'Some noncitizens' on the voter rolls: Maine secretary of state resists efforts for election transparency



Despite recent efforts by Republicans across the country to shore up election integrity, Maine has been under scrutiny about its voter rolls. Now, the Republican National Committee is demanding accountability.

Maine Secretary of State Shenna Bellows has allegedly been stonewalling RNC and federal efforts to obtain up-to-date voter role information as required by the National Voter Registration Act.

'Despite admitting that noncitizens are registered to vote in Maine’s elections, Shenna Bellows continues to block efforts to clean up the voter rolls.'

In a complaint letter obtained by Blaze News addressed to Attorney General Pam Bondi, RNC chief counsel Mandy Lester accused the Maine secretary of state of violating the requirements of the NVRA.

Dating back to March 25 of this year, the RNC requested that the secretary of state, who is the chief election officer of the state, provide records pertaining to Maine's voter list maintenance system.

RELATED: 16 noncitizens apparently voted in Michigan in 2024 — and liberals are cheering about it

Photo by SAUL LOEB/AFP via Getty Images

Bellows' office acknowledged the request on May 4 but apparently failed to provide any of the requested information. Following two months of silence and a reminder from the RNC on July 23, Bellows' office responded that the records could be provided within "'36 to 48 months' provided that the RNC was willing to pay $23,000.00 for the requested records," according to the complaint.

The letter noted that these conditions were "intentionally prohibitive and contravene the NVRA's clear commitment toward transparent government and public accountability."

Perhaps central to transparency concerns raised by the RNC and Department of Justice was the secretary's assertion that her office could not fulfill the request for voter information between the window of the November 2022 general election through the close of registration for the November 2024 general election because "the Department conducted its last list address confirmation mailing in June of 2022," per the complaint.

The complaint also cited a clip of an interview on lawyer Marc Elias' podcast in which Bellows admitted that she was "sure" that there were noncitizens on the voter rolls: "And guess what? There are duplicates on the voter rolls because people don't tell their clerks when they move. Not duplicate voters, but duplicate registrants. ... I'm sure there are, in some isolated instances, some noncitizens [...] on the rolls. And that's what the election officials do every day is verify the integrity of the voter rolls."

“Despite admitting that noncitizens are registered to vote in Maine’s elections, Shenna Bellows continues to block efforts to clean up the voter rolls,” said RNC Chairman Joe Gruters. “Bellows is undermining Maine's elections and betraying the trust of every Maine voter."

Bellows framed the federal government's scrutiny of Maine's voter rolls as an encroachment of power: "So are they looking for that one or two or three cases to try to impinge and just attack the integrity of our elections? Are they trying to create a pretext for more federal involvement in our elections? Are they trying to take down secretaries of state they don't like? Or is it a combination of things?"

The RNC letter concludes with an urgent request for an "immediate federal investigation within the Department of Justice's statutory authority," emphasizing that this matter requires the DOJ's "prompt attention."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Michael Brown witness gunned down near 2014 shooting site



Dorian Johnson, a friend of Michael Brown — an 18-year-old who was killed by a Missouri police officer 11 years ago — was shot and killed over the weekend near the same location.

'There had been earlier rumors that this was an officer-involved shooting however that information is incorrect.'

Johnson claimed he was with Brown when Officer Darren Wilson stopped them in 2014. Wilson contended that he shot Brown in self-defense, but Johnson spread claims that Brown was surrendering, sparking the protest chant, "Hands up, don't shoot," and nationwide Black Lives Matter demonstrations.

"He put his hands in the air," Johnson previously stated about Brown. "He started to get down, but the officer still approached with his weapon drawn. And he fired several more shots. And my friend died."

However, a report from the Department of Justice concluded that Johnson's claims were not accurate.

"Witness accounts suggesting that Brown was standing still with his hands raised in an unambiguous signal of surrender when Wilson shot Brown are inconsistent with the physical evidence, are otherwise not credible because of internal inconsistencies, or are not credible because of inconsistencies with other credible evidence," the DOJ found.

Despite two separate law enforcement investigations concluding that Brown had not put his hands up in the air to surrender, Johnson continued to stand by his account of events.

RELATED: Ferguson cop attacked at Michael Brown protest, suffers 'severe brain injury' and is 'fighting for his life,' police say

Photo by St. Louis County Prosecutor's Office via Getty Images

"His hands were definitely up when he turned around," Johnson told the Washington Post five years after the shooting. "Whether his hands were up, or halfway up, or fully down or up, he was killed and he was unarmed. He wasn't posing a threat."

Johnson, 33, was killed during a "domestic incident" around 8:30 a.m. on Sunday, according to Melissa Price Smith, St. Louis County prosecuting attorney. He sustained multiple gunshot wounds, officials said.

