The Saga Of Tennessee’s Nico Iamaleava Is The Latest Expression Of The Brokenness Of College Sports

This is only the latest example of the rapid destruction of college sports in America.

EA Sports doubles NIL compensation for NCAA football players ahead of new game release



Electronic Arts will increase its payments to college athletes this year for their name, image, and likeness, more than doubling the payouts from 2024.

In email to Division I NCAA athletes on Tuesday, EA Sports announced it would increase payments from $600 to $1,500 to football players for their inclusion in the upcoming college football video game.

Players included in the deal will also receive a copy of the deluxe edition of College Football 26, a bonus they similarly received for the last game. Some players will again serve as brand ambassadors for the game and receive further compensation.

Discussions did not go so easily for EA Sports last year. Many accused the game giant of undercompensating athletes, something Texas quarterback and legacy player Arch Manning seemed very aware of.

The nephew of Super Bowl winners Peyton and Eli Manning, Arch held out on negotiations until the 11th hour, when Electronic Arts eventually caved and paid a reported $50,000 (or more) to have the young star appear in the game. Soon thereafter, Manning released a promotional video with his uncle Eli to promote the title.

"I'm IN the game," Manning wrote, along with the signature "horns up" emoji representing Texas.

College sports reporter Pete Nakos told Blaze News at the time that cover athletes for the game received payments in the low six figures.

Texas QB Arch Manning held out for a reported 84x pay increase for his inclusion in NCAA Football 25. Photo by Sam Hodde/Getty Images

More than 8,000 players agreed to be in to the previous game within days of being offered a deal in 2024, with a total of 14,000 athletes opting in. This averaged out to about 85 players per team.

NCAA Football 25 was the first video game of its kind in 10 years, and fans flocked to stores and online retailers to make it the highest-selling sports game of all time. It was reported last July that the game had taken in a reported $500 million in just a few weeks, according to On3.

Speaking on the new NIL deal, EA Sports executive Sean O'Brien said the company's approach "empowers each athlete to make their own decision."

"College sports are growing and changing," O'Brien continued. "Our focus at EA Sports is on continuing to put athletes first as we bring them in the game in College Football 26 and beyond."

Agency OneTeam Partners has a multiyear contract with EA Sports to negotiate group licensing rights and reportedly claims to advocate on behalf of the players due to their lack of unionization. However, EA still makes the final decision in terms of how much the company will pay the college athletes.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

D.C. Decision Makers Could Kill College Sports By Giving NCAA Big Dogs A Legal Monopoly

The NCAA is broken, but handing the keys to a few fat cats will make it even worse.

Former NCAA hurdler demands 'stolen' championship be returned after she was defeated by male athlete: 'I want it back'



Former track and field athlete Minna Svärd is asking the NCAA to award her a 2019 victory that she says was "stolen" by a male athlete participating in the women's division.

Svärd raced for East Texas A&M University in 2019 in the women's 400-meter hurdles and was the fastest female at any NCAA Division II school.

Svärd wrote an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal and participated in subsequent interviews regarding a race at the NCAA championships where she posted a time of 59.21 seconds. Unfortunately, a male athlete named CeCe Telfer was also in that race, and with a time of 57.53, beat her by 1.68 seconds.

"It's been five years since that honor was stolen from me," Svärd wrote. "I want it back."

The Swedish athlete also revealed in an interview with Megyn Kelly that Telfer was allegedly ranked 390th in men's competitions before becoming the top female hurdler less than two years later. The male towered over his competition at events, dwarfing female athletes in side-by-side comparisons that made footage a travesty to watch.

'My dreams were taken away from me once again.'

Telfer was heralded by progressive activists after his win and received an honor for his "pioneering actions" in the sport of track and field. He was soon paraded around on networks like CNN and CBS who celebrated him for his alleged struggle as a black woman.

In 2024, the athlete promised vengeance in response to criticisms and said he would return to women's sports and take more records from female athletes.

"My dreams were taken away from me once again. So I plan on going back to New England, hitting up all the indoor competitions, and taking all the names, all the records, and everything," he said in an interview.

Correcting the record

Svärd, applauding President Trump's executive order aimed at preventing men from competing in women's sports, still said the order does not go far enough. She added that official results of past competitions should be corrected to align with the reality that they were the result of male competitors.

However, the Department of Education made the very same declaration in February. The government agency sent a letter to the NCAA demanding any records or awards given to males in female categories be returned to the actual winners.

The letter defined such awards or records as being "wrongfully credited to male athletes."

Svärd has echoed many sentiments shared by female athletes who had opportunities taken by men posing as women, such as the fact that every time a male athlete enters or participates in a women's event, it displaces at least one female athlete that should have been there.

