'The dam is bursting': Riley Gaines and other female athletes sue NCAA for allowing transvestites to invade women's sports



All-American swim star Riley Gaines and 15 other all-female athletes are suing the National Collegiate Athletics Association for allowing transvestites to invade women's sports and locker rooms.

Gaines, host of the podcast "Gaines for Girls," noted on X, "The dam is bursting & it's about time."

The athletes who have joined the legal fight include All-American swimmer and Olympian Réka György; 2-time NCAA Champion and 31-time All-American swimmer Kylee Alons; soccer and track star Ainsley Erzen; University of Kentucky tennis player Ellie Eades; and Roanoke College swimming captains Lily Mullens and Kate Pearson along with their teammates Susanna Price, Carter Satterfield, Katie Blankship, and Julianna Morrow.

Background

Independent Council on Women's Sports, the group that ultimately organized the class action, penned a letter in January 2023 putting the NCAA Office of Legal Affairs on notice that their "practice of allowing male athletes on women's teams constitutes illegal discrimination against women on the basis of sex."

Stressing that the "NCAA is not above the law," the women's advocacy group demanded the association oust men from women's sports and locker rooms.

In subsequent months, various state governors around the country cognizant of the well-demonstrated athletic gap between men and women implored the NCAA Board of Governors to revise its transvestite student-athlete policy.

ICONS' letter and the gubernatorial pressure apparently weren't enough to make the NCAA budge. Sixteen female athletes figured a lawsuit might do the trick.

The Free Press reported that the suit could impact eligibility rules at 1,100 colleges and universities represented by the NCAA.

The class-action lawsuit

The stated aim of the lawsuit, filed this week in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, is to "secure for future generations of women the promise of Title IX that is being denied them and other college women by the National Collegiate Athletic Association working in concert with its member colleges and universities including those that are part of the University System of Georgia."

The suit accuses the NCAA of aligning with "the most radical elements of the so-called diversity, equity, and inclusion agenda on college campus" in the interest of "retaining control of the monetization of college sport," a multi-billion-dollar business.

To ensure this profitable ideological alignment, the suit claims the NCAA has also coordinated with member institutions such as Georgia Tech to suppress the free speech of student athletes who resist or speak out about the corruption of women's sports.

Part of this suppression strategy allegedly involves the imposition of "what the NCAA calls 'LGBTQ-Inclusive Codes of Conduct' which 'outlin[e] consequences for engaging in homophobic and transphobic behaviors.'"

The plaintiffs have requested the court declare that the NCAA violated Title IX and the 14th Amendment.

The suit specifically claims that the NCAA's eligibility policies pertaining to transvestites are discriminatory and violate Title IX because they:

  • permit men to compete against women in competitions and for prizes designated for females;
  • "deprive women of equal access to separate showers, locker rooms, and associated restroom facilities";
  • "diminish equal opportunities and resources for women";
  • "divert opportunities and resources to males";
  • "subject women to a loss of privacy and emotional harm"; and
  • "disproportionately impact and suppress the free speech rights of women advocating for their rights, safe spaces, and a reasonable and correct application of Title IX and equal protection principles."

The plaintiffs seek declarations that the University System of Georgia and Georgia Tech have similarly run afoul of federal law.

Beyond demanding declarations and damages, the female athletes want the NCAA and the other defendants to be barred from continuing to allow men into women's sports and from altogether enforcing its transvestite policies.

The plaintiffs have also asked that male athletes — such as the swimmer formerly known as William Thomas — have any awards, prizes, titles, or trophies won while competing against real women invalidated and reassigned.

"We're not just fighting for ourselves, we're fighting for every young girl who dreams of competing in sports," Gaines said in a statement.

ICONS cofounder Marshi Smith, herself a collegiate All-American and NCAA national champion swimmer, stated, "This lawsuit against the NCAA isn't just about competition; it's a fight for the very essence of women's sports."

"We're standing up for justice and the rights of female athletes to compete on a level playing field," continued Smith. "It's about preserving the legacy of Title IX and ensuring that the future of women's sports is as bright as its past."

