YOU are in charge of your health— NOT the government



The “Make America Healthy Again” spin on Trump’s original slogan has undoubtedly stolen the hearts of health-minded Americans everywhere, but Stu Burguiere of “Stu Does America” isn’t completely sold.

“I think most people really like that idea,” he says. “We are going down a road, we’re not necessarily the healthiest people. Obesity is through the roof. There are a lot of long-term diseases out there. And so you have to kind of look at this and say, ‘Well, you know, how can we solve these problems?’”

Burguiere, who admits that he has just eaten Cheez-Its himself and gave his son Welch’s fruit snacks, doesn’t believe he’ll “make it in the ‘Make America Healthy Again’ world.”

“I can’t survive in that world, I have too much processed food,” he says, noting that healthy food isn’t the only thing RFK Jr. would be overseeing. “There are a lot of really important decisions being made by the HHS secretary as it relates to something like abortion.”


“If you’re a pro-life person, a lot of those funding decisions, the ease of being able to get chemical abortion pills mailed to you, those are all decisions that were at the HHS level. When Donald Trump was president the first time, he made decisions to restrict those efforts for abortion. Will RFK Jr. do the same thing?” Burguiere asks.

RFK Jr. has also critiqued products like Banana Boat sunscreen for children, which Burguiere isn’t quite on board with either.

“I’m going to go out on a limb here and say you should put sunscreen on your kids when they’re out in the sun. That’s just my opinion. Again, I might be out of the mainstream now,” he explains.

“So many people live in a constant state of fear trying to avoid every ingredient,” he continues. “Relax, live a little, enjoy your life. Indulge occasionally, like on Thanksgiving. Outside of really limited exceptions like allergies, you’re a pretty resilient creature. You can eat fun things and you can be perfectly fine.”

“I’m a conservative. I want smaller government. I don’t want Michael Bloomberg telling me what size soda I can drink, I don’t want Michelle Obama telling me when to move, and I don’t want RFK Jr. micromanaging my micronutrients,” he adds.

Want more from Stu?

To enjoy more of Stu's lethal wit, wisdom, and mockery, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

$1.5 billion in 15 weeks: Kamala Harris’ INSANE campaign spending exposed



Kamala Harris’ campaign took a nosedive toward the end, and upon closer look, her wasteful spending may have played a major role — as the vice president reportedly burned through $1.5 billion within just 15 weeks.

“She was able to spend $1.5 billion in 15 weeks with no assets. Really impressive,” Stu Burguiere of “Stu Does America” comments.

“Her cash-rich campaign spared no expense as it hunted for voters — paying for an avalanche of advertising, social-media influencers, a for-hire door-knocking operation, thousands of staff, pricey rallies, a splashy Oprah town hall, celebrity concerts, and even drone shows,” Shane Goldmacher wrote in an article for the New York Times, adding, “It was a spree that averaged roughly $100 million per week.”


The Harris campaign’s biggest expense was advertising, spending most of a whopping $600 million on producing and buying media. $2.5 million was directed toward three digital agencies that specialize in working with online influencers.

Harris’ Oprah town hall cost the campaign close to $2.5 million as well, which Oprah attempted to explain away through the cost of setup.

“Oprah does have a bit of an argument here. First of all, she wasn’t just taking in a million dollars herself, it was going to this production company, and these events do cost a lot of money,” Stu says. “You could say, ‘OK, well, shouldn’t she just give that to her for free if she supported Kamala so much?’”

“You’d think so, but because of what Democrats want from campaign finance reform, there are campaign finance laws that say you can’t basically donate a bunch of free stuff and say that’s not a donation,” he continues.

However, there is one problem.

“In their own attempt at a defense here, they seemingly reveal a crime though because they say the $1,000,000 undercounts the cost of the event, the full cost, which ran closer to $2,500,000,” he explains. “So if in the bookkeeping they say it’s a million dollars but it actually costs $2,500,000, and Oprah ate the $1,500,000, that’s actually campaign finance violation. It’s a crime.”

“So in their attempt to try to win the press war, they may have actually committed a crime,” he adds.

Want more from Stu?