RELATED: 'Hands Up, Don’t Shoot' Was 'Wrong, Built on a Lie' and Officer Darren Wilson Was 'Justified'…Says Liberal Columnist?

Photo by Joe Raedle/Getty Images

"There had been earlier rumors that this was an officer-involved shooting however that information is incorrect. No officers, Ferguson or otherwise, were involved in this incident other than to begin our investigation," Ferguson Police stated.

One suspect was taken into custody but was later released without facing any criminal charges, Price said.

The investigation into Johnson's death remains ongoing.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Democrat Lawfare Came For Me, And It Can Come For You Too

Why do I fight on? Because if I lose, every senior White House advisor will face the same Hobson’s Choice I did: honor the Constitution and risk prison, or bend the knee to partisan inquisitors and betray the republic.

Trump’s DOJ cracks down on defiant sanctuary city mayor shielding illegal aliens



The Trump administration's Department of Justice is taking legal action against another sanctuary jurisdiction.

The DOJ filed a lawsuit on Thursday against Boston, contending that the city's sanctuary status interferes with the federal government's immigration enforcement.

'If Boston won't protect its citizens from illegal alien crime, this Department of Justice will.'

The agency accused Democrat Mayor Michelle Wu, who recently reaffirmed her support of sanctuary policies, of "repeatedly" shielding criminal illegal aliens from federal immigration agents and endangering public safety.

"In a recent letter to Attorney General Pamela J. Bondi, Mayor Wu went so far as to say that 'Boston will never back down' from its sanctuary city policies," the DOJ's lawsuit read. "Cities cannot obstruct the Federal Government from enforcing immigration laws. When that occurs, a city breaks the law. The City of Boston is doing just that."

The department argued that the city's sanctuary policies, specifically the Boston Trust Act, are illegal under federal law. The act prevents local law enforcement and other city departments from cooperating with Immigration and Customs Enforcement's detainer requests.

RELATED: ‘Flood the zone’: ICE fires back at Boston Mayor Wu’s sanctuary defiance

Photo by JOSEPH PREZIOSO/AFP via Getty Images

The lawsuit against Boston is part of the DOJ's greater effort to take legal action against sanctuary policies nationwide. The department previously filed complaints in New York, New Jersey, and California.

"The City of Boston and its Mayor have been among the worst sanctuary offenders in America — they explicitly enforce policies designed to undermine law enforcement and protect illegal aliens from justice," Bondi said. "If Boston won't protect its citizens from illegal alien crime, this Department of Justice will."

RELATED: Boston mayor vows to continue resisting Trump's deportation efforts

U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi, President Donald Trump. Photo by Joe Raedle/Getty Images

Wu responded to the lawsuit by declaring that the city "will not yield."

"This is our city, and we will vigorously defend our laws and the constitutional rights of cities, which have been repeatedly upheld in courts across the country. We will not yield," Wu stated.

"This unconstitutional attack on our city is not a surprise," Wu continued. "Boston is a thriving community, the economic and cultural hub of New England, and the safest major city in the country — but this administration is intent on attacking our community to advance their own authoritarian agenda."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Trump bashes 'badly failing' Democrats for reigniting Epstein skepticism: 'Does anybody really believe that?'



President Donald Trump doubled down on the Epstein attacks, once again pointing the finger at the Democratic Party.

The outrage surrounding the administration's handling of the Epstein files subsided in recent weeks while Congress was out of session. Now that the Hill is back, lawmakers have reignited interest in the Epstein scandal, which Trump insists is a "Democrat hoax."

'The Dems don't care about the victims.'

"The confused and badly failing Democrat Party did nothing about Jeffrey Epstein while he was alive except befriend him, socialize with him, travel to his Island, and take his money!" Trump said in a Truth Social post Friday.

"They knew everything there was to know about Epstein, but now, years after his death, they, out of nowhere, are seeming to show such love and heartfelt concern for his victims," Trump added. "Does anybody really believe that?"

RELATED: White House slams Massie's Epstein bill as a 'very hostile act' — some Republicans sign on anyway

Photo by Joe Schildhorn/Patrick McMullan via Getty Images

Trump insisted Democrats don't actually care about Epstein's victims, saying if they did, they would have taken action in years prior. Instead, Trump argued that Democrats have resurrected the scandal because of their low approval ratings.

"The now dying (after the DOJ gave thousands of pages of documents in full compliance with a very comprehensive and exacting Subpoena from Congress!) Epstein case was only brought back to life by the Radical Left Democrats because they are doing so poorly, with the lowest poll numbers in the history of the Party (16%), while the Republicans are doing so well, among the highest approval numbers the Party has ever had!" Trump said. "The Dems don't care about the victims, as proven by the fact that they never did before."

"This is merely another Democrat HOAX, just like Russia, Russia, Russia, and all of the others, in order to deflect and distract from the great success of a Republican President, and the record setting failure of the previous Administration, and the Democrat Party," Trump added.

