Citizens Worldwide Have Had Enough Of Globalist Idiocy
"Workers are really, really suffering right now," said Abdul Aris, an Indonesian union official.
An estimated 70,000 people protested in Prague against the Czech government over the weekend. The protesters expressed anger over soaring energy prices and voiced opposition to the European Union and NATO.
Czech inflation, according to Bloomberg, is currently the highest since 1993. The Czech central bank forecasts inflation to peak at around 20% in the coming months.
Those protesting represented a wide swath of the political spectrum, as supporters of groups ranging from the “major anti-migrant populist” Freedom and Direct Democracy party to the Communist Party showed up, ABC News reported.
"The aim of our demonstration is to demand change, mainly in solving the issue of energy prices, especially electricity and gas, which will destroy our economy this autumn," event co-organizer Jiri Havel told iDNES.cz news website.
In addition to questioning the Czech government’s ability to reverse the rise in energy prices, protesters condemned the Czech government for supporting sanctions against Russia. The demonstrators also criticized the European Union’s (EU) plan to cut greenhouse gas emissions and reach climate neutrality, according to the Associated Press. The Czech Republic is a member of the EU.
Zuzana Majerová Zahradníková of the anti-EU Trikolora party told protesters, “Fiala’s government may be Ukrainian, it may be Brussels, but it is definitely not Czech.” The EU is headquartered in Brussels, Belgium. The Czech Republic has been an avid supporter of Ukraine in its battle against Russia and has donated weaponry to the Ukrainian armed forces.
"The protest on Wenceslas Square was called by forces that are pro-Russian, are close to extreme positions and are against the interests of the Czech Republic," said Czech Prime Minister Petr Fiala. Fiala criticized the demonstrators, claiming they were expressing pro-Russia views “that are not in the interest of the Czech Republic and our citizens.” Fiala’s collation government survived a vote of no confidence on Friday.
The Guardian reports that Pavel Blažek – the Czech Republic’s minister of justice and a member of Fiala’s party – warned last week of the risks involved in not addressing the country’s energy issues. “If the energy crisis is not resolved, the political system of this country is at risk,” Blažek said.
Organizers have vowed to stage further protests unless the government resigns by September 25.
Poland’s national soccer team is refusing to play Russia in a 2022 World Cup playoff match in the wake of the Russian invasion of Ukraine.
The president of the Polish football association, Cezary Kulesza, said that the Polish national team “does not intend” to participate in the playoff match, the BBC reported.
In a joint statement, members of the Polish team said, “We, the players of the Polish national team, together with the Polish Football Association, decided that as a result of Russia’s aggression against Ukraine, we do intend to play in the playoff match against Russia.”
“It is not an easy decision,” the statement continued, “But there are more important things in life than football. Our thoughts are with the Ukrainian nation.”
Polish footballer Robert Lewandowksi said, “It is the right decision! I can’t imagine playing a march with the Russian National Team in a situation when armed aggression in Ukraine continues. Russian footballers and fans are not responsible for this, but we can’t pretend that nothing is happening.”
It is the right decision! I can\u2019t imagine playing a match with the Russian National Team in a situation when armed aggression in Ukraine continues. Russian footballers and fans are not responsible for this, but we can\u2019t pretend that nothing is happening.https://twitter.com/Czarek_Kulesza/status/1497489152434061315\u00a0\u2026— Robert Lewandowski (@Robert Lewandowski) 1645866878
Cezary Kulesza, the current president of the Polish Football Association, said, “Due to the escalation of the aggression of the Russian Federation towards Ukraine the Polish national team does not intend to play the play-off match against Russia.”
No more words, time to act! Due to the escalation of the aggression of the Russian Federation towards Ukraine the Polish national team does not intend to play the play-off match against Russia. We are in talks with and federations to bring forward a joint statement to FIFA.— Cezary Kulesza (@Cezary Kulesza) 1645871093
Polish President Andrezj Duda replied to Kulesza’s statement saying, “Rightly so, Mr. President. You don’t play with bandits!”
Poland’s Prime Minister, Mateusz Morawiecki, also chimed in saying, “You cannot play a match against Russia under such circumstances … Thank you so much for this decision.”
National teams from Sweden and the Czech Republic joined Poland in a joint statement.
The Swedish and Czech teams are to play each other in a playoff match and whichever team wins would likely advance to play the Russian team in the World Cup tournament.
The Swedish team said on Twitter that they “will not play against Russia – regardless of where the match is played.” In a statement, the team said, “The Federal Board also urges FIDA to cancel the playoff matches in March in which Russia participates.”