The NCAA said in a statement obtained by The Hill, "College sports are the premier stage for women's sports in America, and while the NCAA does not comment on pending litigation, the Association and its members will continue to promote Title IX, make unprecedented investments in women's sports and ensure fair competition in all NCAA championships."

CBS News noted that representatives from the Georgia schools named in the suit said they had not yet been served with the lawsuit and would not comment.

It's personal

The lawsuit comes more than a year after Riley Gaines wrote to NCAA president and former Massachusetts Gov. Charlie Baker (R), speaking to the "anger and frustration" experienced by girls "who had worked so hard and sacrificed so much to get to this moment only to have to compete in a farce."

In her message to Baker, Gaines also highlighted the scientifically documented physical advantages male athletes have over female competitors. The former All-American swimmer witnessed this advantage firsthand in 2022 when she had to compete against Thomas, who dominated the NCAA Swimming Championships.

Blaze News previously reported that Thomas had been a middling performer on the University of Pennsylvania men's swimming team until he started taking cross-sex hormones in 2019 and competing against women.

He subsequently crushed records set by real women in the 500-yard freestyle in the 2022 championships and tied with Gaines for fifth the next month in the women's 200-meter.

Thomas' inclusion impacted various women besides Gaines, a number of whom are plaintiffs in the case.

Réka György, for instance, indicated in 2022 that Thomas' inclusion precluded her from securing a spot in the consolation final.

"That final spot was taken away from me because of the NCAA's decision to let someone who is not a biological female compete," György said in a March 2022 letter to the NCAA. "It hurts me, my team and other women in the pool."

It wasn't just Thomas' physical advantage that was a problem for female NCAA athletes. He also brought his vestigial male appendage into the women's locker room with him.

Kylee Alons, a plaintiff in the suit who previously swam for North Carolina State, told the Free Press that to avoid changing with a then-anatomically correct man, she started changing in a "dimly lit storage and utility closet" behind the bleachers.

"I was literally racing U.S. and Olympic gold medalists and I was changing in a storage closet at this elite-level meet," said Alons. "I just felt that my privacy and safety were being violated in the locker room."

Gaines previously alleged that on at least one occasion, Thomas exposed his male genitals in the presence of real female athletes.

Kaitlynn Wheeler told the Free Press that when changing into racing suits, "You're exposed."

"You can't stand there and hold a towel around you while putting the suit on at the same time," said Wheeler. "Never in my 18-year career had I seen a man changing in the locker rooms. I immediately felt the need to cover myself."

Gaines underscored that Thomas was merely taking advantage of the rules on the books: "It is the rules that are the problem. Not Lia Thomas."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Exclusive: Parental Rights Group Files Complaint Against Illinois School For Racist Black- And Hispanic-Only Programs

Parents Defending Education alleged that the Illinois Mathematics and Science Academy is employing racially discriminatory policies.

Activists Work To Stop New College’s Gains For Students With ‘Misgendering’ Complaint To Feds

The school’s return to classical liberal arts provides a deeply appealing alternative for colleges and universities, not just in Florida, but across the entire nation.

Pharma Lawsuit Shows The Extent Of Biden’s Health Care Stranglehold

Merck calls 'negotiation' provisions in Biden's Inflation Reduction Act 'unconstitutional,' but there may be no way out.

American flag must come down, condo association tells owner — because it's making too much 'noise' when wind blows



Old Glory has been enduring quite the beating in a variety of ways lately.

From professional athletes kneeling in front of it when the national anthem is played before games to violent left-wing protesters burning it in the streets and Democrat-dominated county mulling a restriction on it — on private property, no less — it seems everywhere you turn these days there's a new push against the American flag.

Well, now there's a new complaint — and it's coming from a condominium association in Fargo, North Dakota.

Now what?

Andrew Almer told KVLY-TV that he's flown a U.S. flag from his balcony at the Plum Tree Square condos with no problem for the last two years.