To enjoy more of Stu's lethal wit, wisdom, and mockery, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Trump appoints Gaetz and Gabbard — but are they good picks? Democrats don’t think so



Donald Trump is wasting no time building his team, and his recent appointments have fueled an absolute meltdown on the left — specifically his appointments of Tulsi Gabbard and Matt Gaetz.

Gabbard was appointed to the position of director of national intelligence, while Gaetz was appointed attorney general by the president-elect.

“What’s interesting about Gabbard,” Stu Burguiere of “Stu Does America” comments, “is she has come a long way, but she’s come a long way in certain categories.”

“She was very, very liberal, approaching a socialist. I mean, she was supporting Bernie Sanders for president. She’s come a long way on things like that. She has not really moved at all on her views when it comes to foreign policy and the military-industrial complex, if you will,” he explains.


However, Gabbard still must be confirmed by the Senate, and Burguiere believes that might present an uphill battle.

“She’s also probably a little risky to actually get confirmed. I don’t think the Democrats have too warm feelings for her any more, and there are a bunch of those old-school Republicans who will not like her approach to foreign affairs,” Burguiere says, noting that John Bolton has called her a “threat to national security.”

As for Gaetz, Burguiere believes it will be “an interesting ride” for him to actually get into the position, as Democrats are up in arms at the appointment and continue to accuse him of "sex trafficking."

“Is he a good pick? He will do the things that Trump wants him to do, and he will be very aggressive in doing them. And you can kind of understand the thought process here, right? Bring somebody in who is going to go balls to the wall and go into the DOJ and fire basically everybody,” Burguiere says.

“Gaetz will do it, but he’ll do it in a very splashy way, and that’s something obviously Donald Trump kind of likes, usually. So we will see how this goes,” he adds.

Want more from Stu?

To enjoy more of Stu's lethal wit, wisdom, and mockery, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Down to the wire: Predicting key swing states and election WINNER



It’s Election Day 2024, and Americans across the country are beelining for the ballot boxes to ensure their voice is heard — and praying that their voice matches the masses.

Stu Burguiere of “Stu Does America” accurately predicted the unfavorable outcome of the 2020 election, and he’s here to calm the minds of those dropping a vote for former President Donald Trump in 2024.

“Gun to my head here, it’s time to make last-minute predictions,” Burguiere says. “We’re going to give Georgia and the 16 electoral votes over to Donald Trump.” While Trump only has a slight but consistent polling lead in Georgia, Burguiere explains that “the fundamentals of the state lean a little bit red.”


Stu also predicts that North Carolina, a state whose citizens are still reeling from the aftermath of Hurricane Helene, will vote in favor of Trump.

“Donald Trump wins North Carolina with 16. Again, same situation roughly as Georgia, it’s a very close state, it could go either way,” he explains. “But I think Donald Trump again, with a small but persistent lead in the polls, holds onto North Carolina in a very close margin.”

He believes the clearest state going to Donald Trump is Arizona, with 11 electoral votes.

“It’s still a traditional red state,” Stu says, before setting his sights on Nevada.

“This is one of these states I went back and forth on multiple times,” he explains. “I wound up going with Kamala Harris winning Nevada with 6 electoral votes. OK, I know everyone loves that, they love when I pick Kamala Harris in these states.”

Stu believes that the traditionally blue state of Michigan will go to Kamala Harris, and Wisconsin will go to Donald Trump.

Pennsylvania, the biggest swing state, is the most concerning — but if Stu is right — he has good news.

“I’ve decided to put Donald Trump in control of those 19 electoral votes,” he says. “The final count, Kamala Harris, 247 electoral votes. Donald Trump, 291 electoral votes. All of that to say that the official prediction of the ‘Stu Does America’ program, with incredibly limited confidence, is Donald Trump.”

“Donald Trump becomes the second president in history to have a presidential term, take one off, and then get the gig back,” he adds.

Want more from Stu?

To enjoy more of Stu's lethal wit, wisdom, and mockery, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

‘Democracy dies in darkness’: Liberals lose their minds when Bezos refuses to toe the party line



There’s no doubt that the liberal mainstream media is relentless in its obedience to Kamala Harris — but one major leftist newspaper, the Washington Post, has faced swift ostracization for its refusal to endorse the vice president as president in 2024.

