Endorsing Cornyn Jeopardizes Trump’s Legacy On Immigration

At the 2024 Republican National Convention, attendees held signs reading 'Mass Deportations.' Trump campaigned and won on that promise, which is why the current Texas Senate runoff is so important.

Republicans In Congress Look To Stop ‘Judicial Coup D’Etat’

Bills would check district courts from issuing nationwide injunctions like those issued against President Trump's executive orders.

3 Ways Trump Plans To Root Out Rampant Obamacare Fraud

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' latest proposed rule focuses on combatting waste and fraud within the Obamacare program.

Rift Grows In Southern Baptist Convention Over Support For Leftist Immigration Policy

Many Southern Baptists believe the gospel hinges on Jesus' redemptive work, not leftist politics, and are increasingly resistant to what they see as manipulative leadership.

Deportations are mass enforcement, not mass deprivation of ‘rights’



Donald Trump hasn’t yet begun his second term in office, and illegal alien advocates are having a complete meltdown. According to these self-proclaimed champions of the downtrodden, Trump’s plan for mass deportations will result in the worst civil rights crisis in the history of the United States. Don’t listen to any of them. They don’t know what they’re talking about.

To start, foreign nationals do not have the right to enter or remain in the United States. The Supreme Court established this principle in Ekiu v. United States. “It is an accepted maxim of international law that every sovereign nation has the power, as inherent in sovereignty and essential to self-preservation, to forbid the entrance of foreigners within its dominions or to admit them only in such cases and upon such conditions as it may see fit to prescribe,” the court ruled.

Because the Biden administration ignored the Immigration and Nationality Act for four years, the Trump administration must now catch up to reset the system.

The court reaffirmed this view 75 years ago in United States ex rel. Knauff v. Shaughnessy, holding that a foreign national has no legal right to enter the United States without authorization from the U.S. government.

In plain English, that all means independent nations can let in, kick out, or refuse admission to foreigners as they see fit.

In the United States, the admission of aliens and the terms and conditions under which they may remain in the United States are set forth in the Immigration and Nationality Act. There are, essentially, two classes of lawful migrants: those granted temporary admission and those granted lawful permanent residency (colloquially known as “green card holders”).

Aliens granted temporary admission to the United States may also be deported. This most often occurs if they violate the terms of their stay by overstaying the authorized period or by committing a crime while in the country. Essentially, the U.S. government expects foreign nationals to be good guests during their visit.

The term “lawful permanent resident” can be misleading. Green card holders may live in the United States indefinitely, as long as they follow the rules. However, they are subject to removal if they commit a crime, fail to pay taxes, or smuggle other aliens across the border.

In the end, whatever Uncle Sam giveth, Uncle Sam may taketh away.

Anyone who enters the United States without the government’s permission is an illegal alien. Illegal aliens are subject to deportation because they are trespassers. Whether an individual wants to remain in the United States, has managed to avoid detection, has not broken any other laws, or even has children born in the America does not matter. The key legal issue is that illegal aliens did not follow the process required to enter and remain lawfully.

Aliens in the United States are generally entitled to the same civil rights as everyone else. However, there are important differences. For example, U.S. citizens enjoy broad free speech protections and can freely join the Communist Party or any other totalitarian party. In contrast, an alien may be deported for membership in such a group.

In Matthews v. Diaz, the Supreme Court stated explicitly that “Congress, which has broad power over immigration and naturalization … regularly makes rules regarding aliens that would be unacceptable if applied to citizens.”

Aliens are entitled to due process during deportation proceedings, which means they must be given a chance to respond to any removal charges the government files against them. The bar for deportation is low: Officials need only prove that the individual is not a U.S. citizen and is subject to removal under the Immigration and Nationality Act.

Immigration hearings are civil, administrative proceedings. An alien in removal proceedings is entitled to an attorney. But unlike a criminal proceeding — where indigent defendants can ask the court for a public defender — respondents in civil proceedings must pay for counsel out of their own pockets. Which is perfectly fair. Why should U.S. taxpayers be forced to foot the bill for legal counsel to defend uninvited foreign trespassers from deportation?

