From Courtesan To Patriot: The Remarkable Life Of Pamela Harriman
A new book about Pamela Harriman recounts the escapades of one of the 20th century's most notorious women.
Chinese communists appear to be cozying up to Hamas.
Chinese diplomat Wang Kejian recently met with Ismail Haniyeh, the political leader of the Islamic terrorist organization. A Chinese foreign ministry readout reportedly indicated Wang and Haniyeh "exchanged views on the Gaza conflict and other issues" while in Qatar.
According to a Hamas statement reviewed by the Middle East Media Research Institute, Haniyeh said he was "proud of the close relations between the two friendly peoples" and expressed gratitude to China for its help at the United Nations, particularly on the Security Council and in the International Court of Justice.
Hamas claimed that Haniyeh impressed upon Wang the need to "cause the occupation army to withdraw [from the Gaza Strip], return the displaced [Gazans to their homes], and provide what is needed to rebuild [the Strip]."
Haniyeh also discussed the terrorist organization's aspirations to establish a "fully sovereign, independent Palestinian state with Jerusalem as its capital, and to implement the [Palestinians'] right of return and right to self-determination."
Wang allegedly "stressed the close and historical relations between the Palestinian and Chinese peoples, as well as China's unwavering positions on the Palestinian issue and its support of the Palestinian people's just demands for freedom, independence and the establishment of the Palestinian state."
— (@)
The Chinese communists are keen on Palestinian statehood but remain opposed to recognizing the sovereignty of Tibet, Hong Kong, Uyghuristan, and the island nation of Taiwan. Additionally, the regime in Beijing appears keen on gobbling up territories belonging to Japan, Malaysia, the Philippines, Vietnam, Indonesia, India, and Brunei.
Wang allegedly "emphasized that the Hamas movement is part of the Palestinian national fabric and that China is acting to preserve the relations with it."
China has yet to condemn Hamas for the Oct. 7 terror attacks, which resulted in the massacre of more than 1,200 Israelis and dozens of Americans. It has, however, condemned Israel's subsequent war on terrorism and called for a "two-state" solution.
CNN reported that Wang, a former communist Chinese ambassador to Lebanon, has been in the Near East since at least March 10, meeting with counterparts in Egypt, Israel, and Qatar. Wang also met with the Palestinian Authority's Foreign Minister Riyad al-Maliki who presented the Palestinian case to the U.N. General Assembly last month.
When in Israel, Wang reportedly told officials that the top priority is a "comprehensive ceasefire, cessation of the war, guarantee of humanitarian aid and protection of civilians."
China has exploited the Israel-Hamas war as an opportunity to curry favor with nations antipathetic to the U.S. and Israel.
Last month, Wang said in Beijing, "China supports Palestine's full membership in the U.N., and urges [a] certain UN Security Council member not to lay obstacles to that end."
Wang's meeting with the terrorist leader came just days after Hamas presented a new ceasefire plan, which would require Israel to release hundreds of Palestinian prisoners, including scores of verified terrorists, and Hamas to release some of the Israeli women, children, and geriatrics it has taken captive. Following the prisoner releases, the plan indicates Israeli forces would retreat from Gaza.
Despite feigning interest in peace, the Jerusalem Post reported that Osama Hamdan, a Lebanon-based Hamas official, told the Hezbollah-linked Al-Manar this week that "the battlefield is not confined to Gaza."
Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!
China has signaled a desire to play nice with the U.S. now that it is facing an economic slowdown.
Xi's vice president, Han Zheng, said Wednesday that China is "ready to strengthen communication and dialogue with the United States at all levels, advance mutually beneficial cooperation, properly manage differences and jointly address global challenges," reported the Agence France Presse.
Han appears eager to set an optimistic tone ahead of Chinese dictator Xi Jinping's meeting with President Joe Biden in San Francisco on Nov. 15. ABC News indicated the talks will be taking place off to the side of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit.
The bar for a successful meeting is fairly low granted the last time the two leaders met — at the Group of 20 summit in Bali, Indonesia, last year — Biden reportedly objected to the communist state's "coercive and increasingly aggressive actions" toward the island nation of Taiwan.
Wang Wenbin, a spokesman for the communist regime, noted this week, "The road to San Francisco is not smooth, and we cannot be on autopilot."
"Both sides must ... truly implement the consensus reached by the two heads of state, eliminate interference and overcome obstacles, enhance consensus and accumulate results," said Wang. "The world is big enough for the two countries to develop themselves and prosper together."
The apparent desire for improved relations is not, however, limited to the Chinese regime.
A new Morning Consult poll indicates the share of Chinese adults who said the U.S. was an "enemy" dropped from over 80% in April 2022 to 48% last month. A sliver minority figured the U.S. for friendly in early 2022, but now 45% regard the U.S. in positive terms, reported Axios.
