Biden ‘gaslights’ American people; issues executive order that will NOT close the border



Joe Biden has just issued an executive order to “temporarily prevent migrants from seeking asylum at the U.S.-Mexico border.”

While most of the media is acting as though Biden is actually closing the border, Sara Gonzales sees right through it.

“If you have the ability to close the border then close the freaking border now, we don’t need to wait until we have a seven day average of daily crossings that hits 2,500. We don’t need to wait for that,” Gonzales says.

“But Joe Biden says, ‘No, no, no, that’s fine, I will abuse my authority and I will just issue an executive border to only activate closing the border when we hit that 2,500 mark, and then the border would reopen when crossings stay below a daily average of 1,500 for seven consecutive days,’” she adds.

“It’s almost as if they don’t actually want a solution at all,” Eric July agrees. “This is why you got this kind of cat and mouse game going on.”

Gonzales calls what they’re doing “gaslighting,” before listening to what Biden had to say regarding his executive order.

“I’ve come here today to do what the Republicans in Congress refuse to do: take the necessary steps to secure our border. Four months ago, after weeks of intense negotiation between my staff and Democrats and Republicans, we came to a clear, clear bipartisan deal,” Biden said.

“It was the strongest border security agreement in decades, but then Republicans in Congress, not all, but walked away from it. Why? Because Donald Trump told them to. He told the Republicans, which has been published widely by many of you, that he didn’t want to fix the issue, he wanted to use it to attack me.”

“It was a cynical, an extremely cynical political move and a complete disservice to the American people who are looking for us to not weaponize the border but to fix it,” he concluded.

Gonzales can’t believe what she’s hearing.

“Joe Biden, the man who has done nothing for nearly four years at the border, and not only done nothing but actually reversed all of the policies that Trump had that were working.”


Want more from Sara Gonzales?

To enjoy more of Sara's no-holds-barred take to news and culture, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Resurfaced video: Democrats protested electoral votes after 2000, 2004 elections, cited 'irregularities across this country with regard to voting'



TheBlaze's Chris Enloe noted this weekend that while Democrats are rebuking Republicans for planning Wednesday to oppose the Electoral College certification of Joe Biden's presidential victory due to fraud concerns, Democrats themselves have a robust history of doing that very thing.

And a damning, resurfaced video underscores what's already on the public record.

OK for thee — but not for the GOP?

The video is a compilation of clips from congressional sessions following the 2000 and 2004 presidential elections, both won by Republican George W. Bush — and in the clips Democrats launched protests against Bush's electoral votes.

In January 2001, Democratic U.S. Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee of Texas spoke about the "millions of Americans who have been disenfranchised by Florida's inaccurate vote count" — a statement that drew jeers in the chamber.

Image source: Rumble video screenshot

In January 2005, Democratic U.S. Rep. Stephanie Tubbs Jones of Ohio told a joint session of Congress that "the objection today is raised because there [were] irregularities across this country with regard to voting, and we as a Congress have an obligation to step up to the plate and correct them."

Also during the 2005 session, Democratic U.S. Rep. John Conyers of Michigan said, "We're here because not a single election official in Ohio has given us any explanation for the massive and widespread irregularity in the state, no explanation for the machines ... that recorded [then-Democratic presidential nominee John] Kerry votes for Bush."

That wasn't all. The Washington Post reported that during the January 2001 session, words such as "fraud" and "disenfranchisement" were heard above Republicans calling for "regular order."

More from the paper:

The Democratic protest was led by Black Caucus members who share the feeling among black leaders that votes in the largely African American precincts overwhelmingly carried by [then-Democratic presidential nominee Al] Gore were not counted because of faulty voting machines, illicit challenges to black voters and other factors.

"It's a sad day in America," Rep. Jesse L. Jackson Jr. (D-Ill.) said as he turned toward Gore. "The chair thanks the gentleman from Illinois, but . . . " Gore replied.

At the end of their protest, about a dozen members of the Black Caucus walked out of the House chamber as the roll call of the states continued.

The Post added that then-House Minority Leader Richard A. Gephardt (D-Mo.) urged the Black Caucus members not to raise objections because Gore didn't support such a move, but caucus members argued in a news conference that they had to challenge Bush's election.

"There comes a time you have to take your destiny into your own hands, no matter what is being said by whom," Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.) said at the time, the paper reported.