RELATED: Thomas Massie leads pressure campaign, forcing Congress to address Epstein

Photo by Bill Pugliano/Getty Images

Although Trump has repeatedly framed the Epstein scandal as a Democratic talking point, there has consistently been bipartisan support for transparency.

The moment Congress came back in session on Monday, Republican Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky filed a discharge petition, which would force a vote on the House floor to release the Epstein files. In order to force the vote, Massie would need signatures from at least 218 members of Congress.

As of Thursday, the petition has secured 215 signatures, including four from Republicans: Reps. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia, Nancy Mace of South Carolina, Lauren Boebert of Colorado, and Massie. Rep. Eric Swalwell of California is the only Democrat who has not yet signed but intends to, meaning signatures from at least two more Republicans are needed to force the vote.

Notably, the White House slammed Massie's petition, calling it a "very hostile act" to deter other Republicans from signing on.

RELATED: FBI, DOJ Epstein memo sparks right-wing outrage: 'Nobody is believing this'

Photo by Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images

"Helping Thomas Massie and liberal Democrats with their attention-seeking, while the DOJ is fully supporting a more comprehensive file release effort from the Oversight Committee, would be viewed as a very hostile act to the administration," one White House official said in an email to NBC.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

California utility faces federal lawsuits over deadly fires



The Department of Justice has charged a California utility with igniting the Eaton Fire in January near Los Angeles, which resulted in the deaths of 19 people and the destruction of thousands of buildings.

The DOJ filed two lawsuits against Southern California Edison, seeking $40 million in damages for the Eaton Fire and an additional $37 million in damages for the Fairview Fire, which occurred near Hemet in 2022.

'These lawsuits do not include Edison's liability for private homes and other private property damage.'

While the results of the official investigation into the Eaton Fire have not yet been announced, it was allegedly sparked by "faulty power infrastructure or by sparks from faulty power infrastructure owned, maintained, and operated" by the California utility, according to the DOJ's complaint.

"The lawsuits filed today allege a troubling pattern of negligence resulting in death, destruction, and tens of millions of federal taxpayer dollars spent to clean up one utility company's mistakes," U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli stated during a news conference on Thursday.

"We believe that the evidence is clear that Edison is at fault, and by their own admissions, no one else is at fault," Essayli said, referring to a July report in which Edison admitted that it was "not aware of evidence pointing to another possible source of ignition."

RELATED: Los Angeles mayor fires LAFD chief who blamed officials' incompetence for disastrous wildfire response

Photo by Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

Essayli stated that his office is "demanding" that the utility and "not its ratepayers" cover the damages.

"Edison must not be allowed to pass along its liability onto hardworking ratepayers," he wrote in a post on social media. "The United States seeks to recover financial losses from fire suppression and damage to National Forest lands. These lawsuits do not include Edison's liability for private homes and other private property damage."

RELATED: EXCLUSIVE Blaze Media footage of Los Angeles reduced to rubble

Photo by JOSH EDELSON/AFP via Getty Images

Jeff Monford, a spokesperson for Edison, told the Associated Press that it is reviewing the lawsuits.

"We continue our work to reduce the likelihood of our equipment starting a wildfire," Monford said. "Southern California Edison is committed to wildfire mitigation through grid hardening, situational awareness, and enhanced operational practices."

Los Angeles County also filed a lawsuit against Edison in March.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

DOJ’s Rumored Trans Gun Ban Does Nothing But Play Right Into Democrats’ Hands

Taking away firearms never has and never will remedy evil or keep institutions from routinely feeding people’s gender delusions.

Fed Gov. Lisa Cook’s Ann Arbor pad is allegedly a rental too



Lisa Cook’s financial house is on fire. Naturally, there is a Michigan angle to the story. Because there’s always a Michigan angle to the story.

Cook, a governor with the Federal Reserve Bank, has a bank loan on a “secondary” home in Massachusetts, which the Trump administration alleges she rents out full-time. A judge might call that mortgage fraud.

There cannot be two sets of rules: one for the elites who scam their way into favorable financial terms and another for the rest of us.

Cook also owns a condo in Atlanta, which she claims is her primary residence on banking and government documents. The Trump administration alleges there is evidence that she rents that one out, too. And that also could be mortgage fraud.

But Cook also has a third home in Ann Arbor, which she also lists as her primary residence on banking and government papers. Lisa must be living in Ann Arbor in the tidy brick house with a columned portico on Jackson Avenue, right?

RELATED: Trump fires Biden Fed governor for possible 'criminal conduct' — but Lisa Cook is desperate to cling to power

- YouTube

I stopped by the house last week. The glass in the storm door was filthy with neglect. A metal lockbox — the kind used by realtors — hung on the door knob. From the porch, I could see a figure sitting at the dining room table. When I knocked, the door slightly cracked open, only to reveal a white man partially visible behind the filthy glass.