Image source: YouTube screenshot

"It's a symbol of our nation. It should be flown whenever it can be," Almer told the station. "I have a lot of friends and family that are in the military."

Image source: YouTube screenshot

Then a chilly breeze began to blow.

Almer told KVLY he started receiving letters about two months ago from the condo association president saying his flag must come down — because it makes "an excessive amount of noise in the the wind at all hours."

The letter also states that Almer's flag must come down "during these times" as well as during "any inclement weather" and "between sunset and sunrise."

Image source: YouTube screenshot

"You really have to be kidding me?" Almer exclaimed to the station. "With everything that's going on nowadays in the world, this is something that you're going to complain about?"

The Federal Freedom to Display the American Flag Act of 2005 says no homeowner association can restrict owners from displaying the American flag on their property, KVLY noted.

"It's not anything offensive," Almer added to the station. "It's not rude, it's not nasty — it's the American flag."

But KVLY reported that there are exceptions — specifically that associations can restrict owners from flying the American flag if it's reasonable or in the best interest of the association.

'It's not coming down anytime soon'

Either way, Almer emphasized to the station that his flag is staying up, even if there are fines in his future.

"It's not coming down anytime soon," he told KVLY. "It's not making that much noise that it's a liability to the association."

The station said it made multiple attempts to get in contact with the condo association president but has not heard back.

News Fargo man told to take down American Flag because of noise complaintyoutu.be

Anything else?

The following are some other examples of recent stances against the U.S. flag:

  • Fairfax County, Virginia — where nearly 75% of ballots last fall were for President Joe Biden over former President Donald Trump — earlier this month was looking into regulated the size, height, and number of flags that residents and businesses can fly on private property, including the American flag.
  • Last fall, a Columbia University adjunct lecturer insisted the American flag is a hateful symbol of genocide.
  • In October, Antifa militants reportedly were caught on video ganging up on a woman of color and dragging her to a Portland, Oregon, sidewalk by her hair in an attempt to yank an American flag from her — but she wouldn't let go.

Buy there was some good news, too:

Christmas lights on home ripped as 'harmful,' 'reminder of divisions ... systemic biases.' Then anonymous critic gets holiday haranguing.



A Minnesota couple received an anonymous letter Monday criticizing the Christmas light display on their St. Anthony home as "harmful," Fox News noted.

Say what?

The letter to Kim Hunt and her husband started out like so: "I couldn't help but notice your Christmas lights display. During these unprecedented times, we have all experienced challenges which casual words just don't describe what we're feeling. The idea of twinkling, colorful lights are a reminder of divisions that continue to run through our society, a reminder of systemic biases against our neighbors who don't celebrate Christmas or who can't afford to put up lights of their own."

It adds that "we must do the work of educating ourselves about the harmful impact an outward facing display like yours can have."

Here's a look at the letter — and the "harmful" Christmas lights:

ICYMI: Here's the actual photo of the "offensive" Christmas lights... https://t.co/jIl9mj2L7A
— CrimeWatchMpls (@CrimeWatchMpls)1607434583.0

The letter writer then says, "I challenge you to respect the dignity of all people, while striving to learn from differences, ideas, and opinions of our neighbors. We must come together collectively and challenge these institutional inequities. St. Anthony is a community welcoming of all people, and we must demand better for ourselves."

What did Hunt have to say?

Hunt told Fox News that she and her husband were "very surprised, shocked, and saddened by the letter" — particularly since the lights give her a sense of "joy" when she returns from her job as a nurse working with COVID-19 patients.

She added to the cable network that "these times we live in are so divisive" and that it's "a sad statement that Christmas lights have to be a target."

"We need to be inclusive of everyone, and let's face it, a lot of people put up holiday lights or decorate their homes for other occasions to bring beauty and happiness to what can be a very ugly world," Hunt told Fox News, adding that three other homes in the area have received the same letter.

What did observers have to say?

As you might expect, the letter writer got an earful from Twitter users who saw the Crime Watch post containing the photo of the letter.

