNote that McConnell said he would blow up the chips bill if Dems tried to do budget reconciliation pkg for social spending plan. Chips passes. Manchin/Schumer immediately announce agreement on reconciliation measure\u201d
— Chad Pergram (@Chad Pergram) 1658957890

Thus, when Democrats pass that bill next week and all these same McConnell Republicans vote against it, just know that McConnell gave up his leverage and is responsible for that massive tax-and-spend giveaway to woke industries because he agreed to pass another massive corporate welfare bill. Nor do they have any plans to hold up the NDAA or the fiscal year 2023 budget bill when it comes due at the end of September.

But fear not. Spend the next few months campaigning for this same party so that none other than a Majority Leader Mitch McConnell is waiting for you as the reward for your hard work.

Poll: More than half of Wyoming GOP primary voters will vote for anyone but Liz Cheney



As House Republicans seem increasingly likely to force conference chairwoman Rep. Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.) out of leadership, a new poll of Wyoming Republicans indicates primary voters are ready to toss Cheney out of Congress.

A WPA Intelligence poll commissioned by the Club for Growth PAC, a grassroots organization that supports candidates who believe in limited government and economic freedom, found that 52% of Republican voters in Wyoming will vote for anyone but Cheney in the 2022 primary.

The beleaguered congresswoman's favorability is 36 points under water, with just 29% of GOP voters having a favorable view of Cheney and a whopping 65% viewing her unfavorably. Only 14% of voters say they will vote to re-elect Cheney regardless of who runs against her. Another 31% say they will consider another candidate before making up their mind.

NEW: @club4growth poll shows trouble for Liz Cheney in #WYAL >> 52% of GOP primary voters would vote against her… https://t.co/KljC6IQazw

— Ally Mutnick (@allymutnick) 1620238227.0

These numbers paint a clear picture: Unless something drastic and unforeseen happens, Liz Cheney will not be re-elected in 2022.

It's an astonishing fall for the daughter of former Vice President Dick Cheney, who himself served for ten years in the House of Representatives and once held the very leadership position she seems likely to lose.

First elected to Congress in 2016, Liz Cheney was well respected by the Republican establishment and seen as a rising star in the party. Rush Limbaugh once called her "Republican Party royalty" and praised her as a solid conservative. After winning re-election in 2018, she was elected to a leadership position as conference chair, the No. 3 position for Republicans in the House and a role that is largely responsible for the conference's messaging to voters.

Cheney once may have had a bright future in the GOP. But she is out of step with Republican voters on the key issue of former President Donald Trump.

As she herself explained in a recent op-ed for the Washington Post, Cheney holds Trump responsible for provoking the violence at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6. She thinks Trump is a liar who is undermining "confidence in the result of elections and the rule of law" by continuing to assert that the 2020 presidential election was fraudulent and that Biden's win was illegitimate.

Her convictions led her to vote to impeach the former president, which led Wyoming Republicans to officially censure her and call for her resignation in response. Nevertheless, Cheney has continued to be one of Trump's most outspoken Republican critics.

But opposition to Trump has consequences in the modern Republican Party. House Republicans recognize this, and it is for this reason that Republican Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy said this week he has "lost confidence" in her ability to carry the GOP message in leadership.

The congresswoman most likely to succeed Cheney as conference chair is Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-N.Y.) who was endorsed for the position by Trump and is well liked in the GOP conference. Stefanik is vocally supportive of Trump and was one of several House Republicans to vote against certifying the Electoral College results for several states that President Joe Biden won.

Interestingly, the Club for Growth — which commissioned the poll on Cheney's favorability — opposes Stefanik for Republican leadership even though she has Trump's support.

Elise Stefanik is NOT a good spokesperson for the House Republican Conference. She is a liberal with a 35% CFGF lif… https://t.co/tyDZ9l3ivE

— Club for Growth (@club4growth) 1620252579.0

According to the club's scorecard of members of Congress, Stefanik is one of the most liberal Republicans in the GOP conference. Though she supports Trump rhetorically, her record in Congress was to vote against major pieces of the president's agenda.

Stefanik voted for amnesty with citizenship for illegal immigrants; voted against the 2017 Trump tax cuts; voted to terminate Trump's emergency declaration at the border; and joined 11 other Republicans to override funding for the border wall. She supported the first version of the "Equality Act" before voting against it after Biden became president. Stefanik also voted with Democrats to force Trump to stay in the Paris climate accord.

Liz Cheney pens op-ed urging GOP to 'steer away' from 'Trump cult of personality'



House Republican Conference Chairwoman Rep. Liz Cheney (Wyo.) is urging her party to "steer away" from the "Trump cult of personality" as she faces being ousted from her leadership position — and possibly even her House seat — over her criticisms of former President Donald Trump.

What are the details?

In a piece published in The Washington Post on Tuesday afternoon, Cheney asserted that "the GOP is at a turning point" and "history is watching us."

Cheney wrote in her opening:

In public statements again this week, former president Donald Trump has repeated his claims that the 2020 election was a fraud and was stolen. His message: I am still the rightful president, and President Biden is illegitimate. Trump repeats these words now with full knowledge that exactly this type of language provoked violence on Jan. 6. And, as the Justice Department and multiple federal judges have suggested, there is good reason to believe that Trump's language can provoke violence again. Trump is seeking to unravel critical elements of our constitutional structure that make democracy work — confidence in the result of elections and the rule of law. No other American president has ever done this.

She argued toward the end:

"We Republicans need to stand for genuinely conservative principles, and steer away from the dangerous and anti-democratic Trump cult of personality. In our hearts, we are devoted to the American miracle. We believe in the rule of law, in limited government, in a strong national defense, and in prosperity and opportunity brought by low taxes and fiscally conservative policies."

The op-ed comes amid reports that Republicans are seeking to boot Cheney from her post as the third-ranking Republican in the caucus, over her insistence that Trump — a popular figure in the GOP — is dishonest and bad for the party. The frontrunner for replacing Cheney is purportedly Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-N.Y.), a staunch Trump loyalist.

Trump, who has repeatedly fired back at Cheney, issued a statement the same day as her op-ed, writing:

"Liz Cheney is a warmongering fool who has no business in Republican Party Leadership. We want leaders who believe in the Make America Great Again movement, and prioritize the values of America First. Elise Stefanik is a far superior choice, and she has my COMPLETE and TOTAL endorsement for GOP Conference Chair. Elise is a tough and smart communicator!"

But not all conservatives are on board with Stefanik, either.

After several Republicans voiced their support for Stefanik being elevated to replace Cheney, the Club for Growth tweeted, "Elise Stefanik is NOT a good spokesperson for the House Republican Conference. She is a liberal with a 35% [Club for Growth Foundation] lifetime rating, 4th worst in the House GOP. House Republicans should find a conservative to lead messaging and win back the House Majority."

Elise Stefanik is NOT a good spokesperson for the House Republican Conference. She is a liberal with a 35% CFGF lif… https://t.co/tyDZ9l3ivE

— Club for Growth (@club4growth) 1620252579.0

Gabriel Sterling — a top election official in Georgia who has also taken heat from fellow Republicans over the handling of the general election in the state — argued, "Liz Cheney is more conservative on issues than Elise Stefanik. Cheney voted with Pres. Trump's agenda more than Stefanik. Cheney doesn't support Trump's Big Lie that the election was stolen, Stefanik does. This isn't about philosophy...it's about personality and ego alone."