Women giving up on marriage? Data reveals who’s happiest



While millions of young girls in the not-so-distant past dreamt endlessly of their wedding days, American women are apparently now flat out rejecting the institution of marriage — believing it won’t bring them happiness.

According to a recent article in the Wall Street Journal, “Over half of single women said they believe they were happier than their married counterparts.” The article looks at a 2024 AEI survey of 5,386 adults, where just over a third of surveyed single men said the same.

And in a 2022 Pew survey of single adults, only 34% of single women and 54% of single men were “looking for romance.” This is down from 38% and 61% in 2019.


“What’s not understandable to me is this perception that married people are not happy,” Stu Burguiere of “Stu Does America” comments. “Women really hold that strongly, men to a lesser degree, but still have that in their opinion.”

While the stats reflect single women believing marriage leads to unhappiness, the stats also prove them wrong.

Per the latest General Social Survey, the Institute for Family Studies found that the answer to “Who is happier?” is very clear.

Married women with children were by far the happiest with 39.5% reporting as “very happy” and 47.6% reporting as “pretty happy.” Another 12.9% reported being “not too happy.”

Only 21.5% of unmarried women with no children reported being “very happy,” while 53.8% reported being “pretty happy,” and 24.6% reported being “not too happy.”

“I think a lot of people convince others that, actually, married life sucks, and it doesn’t. It’s actually great,” Stu says. “When you’re in conversations with your friends, if you’re a married person, don’t try to scare them away.”

“You’re scaring them away from something that will probably benefit them,” he adds.

Want more from Stu?

To enjoy more of Stu's lethal wit, wisdom, and mockery, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Do not resuscitate: Conservatives look to defund NPR



President Donald Trump has been urging Republicans to defund NPR and PBS — and conservatives aren’t taking his suggestion lightly.

After a hearing by the House DOGE Subcommittee, Rep. Ronny Jackson (R-Texas) is introducing a bill to pull all government funding from the “chronically biased” outlets, which he claims have been “pushing Democrat talking points under the fake banner of ‘public media.’”

Jackson’s bill, titled the “No Partisan Radio and Partisan Broadcasting Services Act,” would cut off all government funding for both outlets, and those for the bill aren’t being easy on NPR CEO Katherine Maher.

“You’re a rabid progressive, and do you not think it’s a problem that your political leanings make it seem to the American people that you’re not biased?” Rep. William Timmons (R-S.C.) said to Maher during the hearing.


“Let’s talk about the newsroom. You have 87 registered Democrats, not a single Republican in your editor board. I mean, how does that work to give us the perception that you’re doing your job of actually delivering unbiased information?” Timmons continued.

“Well, I would agree with you that that number is a concern if it is accurate,” Maher replied.

“I’m stuck on the fact that she thinks this is a ‘concern,’ that there’s 87 Democrats and zero Republicans,” Stu Burguiere of “Stu Does America” comments. “You know, like 60-40 would be a concern, 55-45, maybe a little bit of a concern, 65-35, a real concern.”

“100-0 is a plan,” he continues. “You’re doing that intentionally.”

Want more from Stu?

To enjoy more of Stu's lethal wit, wisdom, and mockery, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Leftists burn Teslas in $43M astroturf protest



While left-wing protesters are burning Tesla electric cars to “save democracy,” others are doing research to understand whether these protesters are just dumb or if they’re being paid.

And it appears it’s the latter.

Stu Burguiere of “Stu Does America” has found some receipts from reporter Asra Nomani, and they’re not pretty.

“I went to the Tysons, Va., #TeslaTakedown protest on Tyco Road for @FairfaxTimes last Saturday, locals calling on America to ‘deport @elonmusk,’ and saw familiar faces from local Democratic Party activism,” Nomani wrote in a post on X.


“I documented identical messaging to protests nationwide and then built a @DPearlProject database of 304 protests that reveals that indeed the protests are more Astro Turf than ‘grassroots,’” she added.

Nomani continued on to say that while these protests appear “spontaneous,” they’re actually the product of “well-funded, tightly coordinated campaigns led by national political organizations like the Indivisible Project, MoveOn.org, and professional protest firms.”

“These groups use digital platforms, pre-scripted chants, pre-printed signs, and nationwide toolkits to manufacture the appearance of grassroots activism, and the messages on Tyco Road mirror the language of protests nationwide,” she said, noting that this is called “AstroTurfing.”

Nomani found that 100% of the groups and individuals who organized the protests were allied with the Democratic Party, only 15 organizations and their affiliates are behind the protests nationwide, and the most involved groups promoting the #TeslaTakedown protests have combined revenues of at least $43.1 million.