This rings true according to a United Nations study from 2024, which claimed more than 600 female athletes lost podium positions in 29 sporting categories to male athletes.

While Svärd is still waiting for her championship to be returned to her, she cited one unfortunate accolade that cannot be taken away:

"That made me the first collegiate woman to be told her victory was worth less than a man's feelings."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Riley Gaines, college athletes call out NCAA for 'loopholes' in transgender policy that allows men on women's practice squads



Former collegiate swimmer Riley Gaines and other athletes starred in an ad accusing the NCAA of developing a substandard policy surrounding men in women's sports.

Gaines, a former NCAA swimmer who competed against transgender athlete Lia Thomas in the women's category, appeared in an ad for XX-XY Athletics, a brand that pushes for women's rights in sports.

"This policy does not protect female athletes. It sets no clear boundary to ensure that women's sports are for women only," the ad said in reference to the NCAA's new policy.

The governing body's policy is in reaction to President Trump's executive order to prevent women's sports from being infiltrated by men. The order called for "enforcement actions against educational institutions" if they force women to participate in sports or athletic events with men or if women are forced to "appear unclothed before males."

For competitions, the new policy says a "student-athlete assigned male at birth may not compete on a women's team."

At the same time, the same policy stated that a student-athlete who is male "may practice on the team consistent with their gender identity and receive all other benefits applicable to student-athletes who are otherwise eligible for practice."

Simply put, the male athlete may stay on the female team, so long as they are not actively in competition and can still receive athletic benefits.

'The policy is riddled with loopholes.'

For women, the same rules apply if they are on "hormone therapy," such as testosterone. They may also remain on a women's team but also can only partake in practices.

"The new NCAA policy is in direct conflict with President Trumps [sic] beautifully written Executive Order, 'Keeping Men Out of Women's Sports,'" Gaines said in a post while sharing the ad.

— (@)

Jennifer Sey, founder of the clothing brand and former United States national artistic gymnast, said, "The policy is riddled with loopholes."

"[It] ensures that the NCAA need not take any accountability for ensuring that women’s sports and spaces in federally funded, Title IX governed institutions remain for women only."

Sey also criticized the idea that the NCAA is relying on birth certificates to verify an athlete's sex, stating, "The vast majority of states have laws on the books allowing people to change their sex on their birth certificate with varying levels of requirements. (Only 6 states don’t allow it at all.)"

Attached to the NCAA's announcement of its policy change was a document providing its "Guidance on Inclusive Language."

The guidance warned against the use of offensive language when referring to a person's citizenship, nationality, gender, or disability.

For example, it said to "avoid terms such as 'foreigner' or 'alien'" and instead say "international" or "citizen" of another country.

For gender, it said not to make assumptions that express "implicit bias" and to not assume a person's pronouns.

The ad went on to demand safe sports for women, without any inclusion of men.

The athletes included in the ad are the following: Macey Boggs, Payton McNabb, Kaitlynn Wheeler, Réka György, Neely Gaines, Lauren Miller, and Sia Liilii.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

The NCAA can’t lead college sports if it rejects biological reality



The NCAA has no excuse any more.

The spineless leaders who run it got the cover they desperately needed from President Donald Trump to acknowledge the obvious biological differences between men and women. It was like the Garden of Eden all over again — after smoking crack.

Any organization that can’t define what a woman is shouldn't be allowed to survive, let alone oversee the future of collegiate athletics.

Male and female he created them, sayeth Trump upon signing an executive order on National Girls and Women in Sports Day. Instead of being cast out of paradise, though, for violating that order, the penalty for the trans terrorists will henceforth be investigation and loss of federal funding as well as heaping portions of mockery, scorn, and — if we should be so lucky — Nancy Mace yelling, “Tranny, tranny, tranny!” until their ears bleed.

Now that we’ve settled where penises do and don’t belong, the NCAA has a chance to salvage a shred of dignity on another front. Soon, its officials will appear before the Senate Commerce Committee to argue for its role in the future governance of college athletics. If the NCAA fails to follow through on protecting female athletes after Trump’s photo op with Riley Gaines and her allies, it will collapse before the committee, now chaired by Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas).

This isn’t about gender clarity for the NCAA’s leadership. They aren’t having a sudden moral awakening. More likely, they’re barely capable of doing the math on societal relevance and financial survival.

Let’s be honest — that makes far more sense than expecting the same gender ideologues to suddenly see Trump as their Rosetta stone for truth, science, and decency.

Now, back to Cruz. Since the chaotic and unsustainable introduction of “name, image, likeness” funding for college athletes in 2021, the NCAA has struggled to navigate its own future. A group that couldn’t muster the will to keep mentally ill men out of women’s locker rooms was never going to figure out the next phase of college sports without help from leaders like the junior U.S. senator from Texas.

