Oxford Comms Guru, A Democratic Donor, Very Upset Over Free Beacon Report on Wes Moore

Oxford’s deputy communications chief, Julia Paolitto, was not a fan of the Washington Free Beacon’s report on Maryland Gov. Wes Moore (D.), which revealed the potential 2028 Democratic presidential candidate boasted about being a "foremost expert" on radical Islam—though nobody can find his graduate thesis from Oxford, where he attended graduate school as a Rhodes Scholar.

The post Oxford Comms Guru, A Democratic Donor, Very Upset Over Free Beacon Report on Wes Moore appeared first on .

Justice Department Sues Minneapolis Schools For Giving Preferential Treatment To Non-White Teachers

The U.S. Department of Justice filed a lawsuit against Minneapolis Public Schools (MPS) over a collective bargaining agreement giving preferential treatment to non-white teachers and shelling out other benefits based on race. After settling a three-week strike of the Minnesota Federation of Teachers in 2022, MPS included a provision in new teacher contracts that let […]

Georgetown prof starts running after realizing he's talking to James O'Keefe — and his racial 'slurs' are on camera



Jonathan Franklin, a former race and identity correspondent for National Public Radio who now apparently serves as an adjunct professor at Georgetown University, recently went into panic-mode after realizing he had made a series of damning remarks to investigative journalist James O'Keefe on hidden camera.

In the footage published on Wednesday by the O'Keefe Media Group, Franklin — whose personal website is now password-protected, Instagram profile has been set to private, and page on the Georgetown University was largely scrubbed — appears to call various black conservatives a "coon," including Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, Candace Owens, and U.S. Ambassador to the Bahamas Herschel Walker.

'Well, the thing is that I actually am James O'Keefe.'

When pressed by O'Keefe on why he hasn't shared such views publicly, Franklin, who is set to teach a journalism course on sourcing and interviews, appears to say, "I'd have to stop being a journalist for me to say what I really want to say."

At one point in his conversation with O'Keefe — whom he evidently did not recognize on account of a pair of glasses — Franklin appears to say, "I work with a bunch of stupid white people."

Franklin declined to comment on the situation involving the video published by O'Keefe, a representative told Blaze News.

RELATED: University of Minnesota faces backlash over project that seeks to cure the 'Whiteness Pandemic'

Photo by Joe Raedle/Getty Images

Georgetown University did not respond to Blaze News' request for comment.

After hearing enough racially charged rhetoric, O'Keefe asks Franklin in the video what he thinks about James O'Keefe.

Franklin answers, "I've heard from people he's an a**h**e."

"Well, he does, like, the undercover stuff and, like, exposes people, you know?" says O'Keefe. "He exposes people, you know, telling people, like, what they really think."

"There's a way to do that sort of watchdog, gotcha, ambush journalism but doing in a way that doesn't disrespect the person that you're trying to catch or yourself as a reporter," says Franklin.

O'Keefe then takes off his glasses, points to the hidden camera, and announces to Franklin, "Well, the thing is that I actually am James O'Keefe."

"No, you're not," responds Franklin.

Upon realizing the man he'd been talking to is in fact James O'Keefe, Franklin gets up and begins to run away. Outside the building, Franklin can be seen falling to the ground. After asking whether the adjunct was all right, O'Keefe tries asking him clarifying questions about his apparent "coon" comments, to which Franklin responds, "I will sue."

O'Keefe and his team subsequently took Franklin to a pharmacy to get him Band-Aids for the cuts he sustained in his tumble. After cooling off, Franklin appeared to confirm to O'Keefe on camera that while he did work for NPR, he had lied during their earlier conversation about working for CBS News.

When later discussing the encounter, O'Keefe questioned whether an individual who allegedly harbors racist views and would share them with a stranger should be teaching journalism classes at an institution like Georgetown University.

