Brittney Griner’s optics RUINED by Caitlin Clark fans
In the middle of a halftime interview, WNBA star Brittney Griner interrupted the conversations to yell at the referees for “blowing a call” and revealed her true colors to fans all over the country.
“No one wants to see that,” BlazeTV host Jason Whitlock tells BlazeTV contributor Steve Kim on “Fearless.” “And look, I’m going to be hypocritical, or double standard, if that were a man in a men’s league, I think people would be more tolerant of it.”
“But to see women behaving that way, behaving as men, being as profane, trying to be as intimidating,” Whitlock continues, “This is why they don’t want fans like me paying attention. That kind of stuff could go on in the old days, and it would be a tree falling in the woods. No one would complain because no one saw it.”
“So you’re not a fan of her being authentically Brittney,” Kim responds.
In another clip of Griner during a game against the Indiana Fever, it appears that she’s saying something negative about “white girls” through lip reading and clear anger through her body language.
Kim doesn’t believe it matters what Griner said as it’s during a heated game, and Whitlock agrees — but notes the fallout would be different for someone like Caitlin Clark.
“Steve, I’m right there with you. It doesn’t matter to me what Brittney Griner said there in the heat of the moment. You’re absolutely right,” Whitlock says. “If Caitlin Clark’s on camera mouthing the words ‘black girl,’ it doesn’t matter in what context. She’d get strung up.”
“This is why they don’t want Caitlin Clark fans paying attention, because we’ll question things that previously would never be questioned,” he adds.
Want more from Jason Whitlock?
To enjoy more fearless conversations at the crossroads of culture, faith, sports, and comedy with Jason Whitlock, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.
NYT reporter exposes how Pornhub treats children — and receives more death threats than ever before
New York Times reporter Nicholas Kristof made waves in 2020 when he penned a piece titled "The Children of Pornhub," which sparked a lot of positive change within the industry as well as legislatively.
Now, he’s written a new piece that details how Pornhub’s employees deal with child sex abuse material. “If you don’t believe in evil, you just need to read this article,” BlazeTV host Allie Beth Stuckey says on “Relatable.”
In the article, Kristof relays that he was able to get his hands on leaked documents. Those documents disturbingly showed that Pornhub hosted videos tagged with terms like “12-year-old.”
“This is very disturbing,” Stuckey says, noting that there was one video of a 15-year-old “enduring gang rape.”
“It was uploaded to Pornhub, and it was viewed widely, leading to her being shamed and dropping out of school. As you can imagine, it ruined her life,” she explains. “Pornhub delayed removing flagged child sex abuse material, so this was content that they knew was child sex abuse material, with 706,000 videos flagged for review.”
Some of the videos required 16 flags before anyone at Pornhub would take action.
“Internal memos seem to show executives obsessed with making money by attracting the biggest audiences they could, pedophiles included. In one memo, Pornhub managers proposed words to be banned from video descriptions — such as ‘infant’ and ‘kiddy’ — while recommending that the site continue to allow ‘brutal,’ ‘childhood,’ ‘force,’ ‘snuff,’ ‘unwilling,’ ‘minor,’ and ‘wasted,’” Kristof wrote in the piece.
According to Kristof, Pornhub staff acknowledged these memos and had internal discussions joking about the request and debating whether or not to allow "childhood" as a term.
One employee reportedly wrote that they “shouldn’t CC our manager when we are talking about child sex abuse material,” while another one said “we don’t want our manager to know about this.”
“No, they didn’t want people to know about this. The employees at Pornhub know that there are children and there are babies that are being sexually abused on their website, and they won’t do anything about it,” Stuckey comments, disgusted.
“Because it makes them money, and that is why they oppose every single regulation and every single form of protection that is out there,” she adds.
After publishing the article, Kristof explained that he has “never received more death threats” after writing an article than when he published the article in 2020 exposing how Pornhub monetizes child rape.
“He said he’s reported on terrorism, he’s reported on extremists and gangsters, and never has he received more death threats than when he threatened the porn industry,” Stuckey says.
“Imagine thinking Satan isn’t real,” she adds.
Want more from Allie Beth Stuckey?
To enjoy more of Allie’s upbeat and in-depth coverage of culture, news, and theology from a Christian, conservative perspective, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.
What's REALLY behind Joe Biden's cancer announcement
Former President Joe Biden announced to the world this past Sunday that he was diagnosed with stage four prostate cancer — which has unfortunately already metastasized and spread to his bones.
Biden posted a photo of himself and the former first lady, Jill Biden, to social media with the caption: “Cancer touches us all. Like so many of you, Jill and I have learned that we are strongest in the broken places. Thank you for lifting us up with love and support.”
The Gleason score measures the severity of Biden’s prostate cancer at a 9/10.