SvFF\u00b4s besked: Herrlandslaget kommer inte att spela mot Ryssland \u2013 oavsett var matchen spelas.\n\nF\u00f6rbundsstyrelsen uppmanar samtidigt FIFA att st\u00e4lla in de play off-matcher i mars d\u00e4r Ryssland deltar.— Svensk Fotboll (@Svensk Fotboll) 1645886279
On Saturday, Roman Abramovich, Russian billionaire and owner of the Chelsea Football Club, handed over the “stewardship and care” of the Premier League club to the trustees of its charitable foundation. Abramovich, who has owned Chelsea since 2003, forfeited ownership of the team after the British parliament pressured him to do so in the wake of the Russian invasion of Ukraine, the Associated Press reported.
Abramovich said, “I have always taken decisions with the Club’s best interest at heart. I remain committed to these values. That is why I am today giving trustees of Chelsea’s charitable Foundation the stewardship and care of Chelsea.”
Mask-wearing was likely the greatest failed social experiment of our lifetime. Yet its own failure means it continues to be forced down our throats … or noses.
While it was always illogical that a cheap mask could stop a virus that is much smaller than the mask's pores, we embarked on a grand national experiment with a greater degree of compliance and shame than anyone could have imagined. On June 9, 2020, Reuters ran a headline, "Widespread mask-wearing could prevent COVID-19 second waves." The outlet suggested, based on a mathematical equation presupposing that masks work, that "even homemade masks can dramatically reduce transmission rates if enough people wear them in public."
Well, the media got their wish more than they could ever have imagined, yet nowhere in the world did it stop the next wave or the one after that. That should have been the end of masks, but instead, we have allowed the global governments to continue lying to us when our own eyes can see masks failing to work in the real world. They are still trotting out theoretical studies or lab simulations of particles to hypothesize that masks might work, over a year after they failed to work on us humans when it mattered.
As the CDC attempts to resurrect universal masking in America, it's important to remember all the times the media suggested masks were the cause of the sudden drop in cases, when in fact cases increased with greater intensity later on – months into universal masking. In their minds, masks are immaculate and can never be proven ineffective.
In reality, as we've come to learn over the past 17 months, the virus saturates a given area for 6-8 weeks and then moves on, until the next wave a few months later. Nothing we do can prevent either the up-slope or down-slope of the curve.
Given the acuteness of the political amnesia, here is a reminder of just a few times the media credited masks for a decline in cases, only to have it blow up in their faces. This is built on the incredible research of the indispensable Ian Miller:
Perhaps the greatest illustration of the insanity of responding to the Delta mutation with masks is that the entire mutation emanated from India, 100% after the media had praised the country for ending its first wave in the fall with masks. "The country has managed to encourage and enforce almost universal acceptance of masks without much debate," wrote the Wall Street Journal on December 30 in an article titled, "Covid-19 Was Consuming India, Until Nearly Everyone Started Wearing Masks."
In case you needed more evidence of how completely irrelevant mask wearing is, India had 81% mask compliance in Feb… https://t.co/A5vgw4fnVl
— IM (@ianmSC) 1623350526.0
"Until you have a vaccine, you have a social vaccine, and the social vaccine is the mask," Health Minister Harsh Vardhan repeated in speeches. Well, the cruel irony is that the mask-wearing failed to stem India's very sharp incline in March, and it wasn't the vaccine that precipitated the sharp decline in cases two months later. India barely had anyone vaccinated at the time.
Well, certainly the Czechs did it right by instituting a mask mandate early on. That is most certainly why they barely had a problem until the fall of 2020, right? Wrong! Masks "worked" until they didn't work. On October 19, CNN published a bizarre article titled, "Masks made Czech Republic the envy of Europe. Now they've blown it." Except, they never worked; it's just that it wasn't their turn for the spread until the fall. Czech Prime Minister Andrej Babis boasted that his country was among the "best in Covid," in part because of masks. In July, USA Today wrote that the Czechs taught us a "lifesaving lesson" about mask-wearing. But then in October, they experienced one of the sharpest inclines in all of Europe. They experienced two more waves thereafter, with at least the same degree of mask compliance, and now have the fourth-highest death rate in the world.
As we know, mask compliance is the key to controlling COVID cases, so I guess everybody in the Czech Republic start… https://t.co/8Tz38zdaWJ
— IM (@ianmSC) 1627323430.0
The highest death rate in the world, of course, is Peru, with one of the longest and strictest lockdowns and earliest mask mandates.
