Amid elites' talk of 'Disease X,' Chinese lab debuts mutant coronavirus with 100% kill rate in humanized mice



Chinese scientists in Beijing have crafted a coronavirus variant called GX_P2V that kills humanized mice 100% of the time, largely with late-stage brain infections. The scientists indicated their mutant virus "underscores a spillover risk of GX_P2V into humans."

The study, regarded as pointless and dangerous by Western experts, comes amidst chatter by global elites about "Disease X," a hypothetical pestilence more lethal than COVID-19, and just days after a British report revealed lab leaks of deadly pathogens occurred frequently, even in labs with ostensibly better standards than those observed in China.

The preprint of the study, published earlier this month in BioRxiv, details how coronaviruses allegedly derived from the scaly anteaters known as pangolins ahead of the COVID-19 pandemic were grown in a lab in 2017 and 2020, then tested on mice.

The researchers, including a former Chinese military biosecurity expert, cloned a mutant version of the 2017 strain, which was initially able to infect both golden hamsters and mutant mice. The mice had been humanized — altered to express human ACE2, the receptor used by SARS-CoV to gain entry into human cells.

"We found that the GX_P2V(short_3UTR) clone can infect hACE2 mice, with high viral loads detected in both lung and brain tissues," wrote the researchers. "This infection resulted in 100% mortality in the hACE2 mice. We surmise that the cause of death may be linked to the occurrence of late brain infection."

When conducting autopsies on the humanized mice, the researchers detected "significant amounts of viral RNA in the brain, lung, turbinate, eye, and trachea of the GX_P2V C7 infected mice, whereas no or a low amount of viral RNA was detected in other organs such as the heart, liver, spleen, kidneys, tongue, stomach, and intestines."

The researchers also indicated the uncloned version resulted in 100% mortality in the humanized mice.

All mice infected with the live virus died with 7-8 days. Prior to their demise, the rodents began losing weight, reaching a 10% body weight decrease by the sixth day of infection.

By the seventh day, "the mice displayed symptoms such as piloerection, hunched posture, and sluggish movements, and their eyes turned white."

While the study references parallel work executed by Wuhan Institute of Virology scientist Dr. Shi Zhengli, an infamous virologist known as China's "bat woman," the New York Post suggested there appears to be no formal link between this study and the communist-run WIV.

The WIV was the epicenter of the COVID-19 pandemic, home to U.S.-funded gain-of-function experiments on coronaviruses, and the workplace of the likely COVID patients zero.

The 2023 Global BioLabs Report out of King's College London gave China an overall biorisk management score of 33 out of 48. The U.S., by way of comparison, scored 42. China's international biorisk management engagement score was 8 out of 14.

Largely through freedom of information requests, the Telegraph recently discovered that the U.K., which tends to rate higher on biosafety and biosecurity than China, saw a 50% increase in lab leaks and accidents since the pandemic.

Dr. Francois Balloux, an expert in infectious disease epidemiology and pathogen genomics at the University College London's Genetics Institute, said on X, "It's a terrible study, scientifically totally pointless. I can see nothing of vague interest that could be learned from force-infecting a weird breed of humanised mice with a random virus."

"Conversely, I could see how such stuff might go wrong," added Balloux.

American molecular biologist Richard H. Ebright of Rutgers University responded to Balloux's assessment, writing, "Concur."

Ebright suggested that contrary to a community note on X, the virus was not an "existing virus" prior to the experiments but rather a "new mutant variant constructed in laboratory by serial passage."

Ebright later noted, "Thank Fauci and Collins for encouraging this type of research."

Guennadi V. Glinskii, a former National Institutes of Health consultant and retired UC San Diego professor who specialized in personalized genomics-guided prevention, stressed, "This madness must be stopped before too late."

In the meantime, international elites appear to be working under the presumption the madness will not come soon enough.

Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, the head of the World Health Organization, was joined by policymakers, corporate leaders in the pharmaceutical industry, and various technocrats at the World Economic Forum's meeting of the minders Wednesday to discuss preparations for "Disease X."

Ghebreyesus said, "Anything happening is a matter of when, not if."