"That type of racism is not just his personal opinion," said O'Keefe. "It is a bias about a group of people that directly affects fairness, credibility and judgment. Why? Because he's a professor who is using these slurs. He is revealing a framework that shapes how he interprets information."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Christian students are pushing back — and universities are cracking



As one of the last conservative Christians serving as a tenured philosophy professor at a public university, I’ve had a front-row seat to the intellectual circus that critical theory and intersectionality have unleashed on higher education. I call it out on X and Substack. Professors from ASU’s Barrett Honors College and English Department have attacked me for doing so, calling me a “joke” and a “sloppy thinker.” This is the abuse anyone receives for defending God’s word.

But something new — and encouraging — is happening.

Christian students are speaking up. They are filing complaints. They openly quote Scripture in their assignments. And in this case, the university backed down.

Students are calling it out, too.

Last week at the University of Oklahoma, two instructors were removed for blatant viewpoint discrimination against a Christian student. If even 5% of cases like this see daylight, the DEI structure will start to crack within the academic year. If the polls are right, 97% of faculty identify as left or far left. What we see now — open disdain for Scripture — is not an anomaly. It’s the visible edge of a worldview that has captured entire campuses.

Beneath the surface sits the full intersectional framework, built on one central assumption: Christianity is the axle around which oppression supposedly turns.

The assignment that exposed the bias

The student’s psychology assignment was simple: a 650-word response to a study about gender norms and bullying among middle-schoolers.

She wrote: “Society pushing the lie that there are multiple genders and everyone should be whatever they want to be is demonic and severely harms American youth.”

She grounded her argument in Genesis, explained God’s creation of male and female, and correctly defined ezer kenegdo as “a helper equal to man.”

In short, she used: Scripture, theology, linguistic analysis, and a historical ethical framework. That is a well-reasoned paper in the humanities. Except when the worldview is Christian.

The instructor’s response?

“Your reaction paper contradicts itself, uses personal ideology over empirical evidence, and is at times offensive.”

And then the tell: “Every major psychological, medical, pediatric, and psychiatric association acknowledges that sex and gender is neither binary nor fixed.”

This is false. No serious biology text claims human sex is nonbinary. Disorders of development exist, but disorders do not replace design.

The deeper problem stood out like a vegan at a Texas barbecue: The Bible does not count as evidence. Even if the rubric justified deductions, dismissing Scripture as “personal ideology” exposed the bias.

Quote Judith Butler or Michel Foucault, and the academy nods solemnly. Quote the Bible, and you lose points.

The modern university’s dogma is simple: The Bible is never admissible. Everything else is.

Christians have known this for decades and quietly self-censored to protect their grades and academic futures. Which raises the question: How did we arrive here?

How we got here

Hostility toward Christianity did not appear overnight. It grew slowly through deliberate gatekeeping. Hiring committees screened out conservatives, shaping departments where 90%-97% of faculty became ideological clones. Administrators learned to view biblical faith as bigotry. DEI offices began to enforce viewpoint discrimination while denying it.

Fair hiring does not produce a 97% monoculture. That is ideological capture.

Christians allowed it because they confused niceness with faithfulness. Niceness — a word that never appears in Scripture — is fear disguised as virtue. It keeps people quiet so they can stay liked.

The left used a strategy straight from Marx, who took it straight from the enemy (“devil,” meaning accuser): Accuse Christians of oppression; rewrite history so the West is defined by its sins, never its virtues; demonize Scripture and its adherents; and weaponize shame to silence dissent.

It worked — for a time. The spell is breaking.

No neutrality

Many Christians assumed universities were neutral. They aren’t. They never were.

Every institution aligns with one of two cities: “the City of God” and “the City of Man.”

The City of Man controls the universities. This is not hyperbole. Romans 1 describes it plainly.

Those who reject God do not become neutral observers. They become evangelists for a rival religion. That rival religion has doctrines:

  • The Bible is oppressive.
  • Christianity is harmful.
  • Gender is unlimited.
  • Identity is self-created.
  • The highest good is “authenticity.”
  • The greatest sin is disagreement.

A new orthodoxy rules the campus, and the Oklahoma student violated it — praise God that she did.