Morning Consult noted that Chinese adults' softening stance on the United States "is likely driven more by public anxiety over the country's ailing economy than by a geopolitical about-face."
China is presently facing astronomical youth unemployment, a collapsing real estate industry, debt crises, and diminished confidence amongst foreign investors.
Liu Shijin, a member of the People's Bank of China's monetary policy committee attempted to put an optimistic spin on the Chinese economy Wednesday, stating, "China is still in the stage of medium-speed growth of about 5%, and it is possible to have the potential of medium-speed growth for five to 10 years," reported Reuters.
Liu conceded that key drivers of economic growth have slowed in the Asian nation, prompting China to seek out a new growth model. Continued tensions with the U.S. are unlikely to help China get over its slump.
Xi told U.S. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer last month, "We have 1,000 reasons to improve China-US relations, but not one reason to ruin them," reported the AFP.
Blaze News has detailed a few reasons in recent months to doubt Xi's desire for a mutually beneficial relationship, such as when his regime:
Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!
The U.S. fought valiantly to liberate Europe from totalitarian powers in the 20th century and footed the bill for its latest fight with Russia.
Now, confronted with the threat of an increasingly aggressive and genocidal threat in the east, it appears America may not be able to rely on its continental beneficiaries to return the favor.
The European Council on Foreign Relations just published the results of an extensive poll of over 6,000 people across 11 European Union member nations — Austria, Bulgaria, Denmark, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, the Netherlands, Poland, Spain, and Sweden — "to understand how European citizens see their place in the world today."
In the event of a war between the U.S. and China — as might result from a Chinese invasion of the island nation of Taiwan — only a quarter of European respondents, on average, "would like their country, or Europe, to take America’s side."
62% of Europeans surveyed would like to remain neutral, notwithstanding their nations' ongoing infiltration by Chinese communist spies, subversion by illegal Chinese police operations, and economic coercion by Beijing.
The survey also found:
Jana Puglierin and Pawel Zerka, senior policy fellows at the ECFR, indicated the notion of neutrality was naïve, writing, "While remaining neutral in the case of great power confrontation is an appealing idea, a US-China confrontation would have a massive impact on Europe’s trade and economy at a minimum and European countries would certainly not be neutral bystanders. In addition, the US would likely demand loyalty from Europeans, reminding them of America’s pivotal role in ensuring a strong Western response to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine."
There appear to be two dominant schools of thought in Europe: de-risking and deference. While both entail some form of continued appeasement of Beijing, the latter appears to involve more mental gymnastics on the part of leaders who routinely pay lip service to the importance of democracy and human rights.
The ECFR indicated that European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen and French President Emmanuel Macron exemplify the two varieties of collaborators.
Von der Leyen acknowledged in a March speech that China is ramping up its military posture, its policies of disinformation, and economic and trade coercion, stressing, "These escalatory actions point to a China that is becoming more repressive at home and more assertive abroad."
De-risking, according to von der Leyen, will require addressing "distortions created by China's state capitalist system," reassessing the terms of the Comprehensive Agreement on Investment, altogether reducing dependence on China, and limiting economic and national security exposure "in the context of China's explicit fusion of its military and commercial sectors."
Macron, alternatively, makes von der Leyen out to be a hawk with his deferential stance to Beijing.
The ECFR suggested that Macron is willing to prioritize close economic relations, even if that compromises allied nations.
"Macron spoke of reviving the strategic and global partnership with China and deliberately avoided critical remarks on the subject of Taiwan. Like Scholz before him, Macron was accompanied by a business delegation, which concluded numerous agreements in China," reported the ECFR. "Macron’s message to Xi was clear: Paris wants close economic relations with Beijing, even if China does not oppose Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and continues to maintain close relations with the Kremlin."
The New York Times reported that during his China trip in April, Macron reiterated his opposition to the economic decoupling from China favored by the U.S. and his preference for a world where American dominance was minimized or zapped altogether.
According to the ECFR's findings, "European citizens are more on Team Macron than Team von der Leyen. They do not see China as a power that challenges and wants to undermine Europe, and they do not buy into the 'democracy versus autocracy' framework promoted by the Biden administration."
Among the 11 nations where citizens were polled, it appears Germany, Sweden, France, and Denmark are outliers in terms of their citizenry recognizing China as a "rival" or an "adversary."
The rest reckon China to be an "ally" or a "partner."
The Euro-Sino love-in could be disrupted, however, if Beijing officially begins arming Russia.
"On average, 41 per cent would be ready to sanction Beijing in that event, even if that meant seriously damaging Western economies. A minority of 33 per cent, on average, would oppose this," reported the ECFR.
Russia and Communist China further evidenced their affinities and shared geopolitical aims this week. Chinese dictator Xi Jinping and Russian President Vladimir Putin met at the Kremlin Tuesday to discuss a "new era" of bilateral ties and greater cooperation on a number of issues spanning the globe.