The WHO director suggested further that COVID-19 could be thought of "the first Disease X," adding "it may happen again."

The WEF previously suggested that "Disease X" could "result in 20 times more fatalities than the coronavirus pandemic," reported Newsweek. The last virus out of China killed over 1.1 million Americans according to the CDC.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Biden admin's latest vaccine push falls on deaf ears, with majority indicating they will not get the COVID-19 shot



The Biden administration has implored Americans in recent weeks to get yet another COVID-19 booster. A new poll has revealed that the majority of Americans have no interest in complying. This is especially true of Republicans.

Moderna, whose profits in recent years have been driven by COVID-19 vaccine sales, claimed in August that an early study showed its latest vaccine to be effective against the so-called "Eris" and "Fornax" subvariants. Pfizer similarly alleged that the shot it developed with BioNTech has demonstrated neutralizing activity against the Eris subvariant, at least in mice, reported Reuters.

On Sept. 12, eight days after the double-vaccinated and twice-boosted first lady Jill Biden came down with COVID-19 yet again, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommended that everyone 6 months and older take the updated COVID-19 vaccines.

The CDC further claimed that the "benefits of COVID-19 vaccination continue to outweigh any potential risks" and that "serious reactions after COVID-19 vaccination are rare."

Eighty-year-old President Joe Biden, who last caught COVID-19 in July 2022, got an updated booster on Sept. 22 and encouraged all Americans to do likewise.

The latest Kaiser Family Foundation COVID-19 Vaccine Monitor poll revealed last week that 52% of U.S. adults don't feel much like following the president's lead.

According to the poll, 33% of respondents said they would "definitely not get" the vaccine and another 19% indicated they would "probably not get" the vaccine.

Conversely, 23% of adults indicated they "definitely" plan to get the vaccine and another 23% suggested they will "probably" get it.

And 94% of respondents who never received a vaccine indicated they'd likely hold fast. Only 1% indicated with any certainty they'd cave now, years after America achieved herd immunity.

When it comes to children, it appears most parents won't roll the dice.

According to the KFF, "Most parents say they will not get their child the new COVID-19 vaccine including six in ten parents of teenagers (those between the ages of 12 and 17), and two-thirds of parents of children ages 5 to 11 (64%) and ages 6 months to 4 years old (66%)."

Over half of parents of children aged five and younger gladly admitted to neither giving their child the COVID-19 vaccine nor intending to do so in the future.

A key predictor of vaccine uptake appears to be political affiliation.

Whereas 69% of Democrats indicated they would probably or definitely get the latest shot, the same was true of only 25% of Republican respondents. On the flip side, 29% of Democrats expressed resistance, whereas 76% of Republicans indicated they would not get the booster.

It appears that Democrats continue to let COVID-19 concerns dictate their lives; 58% of Democratic respondents indicated they changed their behavior to "be more COVID-conscious." Only 19% of Republicans did likewise.

There may be a link between uptake and confidence in vaccine safety and medical authorities. After all, 84% of Democrats believe the vaccines are safe. Only 36% of Republicans think likewise.

And 88% of Democratic respondents indicated they trust the CDC, and 86% said they trust the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. For Republicans, the corresponding trust levels were 40% and 42%, respectively.

As has been true throughout the pandemic, a much smaller share of Republicans (24%) than Democrats (70%) expect to get the new COVID-19 vaccine \u2013 a 46 percentage point gap, according to our latest COVID-19 Vaccine Monitor poll. https://t.co/u1INw3bC6o
— KFF (@KFF) 1696169707

According to the CDC's COVID-19 tracker, only 1.8% of emergency department visits between Sept. 17 and Sept. 23 were diagnosed as having the virus.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Media sounds alarm over new Eris COVID variant, pushes for Americans to mask up



The media is sounding the alarm over the newest COVID variant – Eris or EG.5. The mainstream media is already making a push for Americans to mask up as the new variant begins to spread.

The latest COVID variant is called Eris – named after the Greek goddess of strife and discord. The new strain is a descendant of the Omicron variant.

The World Health Organization noted, "EG.5 is a descendent lineage of XBB.1.9.2, which has the same spike amino acid profile as XBB.1.5."

