Democrat Media Are Horrified At Trump’s Plan To End Federal Racial Discrimination
Trump plans to reverse federal agencies' practices of using antidiscrimination laws to discriminate against white people, Axios reported.
The U.S. Commerce Department has declared a 90-day pause on the export of most civilian firearms and ammunition under the premise that it will reduce the "risk of firearms being diverted to entities or activities that promote regional instability, violate human rights, or fuel criminal activities."
But what’s it really about?
“They say they're doing this because they want to make sure that the guns that are being sold by manufacturers to gun stores all around the world … don't fall into the wrong hands,” says Glenn Beck, “but we're sending billions of dollars' worth of ammunition and guns to Ukraine without anyone tracking any of it.”
Stu Burguiere finds it interesting that “the left has just decided that they're the pro-war people, but they don't want us to be able to protect ourselves against lawless mobs that … go through city after city after city.”
Speaking of lawlessness, look no further than the tragedy that happened last week in Maine when a shooter opened fire at a bowling alley, killing 18 people. Unsurprisingly, the left, along with the media, has used the incident to fuel the campaign against guns.
Conservatives have countered the argument with their usual list of reasons – “It's the shooter, not the gun; the man was unstable [and] shouldn’t have had a gun; … regulations wouldn’t have stopped him; bad guys don’t observe the regulations; these shootings are stopped by good guys with guns,” etc.
While “all of that stuff is true,” says Glenn, “none of that is the thing we should focus on right now.”
“Rather, we should realize that we are living in a very special and unique time where all of the original reasons for the Second Amendment are as urgently relevant as they have ever been, [and] we should probably understand those reasons,” he continues.
As a “natural law,” self-defense falls “under the inalienable right to life,” which protects citizens not only from “people with evil intent” but also from “an out-of-control government,” especially when that government is as “weaponized” as it is today, says Glenn.
Those who want to ban certain rifles specifically would do well to consider “the history of asymmetric warfare from the Revolutionary War,” as well as the fact that “gun confiscation [is] one of the first acts of every tyrant in history.”
Anti-gun advocates would also do well to consider the “truly frightening crime statistics” in America today and the war raging between Hamas and Israel.
“What would the result have been if the population of Israel had been completely disarmed and helpless, fully dependent on their security forces? How many would be dead?” asks Glenn. “Far more than are.”
Further, the Jews in our own country “have to cower inside their homes or get locked in libraries for fear of the mob.”
“We live in a time when hundreds of thousands of people feel free to openly shout their support for evil and genocide and their hatred for the culture that welcomed them into their midst – a time when open borders have meant 10 million people and thousands on the terror list that are present right now in our cities,” not to mention the constant threat of “the cartels and the gangs,” laments Glenn.
The truth is, “self-defense has never been more relevant than it is today.”
“I don't know what the Biden administration is doing this time,” says Glenn, “but their every step has been to erode your rights one way or another.” This temporary halt on civilian firearms and ammunition export is probably no different.
To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis, and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.
Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, who is currently running for president, has indicated that he would support abolishing the Department of Education, the Department of Energy, the Internal Revenue Service, and the Department of Commerce.
He named the four government entities after Fox News Channel's Martha MacCallum asked him if he would support nixing any agencies.
DeSantis, who previously served in the U.S. House of Representatives, indicated that he would support eliminating those four government entities if Congress would work with him to do so.
But he also said if the legislature will not support such a move, he would utilize the agencies to counter "woke ideology" and "leftism," such as by using the Department of Education to "reverse all the transgender sports stuff."
DeSantis said that either route would mark a "win for conservatives."
— (@)
In the Republican presidential contest, the Florida governor, who just won re-election last year, has been polling in second place, far behind former President Donald Trump. But while DeSantis is trailing Trump, he has been polling higher than the rest of the GOP presidential primary field.
The first Republican presidential primary debate will be held in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, on August 23.
Earlier this week, during remarks in Texas, DeSantis said that he would support rules of engagment that allow for using deadly force against drug cartel operatives who cut through America's border wall. "If somebody were breaking into your house to do something bad, you would respond with force. Yet why don't we do that at the southern border?" he said. DeSantis also said he would designate the cartels as foreign terrorist organizations or transnational criminal organizations.
Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!
The U.S. supply of computer chips has reached such alarmingly low levels that countless American manufacturers are now at a heightened risk of shutting down, the Biden administration announced this week.
The plethora of American companies that use semiconductors — such as automakers, medical device manufacturers, and other electronic device producers — now have just five days of inventory on shelves, compared to 40 days in 2019.
Amid a continued global supply chain crisis, demand for semiconductors has reportedly skyrocketed, outstripping supply even as chip makers near their maximum output.
The worrying data was uncovered in a "Risks in the Semiconductor Supply Chain" report released by the Department of Commerce on Monday that surveyed 150 chip consumers starting in September 2021.
The supply shortage has U.S. manufacturing plants in a vulnerable state.
"If a COVID outbreak, a natural disaster, or political instability disrupts a foreign semiconductor facility for even just a few weeks, it has the potential to shut down a manufacturing facility in the U.S., putting American workers and their families at risk," the Commerce Department noted in a press release.
There is essentially "no room for error," noted Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo.
The department added that bottlenecks are most concentrated in industries that use "legacy logic chips (used in automobiles, medical devices, and other products), analog chips (used in power management, image sensors, and radio frequency), and optoelectronics chips (including for sensors and switches)."
In response to the shortage, the Biden administration urged Congress to act quickly to pass the CHIPS Act, which would free up to $52 billion in federal funding for domestic semiconductor manufacturing.
“The semiconductor supply chain remains fragile, and it is essential that Congress pass chips funding as soon as possible,” Raimondo said in a statement. “With sky-rocketing demand and full utilization of existing manufacturing facilities, it’s clear the only solution to solve this crisis in the long-term is to rebuild our domestic manufacturing capabilities."
"Every day we wait on this funding is a day we fall further behind," she added.
But industry executives aren't optimistic that the funding would help alleviate the crisis, the Washington Post reported. They argued federal funding could help build up the long-term supply of chips but wouldn't help in the short term because chip factories take years to build.
Chip consumers that were surveyed by the department similarly estimated that shortages wouldn't go away in the next six months, and some suggested it could take until 2023.
Even barring a disaster like widespread factory shutdowns, American consumers are still poised to bear the brunt of the shortage's consequences, which include rising inflation.