“‘Oh, it’s just the average person,’” Stu mocks. “Just the average person and their $43 million dollars.”

Want more from Stu?

To enjoy more of Stu's lethal wit, wisdom, and mockery, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

New York Times charts prove COVID panic's permanent damage



Five years after the world stopped and lockdowns began, shocking New York Times data reveals that the COVID-19 panic left permanent scars on America’s economy.

“Remember, that 2020 to 2022 period was a dark economic time, right? It was really, really terrible, and it lasted a long, long time until it came ‘back to normal.’ But the chart can’t even detect those changes any more because COVID broke the chart,” Stu Burguiere of “Stu Does America” comments.

And while many things did go “back to normal,” some things have stayed at COVID levels for five years now.

“Some things changed around the country and never got back to normal. And this is the stuff we really lost because of not only COVID, but the government response to COVID,” Stu explains.


The New York Times charts reveal that used car prices are one of these things that never went back to baseline. The used car market had been reasonable before and at the beginning of COVID, before spiking like crazy up to February 2022. While it has dropped slightly, it’s still far above pre-COVID levels.

“And then this is probably one of the more sad examples of what we lost during COVID,” Stu says. “Third through eighth-graders and their test scores. This is just a way of measuring academic performance, it’s not necessarily just about whether they get lower scores or not, but you see a massive drop-off.”

On average, these students have fallen quite behind in reading and math — but depending on where they go to school, that changes slightly.

“Red states opened early, got their kids back to school. Their decreases are much less punishing to the kids when it comes to academic performance than it is in blue states,” Stu explains.

Even sadder is the chart revealing socialization.

“This was decreasing anyway, before we got to the COVID period, and then we saw a massive drop-off in 2020 by about 25% of the time you’re normally socializing with others. That drops by 25% in 2020 and has stayed low,” Stu says.

“We have now lost a massive percentage of the time that we actually spend with other human beings,” he continues. “That’s bad. Spending all your time online and not spending time with actual people is really, really, bad.”

Want more from Stu?

To enjoy more of Stu's lethal wit, wisdom, and mockery, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Gwyneth Paltrow’s controversial comments EXPOSE Hollywood's double standard



Gwyneth Paltrow has come under fire recently for the comments she made in an interview with Vanity Fair regarding her latest role in Josh Safdie’s “Marty Supreme,” in which her character was in a romantic relationship with the much younger Timothee Chalamet.

“I mean, we have a lot of sex in this movie,” Paltrow said in the interview. “There’s a lot — a lot.” However, Paltrow was not familiar with what is called an “intimacy coordinator,” which she didn’t know existed.

“I was like, ‘Girl, I’m from the era where you get naked, you get in bed, the camera’s on,’” Paltrow recalled telling the coordinator when filming sex scenes for the new movie.


“How did you not know this existed?” Dave Landau comments to Stu Burguiere on “Stu Does America.” “Harvey Weinstein gave her the career she has. You don’t know why there’s an intimacy coordinator on set now? It’s because of what he did to you.”

Paltrow also recalled telling the intimacy coordinator to “step back a little bit.”

“I don’t know how it is for kids who are starting out, but … if someone is like, ‘Okay, and then he’s going to put his hand here,’ I would feel, as an artist, very stifled by that,’” she told the reporter. Paltrow also then joked that she’s “109 years old” while Chalamet is “14.”

“That’s an interesting way to put it,” Stu comments, noting that there is a “bizarre double standard” when it comes to predatory older men and the glorified older woman.

“Now, maybe in comparison to the horrible things that were done by so many in Hollywood, it doesn’t stand up. Probably, Timothee Chalamet is like, ‘Yeah, this is great,’” he continues.

“You see the parallels throughout life, like when the hot 27-year-old teacher hooks up with the student, everyone kind of just jokes about it and it’s hilarious, and we don’t say ‘statutory,’ those words don’t come out of anybody’s mouth,” he adds.

Want more from Stu?

To enjoy more of Stu's lethal wit, wisdom, and mockery, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Big Soda paid MAGA influencers to defend junk food



Major soda companies attempted to secretly buy off conservative social media personalities to fight against SNAP benefit reforms — but social media users were too quick to catch on.

It all began with X user Nick Sortor, who posted evidence on the social media platform that a company called Influenceable was cutting big checks to MAGA-aligned influencers on behalf of Big Soda.

“Over the past 48 hours, several large supposedly MAGA-aligned ‘influencers’ posted almost identical talking points fed to them, convincing you MAHA was out of line for not wanting soda purchases with food stamps (SNAP),” Sortor wrote in a post.