“Presidential endorsements do nothing to tip the scales of an election. No undecided voters in Pennsylvania are going to say, ‘I’m going with Newspaper A’s endorsement.’ None. What presidential endorsements actually do is create a perception of bias. A perception of non-independence. Ending them is a principled decision, and it’s the right one,” Jeff Bezos wrote in an WaPo op-ed.

While Stu Burguiere of “Stu Does America” believes Bezos op-ed is a “step in the right direction,” he notes that every other mainstream newspaper “basically endorses a Democrat or Kamala Harris.”


It’s also quite clear, despite Bezos' non-endorsement of Kamala, that the Washington Post is a clearly partisan paper intent on showing Democrats and Kamala Harris in the best light.

“I would prefer a movement away from this approach, at least by some of these more mainstream publications. Come out and just be nonpartisan and actually cover the news correctly. A solution to this though is not stop endorsing candidates but still be liberal on everything. That doesn’t solve any problem,” Burguiere explains.

“In a way, it’s trying to make their left-wing activism a little more subtle, a little more stealth,” he adds.

After the Washington Post’s non-endorsement, the newspaper’s very own Pulitzer Prize-winning cartoonist Anne Telnaes created a cartoon of absolutely nothing, just a blacked out piece of paper, titling it “Democracy dies in darkness.”

“They literally believe they are owed the endorsement of every single media organization in the United States or democracy is dead, and they will tell you it’s dead by some gray paint, something on a page,” Stu says.

“Like, all right, stop being so self-important. You want to write a piece that says ‘I don’t agree with this decision, here’s why,’ that’s one thing. To act like democracy is dying in darkness because the Washington Post, one of the most liberal publications in the United States, didn’t explicitly say they want Kamala Harris to win is just dumb,” he adds.

Want more from Stu?

To enjoy more of Stu's lethal wit, wisdom, and mockery, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Is the abortion pill as ‘safe’ as Advil? Democrats say yes



Abortion is the biggest issue that the Democrat Party is running on, but Democrats never tell you how dangerous the procedure really is.

Which is why when young mother Amber Thurman died after taking the abortion pill, the mainstream media went after the abortion laws in Thurman’s home state of Georgia rather than the pill that killed her.

“She left Georgia, where she could not get an abortion at the time of her pregnancy that she was in, she went to another state, got abortion pills, took them, came back, was told everything is going to be fine, no big deal,” Stu Burguiere of “Stu Does America” explains.


“She took them, had a very, very big deal, and she wound up going to the hospital. They didn’t treat her for a long time, and she wound up dying. Now, she didn’t go to the hospital because of the Georgia abortion law. She went to the hospital because the pills she was told were going to be totally innocuous wound up putting her in a situation where she needed to go to the hospital,” he adds.

The babies in her womb were already dead from the abortion pill, so no abortion laws would have applied to her situation when she went to the hospital. The poor infants were not evacuated from her system, so that’s when sepsis set in.

While the Democrats jumped on this story because they felt they could mess with the truth and pin Thurman’s death on abortion laws, one story they ignored was the case of Eliana Dickson.

Dickson, a Nevada woman, also died of sepsis after taking abortion pills.

“You might note that Nevada does not have the Georgia abortion law,” Stu says, commenting that these women are sold a much different idea by doctors, politicians, and the media — so they have no idea what they could be getting themselves into.

“If you have a woman in your life that, God forbid, has gone down this road and is having these problems, please let them know, because the media is not going to do that. They’re going to do the exact opposite of that. They’re going to try to hide that information from them because they want political points. It’s disgusting,” he adds.

And they don’t just hide that information, but they lie about it.

CNN anchor Kaitlan Collins even compared the abortion drug mifepristone’s “safety” to being “on par with those of common over-the-counter pain relievers like ibuprofen and acetaminophen.”

“Forget for just a moment all the stats I’m about to bring up and just, does that pass the sniff test to you? Have you ever had Tylenol? Have you ever had Advil?” Stu asks, disturbed. “Do you think that has a safety profile equal to the abortion drug? Do you think that? But no, experts are telling you it, so it must be so.”

Want more from Stu?