Fox News said former Baltimore Ravens quarterback Derek Anderson observed: "Saw this coming a long time ago. 'If I can't have it nobody can' or 'if they have it we all deserve it' that's not life."

Others had similar reactions:

  • "Ironic that the letter writer is doing exactly what they accuse the homeowner of doing — not being accepting of others," another commenter said. "I would redouble my lights."
  • "People just need to stop already!!" another user declared. "If I lived in that neighborhood I'd help the owner put up even more lights."
  • "If I were the recipient of that letter, I would put up THREE TIMES the amount of lights that I originally had put up," another commenter noted.

Target blasted for removing book about 'Transgender Craze Seducing Our Daughters' after complaint that it spreads 'transphobia'



Target is being blasted for removing a book — "Irreversible Damage: The Transgender Craze Seducing Our Daughters" by noted Wall Street Journal contributor Abigail Shrier — after a complaint on Twitter that the book is spreading "transphobia."

What's the background?

Shrier's book was released in June, and the likes of Joe Rogan, Ben Shapiro, and Dennis Prager have interviewed her about it.

As indicated in the title, the book isn't about transgenderism generally but specifically about the impact it's having on girls — "who had never experienced any discomfort in their biological sex until they heard a coming-out story from a speaker at a school assembly or discovered the internet community of trans 'influencers,'" according to the book's description.

"Unsuspecting parents are awakening to find their daughters in thrall to hip trans YouTube stars and 'gender-affirming' educators and therapists who push life-changing interventions on young girls — including medically unnecessary double mastectomies and puberty blockers that can cause permanent infertility," the description also says.

Here's Shrier talking about "Irreversible Damage" with Prager:

Abigail Shrier: Transgenderism's "IRREVERSIBLE DAMAGE"youtu.be

What was the complaint about the book?

Twitter user @BlueIris04 complained to Target that "Irreversible Damage" is guilty of "transphobia" and said the "trans community deserves a response" from Target as to why it's selling the book.

Incidentally, @BlueIris04 uses "ACAB" — which stands for "all cops are bastards" — as well as the word "Ten" with an image of a skull for a Twitter handle. At some point @BlueIris04 blocked access to his or her tweets — but a screenshot of the complaint was saved:

@AskTarget @BlueIris04 lol they changed it but screenshots are forever https://t.co/TmCC5AYnWu
— LB (@LB)1605236137.0

Later @AskTarget replied to @BlueIris04 that "Irreversible Damage" was removed from its "assortment" of books:

Image source: Twitter/AskTarget

TheBlaze on Friday morning conducted a search on Target's website for Shrier's book, but it did not show up.

How are folks reacting to Target removing the book?

While some applauded Target's removal of "Irreversible Damage," other Twitter users weren't so keen on the decision:

  • "So @AskTarget, opposite opinions, right or wrong, are not welcome in your stores because of hurt feelings?" one user wrote. "Thanks for contributing to the mental and emotional failure of upcoming generations. They need to learn that not everything or everyone revolves around their feelings."
  • "Thanks for pandering to an a**hole who advocates for the murder of cops," another user noted.
  • "They need to be held accountable for censoring what we are allowed to read," another commenter said. "This is a good book."
  • "I don't feel safe at stores that allow a handful of activists to censor speech," one user offered.
  • "So the left advocates censorship, anti-Semitism, violence against political opponents, universal health care, marking and blacklisting people and socialism... ..then call everyone ELSE a Nazi," another commenter noted. "Stopped going to Target when they betrayed us with bathrooms."

What did the book's publisher have to say?

Regnery Publishing on Friday morning offered TheBlaze the following statement:

The "Woke, Inc." trend is, sadly, only getting worse. The mob has sufficiently trained big corporations like Target to live in fear — so much so that it only took *one* complaint from a Twitter user to convince Target to pull a bestselling book from its website. But as Target and other cowardly corporations cower in fear of leftist mobs, Regnery has always and will continue to stand proudly behind powerful voices like Abigail Shrier and the tremendously important work she has done in researching and writing "Irreversible Damage."

