Biden administration bragged about a 'quieter,' more peaceful Middle East just one week before Hamas attacks



The Biden administration was boasting about a "quieter" Middle East that requires far less attention than previous administrations just days before Palestinian forces attacked Israel.

Eight days before the Hamas attacks on Israeli civilians, U.S. National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan expressed how well the Biden administration's foreign policy had worked in the Middle East. The region is “quieter today than it has been in two decades," Sullivan declared, according to Townhall.

“What we said is we want to depressurize, de-escalate, and ultimately integrate the Middle East region. The war in Yemen is in its 19 months of truce. For now, the Iranian attacks against U.S. forces have stopped. Our presence in Iraq is stable,” Sullivan remarked.

Sullivan explained that "challenges remain" in the region.

“Iran’s nuclear weapons program, the tensions between Israelis and Palestinians. But the amount of time I have to spend on crisis and conflict in the Middle East today, compared to any of my predecessors going back to 9/11, is significantly reduced,” he continued.

A month prior to the Hamas attack, President Biden agreed to release nearly $6 billion in frozen Iranian assets as part of a deal to set free five Americans who had been detained in Iran for years.

The move was mocked by President Trump, who said that money would be used to fund terrorism and that Biden's moves are worsening diplomatic relations across the globe.

“Can you believe that Crooked Joe Biden is giving $6 Billion to the terrorist regime in Iran? That money be used for terrorism all over the Middle East and, indeed, the World. This incompetent FOOL is absolutely destroying America," Trump wrote on Truth Social.

“He had the audacity to announce this terrible deal today, September 11. To pay for hostages will lead to kidnapping, ransom, and blackmail against Americans across the globe. I freed many dozens of our people from various unfriendly countries and never paid a dime!" Trump added.

Can you believe that Crooked Joe Biden is giving $6 Billion to the terrorist regime in Iran? That money be used for terrorism all over the Middle East, and, indeed, the World. This incompetent FOOL is absolutely destroying America. He had the audacity to announce this terrible\u2026
— Donald J. Trump Posts From His Truth Social (@Donald J. Trump Posts From His Truth Social) 1694475475

Hamas revealed that it had indeed received support from Iran for its attacks.

"Iranian security officials helped plan Hamas’s Saturday surprise attack on Israel and gave the green light for the assault at a meeting in Beirut last Monday, according to senior members of Hamas and Hezbollah, another Iran-backed militant group," the Wall Street Journal reported.

Ghazi Hamad, a Hamas spokesman, also confirmed to the BBC that Iran provided direct backing.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Sen. Graham joins critics calling for Pulitzer Prize given to Washington Post and New York Times to be rescinded after Durham report proved their narrative to be 'politically motivated crap'



The Pulitzer Prize board honored New York Times and Washington Post reporters with a cash prize and its once-esteemed award in 2018 for peddling the thoroughly debunked Trump-Russia collusion narrative, which proved politically expedient for the liberal reporters' ideological comrades in Washington at the time.

In light of the damning Durham report, critics now reckon the awards to be albatrosses around the necks of those who dutifully worked to mislead the nation — put there by an organization apparently indifferent to the storm gathered as a consequence.

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) has joined those now urging that the Pulitzer Prize awarded to the staff at both papers be "taken back."

Graham told Fox News' "America's Newsroom" Tuesday that "we have a situation where the FBI ran every stop sign available, kept pushing a warrant against an American citizen based on a Steele dossier that was a piece of fiction. The information was supplied the FBI by two Russian agents. It was used to get a warrant against an American citizen to turn his life upside down and create a cloud of the Trump presidency and try to deny him the presidency."

With the full understanding provided in the Durham report that the investigation was from the get-go a stitch-up predicated upon a false claim, originally approved and advanced by failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, Graham stressed that three things should happen:

First, Attorney General Merrick Garland "should pick up the phone and call all those that were harmed by this and say, 'Even though it didn't happen on my watch, I'll apologize to you. This is not the Department of Justice that I want you to believe in,'" said Graham.