Peru had one of the world’s longest lockdowns, with early mask mandates & permission slips required to leave home.… https://t.co/LCbU9kL822
— IM (@ianmSC) 1623013733.0
No country has taught the world more about mask-wearing than Japan, and no country now faces the shame and embarrassment of its failures. It's sure great we chose Japan as the host of this year's Olympics, so we don't have to worry about COVID because of their mask-wearing. After all, more than a year ago, Forbes reported, in an article titled, "The Japanese perfect the mask," that Japan's "high rate of mask-wearing," reported at 96%, was "responsible for preventing the spread of COVID." Well, the Japanese are now on their third large wave, which spread so much that all spectators were barred from the Olympics. For the first time ever, athletes are playing in front of empty stadiums because masks worked so well until they didn't.
Japan’s seeing another sizable and rapidly growing increase despite their 98% compliance and “culture” of mask wear… https://t.co/ZwN1w3ayKQ
— IM (@ianmSC) 1627069471.0
It should by noted that, like most Asian countries, Japan's death rate will likely remain low. But it's clear that this has a lot more to do with the health of its population and possible inherent partial immunity, and not masks, because the virus is spreading uninhibited.
Historically, Israel has done things smartly, so everyone credited the Israelis' disciplined mask-wearing with their mild waves for the first few months of the pandemic. In fact, despite having a mild wave in the early summer and a substantial wave in the fall of 2020 after the masks and strict enforcement thereof were in place, the WSJ cited "experts" on November 1, basically saying that lockdowns didn't work but the masks did. "Infections are dropping sharply despite less stringent rules and more defiance of them, likely because of more widespread use of masks," wrote the Journal. Well, after "working" for a few weeks (after "not having worked" in the prior waves), they went back to not working, as Israel experienced its worst wave yet in December and January. Eventually, cases ground to a halt, as they did in most places after the winter spread, and Israel finally relaxed the mandate. Another wave came back, and the country reinstated the mask mandate on June 24. Yet despite the mandate and one of the highest vaccination rates, cases have increased tenfold since June 24 and are higher than they were at this time last year with zero vaccination.
It’s absolutely hilarious that Israel is reinstating a mask mandate given that the initial one already completely f… https://t.co/qoNZtuUtEb
— IM (@ianmSC) 1624650688.0
California at large, and San Francisco in particular, did everything "right" and did so from early March 2020. Last August, CNBC hailed San Fran as being "better off than most U.S. cities," in part because of its culture of masks. Dr. Bob Wachter, chairman of the department of medicine at UC San Francisco, was quoted as crediting the "social pressure" in the city. "In San Francisco, if you go to a gathering with one person having a mask off, it's likely that person would be looked at funny and their friends might even say something," he said.
While they did finally relinquish the mandate about a month ago, the city still has a much greater residual culture of mask-wearing than almost anywhere in the country. Yet despite being above the 35th parallel, San Franciscans are experiencing their sharpest increase ever, whereas most of those experiencing increases now are in the South, as we witnessed last year. Moreover, like most places with a strong culture of masking, they have a strong culture of vaccination, with 85% of seniors fully vaccinated and 77% of those over 12.
A USA Today fact-check cited a CDC report crediting masks for the rapid decline in cases in Jena, Germany. "And in the German city of Jena, first in the country to implement public mask wearing last April, masks led to a 75% decrease in new COVID-19 cases in little under three weeks, one December study found," wrote the fact-checker on March 12, 2021, in claiming it's "false" to assert that the CDC's evidence found a "negligible" effect of masking. What is shocking about the timing of this "fact-check" is that the checker had the luxury of experiencing an entire year of the curve and could easily have seen that after cases went down, they went up over the winter by nearly 1,000% in the state of Thuringia (of which Jena is the largest city) after the mask mandate was in place so early! Yet they can publish information that was disproven by reality.
In general, Germany is quite instructive, because Bavaria and Berlin are one of the only known places to mandate the use of N95 masks, yet they failed to stop the subsequent wave.
Back at the end of March, Berlin mandated N95 masks be worn, joining Bavaria with the strictest mask mandate in Ger… https://t.co/y19cUh2gvG
— IM (@ianmSC) 1624389921.0
There are many more examples, but we need not belabor the point that after 17 months, it is impossible for any rational person to think masks factor in at all in changing the spread of a virus.
Some have suggested that America has become a less religious country in recent years. What the past year has demonstrated is that a great many have unwavering faith in religion, just not the one that serves the God our founders did.
Everywhere the magic masks were forced upon the people, they failed to stop the surge of cases, and in fact, those countries have seen dramatic increases in cases. Nowhere is this more evident than in the Czech Republic.
All those European countries that thought they beat the virus with a lockdown were in for a rude awakening. Now they have nothing to show from the destruction wrought by lockdowns but a massive surge in coronavirus cases. However, we were told that mask-wearing is the most effective tool to save lives — to the point that social media now censors anyone who opposes these mandates.