In 2023, Cruz introduced draft legislation to guide the NCAA and its member institutions toward recognizing student athletes as employees of their universities. But moving beyond the draft stage is fraught with land mines.

Title IX remains in jeopardy, no matter what Trump just accomplished, because men’s football and basketball generate significantly more revenue than any women’s sport. Meanwhile, many school presidents and athletic directors warn that losing Olympic men’s sports at the college level is becoming a real possibility — especially for institutions without deep budgetary resources or major donor support.

Hint: That’s most of them.

Without the NCAA’s agreement to protect women’s sports, Cruz and the Commerce Committee might have had an easier job. If the NCAA had refused to cooperate, it would have effectively forfeited its place at the grown-ups’ table. But now, the organization’s leaders can dig in their heels, leveraging their compliance with Trump’s order as a bargaining chip in his favorite game — “let’s make a deal.”

This will be a high-stakes poker match. The NCAA will undoubtedly use Title IX as a defense — whether legitimate or a bluff — to convince the Commerce Committee that paying college athletes is financially unworkable without cutting jobs and eliminating sports programs.

I worked for Cruz, so I know firsthand how seriously he takes his principles and how thoroughly he does his due diligence. He’s a proud girl dad and a dedicated sports fan, making him both knowledgeable about these issues and personally invested. Cruz also just won re-election by defeating a former Baylor college football star — someone he mocked for supporting transgender insanity and the push to replace women with men in sports.

I probably don’t need to suggest this to my former boss — he’s likely already thinking it. But under no circumstances should federal legislation save the NCAA unless it makes clear that the organization isn’t just paying lip service to Trump’s executive order. It must commit to upholding biological reality in sports permanently.

The NCAA should be forced to acknowledge that reality once and for all. Otherwise, it can continue its losing streak in the courts.

Any organization that can’t define what a woman is shouldn't be allowed to survive, let alone oversee the future of collegiate athletics.

Only Congress And The President Can Save College Sports

Saving college sports this time will require comprehensive federal legislation that touches some of the most complex areas of law.

Democrats melt down over bill banning males from female sports: 'Bigoted folks love this bill!'



The Protection of Women and Girls in Sports Act of 2025 passed a House vote on Wednesday, sending Democratic lawmakers into a frenzy over the potential law.

Representative Greg Steube (R-Fla.) had his bill passed through the House by a vote of 218-206, with the intention of keeping male athletes from participating in female sports in schools.

Democrats took grave issue with the bill, saying it was not only unfair to "transgender girls" but that it would also result in "genital examinations" on young girls.

Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) went on a verbal rampage and began with a claim that women are "bleeding out in parking lots across the country" due to lack of abortion access.

"[Republicans] are standing there allowing us to die, now want to pretend today that they care about women," she continued.

Ocasio-Cortez then said the bill would result in "genital examinations into little girls ... in the so-called name of attacking trans girls."

"Trans girls are girls," the New York Democrat continued. "I don't know who's been to gym class lately, but girls, even if you only believe in two genders, I've played coed sports all the time," she explained.

Before she yielded, AOC added, "Yes, bigoted folks love this bill. Assaulters love this bill."

'This obsession with monitoring kids genitals is absolutely the problem.'

Representative Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) proudly voted no on the bill and said Americans needed to be educated "about the facts" and pointed to how few transgender athletes there are in college athletics.

This was reference to a NCAA president Charlie Baker, who stated this fact when facing questions from Congress about the issue in December.

Jayapal said the potential law would "harm all girls" and claimed gender tests are "invasive and impossible to implement."

"How do you verify a girl’s 'reproductive biology?' If a young girl, if your daughter does not look feminine enough, does that mean she's subject to examination now?" the Democrat asked.

Other Democrats further pushed the idea of genital examinations as the predominant method to determine biological sex.

"This obsession with monitoring kids genitals is absolutely the problem," said Representative Becca Balint (D-Vt.). "This is asking people to show them what is underneath their underwear. That is what we're talking about."

Maxwell Frost (D-Fla.) said the bill "empowers pedophiles and predators."

Andrea Salinas (D-Ore.) also claimed female athletes would be subjected to "genital inspections.”

Of course, there are several methods to determine gender that are far less intrusive than physical examinations.

As tennis legend Martina Navratilova has stated for years, a cheek swab is the most unintrusive method to determine gender.