“How do we live in a world where it could be possible that this man was president of the United States of America for four years with access to not just run-of-the-mill health care like you or I would have,” BlazeTV host Sara Gonzales says.
“This guy has access to the greatest health care in the entire world, and this just slipped past them until he was out of office and in stage four. They just didn’t take the tests? They just missed it?” Gonzales asks, skeptical.
Biden’s doctors had repeatedly assured the public that during his presidency, he was fit to lead, despite showing clear signs of deterioration.
“I mean, clearly he was a frail, 80-year-old man, who had a long, documented history of health problems,” Gonzales says, “and you’re telling me that the man who was just president of the United States, who had the best health care available to him, they couldn’t catch it until just now?”
But Gonzales isn’t the only one who’s skeptical.
In an interview on NewsNation, urologist Dr. David Shusterman also revealed that the diagnosis has him in disbelief.
“It’s very unlikely that someone could get annual checkups and not notice a PSA elevation,” Shusterman said. “This is what I typically would see in a VA hospital where a patient hasn’t had medical attention in 10 years, presents to an emergency room with bone pain, and then they find that it’s metastatic prostate cancer.”
Another doctor shocked viewers on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” when he told the host that he did not believe Biden just developed cancer in the last few months.
“He’s had this for many years, maybe even a decade, growing there and spreading,” said Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel, who is an oncologist. “He did not develop it in the last 100 to 200 days.”
“According to all of the doctors that I have seen speak out on this, including that guy right there, it is not possible for this to appear, poof, out of thin air this quickly. Which means you’re left with the idea that Joe Biden just didn’t receive proper testing as president of the United States,” Gonzales says.
“That’s beyond imagination,” she adds.
Want more from Sara Gonzales?
To enjoy more of Sara's no-holds-barred take to news and culture, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.
David Hogg OUSTED by his own party?
Parkland shooting survivor David Hogg recently held the title of the vice chair of the Democratic Party — but it was short-lived.
The Democratic National Committee has now voted to void its election of Hogg and has ousted him from the position just months after he was elected. While some may be shocked by the move, there were some signs that Hogg's position wouldn't last long.
In a recent segment on Bill Maher, Hogg explained the issues he was having with the Democratic Party and his new position, telling Maher that he didn’t know if it “made sense to have the gender balance rule anymore in this day and age.”
“I want to focus on whoever’s just best at the job at this point, that’s my own view,” Hogg added.
Sara Gonzales of “Sara Gonzales Unfiltered” isn’t surprised.
“Probably because he’s really, really bad at this,” Gonzales comments. “He was 25 years old, the youngest ever, and now the Democrats are internally scrambling trying to figure out how the hell to get rid of him.”
“They love elevating young people who are unqualified for positions,” senior fellow at the Heartland Institute, Justin Haskins, says. “He must be stirring the pot in a way that they don’t like in order for him to be ousted like this.”
“And the rule thing makes no sense, because they just change the rules whenever they want,” he adds.
“They don’t ever care about procedure, they certainly don’t care about laws, so for them to come and say this is utter bunkum. He’s probably pissed the wrong person off,” BlazeTV contributor Matthew Marsden chimes in.
“Right there, he said a controversial thing and said that ‘all I’m interested in is somebody being competent,’ and you can’t say that,” he continues, adding, “You can’t say that because that is not a qualifier for you in the Democratic Party.”
Want more from Sara Gonzales?
To enjoy more of Sara's no-holds-barred take to news and culture, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.
Ben & Jerry’s co-founder ARRESTED while protesting RFK Jr.
In a recent congressional hearing, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. was caught off guard by the protests of none other than Ben & Jerry’s co-founder Ben Cohen — who was then promptly arrested.
Cohen was removed about 15 minutes into the congressional hearing for yelling that “Congress pays for bombs” while the Health and Human Services secretary was trying to speak.
“He’s protesting at RFK Jr., who would be completely aligned with him, I think, on that issue,” Stu Burguiere comments on “The Glenn Beck Program.” “I could be wrong on this, but maybe Ben might even be one of those old school socialist types that would maybe even agree with us on some of the censorship stuff.”
“They were for that when they were the ones being shut up,” Glenn Beck agrees. “And now that they’re not the ones being told to shut up, they’re like, we have every right to tell you to shut up.”
Cohen was also recently interviewed by Tucker Carlson, which Stu believes is actually a symptom of a bigger issue.
“I’ve noticed this thing that we’re doing, and I’m a little concerned,” Stu says. “Us on the right, the conservative side of the spectrum, find someone who has some crossover with us in some way but is really a figure of the left, and we kind of give this warm embrace and say, ‘Hey, come on over.’”
Stu uses Tulsi Gabbard as an example, who made the switch from the Bernie Sanders left to the Make America Great Again movement in the not so distant past.
