The PERFECT analogy to explain why Caitlin Clark’s WNBA salary makes sense
In the wake of Iowa Hawkeyes guard Caitlin Clark signing with the Indiana Fever, fans are outraged at the superstar’s projected WNBA salary, which will earn her just $76,535 for her rookie season.
When you consider that Clark was the number-one draft pick, that amount does seem remarkably low, especially when you consider that the number-one draft pick for the NBA in 2023 was Victor Wembanyama, whose starting salary with the San Antonio Spurs was just over $12 million.
Is this fair?
According to Dave Rubin and guest Dennis Prager, yes.
While Dave gives credit where credit is due, calling Clark a “spectacular women’s basketball player,” he doesn’t think “[taking] some money from LeBron James and [giving] it to Caitlin Clark” is the answer.
Prager agrees, offering an analogy that puts things into perspective.
“How much does a supermodel make? The truth is some of them make millions of dollars a year,” he tells Dave.
And he’s correct. In 2023, several supermodels made tens of millions of dollars, and every single one of them was – you guessed it – a woman.
“Are there any male supermodels who make millions of dollars a year?” Prager asks. “I doubt it.”
Correct again. The highest-paid male model of 2023 was Sean O’Pry, who earned roughly $1.5 million.
Why the disparity?
“Because generally speaking, people would rather see women models than male models,” says Prager. “So is it fair that male models make so much less than female models? Yes, of course it’s fair!”
And just as the male modeling industry pales in comparison to the female modeling industry, so “the WNBA does not bring in the revenue of the NBA.”
“They take the gender confusion and then they combine it into something as it relates to capitalism that really just all leads to socialism,” says Dave.
To hear more of the conversation, watch the clip below.
Want more from Dave Rubin?
To enjoy more honest conversations, free speech, and big ideas with Dave Rubin, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.
Will viewership tank once Caitlin Clark heads to the WNBA?
Women’s basketball has now broken records, and some believe it has a lot more to do with Caitlin Clark than anything else.
The television broadcast of the South Carolina-Iowa game averaged 18.9 million viewers and peaked at 24.1 million, which is the most views ever recorded for a men or women’s college basketball game on an ESPN platform.
“She’s brought a bunch of eyes to women’s college basketball,” Jeffy tells Pat Gray, who adds, “It’s hard for me to believe. The most-watched basketball game of any kind?”
While it’s an impressive feat, neither Gray or Jeffy believe the viewership will continue once Clark moves on to the WNBA.
“In the future, without Caitlin, you know there will be a few more eyes brought to women’s basketball,” Jeffy says.
Gray wonders if “they will stay there,” and Jeffy predicts, “No way.”
Even the vice president has gotten in on the madness by recently feigning interest in women’s basketball, claiming that women’s teams were not allowed to have brackets until 2022.
“A bit of a history lesson, do you know that the women’s teams were not allowed to have brackets until 2022? Think about that,” Kamala Harris said, despite being wrong.
“People used to say, ‘Ah, women’s sports, who’s interested?’” She added.
“We’ll check back in with you next year after Caitlin’s gone,” Gray laughs.
Want more from Pat Gray?
To enjoy more of Pat's biting analysis and signature wit as he restores common sense to a senseless world, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.