Jesse Ridgway turned a child’s death into content



Every parent knows the moment. The phone call. The ultrasound. The doctor walking back into the room. The uncertainty.

We all tell some version of the same joke: “I just hope the baby has 10 fingers and 10 toes.” We spend nine months praying for a healthy baby. We celebrate reassuring scans. We cling to every piece of good news.

Some decisions are so intimate and consequential that they do not belong in the marketplace of clicks and comments.

But over those nine months, we learn the ultimate lesson of parenthood and life: We are not in control.

Last week, the country got a front-row seat to one family’s struggle with that lesson. Jesse Ridgway, a YouTuber known as “McJuggerNuggets” with more than 4 million subscribers, took to X to update followers on a pregnancy he and his wife had documented for months.

“This week, my wife and I made the very difficult decision to terminate the pregnancy due to Trisomy 21,” Ridgway wrote. He added that he had not realized the child would be “fully dependent on others for the rest of their life.” He concluded, “We made a difficult decision that we believe in the long run will be beneficial for our family.”

I suppose the baby was not yet considered part of the family.

I do not doubt that the Ridgways were scared. Every parent can sympathize with fear. Every parent can sympathize with grief over shattered expectations. But what happened next was not merely a story about fear. It was a story about what we do with fear.

The entire enterprise of parenthood is uncertainty.

Healthy babies develop cancer. Healthy babies lose their sight. Healthy babies suffer traumatic brain injuries. Healthy babies develop learning disabilities. Healthy babies struggle with addiction. The moment you become a parent, you sign a contract with uncertainty.

Parenthood does not give you guarantees. It gives you responsibility.

We do not love our children because of the outcomes they produce. We love them because they are ours. If a child develops a disability at age 6, do we decide his life no longer has value? Of course not.

RELATED: Euthanasia and the lie of the ‘good death’

Mininyx Doodle via iStock/Getty Images

Then why would we decide that at 6 months in the womb?

What is so unique about Down syndrome? It involves suffering, imperfection, and uncertainty. But so does every human life. Down syndrome simply makes those realities visible sooner.

The question is not whether this child would face challenges. The question is why challenges suddenly make a life disposable.

If Down syndrome is enough to make a life disposable before birth, what other conditions qualify? Blindness? Autism? Cerebral palsy? A missing limb? A learning disability?

Where exactly is the line?

I will make this personal. Our second child faced a possible cystic fibrosis diagnosis. The meeting with the specialist was dark. She was preparing us for devastating news. I remember sitting in my car afterward, calling my dad, and bawling my eyes out.

But the conversation was never, “Should this child live?” The conversation was, “How do we prepare to raise this child?”

That distinction matters.

Fast-forward to our fourth child, now 5 months old. Her scans showed what doctors believed was a significant kidney defect that would require either in-utero surgery or surgery immediately after birth. Again, my wife and I were terrified. Again, we began preparing.

And again, it was all for nothing.

In both cases, the doctors were wrong.

Doctors are incredibly skilled. They are not prophets. A probability is not a person.

Ridgway mentioned that doctors told him and his wife that up to 90% of women terminate after learning their child has Trisomy 21. That statistic is often cited as evidence of how difficult these diagnoses can be.

I see it differently.

I see it as evidence of how quickly our culture has confused hardship with hopelessness.

This hit me on another personal level. I volunteer at a special-needs ministry. Some of the happiest people I know have Down syndrome. Through all their challenges, they radiate a level of joy, affection, and sincerity that our country desperately needs.

After reading Ridgway’s announcement, I could not stop wondering what one of them would think if he read it. Imagine opening your phone and discovering that people are publicly discussing whether lives like yours are worth living. Imagine being told that your diagnosis makes your existence negotiable.

Parenthood can never be reduced to consumer choice. Children are not products we order. They are gifts we receive.

RELATED: What ‘fur babies,’ 2D boyfriends, and ‘sharenting’ tell us about the West's future

lchumpitaz via iStock/Getty Images

The deepest moments of parenthood often arrive when life refuses to follow the script. A parent’s love is measured by what remains after expectations disappear.

The decision itself was not the only thing that struck me. So did the need to announce it.

Some moments should produce reflection, not engagement. Some decisions are so intimate and consequential that they do not belong in the marketplace of clicks and comments. Have we reached the point where even the death of a child becomes content?

As of this writing, Ridgway’s post has more than 24 million views.

He has faced a mountain of criticism online, much of it hateful and cruel. As a Christian, I am taught to hate the sin and not the sinner. I will leave judgment to God.

But I hope this tragic and very public episode forces us to think carefully about what parenthood requires.

A child does not earn the right to live by meeting our expectations.

Parenthood begins when we decide to love a child even when life does not unfold the way we hoped. The measure of parenthood is not how we respond when life follows the script.

It is how we respond when it does not.

Massachusetts Democratic AG rejects petition to protect infants born alive, calling it 'highly ambiguous' and 'impossible' for voters to understand



The office of Massachusetts Democratic Attorney General Maura Healey formally rejected this week a voter petition seeking to guarantee medical treatment to infants born alive after botched abortion procedures, calling the proposal "highly ambiguous" and arguing that it's "impossible to determine" its meaning.