“Some even slimely [sic] invoked PRESIDENT TRUMP as an emotional manipulation tactic, referring to his Diet Coke button. Not a SINGLE ONE of them disclosed they were paid for these posts, which led readers to believe a general SODA BAN was in the works,” he added.

X users like Eric Daugherty were accused of the grift, who wrote in a post: “Important: We cannot allow Make America Healthy Again messaging to be used to force needy Americans into not buying certain things. Some officials in DC are working on trying to prevent Americans on SNAP food stamps from using those benefits to purchase any soda.”

“Remember when New York City Democrats tried to prevent people from buying and consuming soda? It backfired big time. President Trump literally has a Diet Coke button in his Oval Office. Let people think and decide for themselves. Anyone can consume soda and be perfectly fine in moderation, unless we’re just going to ban every food with sugar in it for SNAP Americans,” he added.

While Daughtery was among those who took the cash, other influencers, like Riley Gaines, refused. Gaines wrote that they offered to pay her to post, but she gave them a “big fat heck no.”

Unlike the others, Stu Burguiere isn’t shocked in the slightest.

“This shouldn’t be that shocking to anybody, right? I mean, this is how the influencer industry sort of works, right? Like you get paid to post,” Burguiere says.

“Fact, a lot of times, I hire people to post for me, because I hate it so much. I actually pay to post. Who’s the real idiot here,” he jokes.

Want more from Stu?

To enjoy more of Stu's lethal wit, wisdom, and mockery, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Andrew Cuomo makes SHOCKING return like a horror movie villain



Andrew Cuomo is not only back, but he is the front-runner in the New York City mayoral race as Mayor Eric Adams faces backlash from his constituents.

“I will say it is absolutely not shocking to me at all that the city of New York is going to put this guy back in office. Not at all. I completely expect it to happen. It is the only real possibility it feels like,” Stu Burguiere says on “Stu Does America.”

“Yeah, there’s a lot of smart, upstate New York people that are like, ‘OK, no way am I voting for that guy again,’ but down in New York it seems almost impossible that this guy’s not going to win a Democratic primary unless some magician comes along,” he adds.

Cuomo also took a whopping 17 minutes to make his campaign announcement, which was full of what Stu calls “nonsense.”


“We know that today our New York City is in trouble. You feel it when you walk down the street and try to not make eye contact with a mentally ill homeless person, or when the anxiety rises up in your chest as you’re walking down into the subway,” Cuomo said in his announcement.

“You see it in the empty storefronts, the graffiti, the grime, the migrant influx, the random violence. The city just feels threatening, out of control, and in crisis. These conditions exist not as an act of God but rather as an act of our political leaders,” he added.

“Yeah, by the way, all Democrats,” Stu points out. “So even if you believe that nonsense, it’s the Democrats fault. Why would you put another one back in?”

Cuomo also used his 17-minute announcement to praise himself for the work he did during the pandemic.

“This is a man that is responsible for killing thousands of people during COVID, and his pitch to America is, and to the New York voters of New York City more specifically, ‘Elect me because of the job I did during COVID,’” Stu comments.

“Now, the good part about his strategy here is all of the people he killed can’t vote, although it’s a Democratic city, so maybe some of them can,” he adds.

Want more from Stu?

To enjoy more of Stu's lethal wit, wisdom, and mockery, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

8 MILES of Amazon rainforest DESTROYED so elites can attend 2025 climate summit



Every year a group of global elites gather at the COP30 United Nations Climate Change Conference to discuss the impending doom our world faces if drastic measures aren’t taken to address the climate crisis. And every year, the normies scream hypocrisy because these elites fly to their exclusive summit in their private jets, while condemning commercial airlines as a climate sin. “Carbon footprints” don’t apply if you’re rich and powerful, apparently.

This year, however, their hypocrisy doubled when it was discovered that eight miles of rainforest in Brazil is being cleared to build a four-lane highway called Avenida Liberdade (Liberty Avenue) in time for the summit, which will take place in November 2025 in Belém, Brazil, a city smack in the middle of the country’s Amazon region.

Tens of thousands of acres of trees have already been cut down following the greenlighting of the project, which has been stalled for over a decade by environmentalists. That is, until more important “environmentalists” needed a road.

It’s almost humorous when you think about it.

Stu Burguiere, BlazeTV host of “Stu Does America,” certainly thinks so, which is why he brought comedian and BlazeTV host of “Normal World” Dave Landau onto the show to discuss the incredibly ironic situation.

“As you know, our greatest existential threat [is global warming]. The only way to solve it is with, you know, electric cars and solar panels, unless Elon Musk makes them because then they're evil,” says Stu.

