3 takeaways from JD Vance’s RNC speech
JD Vance was certainly not a household name when Donald Trump formally declared the Ohio senator his running mate.
“He's pretty new on the scene to most of America,” says Stu Burguiere, noting that Vance has only “been in office for two years” and “doesn't have an awful lot of political experience.”
That said, Vance’s RNC speech was an opportunity to essentially introduce himself to America at large.
Here are Stu’s three biggest takeaways from Vance’s debut speech:
Communication
According to Stu, Vance is “a good communicator” and “a clean speaker ... very, very much like Vivek Ramaswamy, who never really has any stumbles.”
He “was able to hold the audience pretty well” — especially when “he was talking about his life.”
“He told a couple of great stories” about his fiery grandmother and his mother’s “ten years of sobriety,” which Stu says was “maybe the best moment of the speech."
Authenticity
Nikki Haley and Tim Scott’s speeches take on “that stilted politician tone,” says Stu, but “JD Vance does not have that problem.”
He gave “a very natural speech” and “it didn’t feel forced” or “politician-y,” and yet it was clear that “he knows policy."
Debates
In the event Vance finds himself in a debate, Stu has faith that his ability to parley with opponents will be “one of his strengths.”
“I’m really confident JD Vance is going to smoke Kamala Harris,” he says, which just might happen if Biden remains the Democratic nominee.
To hear more of Stu’s analysis, watch the clip below.
JD Vance's RNC Debut: Stu Burguiere's Live Analysiswww.youtube.com
Want more from Stu?
To enjoy more of Stu's lethal wit, wisdom, and mockery, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.
Rally attendee gives HEART-STOPPING account of PA Trump attack
Butler, Pennsylvania, may be a quiet town with just over 13,000 residents — but it’s now forever enshrined in our nation’s memory.
The small town hosted the last Trump rally where the former president just barely escaped a bullet that was meant to kill him, and one of its residents who was in attendance is sharing his side of the story.
“It’s funny, I immediately thought back to like September 11th,” Jessie, the resident, tells Stu Burguiere. “I’ve heard a lot of people say ‘Oh, it was such a beautiful day,’ and that’s exactly what it was here.”
Jessie recalls it taking around two-and-a-half hours to get through security, where no one checked IDs or tickets.
“It was just very, very unorganized,” he tells Stu. “There was a visible difference of less Secret Service,” he continues, explaining that he’s been to three other Trump rallies in the past.
While there were around 40,000 people in attendance, there were only two snipers Jessie could see on the surrounding rooftops.
“I only heard three shots initially, and then I heard multiple shots after that, which I would assume would be Secret Service snipers' engagement, and the Secret Service tackled him so hard that Trump’s shoes fell off,” he explains, noting that the agents holding him down were repeating, “Hawkeye is here.”
While Jessie couldn’t see Trump’s face as he was seated behind him, he could make out his hand, which he tells Stu “had blood on it.”
“Then I saw him stop and put his fist up,” he says, adding, “Then everybody started chanting 'USA' and cheering.”
Jessie was in the center set of bleachers behind the podium, while the far end of the bleachers to the right and the left are where attendees were hit — and tragically one lost his life.
“How crazy is it to you that there wasn’t Secret Service presence or police presence on the building where the shooter actually wound up?” Stu asks.
“Oh my goodness, that’s totally insane,” Jessie answers. “It doesn’t make sense to me at all.”
Want more from Stu?
To enjoy more of Stu's lethal wit, wisdom, and mockery, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.
Democrats STILL delusional after Biden’s deranged debate disaster
For the last four years, Democrats have championed President Joe Biden as the best president and the antidote to Trump.
But after Biden’s horrific debate, a few of them are openly backtracking on their very recent support of a candidate faced with declining health.
The New York Times editorial board is one of them, having just published an article titled “To Serve His Country, President Biden Should Leave the Race.”
“That’s a pretty big step,” Stu Burgiere of “Stu Does America” comments. “Of course, the op-ed is terrible, as you might imagine. It’s basically, ‘Donald Trump is really, really bad. Joe Biden has been the best president ever, but you know, he looked a little old in the debate, so maybe he should step down.’”
Other Democrats are less honest.