What are the details?

The petition would have allowed Massachusetts residents the chance to amend state law to require that "if a child is born alive, all reasonable steps, in keeping with good medical practice, shall be taken to preserve the life of the child born alive."

But in a declination letter sent on Wednesday, Healey's deputy chief, Anne Sterman, announced the attorney general was unable to certify the measure as in "proper form for submission to the people" as required by state law.

"The proposed law contains several highly ambiguous provisions, which make it impossible for us to determine, and inform potential voters of, the meaning and effect of the proposed law," Sterman wrote, going on to nitpick the proposal's language with peculiar intensity.

"Specifically, the proposed law does not define 'a child born alive' or what is required to 'preserve the life of a child born alive,' nor does it specify what 'reasonable steps' must be taken or who 'shall' take them," she added. "These ambiguities make it impossible for a voter to know what 'general rule of conduct' is proscribed by this proposed law."

"Considering the commissions and unresolvable ambiguities described above, we cannot determine with certainty what the proposed law means or would do," she concluded.

What else?

In a press release issued Wednesday, the Massachusetts Republican Party slammed Healey's decision.

Massachusetts Newborn Protection Coalition Chairwoman Bernadette Lyons, who filed the petition, said in a statement that Healey's response is "an insult to the intelligence of Massachusetts voters that they cannot comprehend what a child born alive is."

"There's nothing at all ambiguous about any of this," she argued. "How is a legal guarantee to provide life-saving medical care for babies born alive ambiguous? It cannot get any clearer than that."

Massachusetts Republican Party Chairman Jim Lyons added that there's "absolutely no question" that the attorney general's past involvement with the abortion industry played a role in her decision.

"The attorney general's failure to put her political views aside constitutes a dereliction of her duty," he charged, adding her rejection of the ballot initiative serves as clear evidence that she is an "extension of NARAL and Planned Parenthood."

The press release included a list of campaign donations made to Healey by NARAL and Planned Parenthood amounting to nearly $10,000 since 2014.

Healey has also campaigned for abortion rights, appearing in a video with progressive lawmakers such as Democratic Rep. Ayanna Pressley and Democratic city council members Michelle Wu and Lydia Edward to promote the Act to Remove Obstacles and Expand Abortion Access.

The best weapons in Destiny 2 and where to find them

In this blog post, we are going to talk about the best weapons in Destiny 2. With the release of the new expansion pack, you'll find a handful of exciting weapons with unique mechanics and epic gameplay.

Facebook purging any content containing phrase 'stop the steal'



Facebook announced Monday that it will now remove any content from its platform that includes the phrase "stop the steal" as part of its enhanced enforcement following last week's siege on the U.S. Capitol by Trump supporters.

What are the details?

"We are now removing content containing the phrase 'stop the steal' under our Coordinating Harm policy from Facebook and Instagram," the company declared in a statement. "We removed the original Stop the Steal group in November and have continued to remove Pages, groups and events that violate any of our policies, including calls for violence."

The social media platform, founded by CEO Mark Zuckerberg, went on to explain:

We've been allowing robust conversations related to the election outcome and that will continue. But with continued attempts to organize events against the outcome of the US presidential election that can lead to violence, and use of the term by those involved in Wednesday's violence in DC, we're taking this additional step in the lead up to the inauguration. It may take some time to scale up our enforcement of this new step but we have already moved a significant number of posts.

Facebook's latest measure is part of an ongoing, coordinated crackdown by major social media outlets against President Donald Trump and his assertions that the presidential election was stolen for President-elect Joe Biden.

Following the storming of the Capitol after a massive rally hosted by Trump, the president was banned for life from Twitter and suspended indefinitely from Facebook, Instagram, and other online platforms amid accusations that he incited the violence that left six of his supporters — including a Capitol Police officer — dead.

What about Twitter?

Also on Monday, Twitter announced "some of the steps" the company had taken since last week "to protect the conversation" following the attack that occurred last Wednesday.

"Given the violent events in Washington, DC, and increased risk of harm, we began permanently suspending thousands of accounts that were primarily dedicated to sharing QAnon content on Friday afternoon," Twitter said in a statement. "Many of the individuals impacted by this updated enforcement action held multiple accounts, driving up the total numbers of accounts impacted."

Twitter explained further:

Since Friday, more than 70,000 accounts have been suspended as a result of our efforts, with many instances of a single individual operating numerous accounts. These accounts were engaged in sharing harmful QAnon-associated content at scale and were primarily dedicated to the propagation of this conspiracy theory across the service.

As countless conservative Twitter users complained over the weekend that they were losing a significant amount of followers, Twitter had put out a statement saying that "in order to prevent spam, we regularly challenge accounts to confirm details like email and phone number. Until that info is confirmed, these accounts aren't included in follower counts."

Why lie two days ago? https://t.co/KmcyuRiH3l
— LB (@LB)1610418831.0