“She’s great, so this is not a criticism,” Stu says. “But really, what Tulsi is doing in the government right now is she’s being consistent with her old left-wing views on things, like stopping wars and being tough on intelligence issues with the government.”
“Because we woke up on that,” Glenn interjects.
“That’s what I’m getting to here. What seems to be happening is we’re embracing things on the left, and it’s not us changing their views into ours,” Stu says, adding, “it’s us changing our views into theirs and then embracing some of those people. That’s not necessarily bad if we were wrong the whole time.”
Want more from Glenn Beck?
To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis, and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.
Speaking tongues or nonsense? Rebutting bad TikTok theology
Speaking in tongues is a spiritual act and a gift that is imparted upon believers by the Holy Spirit — and videos of believers speaking in tongues are making the rounds on TikTok.
However, after seeing one video of a young woman recording herself praying in tongues, Allie Beth Stuckey of “Relatable” isn’t convinced that sharing this gift publicly, and online, is the biblical move.
“I think how this is being done on social media is not biblical at all and is actually very dangerous spiritually for those that are viewing it,” Stuckey explains. “This is just not powered by the Holy Spirit, because the Holy Spirit is always going to be in agreement with God’s word.”
“Father, Son, Holy Spirit. All equal persons in the Trinity. They never contradict each other, they never disagree, the entirety of the Bible is God’s infallible, inherent word,” she continues, noting that public prayer for the sake of attention on social media does contradict God’s word.
Not only does Stuckey believe it’s not biblical, but she isn’t sure she buys it as real.
“My own personal observation is that that doesn’t actually sound like a language. That sounds like gibberish said in a rhythmic manner,” Stuckey says. “While I don’t know the intentions of her heart, it does seem to me that this is a performance that is posted on Instagram in order to maybe get likes, or maybe it is for attention, maybe it’s not for those things.”
“Maybe she believes that she is actually showing other people how to pray, or encouraging other people, and yet what she is doing just doesn’t correspond with the biblical directives that we are given,” she continues.
“We should all be able to watch a video like this and agree that filming yourself and posting it for the world to see doesn’t match what Jesus says in Matthew 6:5-6,” she adds.
Matthew 6:5-6 reads: “When you pray you must not be like the hypocrites. For they love to stand and pray in the synagogues and at the street corners, that they may be seen by others. Truly, I say to you, they have received their reward. But when you pray, go into your room and shut the door and pray to your father who is in secret. And your Father who sees in secret will reward you.”
“It seems to me that the point, if we look at the context of what Jesus is saying, and to whom he’s speaking,” Stuckey says, “his point is that prayer should not be a performance for others. It isn’t something that we do to prove ourselves, to prove ourselves holy, or to get likes, or to get affirmation.”
Want more from Allie Beth Stuckey?
To enjoy more of Allie’s upbeat and in-depth coverage of culture, news, and theology from a Christian, conservative perspective, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.
Jasmine Crockett under FEC investigation for money laundering
Texas Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D) has been in the headlines for her wild antics quite a bit in the not-so-distant past, but this time the reason appears to be a little more serious.
Crockett is officially under investigation by the Federal Election Commission for money laundering through the Democrat donation site ActBlue and alleged voter intimidation, after conservative advocacy group the Coolidge Reagan Foundation filed a complaint against her.
A donor was reported to have given 53 separate donations to her campaign that totaled $595 and were made through the ActBlue donations portal. The donations were tied to a 73-year-old Texas resident named Randy Best, but Best’s wife claims to have no knowledge of the donations.
“Now, we have an official FEC investigation into Jasmine Crockett’s campaign, which this says that it was $870,000 dollars of ActBlue donations and that it’s unclear how many of these are similarly fraudulent transactions made in the name of unsuspecting, innocent people, who did not actually provide the funds,” Sara Gonzales of “Sara Gonzales Unfiltered” explains.
“It’s almost like ActBlue has been acting as this giant money-laundering operation for the Democrats,” she continues, adding, “That kind of talk is why I’m demonetized from YouTube.”
Eric July agrees that it’s likely a much bigger problem than just Crockett.
“I mean, you can just look at Congress in general. I mean, I feel like we talk about it every week, how it comes under question how so many of these people get rich despite the salaries that they have. And it’s not like they’re somehow becoming business gurus just by getting some congressional insight,” July tells Gonzales.
“I’m already under the impression that most of them are a bunch of crooks,” he continues. “I mean, they’re swindling the American people regardless, but I believe that a lot of them are also enriching themselves and just using the political system as it is to do it.”
Want more from Sara Gonzales?
To enjoy more of Sara's no-holds-barred take to news and culture, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.
thefederalist.com
www.theblaze.com