To enjoy more of Stu's lethal wit, wisdom, and mockery, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Victoria’s Secret or Victor’s Secret? Trans models featured in 2024 fashion show



The Victoria’s Secret annual fashion show used to be a highly anticipated event. Between the elaborate costumes, celebrity singers, stunning models, and high-profile guest list, the show drew millions of viewers from all over the world.

Enter wokeness.

In 2018, the lingerie company jettisoned the uber sexiness that long defined its brand and adopted a more artsy approach to stand in solidarity with the #metoo movement.

Then in 2021, Victoria’s Secret replaced the iconic “angels” with a group of varied models and influencers to show their commitment to diversity and inclusivity.

Last year, the fashion show was replaced with a strange pseudo-documentary featuring little femininity but lots of diversity, including a Nigerian artist who recited poetry.

And now for the cherry on top. This year, the fashion show, which just returned after a six-year hiatus, included two transgender models.

“Transgender models make history at Victoria’s Secret fashion show,” laughs Stu Burguiere, reading from an Entertainment headline.

“Are you kidding me? Is this real?” he asks.

Unfortunately, the answer is yes.

Valentina Sampaio and Alex Consani, two biological males posing as women, strutted down the runway in full-blown lingerie.

Stu displays the pictures of the two models but says he’s afraid to look too close for fear of “whatever might be going on down there.”

If we can learn anything from Victoria’s Secret it’s that “secrets are important, and sometimes you should keep them.”

“Maybe keep the secrets and don’t put them on television,” sighs Stu.

Want more from Stu?

To enjoy more of Stu's lethal wit, wisdom, and mockery, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Wokeness is 'locked into Democrat DNA'; dooms Kamala’s 2024 campaign



Americans are waking up, and the woke agenda is losing its hold on our great country — which might spell disaster for Kamala Harris’ flailing 2024 campaign.

“You kind of wonder why they go down this road, when we’re having this kind of big conversion in the United States, a United States that kind of took up the mantle of this woke revolution for a while and has now really started to reject it,” Stu Burguiere of “Stu Does America” comments.

The Economist has also recently published an article titled “America is becoming less woke,” which states through statistical analysis that woke opinions and practices are on the decline.


“It’s true,” Stu comments. “I think it’s something that we’ve all sort of felt over the past couple of years. You know, there was that crazy point where everyone seemed to have a DEI person in their company, and everything was woke all the time, and it does seem to have died down a little bit now.”

However, the Democrat Party seems to be delusionally holding on tight to its woke ideology.

“Is the Democratic Party right now just really out of step with what America is doing?” Stu asks. “We have these emotional reactions. The nation had one after George Floyd, but eventually, sober reality comes back, and all of a sudden you’re like wait a minute, what did we change about our society?”

“Here in America, the Democrats took that George Floyd era and locked it into their DNA, and now they are the arbiters of all that is woke and all that is right to say. They embrace stuff like radical racial ideology from CRT and DEI and Ibraham X. Kendi and all the people that you know, all the names that you know, they embraced that. They embraced it hard-core,” he continues, adding, “And America didn’t.”

The Democrat Party has attempted to rectify this with campaign ads like its “man enough” ad, which featured a slew of men saying they are “man enough” to support women who want to make their own decisions about their bodies or run for president.

“I still look at that and I can’t believe it’s real,” Stu comments. “You watch that and you realize exactly what’s happened with our country and what’s happened with the Democratic Party. Why is this failing so bad?”

Want more from Stu?

To enjoy more of Stu's lethal wit, wisdom, and mockery, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

'Past is prologue': Why Trump’s rise in the polls spell a ‘last-minute collapse’ for Kamala



There are only two weeks left until Election Day 2024, and if there’s any truth to the latest polling trends, things are looking good for Donald Trump.

While Stu Burguiere of “Stu Does America” is “always resistant to good news,” the polls he’s seeing seem to spell a “last-minute collapse” for the vice president.

“To remind you, on polling averages, there’s a little bit of secret sauce in every polling average. It’s no polling average is pure, if you will. The closest thing you can come to pure would be RealClearPolitics,” Stu says before analyzing a Washington Post poll, which he admits does have “secret sauce.”

The Washington Post poll has Kamala Harris up by very little in key battleground states, which Stu says reflects a “very close election.”


The New York Times has reported a “slight Trump shift” but “no real favorite” in the presidential race.

