Activist Judge Blocks Law Protecting Minors From Filth Online
Judge Richard Young, who has a history of judicial activism, parroted the arguments of the pro-pornography lobbyists in his ruling.Judge Richard Young, who has a history of judicial activism, parroted the arguments of the pro-pornography lobbyists in his ruling.The Least Congress Can Do Is Hold Tech Giants Accountable For Aiding Child Sex Traffickers
Social media platforms like Facebook provide traffickers and eager predators unprecedented access to children in the United States.Why The Supreme Court Is Unlikely To Fix The Section 230 Immunity Mess — Yet
While oral arguments in the Gonzalez case may delve into the issue, the court will likely sidestep the Section 230 immunity question.Federal Court Determines Section 230 ‘Is Not License To Do Whatever One Wants Online’
The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals just fixed 230(c)(1), creating a conflict with the Ninth Circuit Court. Will the Supreme Court finally address the breadth of Big Tech immunity?Democrats Waging A War On Twitter Don’t Want ‘Transparency,’ They Want Power
Democrats care only about power, and they're afraid Elon Musk-owned Twitter isn't going to protect their power over speech.Section 230 Needs To Be Fixed So Internet Companies Can’t Feature Child Pornography
In the leadup to the Communication Decency Act of 1996, America was concerned about the Internet exposing children to pornography. The July 1995 cover of Time magazine, titled “Cyberporn,” depicted a child staring at a computer with this caption: “Exclusive: A new study shows how pervasive and wild it really is. Can we protect our […]
Today's top stories
www.theblaze.com
freebeacon.com