Despite the clear mental decline Biden’s experienced, Keith Olbermann posted on X, “Today’s YouGov/CBS poll: Should Biden stay in the race? YES, 55% -45%.”
“Should TRUMP stay in the race? NO, 54%-46%,” Olbermann continued, adding, “That says it all. Any effing questions?”
But that poll doesn’t actually say what Olbermann wants it to say.
“The fact that Biden barely beats Trump among Democratic voters as compared to registered voters, that is a massive catastrophe,” Stu says.
In the same poll, 46% of Democratic voters answered that Biden should not be running for president. 45% of Democratic voters also answered that Biden should step aside and let someone else be the nominee.
“Basically half of your own voters are telling you not to run. This is not normal, boys and girls,” Stu adds.
Want more from Stu?
To enjoy more of Stu's lethal wit, wisdom, and mockery, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.
Shocking reality: New border-crossing stats reflect Biden’s real game plan
As the first presidential debate nears, Biden has some good news to share.
United States Customs and Border Protection has released the newest numbers regarding border crossings by illegal immigrants, and the numbers indicate improving conditions.
Since the expiration of the CDC’s Title 42 Public Health order, the Department of Homeland Security has removed or returned 775,000 individuals. And according to border patrol, after Biden’s announcement of asylum restrictions, border counters are down by 25%.
While at first glance these stats look good, Stu Burguiere of “Stu Does America” sees what’s really going on.
He cites a post on X from Fox News' Bill Melugin, who has been covering the border.
“Despite the lower numbers, per CBP sources, there were 783 known gotaways recorded yesterday, a spike from the current 7 day average of 480,” Melugin wrote.
“Big picture: we now have almost three weeks of data showing a significant drop in illegal crossings following Biden’s executive order earlier this month. Mexico continues enforcing on their side of the border, and Texas has their border on lockdown."
"Combo of these factors coming together to now produce the lowest border numbers of Biden’s presidency - after three years in a row of the highest illegal crossings ever recorded,” Melguin continued.
“This has been a very standard thing that Biden has done and bragged about, which is, set the record for the worst performance anyone has ever accomplished, and then back those numbers off and brag about that drop. They’ve done this with gas prices and inflation and a million different other topics,” Stu comments.
The new border-crossing stats that reflect policies Biden is just now implementing were some of the restrictions that Donald Trump had put in place — and Biden had removed his first day in office.
“Obviously, he shouldn’t get credit for that. He let this be a catastrophe for three and a half years, finally did something that people had been begging him to do the entire time,” Stu says. “That will not be the way he explains it on stage in a couple of days. He will surely brag about all these huge drops and how amazing he’s done.”
“This was all designed specifically for this purpose,” he adds.
Want more from Stu?
To enjoy more of Stu's lethal wit, wisdom, and mockery, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.
Lacrosse coach FIRED for congratulating the ‘real woman who won’
In the name of transgender rights, women’s rights — as well as free speech — continue to take a beating.
The latest blow comes from Oberlin College, where administrators fired Kim Russell from her position as women’s lacrosse coach because she dared to voice the most controversial opinion: that men don’t belong in women’s sports.
In March 2022, Russell had shared an Instagram post congratulating Emma Weyant as the “real woman who won” the NCAA 500-yard freestyle, after Weyant had placed second to Lia Thomas, a man who identifies as a woman.
At the top of the post, Russell left comments: “What do you believe? I can’t be quiet on this…I’ve spent my life playing sports, starting & coaching sports programs for girls & women...”
A student had reported her comments to college authorities, prompting Oberlin’s athletic director to demand that Russell write a letter of apology.
Russell refused.
Pat Gray jokes that Russell is obviously “a danger to society," but Oberlin College isn't joking.
“It’s acceptable to have your own opinions, but when they go against Oberlin College’s beliefs, it’s a problem for your employment,” Creg Jantz, senior associate director of athletics at Oberlin College, reportedly said.
“So you don’t really believe that it is important or acceptable to have your own opinions,” Gray says, calling it “incredible.”
Want more from Pat Gray?
To enjoy more of Pat's biting analysis and signature wit as he restores common sense to a senseless world, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.
freebeacon.com
www.theblaze.com
The Hamas HEROES No One Will Tell You About (SATIRE)