So, let's take a look at the results. The Czech Republic has endured the sharpest surge in cases of any European country. It's worse than at any point in the U.S.
According to the European Centre for Disease Control, Czech has the highest attack rate over the past 14 days in the entire continent. The country has 905 cases per 100,000, which is more than twice the rate of France and triple the rate of Spain.
Less than two months ago, Czech Prime Minister Andrej Babis boasted that his country was among the "best in Covid." They credited their strict mandate to wear masks inside and outside the home. I asked my friend Ian Miller of RationalGround.com to add the Czech Republic to his list of mask charts showing the timing of mask mandates compared to the rise in cases. The results are stunning:
@JamesSurowiecki @boutros555 @thereal_truther @BallouxFrancois Really confused how you think this makes the Czech R… https://t.co/fbYQzVEfjx— Ian Miller (@Ian Miller)1603223497.0
In many places, liberals are contending that the situation would have been worse without a mask mandate even though cases eventually spiked. That is obviously a ridiculously unverifiable and speculative claim, but the experience of the Czech Republic exposes the fallacy of this claim. They had near zero cases and hospitalizations for months and now have the worst spike in Europe with a nearly eightfold increase in cases in just one month – long after the mandate had been restored. There is no middle ground. It's quite evident that they didn't have a spread initially and when it was destined to come, it came on strong. Masks played no role.
In fact, one has to wonder if masks are contributing to the spread. So many government agencies warned initially that misuse and reuse of masks could lead to cross-contamination. Well, a recent analysis of the timing of mask mandates in a number of countries has shown that "for every increased percentage point of mask use in a country, there were an average of 37.536 additional positive PCR tests per one million population."
Here is a graphical presentation of the positive correlation between increased mask use and growth in cases:
That study published by three doctors was initially posted at Research Gate, but like so many informative articles presenting the other side of the mask issue, it has been taken down. Part one, which was published earlier, can still be viewed here.
Last month, I reported on an analysis from Tennessee showing that counties without mask mandates had fewer cases, hospitalizations, and deaths per capita than those with the mask mandates.
I'm not going to make the same mistake as the other side and claim that this proves that masks downright spread the virus. Obviously, there are numerous natural factors that could be driving the increased spread, so correlation doesn't necessarily equal causation, but it's certainly ludicrous to suggest that masks help stop the spread at this point.
The Czech government is in such as state of panic at this point that Prime Minister Andrej Babis is building emergency field hospitals. With hospitalizations six times higher than the initial peak in the spring (before universal mask-wearing), Babis warned, "We don't have time—numbers are catastrophic." They can't have it both ways: Either masks are the single greatest tool in stopping the virus or there is panic. They can't panic over a spread that happened with universal masking while extolling the virtues of masks!
Contrast the results of the Czech Republic to those of Sweden, and you will see that lockdowns and masks are clearly not the path to a flatter curve. Sweden has barely had excess deaths over a typical year:
Data can be both beautiful and powerful.Sweden is the only western country not to enact draconian lockdowns, so i… https://t.co/y3BPyFa8lv— Yinon Weiss (@Yinon Weiss)1603215750.0
Moreover, mask supporters often point to the fact that other Scandinavian countries initially had better results than Sweden as a refutation to Sweden's strategy. However, what they forget to divulge is that the other Scandinavian countries have the same or lower rates of mask-wearing. In July, the Council of Foreign Relations conducted a survey of 25 countries, asking respondents, "Have you always worn a face mask outside the home in the last seven days?" Guess which countries reported the lowest rate of mask use? The four Scandinavian countries:
Norway: 3%
Sweden: 3%
Denmark: 1%
Finland: 1%
Thus, the success of those other countries actually goes into the bucket of the non-mask list, not the other way around.
It's no wonder that the response from the media and the politicians is to squelch debate and censor dissent rather than producing evidence that such a draconian and dehumanizing edict is effective. They have no evidence and cannot debate their position.
In the summer, Denmark conducted a much-hyped randomized clinical trial of mask effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 and were slated to publish it in August. Many of us were wondering why it was never published. Former New York Times reporter and noted lockdown critic Alex Berenson discovered the answer for us. On Sunday, he posted a screenshot of an email correspondence he had with Thomas Lars Benfield, the lead investigator on the Danish mask study. The 12-word response to the question of when the study would be published is worth a thousand words.
A lead investigator on the Danish mask study - the ONLY (as far as I know) randomized trial to see if masks protect… https://t.co/APlTS1Jo4M— Alex Berenson (@Alex Berenson)1603040985.0
"As soon as a journal is brave enough to accept the paper," replied Benfield, a clinical professor at University of Copenhagen.