SCOTUS nominee says she has 'a religious view' about when life begins, but does not know when equal protection of the law starts to apply to a human being



Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson, who has been nominated by President Joe Biden to serve on the U.S. Supreme Court, said Tuesday that she does not know when equal protection of the law begins to apply to a human being.

Republican Sen. John Kennedy of Louisiana asked Jackson when she believes that life starts.

"I don't know," Jackson said.

She noted that she has "a religious view" on the matter which she puts aside while making rulings.

Kennedy then asked Jackson, "when does equal protection of the laws attach ... to a human being?"

Jackson told the lawmaker, "I actually don't know the answer to that question. I'm sorry."

WATCH: Sen. John Kennedy questions Jackson in Supreme Court confirmation hearings youtu.be

The nominee raised eyebrows on Tuesday when she told GOP Sen. Marsha Blackburn of Tennessee that she could not supply a definition of the word "woman."

Republican Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas raised the issue again on Wednesday, asking Jackson, "as a judge, how would you determine if a plaintiff had Article III standing, ah, to challenge a gender-based rule, regulation, policy," absent the ability to determine what a woman is.

Jackson noted that she knows that she is a woman and that her mother and Sen. Blackburn are both women.

Cruz interrupted Jackson, asking whether he would possess Article III standing in order to "challenge a gender-based restriction" if he were to decide that he is a woman.

Jackson said that matters related to who can lodge suits based on gender are going through the court system and she cannot make a comment about them.

Biden nominated Jackson to fill the vacancy that will be created when Justice Stephen Breyer retires later this year.

Ted Cruz has BRUTAL message for Biden's Supreme Court nominee:\n\n"I think you're the only Supreme Court nominee in history who's been unable to answer the question: what is a woman?"pic.twitter.com/O7Z76bTeDM
— TheBlaze (@TheBlaze) 1648069774

SCOTUS confirmation hearing got HEATED on Day 3



During her confirmation hearing on Wednesday, Supreme Court Justice nominee Ketanji Brown Jackson was asked about her record which shows a pattern of leniency with individuals charged and convicted of distributing child pornography.

Jackson replied: "We will treat a person who has distributed one thousand [pornographic images of children] a lot worse because that shows that this person is engaged in this horrible behavior. In comes the internet. With one click, you can receive on the internet and distribute tens of thousands. You can be doing this for 15 minutes, and suddenly, you are looking at 30, 40, 50 years in prison."

Senator Lindsey Graham replied saying, "Good! Good! Absolutely!"

Follow TheBlaze on Twitter.


Ketanji Brown Jackson: "With one click you can receive, you can distribute tens of thousands. You can be doing this for 15 minutes and all of a sudden, you are looking at 30, 40, 50 years in prison."

Lindsey Graham: "Good! Good! Absolutely!" pic.twitter.com/euu5ARSHqF

— TheBlaze (@theblaze) March 23, 2022

Judge Nominated To Supreme Court On The Basis Of Her Sex Can’t Define ‘Woman’

Despite those reasons for her nomination, Jackson couldn't give a definition of 'woman' when Sen. Marsha Blackburn asked the question.

Senate Democrats Praise National Review For Helping Their Ketanji Brown Jackson Confirmation Efforts

Much like the White House and its media cronies, National Review was quick to accuse Hawley of orchestrating a smear about the nominee.

Sen. Tom Cotton Blasts Biden DOJ Nominee For Claiming Every American Institution Is Racist

"There is not an institution in this country that isn't suffering from institutional racism," said Vanita Gupta, Biden's nominee for Associate Attorney General.

AG nominee Merrick Garland sidesteps question on letting trans women compete in women's sports: 'Difficult question'



Merrick Garland, President Joe Biden's attorney general nominee, refused to commit to an answer during Monday's confirmation hearing whether biologically born males should be permitted to compete in women's sports as transgender women.

On his first day in office, Biden signed an executive order calling on schools to permit trans female athletes to compete on girls' sports teams.

What are the details?

During Monday's hearing in front of the Senate Judiciary Committee, Garland said that the question — which he did not answer — was a "very difficult societal question."

In remarks, Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.) said, "In my last 20 seconds, I'm going to ask you, if you agree with this statement, allowing, and I'm not suggesting the answer one way or the other, I just want to know what you believe, allowing biological males to compete in an all-female sport, deprives women of the opportunity to participate fully and fairly in sports, and is fundamentally unfair to female athletes."

Garland responded, "This is a very difficult societal question that you're asking me here. I know what underlies it."

Undeterred, Kennedy responded, "I know, but you're going to be attorney general."

Garland explained that he might well be attorney general, but he's not the one "who has to make policy decisions like that."

"But it's not that I'm adverse to it," he countered. "Look, I think every human being should be treated with dignity and respect."

Placing his hand over his heart, Garland added, "And that's an overriding sense of my own character, but an overriding sense of what the law requires. This particular question of how Title IX applies in schools is one and in light of the Bostock case, which I know you're very familiar with, is something that I would have to look at when I have a chance to do that. I've not had the chance to consider these kinds of issues in my career so far, but I agree that this is a difficult question."

From Outsports:

The Bostock case Garland referred to was last summer's decision by the U.S. Supreme Court that provided guarantees to the LGBTQ community that we cannot be discriminated against in matters of employment. Legal scholars have debated whether that right could be applied beyond employment, but writing for the majority, Justice Neil Gorsuch — who filled the seat that President Barack Obama had nominated Garland to fill — seems to have answered that question: "Whether other policies and practices might or might not qualify as unlawful discrimination or find justifications under other provisions of Title VII are questions for future cases, not these."
Sen. John Kennedy asks Judge Garland if he believes biological men should compete in female sports:GARLAND: "This… https://t.co/IbibIx7gWV
— Daily Caller (@Daily Caller)1614020606.0