“I’m a reporter,” I told the figure, who did not undo the chain. “I was wondering if Lisa Cook lives here. Or do you rent?”

“No, we’re just renters here.” He made it clear he didn’t feel comfortable with a reporter on the deteriorating porch. “You’ll have to talk to the owner.”

“OK,” I said. “Is it you just living here?”

“Yeah,” he said.

“Just renting?” I asked again.

“No comment.”

“I’m sorry?”

It was difficult to hear. The traffic was crackling like an old transistor radio. There was a bus stop nearby.

“You’ll have to talk to the owner of the house.”

And with that, the interview was over. The chain rattled. The door closed, and someone pulled the curtains tight.

It’s hard to believe Cook got confused over her mortgage paperwork. Cook is a financial sophisticate, a member of the board of governors of the world’s most powerful central bank. A bank that sets interest rates that influence the cost of financing a home, mind you.

All three mortgages were taken out by Cook in 2021, all within a timespan of two months, three weeks, and four days. In her 2025 government ethics filings, Cook claimed two of the properties are her primary residences and the Massachusetts dwelling is an income property.

That’s cheating. Trump fired her last week for “cause,” and two criminal referrals against Cook have been referred to the Department of Justice. For her part, Cook is suing over her firing.

Trump is accused of attacking a prominent black woman who refuses to lower interest rates as Trump has demanded.

Perhaps.

As far as my motivations go, I simply try to hold the powerful to account. When it comes to questions of residency and real estate, you may have seen me on the porches of two Detroit mayors, a current mayoral candidate, a county executive, a county commissioner, a supreme court justice, a circuit court judge, a district court judge, a member of Congress, a fire commissioner, a prominent minister, and a major political party treasurer, just to name but a dozen. These people were black, white, male, and female. Doesn’t matter to me.

We cannot have two sets of rules: one for the elites who scam their way into favorable financial terms and another for the rest of us who endure audits, foreclosures, and repossession.

Cook has three basic questions to answer:

  1. Was she renting the properties when she was supposed to be sleeping at them?
  2. Did she claim rental income on her tax forms?
  3. And where does she actually live?

Because it sure the heck ain’t Ann Arbor.

Editor's note: A version of article appeared originally in the Michigan Enjoyer.

Thomas Massie leads pressure campaign, forcing Congress to address Epstein



As lawmakers return from their five-week recess, Republican Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky is wasting no time to address the Epstein files.

Just as Republicans managed to drown out much of the Epstein drama, Massie is reigniting the fight for transparency surrounding the files.

'Massie promptly pushed back on the move, calling it a "meaningless vote."'

Massie announced he will file a discharge petition as soon as the House is back in session on Monday, which would force a vote in the House to release the Epstein files, so long as he collects at least 218 signatures from his colleagues. If all 212 Democrats sign on, he will need signatures from at least six more Republican lawmakers.

"I pray Speaker Johnson will listen to the pleas of these victims for justice and quit trying to block a vote on our legislation to release the Epstein files," Massie said in a post on X.

RELATED: Democrat lawmaker pounces on Epstein drama, calls for congressional vote

Photo by Joe Schildhorn/Patrick McMullan via Getty Images

Massie's bill, which is being co-led by Democratic Rep. Ro Khanna of California, requires all Epstein-related materials in the DOJ, FBI, and the U.S. Attorney's Offices to be made publicly available within 30 days of the bill's passage.

The legislation would also require Attorney General Pam Bondi to submit a report to the House and Senate Judiciary Committees listing all the categories of the records that were released and withheld, a summary and legal justification of all the redactions made, and a list of government officials and "politically exposed persons" named in the materials "with no redactions permitted."

With respect to redactions, the bill clarifies no information may be withheld for purposes of "embarrassment, reputational harm, or political sensitivity to any government official, public figure, or foreign dignitary."

The bill does allow for redactions for any content that violates the privacy of any victims involved; for child sexual abuse materials; if it jeopardizes an ongoing federal investigation or depicts death, abuse, or injury of a person; or if it is in the interest of national defense.

RELATED: FBI, DOJ Epstein memo sparks right-wing outrage: 'Nobody is believing this'

Photo by Jemal Countess/Getty Images for Court Accountability

While Massie and Khanna continue their push for transparency, the House leadership also scheduled their own vote on a bill that would direct the House Oversight Committee to "continue its ongoing investigation" into the government's "possible mismanagement" of the Epstein case.

Massie promptly pushed back on the move, calling it a "meaningless vote" that simply provides "political cover" for members who don't support his bipartisan legislation. Massie and Khanna are also set to hold a joint press conference on Wednesday with 10 of Epstein's victims to raise awareness and bring attention to their bill.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!