The WHO stated that EG.5 is a "variant of interest."

NBC News reported that EG.5 symptoms are "unlikely to differ much from those caused by other omicron subvariants," which would "include fever, cough, fatigue, muscle aches, and headache."

Scott Roberts, MD, a Yale Medicine infectious diseases specialist, said Eris is not much different from other recent strains, but "there is some extra degree of immune evasiveness because of a slight difference in genotype."

Yale Medicine stated, "However, EG.5 does have one new mutation in its spike protein (the part that facilitates virus entry into the host cell) that can potentially evade some of the immunity acquired after an infection or vaccination."

Roberts admitted, "I am not aware of data that suggests EG.5 leads to worse cases of COVID-19 compared to prior variants."

NBC News noted, "Experts agree that many people probably have underlying protection from severe disease already."

The first case of EG.5 was reported on Feb. 17, 2023.

The CDC reported that EG.5 was the dominant SARS-CoV-2 strain in the third week of August in the U.S., responsible for 20.6% of cases of COVID-19 in the United States. The second most contracted variant that week at 13.3% of cases, was FL 1.5.1, known as Fornax.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported that COVID cases have increased by 14% in the past week and COVID deaths are up 8%.

According to Worldometer, the seven-day average of COVID cases was nearly 27,000 as of Aug. 18, compared to exactly a year ago when it was over 768,000. The pandemic high was 3.4 million COVID-19 cases on Jan. 26, 2022.

The legacy media is pushing for Americans to start wearing masks with the new Eris variant swirling around the country.

The New York Times advised, "As for how to behave in response to this trend, that’s a tricky question. Many experts still recommend wearing a mask in crowded indoor settings, but they know that not everyone will want to do so. If you’re at high risk for serious illness, you might want to mask up at the grocery store and avoid eating indoors at restaurants. Other people might just want to wear a mask at the airport, to avoid getting sick during that big summer vacation."

The Washington Post advocated, "Vaccines and boosters still should be encouraged, as should safe social practices such as wearing face masks and keeping rooms well ventilated, health experts say."

The TODAY show recommended "wearing a mask in crowded, indoor spaces."

National Geographic published an article titled: "The EG.5 COVID variant is spiking in the U.S. Is it time to mask up?"

"We should take all of these subvariants very seriously. Using testing kits, when symptoms suggest it could be COVID-19, and masking up and staying home if COVID positive, can slow the spread of the new variant. We need to minimize the spread of the virus as much as we can," Angela Rasmussen – a virologist at Vaccine and Infectious Disease Organization in Saskatoon, Canada – told the outlet.

The U.K.'s Independent published an article with the headline: "New COVID wave has begun and masks should be worn again, scientists warn."

A New York hospital has already reinstated its mask mandate because of the new variant.

Syracuse’s Upstate Hospital announced this week: "Effective immediately, mandatory masking is required by all staff, visitors and patients in clinical areas of Upstate University Hospital, Upstate Community Hospital, and ambulatory clinical spaces."

The updated COVID vaccines are expected to be released this fall by Pfizer and Moderna, and are said to combat the Eris variant.

"hese new results, which show that our updated COVID-19 vaccine generates a robust immune response against the rapidly spreading EG.5 and FL.1.5.1 strains, reflects our updated vaccine’s ability to address emerging COVID-19 threats," Moderna President Stephen Hoge, MD, said in a press release.

A Pfizer spokesperson told CNBC that the company's upcoming shot "effectively neutralized" several omicron variants, including Eris and XBB.1.5, in a recent study on mice.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

MSNBC's mask-monger is back, stressing it's 'time to bring them out again'



MSNBC medical contributor Kavita Patel, a former policy official in the Obama White House, appeared bare-faced Tuesday on "José Díaz-Balart Reports" to tell Americans to once again don their masks.

Díaz-Balart led into the segment, saying, "If you’ve noticed more of your friends, neighbors, loved ones are testing positive for COVID, you’re not alone. According to the CDC, COVID-19 hospitalizations are up 12% from last week, and while we’re nowhere near previous levels, it’s still raising concerns."

