CNBC: ‘Best States To Live In’ Mutilate Kids, Free Criminals, Take All Your Money
CNBC wants you to believe states run by Democrats are the best to live in. But they rigged the data.Men in women’s restrooms? Affirmative action? Suppression of religious freedom?
CNBC’s latest “America’s 10 worst states to live in” ranking, published Saturday, appears to place a heavy emphasis on liberal policies, contributing to a bottom-10 list of exclusively red states.
'If Texas was so bad, people wouldn't be fleeing blue states in droves to move here."
Among the criteria considered were crime rates, air quality, health care access, worker protections, civil rights laws, "reproductive rights," and inclusivity.
Tennessee was deemed the worst state to live in the U.S., followed by Texas, Indiana, Louisiana, Georgia, Utah, Missouri, Alabama, Oklahoma, and Arkansas.
However, the methodology quickly drew criticism from conservative politicians and commentators, who argued that several of CNBC’s quality-of-life metrics effectively penalize states for enacting conservative policies.
Louisiana, for example, lost points for abolishing affirmative action requirements in the state’s civil service code in favor of a merit-based system.
“DEI has been swept out of Civil Service. Now employment decisions will be based strictly on the basis of merit,” Gov. Jeff Landry (R) proclaimed in January.
Louisiana was still awarded an “F” letter grade partly for scoring low on "inclusiveness."
Another “F” state, Georgia, was hit hard for a state law protecting the First Amendment’s right to religious freedom.
“The bill would prevent governments from impeding on someone’s religious rights in most cases and stop the enforcement of laws that conflict with someone’s religious expression,” the Associated Press reported.
During the bill’s signing, Republican Gov. Brian Kemp affirmed, “Georgia still remains a state where there is no place for hate, and I can assure all Georgians of that today.”
Citing the ongoing migration of residents from blue states to red states, Rep. Brandon Gill (R-Texas) pushed back against Texas’ low ranking, arguing that the state’s population growth tells a different story.
“If Texas was so bad, people wouldn't be fleeing blue states in droves to move here,” he posted on X.
RELATED: America's best and worst states for religious freedom — and what it means for our future

For Tennessee’s bio, CNBC came out swinging with an attack on the Volunteer State’s law prohibiting transgender-identifying individuals from using bathrooms and locker rooms that don’t align with their biological sex — accusing Tennessee Republicans of imposing “a rash of state laws targeting the LGBTQ+ community.”
The recent designation of June as “Nuclear Family Month” also came under fire.
The Tennessee resolution states, “The nuclear family, consisting of one husband, one wife, and any biological, adopted, or fostered children, is God’s design for familial structure and has been the bedrock of society since the creation of the world.”
Yet CNBC criticized the measure, arguing, “Its sponsors deliberately timed the observance to coincide with the month when Tennessee’s more than 300,000 LGBTQ+ people celebrate Pride.”
Republican Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis came to Tennessee’s defense in a post on X, writing, “If Tennessee was really the worst state to live in people wouldn’t be moving there in large numbers, which they are.”
“Typical nonsense,” he added.
Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton joined DeSantis in blasting the methodology.
“CNBC says the ability to kill unborn babies and engage in woke racism makes states better to live in,” Fitton said, partially in reference to Louisiana and Oklahoma being dinged for having “among the nation’s strictest abortion bans.”
On the other side of the aisle, California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) used the ranking to mock Republicans suffering from what he described as “California Derangement Syndrome.”
“Notice something in common?” Newsom wrote. “All led by Republicans.”
Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!
So long, MSNBC. The Wall Street Journal reported Monday that the failing left-wing media network will be rebranded as MS NOW, or "My Source for News, Opinion, and the World." In addition to dropping NBC from its name, the network will no longer be able to use the iconic peacock logo. Some have described the MS NOW name and logo, unveiled Monday, as resembling the signage for a "discount computer from 1998, not a serious news network."
The post MSNBC's Humiliating Rebrand, In Context appeared first on .
MSNBC suddenly announced a name change Monday morning, saying it will be called My Source News Opinion World (MS NOW) following the impending spinoff from its parent company Comcast. That change comes as an embarrassment to the left-wing network—though NBCUniversal executives said the move was meant to ease "brand confusion," CNBC will keep its name, suggesting NBC is aiming to create unique separation between itself and MSNBC.
The post Embarrassment for MSNBC As It’s Forced To Drop Prestigious ‘NBC’ From Name in Favor of Widely Mocked ‘My Source News Opinion World’ appeared first on .
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries is once again holding back from commenting on Zohran Mamdani, the Democratic nominee for mayor of New York City.
Like most of his fellow New York Democratic lawmakers, Jeffries has refrained from endorsing Mamdani despite his popularity in the city. At the same time, Mamdani's Democratic opponents, like former New York Governor Andrew Cuomo, have torn into the rising star, most recently calling him a hypocrite for living in a rent-controlled apartment.
'The Mamdani campaign is going to have to address it.'
"Somewhere last night in New York City, a single mother and her children slept at a homeless shelter because you, assemblyman [Zohran Mamdani] are occupying her rent controlled apartment," Cuomo wrote in a post on X.
"We are in the middle of a historic affordability crisis," Cuomo added. "Millions of low income New Yorkers need this apartment and an apartment like it. Yet your apartment remains rented to rich people who don't need it."

Many commentators and political analysts attribute Mamdani's success to his focus on affordability. Unlike his challengers, Mamdani has repeatedly advocated for a rent freeze on all rent-controlled apartments intended for low-income residents, which has drawn attention to his own living situation.
Despite Mamdani's hypocrisy, Jeffries yet again withheld from criticizing the Democratic front-runner.
When asked if Mamdani should live in a rent-controlled apartment, Jeffries told CNBC, "That is an issue for the state legislators and state government to work out."
RELATED: Are Democrats reclaiming the 'podcast bros'?

The CNBC host promptly pressed Jeffries, pointing out that people like Mamdani are not the intended demographic for rent subsidies and financial aid.
"It's a fascinating issue about affordability in the city and whether there are folks who are living in rent-controlled apartments all across this city that effectively should be going towards poor people who need that affordability," the host said.
"It's a legitimate issue that has been raised, and the Mamdani campaign is going to have to address it," Jeffries said.
Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!
Recent reports in NPR, CBS News, and CNBC have cited a study from "nonpartisan" research firm Energy Innovation to argue that President Donald Trump's repeal of green energy subsidies will cause energy prices to spike. Those reports did not mention the firm's CEO and cofounder: Sonia Aggarwal, a former Biden climate adviser who helped write those very subsidies into law.
The post Mainstream Media Reports Cite ‘Nonpartisan’ Research Firm to Trash Trump’s Repeal of Green Energy Subsidies. Its Leader Helped Biden Write Those Subsidies Into Law. appeared first on .