Second, FBI Director Christopher Wray should "get on the phone and apologize to the people that had their lives ruined by the FBI."

Third, "the Pulitzer Prize given to the Washington Post and New York Times should be taken back because the entire episode was politically motivated crap. That's not something you should get a Pulitzer Prize for," added Graham.

Graham doubled down on this third suggestion Wednesday, tweeting, "Awarding the Washington Post and New York Times Pulitzer Prizes for reporting political fiction as fact regarding President Trump shows that these prizes are awarded not based on the product of your work, but the subject you go after. They should rescind the prize."

The awards in question went to the staffs of the New York Times and the Washington Post for what the Pulitzer Prize Board characterized as "deeply sourced, relentlessly reported coverage in the public interest that dramatically furthered the nation’s understanding of Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election and its connections to the Trump campaign, the President-elect’s transition team and his eventual administration."

The Daily Mail reported that the Jeff Bezos-owned Washington Post remains unrepentant.

"The Post stands by its reporting," said Jennifer Lee, a spokeswoman for the paper, citing a 2022 review by the Pulitzer board that claimed no aspect of the awarded stories "were discredited by facts that emerged subsequent to the conferral of the prizes."

This statement appears to indicate that false reports may be deserving of awards, just so long as the truth comes out after the receipt of the prize.

While the Washington Post evidently stands by past false narratives, the New York Times appears keen to downplay newly revealed truths.

In its Monday story on the Durham report, the Times claimed, "Mr. Durham’s 306-page report revealed little substantial new information about the inquiry," suggesting that Durham's hunt "for evidence to support Mr. Barr’s theory that intelligence abuses lurked in the origins of the Russia inquiry" had proven fruitless.

It added, "The special counsel’s final report nevertheless did not produce blockbuster revelations of politically motivated misconduct, as Donald J. Trump and his allies had suggested it would."

TheBlaze reported in 2019 that then-President Trump said the Pulitzer committee should revoke a joint Pulitzer Prize from both newspapers "for their coverage (100% NEGATIVE and FAKE!) of Collusion with Russia."

\u201cSo funny that The New York Times & The Washington Post got a Pulitzer Prize for their coverage (100% NEGATIVE and FAKE!) of Collusion with Russia - And there was No Collusion! So, they were either duped or corrupt? In any event, their prizes should be taken away by the Committee!\u201d
— Donald J. Trump (@Donald J. Trump) 1553901917

In response to Trump's suggestion, the New York Times wrote in a March 29, 2019, tweet, "We're proud of our Pulitzer-prize winning reporting on Russian meddling in the 2016 U.S. election. Every @nytimes article cited has proven accurate."

Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) took to Twitter Monday to comment on the Durham report, writing, "Disgraceful. Obama-Biden officials and the corrupt corporate media pushed these piles of lies for years. Accountability now— starting with WaPo and The New York Times returning their Pulitzer Prizes for breathlessly spreading these ‘Russia, Russia, Russia’ lies."

Rep. Byron Donalds (R-Fla.) posed the question, "Ready to give your Pulitzer back now?"

\u201cReady to give your Pulitzer back now?\u201d
— Congressman Byron Donalds (@Congressman Byron Donalds) 1684186374

Sean Spicer, who served as press secretary and White House communications director under President Donald Trump, quipped, "How will the Washington Post send back its Pulitzer? USP, FedEx, UPS."

Former Georgia state Rep. Vernon Jones (R) wrote, "For three years the liberal media portrayed the now-infamous Steele dossier — the original basis for the Trump- Russian collusion claims — as true, and the New York Times and Washington Post received Pulitzer Prizes for a story that not only has been debunked but shown to be the product of Hillary’s Clinton’s presidential campaign."

The Georgia Republican suggested that it's time for the papers to issue apologies.

Graham Reacts to the Durham Report youtu.be

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Another Florida Republican backs Trump for president



GOP Rep. Byron Donalds of Florida has endorsed former President Donald Trump for president, joining a group of Sunshine State Republicans who have thrown their support behind Trump even as the possibility that Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis may throw his hat into the ring looms large.