What will really happen is not “mass deportation” but the consistent, ongoing enforcement of U.S. immigration laws. In short, immigration laws will be enforced, deportation orders will be issued, and foreign nationals who entered illegally will be sent home.

The only difference lies in scale. Because the Biden administration evidently ignored the Immigration and Nationality Act for four years and allowed individuals to cross the U.S.-Mexico border unimpeded, the Trump administration must now catch up to reset the system and restore the process Congress intended. No one’s civil rights will be violated, because aliens have no inherent right to remain unless the United States grants them one.

Dems push Biden to extend deportation shields for illegal aliens in last-minute plea



A group of Democratic senators is relentlessly pushing President Joe Biden (D) to extend deportation protections to illegal aliens ahead of President-elect Donald Trump's upcoming term.

On Monday, seven senators sent a letter to Biden, urging him to redesignate Temporary Protected Status "for All Eligible Countries and Consider Providing Deferred Enforced Departure."

'At risk of being sent back to horrific conditions.'

TPS allows foreign nationals from designated countries to remain in the United States for a temporary period of time. Countries are added to the list when it is deemed unsafe for their citizens to return due to ongoing conflicts, environmental disasters, or other "extraordinary and temporary conditions."

Eligible individuals cannot be deported and may be granted work and travel authorizations during their stay.

According to the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, there are currently 17 countries designated for TPS, including Afghanistan, El Salvador, Honduras, Nicaragua, Syria, Ukraine, and Venezuela.

TPS status is slated to expire for the above-mentioned nations in 2025.

Over the past year, many violent gang members from Venezuela have infiltrated the U.S. and set up operations in several states. While the Democratic senators did not specifically call for TPS to be extended for Venezuelan nationals, their Monday letter indicated Biden should continue providing protections for "all eligible countries."

"We urge your administration to offer vital protections via TPS for eligible countries or parts of countries, providing relief from deportation while allowing these individuals to continue working and contributing to our economy. Where TPS is not an option, we strongly urge the administration to protect qualified vulnerable noncitizens through DED," the letter read.

In addition to granting TPS status to many countries, Biden also extended DED to foreign nationals from Lebanon, Hong Kong, and Palestine. Those protections are scheduled to expire in January 2026, February 2025, and August 2025 respectively.

The USCIS states that DED "is not a specific immigration status," but it shields eligible individuals from deportation.

Democratic senators also called for Biden to "Expedite the Processing of Benefit Requests for Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) Recipients" and "Prioritize Adjudication of Pending Asylum Claims."

The letter to the president was signed by Democratic Senators Richard Durbin of Illinois, Cory Booker of New Jersey, Catherine Cortez Masto of Nevada, Tammy Duckworth of Illinois, Mazie Hirono of Hawaii, Ben Ray Luján of New Mexico, and Alex Padilla of California.

On Wednesday, Cortez Masto, Ray Luján, and Padilla hosted a press conference, further pressuring Biden to act.

"There are thousands of immigrant families from countries who clearly qualify for TPS that are at risk of being sent back to horrific conditions," Cortez Masto stated. "Many of these immigrants, along with so many of our Dreamers, have been living and working in our communities for years. President Biden should act now to protect these immigrant communities and keep families together."

Trump has already indicated that he is willing to "work with the Democrats on a plan" that would allow Dreamers to remain in the U.S. and obtain legal status.

However, Cortez Masto stated during the press conference that she is skeptical Trump will follow through on that promise.

Luján said, "To ensure the safety and security of immigrant communities across the country, we are urging President Biden to take steps to designate, redesignate, and extend TPS for Ecuador, Nicaragua, and El Salvador, as well as expedite the process for DACA recipients to renew their status. I will not remain silent when it comes to protecting our immigrant families and will continue to fight to protect our most vulnerable."

Padilla called Trump's mass deportation plans "immoral" for "taking away lawful status and work authorization for these individuals." He claimed the effort would "be gutting critical sectors of our workforce."

There is currently no indication that the Biden administration plans to take the requested actions.

The White House did not respond to a request for comment from Fox News Digital.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

3 Reasons Obamacare Spending Has Exploded Under Democrats

The increased subsidies Democrats passed in 2021-2022 should be allowed to expire at the end of next year rather than be made permanent.