“If the polls missed like they did in 2022, as I mentioned, they underestimated Democratic support. Harris would sweep all of these states with the exception of Georgia and run away with the election win with over 300 electoral votes,” Stu says.

“If the polls missed like they did in 2020, Donald Trump would dominate a lot of these polls in states, and would win all of these swing states and win with over 300 electoral votes,” he adds.

Stu calls this “very uncertain territory” and says that “at the end of the day, you have a very close election and you don’t know what is going to happen.”

However, Stu is optimistic.

“You have to understand that this is the best chance Donald Trump has ever had to win an election. Now, he won in 2016, but he was a major underdog in 2016. In 2020, he was an even bigger underdog,” Stu says.

“In 2024, it’s basically an even race. And if the past is prologue, if past performance is indicative of future results, in this particular instance, you’ve got a lot of room to sit here and be optimistic,” he adds.

Want more from Stu?

To enjoy more of Stu's lethal wit, wisdom, and mockery, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Highlights from Kamala’s ‘angry’ Fox News interview with Bret Baier



One of the biggest criticisms of the Kamala Harris campaign is that she hasn’t done many interviews, leaving voters none the wiser regarding her murky, ever-changing positions and policies.

It seems her campaign management has noticed the complaint and is making an effort to reverse course in the final weeks leading up to the election. In a bold attempt to reach moderates, Harris sat down with Fox News’ Bret Baier for an interview on Wednesday.

Stu Burguiere breaks down their conversation, outlining everything you need to know.

- YouTubewww.youtube.com

“That was a legitimately difficult interview. [Harris] was not put in easy places,” says Stu, noting that Baier “asked tough questions,” “followed up,” and even “cut her off” when she attempted to “go down nonsensical talking point roads.”

As for Harris, Stu says she took a “filibuster” approach — “Let me get through this so I can say I did it” — which resulted in “very long answers that didn't really get to anything.”

The interview kicked off with the subject of immigration. According to Stu, Baier was “aggressive” on the subject and cut Harris off when she attempted to repeat her “nine-minute word salad” that included blaming Trump for opposing the border security bill.

While they were on the subject of illegal immigration, Baier mentioned the “[illegal immigrants] who got released [from jail], which led to murders” and even asked Harris if she would “like to apologize” to three specific female victims, including Laken Riley.

Harris responded in sympathy but with no apology. When Baier then played a video of Alexis Nungaray, whose young daughter, Jocelyn Nungaray, was murdered by illegal Venezuelan immigrants, Harris eventually said she was sorry for Nungaray’s loss but ultimately reverted back to blaming Trump.

Harris’ “apology,” according to Stu, was equivalent to “how you'd apologize if your neighbor's cat ran out into the street and got hit by a car.”

“She took no responsibility,” he says.

The next subject they discussed was the controversies surrounding the transgender movement. Baier’s exact question was: “Are you still in support of using taxpayer dollars to help prison inmates or detained illegal aliens to transition to another gender?”

He even played a clip of Harris stating that she is indeed in favor of that.

Harris, clearly thrown off by Baier’s trap, responded with, “I will follow the law,” and then claimed that during Trump’s administration, a law providing for such surgeries if deemed medically necessary was in place and that Trump himself followed that law.

“She’s now a prisoner of the law,” who “can't question money for transgender surgeries,” even though “she's running for president of the United States with dozens of law changes,” chides Stu, exposing the glaring contradiction. “Really evasive, really bad.”

However, one of Kamala’s worst moments in the interview was perhaps when the subject of “turning the page” came up, which has been a major talking point for Harris this election season.

Baier played clips of Harris asserting that she would not change anything about Joe Biden’s presidency, contradicting her instance that we need to turn the page and begin a new chapter.

Thrown off, Harris responded by saying that we need to turn the page on the last decade to distance our country from Trump — who she claimed was unfit to serve, unstable, and dangerous.

“Democrats have been president for 60% of the last decade. Donald Trump had four years in office,” corrects Stu, adding that Baier’s traps really made her “angry.”

However, Stu says that her answers continued to get worse. To hear more analysis on the interview, watch the clip above.

Want more from Stu?

To enjoy more of Stu's lethal wit, wisdom, and mockery, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.