Something has changed

Christian students are not taking the abuse quietly any more. They are speaking up. They are filing complaints. They are quoting Scripture openly in their assignments. And in this case, the university backed down. The instructors were removed.

Even on a left-dominated campus, viewpoint discrimination remains illegal — even if DEI treats it as sacred ritual.

If this continues, the monopoly may begin to break — maybe even by spring break.

RELATED: Why the kids are not all right — and Boomers still pretend nothing’s wrong

Photo by Andrew Lichtenstein/Corbis via Getty Images

What you can do

As someone inside the system, here is my advice.

Follow those speaking publicly. We are few, but we are here — and we are not silent.

Equip your children. They will face hostility. They will be mocked. They will be graded down unless they can respond intelligently. Ask pointed questions on campus tours. Get administrators on record renouncing DEI discrimination — then hold them to it.

Consider alternatives. Trade schools, Christian colleges, apprenticeships, online programs — all viable. Many offer a serious education without forcing students through gender theory with Judith Butler 101. Seek professors who teach the great works with a biblical foundation.

Speak boldly. The gospel is not a whisper. “For I am not ashamed of the gospel,” the Apostle Paul writes in Romans, “for it is the power of God for salvation to everyone who believes.”

Christian students are rediscovering that courage. It is long past time the rest of us did, too.

Major telecom giant says it's ditching DEI — but is the new policy just a woke smoke screen?



One of the big three wireless carriers committed on Monday to ditching its diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives.

In a letter to Federal Communications Commission Chairman Brendan Carr, AT&T's Senior Executive Vice President David McAtee II stated that, after reviewing the company's policies and relationships with external groups, he concluded that the "legal landscape governing diversity, equity, and inclusion ('DEI') policies and programs has changed."

'We believe in the importance of advocacy and inclusion of our many suppliers in every aspect of AT&T's ecosystem.'

AT&T, which employs more than 110,000 individuals in the U.S., cited the Trump administration's recent executive orders, Supreme Court rulings, and guidance from the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission as reasons it had decided to alter its "employment and business practices to ensure that they comply with all applicable laws and related requirements."

The company claimed that it has always supported "merit-based" employment opportunities.

"AT&T does not and will not have any roles focused on DEI. ... We do not and will not use hiring quotas based on race, sex, sexual orientation, or any other protected characteristics," the letter reads.

"Further, consistent with the current law, we removed training related to 'diversity, equity, and inclusion' as well as any references to it from our internal and external messaging and will ensure that future training is consistent with guidance released by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission addressing training that could facilitate discrimination in the workplace," AT&T added.

A 2021 report in the City Journal claimed that AT&T once offered employee training titled "White America, if you want to know who's responsible for racism, look in the mirror." The resource called racism a "uniquely white trait," adding that white people "are the sole reason [racism] has flourished for centuries."

The company previously told the New York Post in 2021 that the mentioned resources were offered "on a voluntary basis" in an effort to "build a workplace that is civil, inclusive, and understanding."

"Whether an employee uses these resources or not is up to them, and does not affect their annual performance rating," a representative told the Post. "We have a long and proud history of valuing diversity, equality, and inclusion, and will continue to do so."

RELATED: Verizon shuts down DEI policies for its 105,000 workers

FCC Chairman Brendan Carr. Photo by John McDonnell/Getty Images

While AT&T claims it has ditched DEI for good, it still hosts a "Culture and Inclusion" page on its website that features a quote from the company's vice president of culture and inclusion, Michelle Jordan.

According to Jordan's LinkedIn page, she previously worked as AT&T's "Chief Diversity Officer" but left the role in February 2025, approximately a month after President Donald Trump issued an executive order to end DEI. In that position, which she held for roughly three years, she led the company's "Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion efforts across the business, expanding equitable opportunities for our employees and the communities we serve, as part of how we generate equality for all."

In November 2024, Jordan reportedly took on another role within AT&T as the vice president of culture and inclusion. In her current position, Jordan "leads initiatives that cultivate an inclusive workplace culture, ensuring all perspectives are valued and integrated into every aspect of the organization," she writes.