Following the meeting, Xi told Putin, "Change is coming that hasn't happened in 100 years. And we are driving this change together."
The South China Morning Post reported that the two nations have pledged to collaborate on issues from Southeast Asia to the Middle East and Latin America, likely contesting American supremacy in the process.
While shoring up strength in Asia, in part through the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, Russia and China will also work together on promoting Beijing's Belt and Road Initiative, which permits China to extend its power and influence throughout the developing world.
Through its BRI, China helps poorer nations build ports, rail lines, and telecommunications networks, as well as secure financing. Since this assistance is usually unaffordable by design, the BRI transforms countries into politically malleable debtors.
Russia lauded China's "objective and unbiased position" as it pertains to the war on Ukraine, noting that Moscow and Beijing "are opposed to any states and their blocs damaging the legitimate security interests of other states in order to obtain military, political and other advantages," reported Reuters.
This remark is likely a knock not just against NATO in Eastern Europe but against U.S.-led efforts to protect Taiwan from Chinese invasion.
The joint statement also intimated that China is taking on a greater role as an international peacemaker, while it simultaneously hounds dissenters across the world, interferes in foreign elections, engages in brazen espionage campaigns, and grows its military.
Russia indicated it welcomed "China's readiness to play a positive role in a political-diplomatic settlement of the Ukrainian crisis."
Chinese Foreign Ministry apparatchik Wang Wenbin claimed this week that China has "no selfish motives on the Ukraine issue, has not stood idly by ... or taken the opportunity to profit itself," reported the Associated Press.
The New York Times reported Tuesday that China has sold Russia over $12 million in drones and drone parts since the invasion of Ukraine, ensuring a "steady supply" of equipment to the front lines.
"What China has done boils down to one word, that is, to promote peace talks," added Wang, who also accused the U.S. of "fanning the flames" of conflict.
The U.S. still has nearly 1,000 troops in Syria, most of them sharing bases with Syrian Democratic Forces in the north, reported Stars and Stripes.
Prior to China's latest commitment to challenging America by proxy in the region, Russia was already doing so, engaging in what Gen. Michael Kurilla, CENTCOM'S commander, has called "unsafe and unprofessional behavior."
Russia has been harassing U.S. troops in Syria by buzzing their locations with armed ground attack aircraft, reported Task and Purpose.
In another hypocritical knock against the U.S., Xi and Putin denounced "interference in the internal affairs of other countries in the region."
While contesting American influence in the Middle East, the joint statement also indicated Russia and China were keen on greater involvement in the the Caribbean and Latin America.
In November, Xi told his Cuban counterpart that China intended to "strengthen coordination and cooperation in international and regional affairs" with the Caribbean nation.
The two will “go hand in hand down the road of building socialism with each's own characteristics," said Xi.
David Lewis, professor of international relations at the University of Exeter, noted in 2019 that historically, "attempts to reorient Russian policy toward Asia have often sought to compensate for worsening relations with the West."
Lewis suggested that Putin's "pivot to the East" risked Russia becoming China's junior, dependent partner.
Bobo Lo, a former Australian diplomat, noted in October 2021 that following its annexation of Crimea in 2014, Russia was prompted to turn to China to "fill the technological gap left by the withdrawal of Western companies in Russia. ... And Chinese investment in technology has been absolutely critical to the realization of Russia's Arctic LNG projects."
Tensions between Russia and the West have since only worsened, pushing Moscow into Beijing's lap, even at the risk of Russia becoming a junior partner, or what Harry Kazianis characterized in the New York Post as "the biggest vassal state in modern history."
According to the 2022 U.S. National Security Strategy, China and Russia "are increasingly aligned with each other but the challenges they pose are, in important ways, distinct. We will prioritize maintaining an enduring competitive edge over [China] while constraining a still profoundly dangerous Russia."
TheBlaze previously reported that the Chinese foreign minister threatened "conflict and confrontation" earlier this month if the U.S. doesn't change course as it pertains to its Chinese "containment and suppression" strategy.
Qin Gang, the genocidal communist regime's new foreign minister, criticized American efforts to outcompete China, claiming that "in reality, the U.S. side's so-called competition is all-out containment and suppression, a zero-sum game where you die and I live."
While Qin contended that the U.S. has approached competition with China with a "zero-sum" mentality, a 2021 Pentagon report indicated this may be projection.
The report noted that the CCP's aim is to "achieve 'the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation' by 2049 to match or surpass U.S. global influence and power, displace U.S. alliances and security partnerships in the Indo-Pacific region, and revise the international order to be more advantageous to Beijing's authoritarian system."
Xi stated in October at the opening ceremony of the Chinese Communist Party's 20th National Congress, "Get the house in good repair before rain comes, and prepare to undergo the major tests of high winds and waves, and even perilous, stormy seas."
Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!