"There is only one leader at this time in our nation’s history who can seize this moment and deliver what we need - to get us back on track, provide strength and resolve, and Make America Great Again. That is why I am honored to endorse President Donald J. Trump for President in 2024, and I ask my fellow Americans to join me today," Donalds said in a statement.

\u201cI am honored to endorse President Donald J. Trump for President in 2024, and I ask my fellow Americans to join me today.\n\nRead my entire statement here: \nhttps://t.co/OAsUwWuoUk\u201d
— Byron Donalds (@Byron Donalds) 1680796271

Republican Reps. Anna Paulina Luna and Matt Gaetz, both of Florida, had already declared their support for Trump.

During a Trump rally in Texas last month, Gaetz said that DeSantis and U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas should both endorse the former president.

\u201cWATCH: At the Trump Rally in Waco, @MattGaetz calls on Ron DeSantis and Ted Cruz to stand with MAGA and endorse Donald Trump for President.\n\nCrowd erupts in a standing ovation.\u201d
— Donald Trump Jr. (@Donald Trump Jr.) 1679775317

While DeSantis has not announced a presidential bid, GOP Reps. Chip Roy of Texas and Thomas Massie of Kentucky have both already endorsed him.

DeSantis has said that he believes he has what it takes to be president and that he thinks he could defeat President Joe Biden.

Biden has not yet launched a re-election bid but has said that he intends to run. Democrat Marianne Williamson, who ran during the last election cycle before ultimately dropping out, is running again. And a statement of candidacy filed with the Federal Election Commission indicates that Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is poised to run for president as a Democrat.

So far on the Republican side, Trump is being challenged by former U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley, author and entrepreneur Vivek Ramaswamy, and former Arkansas Gov. Asa Hutchinson.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

NY Times under fire after crossword puzzle published on eve of Hanukkah resembles swastika



On Sunday, the eve of Hanukkah, the New York Times was slammed online for publishing a crossword puzzle that appeared to be in the shape of a Nazi swastika, Fox News Digital reported.

The puzzle's constructor, Ryan McCarty, described the design as a "fun whirlpool shape." Caitlin Lovinger wrote in a Times article about the Sunday puzzle, "I love the geometry in this puzzle — so many stair steps! — and feel that it contributes to a certain evenness in the solve."

The puzzle's layout sparked outrage on Twitter, with critics baffled that the newspaper could miss the resemblance.

Donald Trump Jr. wrote, "Disgusting! Only the New York Times would get Chanukah going with this is the crossword puzzle. Imagine what they would do to someone who did this and was not ideologically aligned with them? I'll give them the same benefit of the doubt they would give those people… EXACTLY ZERO."

\u201cDisgusting! Only the New York Times would get Chanukah going with this is the crossword puzzle. Imagine what they would do to someone who did this and was not ideologically aligned with them? I\u2019ll give them the same benefit of the doubt they would give those people\u2026 EXACTLY ZERO\u201d
— Donald Trump Jr. (@Donald Trump Jr.) 1671394807

Lawyer and BlazeTV host host Mark Levin posted on social media, "Meanwhile, on the first night of Hanukkah the anti-Israel New York Slimes issues a crossword puzzle that looks like a swastika. Of course, when pointed out, they claimed it was a coincidence. What a sick and sad history."

"This is the NYTimes crossword puzzle today on the first day of Hanukka," wrote Keith Edwards, a Democratic strategist and Lincoln Project alum. "What the hell, @nytimes?"

Former Obama and Biden fundraiser Eric Ortner posted on Twitter, "Intentional swastika or not, the fact that the @nytimes @NYTGames would have a staff so insensitive to not catch it, is worthy of discussion & action. This is not getting the attention it deserves. #NeverAgain."

Blake Flayton, a writer at the Jewish Journal, wrote, "Today's New York Times crossword is um…making me nervous."

Over the weekend, the Times' editorial board also published an op-ed criticizing "far-right" Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

"Mr. Netanyahu's government, however, is a significant threat to the future of Israel — its direction, its security and even the idea of a Jewish homeland," the piece stated.