What did Target have to say?

Target on Friday morning didn't immediately respond to TheBlaze's request for comment on the retailer's rationale behind removing "Irreversible Damage" from its website.

Nearly 70-year-old murals at college to be removed after complaints they depict too many white people



Woke college students apparently strike again.

Seems a nearly 70-year-old set of murals at the University of Rhode Island is slated for the dust bin of history.

Image source: WJAR-TV video screenshot

Why?

We'll let Kathy Collins, the school's vice president of student affairs, fill you in on the reason.

"I have received complaints about the murals that [they] portray a very homogeneous population ... the persons painted and depicted on the wall are predominantly white, and that does not represent who our institution is today," Collins told WJAR-TV. "Some of our students have even shared with us they didn't feel comfortable sitting in that space."

Image source: WJAR-TV video screenshot

So now banners cover the murals, which were painted on plaster on two of the walls, the station said.

Image source: WJAR-TV video screenshot

"I think we have to recognize the horrible incidents [involving] George Floyd, Breonna Taylor, and most recently Jacob Blake in Kenosha, Wisconsin, during this ... heightened time, and we as an institution have to look at the systems in place across this institution that maybe are not representing who we are today and representing the true diversity of URI today," Collins added to WJAR.

What's the background?

When veterans returned from World War II and enrolled at URI, they and other community members raised money in memory of those who lost their lives in the war — and result was the construction of a modern student union, and Memorial Union was dedicated in 1954, the station said.

Arthur "Art" Sherman was a decorated veteran and member of the class of 1950, and he was asked to paint murals for new student union, WJAR said.

"Oh, I loved painting that, yeah," Sherman, now 95 years old, told the station. "I never had any formal education in painting, by the way; I just used to cartoon."

Image source: WJAR-TV video screenshot

The murals depict returning servicemen, a class reunion, a URI commencement, a beach scene, and students piled into a car donned in letter sweaters, WJAR said.

Image source: WJAR-TV video screenshot

"Well, it depicted that era," Sherman recounted to the station. "A lot of students, friends of mine, would come by and say, 'Why don't you do this, why don't you do that?' So, that's what I did, so everybody chipped in."

Then came the complaints

Collins noted to WJAR that she's been working for URI for the last four years and has received complaints from students about the murals — and the school decided it wanted to start fall classes without the murals in sight.

"We've made a really difficult decision as we aim for the university's future, and we think about who are our students today, and who are our students going to be tomorrow," Collins told the station.

But the artist's family doesn't agree.

Pamela Sherman, Art Sherman's daughter, told WJAR that her family doesn't agree with the decision to remove the murals.

"It's an opportunity for the University of Rhode Island to do the right thing," Pamela Sherman told the station. "It's an opportunity for them to capture a moment in time in their history."

Image source: WJAR-TV video screenshot

She added to WJAR that the perspective should be, "Let's look at our history, and let's maintain the timeline of that history over the many generations. We would love to see new artwork, but let's put them alongside and show a timeline of the evolution of this campus, the evolution of this university."

Art Sherman ought to know, as he ended up becoming a professor of physical education at URI, where he worked for 30 years, the station said.

When WJAR asked him what he thought about his murals being removed, he smiled and laughed.

"That's a good question. Time goes by, and things change," he said.

Image source: WJAR-TV video screenshot

But his daughter wasn't as diplomatic.

"It's terribly upsetting, and we grew up with those murals being there," Pamela Sherman told the station, adding that "we never want to forget our past."

Collins told WJAR that photographs of the murals "will be included in any celebration of ... the Memorial Union" and that the school will "always recognize" Sherman's work.

Nevertheless, his daughter expressed doubts.

"Wouldn't it be a mistake if we look back 100 years from now and say, 'Isn't it a tragedy that we lost this artwork?'" she asked the station. "It's like any work of art, especially a painting — seeing a picture of it [is] just no comparison [to] seeing it live."

(H/T: The College Fix)