“We also know the only way to stop it is these big climate summits they have around the world where all the people who say climate change is bad fly into a city … and then they all talk to each other because it's not obviously possible to talk to each other across long, large expanses,” he continues, displaying an image of the recent forest clearing.

“They're like, ‘I've never seen that [animal] before,’ and they're like, ‘yeah, it's the last one of them; anyway, shoot it, we have to lay some road,’” Dave jokes.

“I mean, in some ways, it helps their cause, right? Because then they could say … ‘just since we arrived, there's been three species that have gone extinct,'” laughs Stu.

“It's so hypocritical, and it's always on such a funny level,” says Dave.

To hear more of their conversation, watch the clip above.

Want more from Stu?

To enjoy more of Stu's lethal wit, wisdom, and mockery, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

COVID cover-up exposed: New York Times article reveals conspiracy theorists were right all along



Five years ago, Americans were locked down to stop the spread of COVID-19, but they weren’t allowed to ask questions. Specifically, questions regarding “the science.”

Which is why it’s shocking that a recent New York Times op-ed by Zeynep Tufekci, titled “We Were Badly Misled About the Event That Changed Our Lives,” was even allowed to be published.

“Take the real story behind two very influential publications that quite early in the pandemic cast the lab leak theory as baseless. The first was a March 2020 paper in the journal Nature Medicine, which was written by five prominent scientists and declared that no ‘laboratory-based scenario’ for the pandemic virus was plausible,” Tufekci writes.


“We later learned through congressional subpoenas of their Slack conversations, that while the scientists publicly said the scenario was implausible, privately, many of its authors considered the scenario not just plausible, but likely,” the author continues.

The article reveals that evolutionary biologist Christian Anderson wrote in those Slack messages that “the lab escape version of the story is so freakin’ likely to have happened because they were already doing this type of work, and the molecular data is fully consistent with that scenario.”

“Now, that’s kind of a big thing, right? They’re admitting this. You might remember. You might not remember how far this cover-up went,” Stu Burguiere of “Stu Does America” comments.

The article goes on to claim that Jeremy Farrar, who is now the chief scientist at the World Health Organization, suggested that the scientists researching the origins of COVID-19 rule out the lab leak theory “even more directly.”

Stu, while disturbed by the findings, is surprised that the New York Times is publishing a story calling this out — when it was guilty of this itself.

“The New York Times wrote about this stuff all the time and shamed people all the time for this type of stuff,” he says, adding, “and they went even farther than that.”

Want more from Stu?

To enjoy more of Stu's lethal wit, wisdom, and mockery, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Can religion REALLY predict your VOTE?



Questions regarding whether or not America is still a religious country have been circulating for years, and political science professor Ryan Burge believes he may have some answers.

In a General Social Survey Burge shared that spans from 1988 to 2022, the share of Americans who “believe in God without a doubt” has dropped across all political ideologies — but one more than others.

In 1988, 66% of Republicans believed in God without a doubt, and in 2022, that number dropped to 63%. For independents, the number was 59% but dropped to 51%. However, when it comes to godlessness, Democrats take the cake.


Beginning at 63% in 1988, only 39% of Democrats in 2022 reported believing in God without a doubt.

“What we’ve seen more and more over the last 25 years is that God gap has really sorted itself out now, where the Republican Party is definitely the party of religious people, and the Democratic Party has become the party of a couple different groups,” Burge tells Stu Burguiere on “Stu Does America.”

“The Republican Party has stayed relatively white and Christian. It’s still 75% white Christians today. The Democratic Party, however, is 45% nonreligious now and only about 35% white Christians,” he explains, adding, “In some ways, the Republican Party looks like what America looked like 30 or 40 years ago.”

While Republicans have held strong to their belief in God, what’s happened over the past few decades indicates a serious shift for all Americans regarding their priorities.

“For a long time in political science, we used to think that religion was first and politics lived downstream of that. So you know, your church, your pastor, the pope, your theology, taught you who to vote for, and then you voted for that candidate,” Burge says.

“What we’re realizing more and more now, is that people pick their church based on their politics. So politics is first, and religion lives downstream of politics. So whether someone chooses to go to an evangelical church or a Catholic mass or no religion at all, that’s really a political calculation,” he continues.

“People are going to pick a house of worship that aligns with their politics, you know, how they see the political world,” he adds.

Stu is not thrilled by what he’s hearing.

“This strikes me as very bad,” he comments.

Want more from Stu?

To enjoy more of Stu's lethal wit, wisdom, and mockery, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.