Again- no drugs will take away the male advantage. The testosterone threshold varies sport by sport , state by state etc. The threshold should be XX- take a sex test- a simple and inexpensive cheek swab just once in a lifetime and you’re done. Simple. Nothing else is needed
— Martina Navratilova (@Martina) November 17, 2024

Information regarding the ability to determine gender through a myriad of tests is widely available, such as through research sites like Pub Med, which show that not only is saliva a potential testing fluid but so is blood.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

NAACP asks black athletes to abandon dreams of attending and playing for Florida colleges



The NAACP wants black student athletes to give up their dreams of attending Florida colleges and universities because the Sunshine State dared to take a stand against racist propaganda and discriminatory practices.

While Derrick Johnson, president of the identitarian outfit, and NAACP Chairman Leon Russell claim this "is not about politics," their aim is clear: to financially punish organizations that fail to conform with their race-centered political project.

Florida colleges and universities have been dismantling their respective DEI regimes in part to align with a law ratified by Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis in May 2023, which cut off state funding to such discriminatory programs.

Ten days after the University of Florida announced it was shuttering its office of chief diversity officer and eliminating DEI positions on campus in line with the 2023 law, Johnson and Russell penned a letter to current and prospective members of the National Collegiate Athletic Association, urging them to "reconsider any potential decision to attend, and compete at a predominantly white institution in the state of Florida."

The NAACP clarified in a corresponding statement that this letter "comes following recent news that the University of Florida had dismantled its DEI department at the direction of the DeSantis administration's Stop WOKE Act."

The NAACP leaders suggested in their Monday letter that DeSantis' execution of the will of Florida voters — not only in combating critical race theory and discriminatory practices on campus but also taking a stand against abortion, which disproportionately victimizes black babies — amounted to a "devaluation of Black America."

"Now, as a result of his administration's anti-Black ideals, all state-funded universities in Florida will be forced to dismantle their diversity, equity, and inclusion programs," said the letter.

Johnson and Russell made clear they want to hurt Florida colleges and universities financially.

The identitarians suggested that college sports, football especially, is a profitable enterprise "with most revenue earned off the backs of Black student-athletes. At UF and similar institutions, if football stadiums emptied, if merchandise stopped selling, if TV deals fell through, the monetary loss would extend beyond athletics to other university programs."

Johnson and Russell added, "If any institution is to reap the benefits of Black talent, it is only right that they completely invest in Black futures."

Despite attempting to undo a law passed by democratically elected lawmakers and ratified by a democratically elected governor, Johnson suggested in a corresponding statement that the NAACP was attempting to protect democracy.

"The NAACP will remain unwavering in our efforts to hold Governor Ron DeSantis, and all oppressive elected officials accountable for their attempts to unravel our democracy," said Johnson.

Bryan Griffin, communications director for DeSantis, called the identitarians' plea "yet another Florida-aimed political stunt from the NAACP with no basis. FL's education system is ranked #1 in the nation on many metrics (#1 in ed freedom, #1 in higher ed 7 yrs in a row), and this world-class education is open to any American, regardless of race."

Griffin further highlighted the specifics of the law the NAACP is upset about, asking, "How could any reasonable person disagree with any of these prohibitions?"

The "Stop the Wrongs to Our Kids and Employees (WOKE) Act" deems discriminatory any training or instruction that "espouses, promotes, advances, inculcates, or compels such student or employee to believe any of the following concepts":

  • "Members of one race, color, national origin, or sex are morally superior to members of another race, color, national origin, or sex";
  • "A person, by virtue of his or her race, color, national origin, or sex is inherently racist, sexist or oppressive, whether consciously or unconsciously";
  • "A person's moral character or status as either privileged or oppressed is necessarily determined by his or her race, color, national origin, or sex";
  • "A person, by virtue of his or her race, color, national origin, or sex bears responsibility for, or should be discriminated against or receive adverse treatment because of, actions committed in the past by other members of the same race, color, national origin, or sex";
  • "A person, by virtue of his or her race, color, national origin, or sex should be discriminated against or receive adverse treatment to achieve diversity, equity, or inclusion";
  • "A person, by virtue of his or her race, color, sex, or national origin, bears personal responsibility for and must feel guilty, anguish, or other forms of psychological distress because of actions, in which the person played no part, committed in the past by other members of the same race, color, national origin, or sex"; and
  • "Such virtues as merit, excellence, hard work, fairness, neutrality, objectivity, and racial colorblindness are racist or sexist, or were created by members of a particular race, color, national origin, or sex to oppress members of another race, color, national origin, or sex."

DeSantis tweeted on March 1, "DEI is toxic and has no place in our public universities. I'm glad that Florida was the first state to eliminate DEI and I hope more states follow suit."

NBC News reported earlier this month that Republicans in more than 30 states have introduced or passed more than 100 bills in the current legislative session aimed at curbing or regulating discriminatory DEI initiatives.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!