The CDC indicated that between July 16 and July 22, there were 8,035 hospital admissions for COVID-19 in the U.S., a nation home to well over 335 million souls. The bulk of the hospitalizations appear to have been in parts of Texas near the southern border; southeastern Oklahoma; Mohave County, Arizona; four counties in southern Nebraska; northeastern Oregon; and Colquitt County, Georgia.

Patel, a staunch supporter of coercive vaccine mandates, acknowledged in her introduction that "we are not seeing anywhere near the dramatic rises that we saw in previous summers or previous years ... because a large part of the population has either been infected and vaccinated or both several times."

As of November 2022, an estimated 94% of the American population had already been infected with COVID-19 at least once.

Despite intimating that the population now enjoys herd immunity, Patel stressed that it was prudent to "keep people on alert."

To this end, Patel — who suggested in April 2022 that people should still wear masks on airplanes and foist them on fellow passengers despite the expiration of the TSA's mask mandate — attempted to drum up fear over going out in public.

"When you're in those crowded spaces, think about the cost of colds," said Patel. "Sometimes, many people don't have any symptoms. A mask can be your best friend. Keep it."

Patel told Díaz-Balart it was "time to bring them out again, especially as the school season starts," adding, "We don't want to see kids missing school for things we could have prevented."

— (@)

Despite Patel's invocation of kids' well-being — greatly undermined by the school closures teachers' unions supported in recent years — children have faced an infinitesimal likelihood of succumbing to COVID-19, even early in the pandemic when the virus was ostensibly far stronger. Even if there was more than a nominal risk, studies have indicated that the masks commonly used by the public might be ineffective.

A comprehensive Cochrane analysis of scientific studies concerning the efficacy of masks in reducing the spread of COVID-19 and other respiratory illnesses, led by Oxford epidemiologist Tom Jefferson and published in January, concluded, "Wearing masks in the community probably makes little or no difference to the outcome of influenza‐like illness (ILI)/COVID‐19 like illness compared to not wearing masks. ... Wearing masks in the community probably makes little or no difference to the outcome of laboratory‐confirmed influenza/SARS‐CoV‐2 compared to not wearing masks."

Jefferson told journalist Maryanne Demasi, "There’s still no evidence that masks are effective during a pandemic."

The Centers for Disease Control's own peer-reviewed journal, Emerging Infectious Diseases, published a study in May 2020 that found "no significant reduction in influenza transmission with the use of face masks."

The researchers stated, "There is limited evidence for their effectiveness in preventing influenza virus transmission either when worn by the infected person for source control or when worn by uninfected persons to reduce exposure. Our systematic review found no significant effect of face masks on transmission of laboratory-confirmed influenza."

Also early in the pandemic, Dr. Michael Klompas of Harvard Medical School's department of population medicine and others noted in the New England Journal of Medicine, "We know that wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from infection. ... [T]he desire for widespread masking is a reflexive reaction to anxiety over the pandemic."

Dr. Brendan Jackson, the CDC's COVID-19 incident manager, told NPR last week that the CDC presently has no plans to encourage widespread masking again.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Breaking: House spending bill bars EcoHealth Alliance and the Wuhan lab from receiving USAID funds



Lawmakers on the House Appropriations Committee have introduced legislation that would bar EcoHealth Alliance and the Wuhan Institute of Virology from receiving funds from the U.S. Agency for International Development as well as from other financial streams leading back to the Department of State.

This move, preceded by similar efforts in recent months to block funding to EHA and labs run by America's foes, comes just days after the White Coat Waste Project provided receipts — obtained through a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit — that indicated EHA and the Wuhan Institute of Virology had their fingerprints on research that may have ultimately resulted in the deaths of over 1.1 million Americans and well over 6.9 million people worldwide.

Federal documents revealed that EHA, run by British zoologist Peter Daszak, administered at least $38 million in USAID funds to a project on which one of the Wuhan Institute of Virology's "patients zero" was listed as "investigator."