"By championing programs that promote fairness and belonging, Michelle fosters an environment where innovation thrives, driving both employee engagement and business growth," her LinkedIn reads.

RELATED: 'I feel like I've been fired by America': Cracker Barrel CEO nearly brought to tears over redesign backlash

Photo by Smith Collection/Gado/Getty Images

AT&T's website also boasts that it is still committed to fostering an "inclusive culture" through its "Supplier Inclusivity program."

"AT&T's Supplier Inclusivity philosophy centers around our culture and values. We believe in the importance of advocacy and inclusion of our many suppliers in every aspect of AT&T's ecosystem," reads a quote from the company's assistant vice president of supplier inclusivity and sustainability, Alexis Dennard.

Dennard's LinkedIn states that in her role, she focuses on "empower[ing] minority-, women-, disabled, and veteran-owned businesses in the U.S. and worldwide." Dennard reportedly has over 20 years of experience at AT&T and previously oversaw an employee newsletter that provided updates on "new initiatives in diversity and inclusion."

AT&T and the FCC did not respond to a request for comment.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

A Talented Student, But the Wrong Ancestry. Why We Filed Suit Against the Hispanic Scholarship Fund.

Imagine a high school senior anywhere in America with a 4.0 GPA, rigorous coursework, and an extensive record of volunteering and community service. He plans to attend a four-year university but, like millions of families, worries about how to afford it. He discovers a prestigious national scholarship fund offering mentoring, leadership training, and up to $5,000 in financial aid.

The post A Talented Student, But the Wrong Ancestry. Why We Filed Suit Against the Hispanic Scholarship Fund. appeared first on .

Soft-on-crime DEI judge faces heat after releasing violent suspect — who then allegedly lit innocent woman on fire



Last week, a woman was lit on fire while riding the Blue Line in Chicago during an unprovoked attack. Now new evidence has emerged that this was not only a preventable attack, but a judge let the accused attacker off easy after a brutal assault that was caught on camera back in August.

And the judge, Teresa Molina-Gonzalez, has apparently proudly spoken about her unconventional approach to criminal justice in her position of authority.

'However, I had a chance as a prosecutor to make a difference as to what cases come in.'

Libs of TikTok posted a video of Judge Molina-Gonzalez apparently boasting about her soft-on-crime approach in a 2021 speech about the "power of diversity," according to a screen slide.

RELATED: Chicago mayor obliterated by ActBlue strategist over 'absolutely insane' response to woman set on fire on train

Photo by Kyle Mazza/Anadolu via Getty Images

The judge is heard talking about a common $354 fine in the video: "Some of the judges that I work with came from money, so $354 is no big deal. But to most of the people that come to my courtroom, it is a big deal."

"And so I always offer them the opportunity to do community service."

Judge Molina-Gonzalez also seemed to suggest that she filtered the cases based on whether the defendants "look like" her.

"You know, being a Latina in the office, people would tell me, like, 'Don't you feel like you're prosecuting your own people?' But it's true, there are a lot of defendants that look like me. However, I had a chance as a prosecutor to make a difference as to what cases come in. I had a chance as a prosecutor to decide what offers were appropriate," she can be heard saying, seemingly referring to her time as a prosecutor.

She also claimed in an interview posted to the Illinois courts website that "diversity on the bench is important because it allows all people to be represented. It instills faith and integrity in our judicial system."

Lawrence Reed, the 50-year-old accused of lighting the Chicago woman on fire, reportedly has a rap sheet of over 70 arrests and 13 convictions prior to the barbaric attack last Monday.

Judge Molina-Gonzalez placed Reed on a lenient electronic monitoring system after he allegedly slapped a female social worker unconscious in August.

"I can’t keep everybody in jail because the state’s attorney wants me to," she said at the time after the prosecutor warned that an ankle monitor "could not protect the victim or the community from another vicious, random, and spontaneous attack," according to CWB Chicago.

The female victim, 26, is reportedly still in the hospital in critical condition.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!