TheBlaze previously detailed the WCW's findings, which showed that this EHA subcontractor, Ben Hu, was not only among the first infected with COVID-19 at the Chinese military-co-opted Wuhan lab, but also happened to be the lab's lead gain-of-function researcher who routinely conducted deadly experiments on coronaviruses.

Extra to the funds doled out to EHA prior to the pandemic, the WCW indicated that since March 2020, USAID has handed over $11 million to the outfit. The Department of Defense reportedly provided Daszak's organization with another $26 million in that time, and the National Science Foundation gave it another $263,801. The National Institutes of Health also renewed a grant to EHA in May.

According to USA Spending, the NIH and other government agencies have been funneling taxpayer money into EcoHealth Alliance since 2008.

The 2024 State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Bill, reported by Appropriations Subcommittee Chairman Rep. Mario Diaz-Balart (R), will put EHA in the same limitations camp as countries deemed foreign adversaries by the secretary of state.

The bill states that none of the funds made available by this act "may be made available to support, directly or indirectly":

  • "the Wuhan Institute of Virology located in the City of Wuhan in the People's Republic of China";
  • "the EcoHealth Alliance, Inc.";
  • "any laboratory owned or controlled by the governments of the People's Republic of China, the Republic of Cuba, the Islamic Republic of Iran, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, the Russian Federation, the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela under the regime of Nicolas Maduro Moros, or any other country determined by the Secretary of State to be a foreign adversary"; or
  • "gain-of-function research."

Chairman Diaz-Balart will speak generally to the bill's contents outside the Capitol Friday morning.

WCW reportedly worked with Appropriations Committee members Rep. Guy Reschenthaler (R-Pa.), Rep. Chris Stewart (R-Utah), and Rep. Dave Joyce (R-Ohio) on these measures in recent months.

Justin Goodman, senior vice president at WCW, told TheBlaze in a statement, “Our blockbuster investigations prove that the disgraced EcoHealth Alliance secretively shipped US taxpayer dollars from USAID to COVID’s likely Patient Zero Ben Hu at the CCP-run Wuhan lab for dangerous gain-of-function experiments on humanized mice that violated federal policy and that the FBI and other experts believe caused COVID. But, despite EHA’s calamitous collaboration with the Wuhan animal lab and its well-documented waste, fraud, and abuse, EHA has raked in over $11 million in new taxpayer funds from USAID just since the pandemic began. Enough is enough."

"Taxpayers shouldn’t be forced to fund the reckless white coats who caused COVID or other dangerous virus experiments on animals at home and abroad," said Goodman. "We’re proud to work with Congress to curtail wasteful government spending on animal experiments that can prompt pandemics. The solution is simple: Stop the money. Stop the madness.”

Goodman, who suggested the White Coat Waste Project's recent revelations have helped bolster the rationale behind these spending prohibitions, is "cautiously optimistic" that the limitations will survive in the legislation that ultimately passes, in part since there is precendent: "Congress blocked 2023 State Department and Pentagon funding for the Wuhan lab, and the facility was recently disqualified from NIH funding, too. Lawmakers also enacted a WCW-backed measure last year to defund EcoHealth projects in China."

The White Coat Waste Project will endeavor to continue its work getting gain-of-function experiments defunded and "permanently cutting off the grifters at EcoHealth, the Wuhan lab, and all other animal labs run by China, Russia and adversarial nations," said Goodman.

Extra to this latest effort to preclude EHA from taking more taxpayer money, Iowa Senator Joni Ernst (R) stated Wednesday that she will offer amendments to the National Defense Authorization Act to:

  • "Ensure no defense dollars ever go to China's Wuhan Institute of Virology";
  • "Cut off further payments from the Pentagon to EcoHealth, which collaborated with the Chinese, but refuses to cooperate with our investigations into what they were doing with our dollars"; and
  • "Conduct an independent investigation to determine if EcoHealth diverted any U.S. Defense dollars into the Wuhan Institute, or any other Chinese lab, or spent it to create enhanced pathogens of pandemic potential."
TheBlaze reached out to EcoHealth Alliance and Rep. Mario Diaz-Balart for comment, but neither had responded by the time of publication.

Markup of Fiscal Year 2024 State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Bill youtu.be

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!