In 2017, the New York Times came under fire for publishing a crossword puzzle with a design that looked similar to a swastika. The paper replied to the accusations on Twitter, stating, "Yes, hi. It's NOT a swastika. Honest to God. No one sits down to make a crossword puzzle and says, 'Hey! You know what would look cool?'"

\u201c@NYTGames For anyone curious, this is the crossword this tweet is actually about\u201d
— New York Times Games (@New York Times Games) 1509201553

Horowitz: McCarthy passed budget bills with Dem support during Trump years



If you don’t support Kevin McCarthy for speaker, you are somehow helping the Democrats because of a phantom concern that for the first time ever, RINOs will get together and elect a Democrat speaker. This is the propaganda being disseminated by McCarthy and his allies in the broken Conservative Inc. media. Aside from the fact that this concern is completely unfounded, they are forgetting the irony that McCarthy himself, on the most important pieces of legislation – budgets and debt ceiling – worked with Democrats as floor leader to squander the golden years of Trump’s presidency with budget bills that Democrats often supported unanimously.

It’s getting old. Republicans work with Democrats on every policy that matters, especially at the time the ball is actually in play, yet every time we seek to do surgery – either through elections, policy fights, or leadership battles – we are told that if we don’t help the Republicans, who work with Democrats … we are helping the Democrats!

There seems to be an epidemic of political amnesia afflicting some in the legacy Conservative Inc. circles, allowing them to propagate a message that McCarthy, unlike McConnell, is somehow a new kid on the block intrepidly representing the interests of conservatives in 2022. In reality, he is a rusted-out fossil from the Boehner-Cantor-Ryan gang that perfidiously betrayed us on every issue, leverage point, and strategy that could have precluded the terrible morass we find ourselves in today. While McCarthy was never speaker, he was the majority leader from 2014 (and whip since 2010), including those critical years – 2017-2018 – when Republicans held all three branches.

The advantage to my long-standing column is that I have now fought every single budget battle since 2010 and have a column from that time period to show the receipts. Hence, I’m grounded in reality and not afflicted by the same political amnesia that others are.

Here’s that reality. Every single major budget bill that passed under McCarthy’s leadership as floor leader of the last GOP House, which was when the GOP controlled the trifecta and commanded full stewardship over the policies, was passed with more Democrat support than Republican support. It was simply unprecedented in modern history. Imagine the Biden-Schumer-Pelosi Congress passing budget bills nearly unanimously pleasing to Republicans but detested by their core base. Never going to happen, because they don’t have Kevin McCarthy equivalents.

The entire sole leverage point and entire purpose of the GOP controlling the House now is to use the must-pass budget bills to fight the most destructive and unpopular policies of the administration. McCarthy not only failed on every single budget bill as floor leader during the era of trifecta control, but he literally passed bills that were so palatable to the Left that nearly every radical Democrat support them, while any semi-conservative Republican opposed them. How can anyone suggest with a straight face that he McCarthy will somehow fight for us now? What about him shows that he is a changed man, and how are conservatives who raise these valid concerns somehow helping Democrats?

If you want to discuss helping Democrats, here is a synopsis of McCarthy’s budget record as majority leader during the Trump golden years.

  • The first big test came in the spring of 2017. With Trump as president and Republicans in control of both houses of Congress, they had enormous political capital with which to make their mark on the budget and roll back the Obama agenda. This was the first “MAGA-era budget.” But the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2017 (H.R. 244), a 1,665-page omnibus bill, passed on May 3, 2017, with barely any time to read it and was supported by the Democrats 178-15, but the Republicans were split down the middle. Every single Senate Democrat voted for it. Coming on the heels of Obama’s spend-a-thon, the budget bill increased spending, busted the budget caps, declined to gut Obamacare as promised, and failed to fund the border wall. Democrats celebrated the jettisoning of more than 160 policy riders put forth by conservatives. How does this happen with a GOP majority and trifecta control? With people like McConnell and McCarthy in charge promoting it. For more background, here is my column at the time.
  • The next big test was the first debt ceiling suspension under Trump and the GOP trifecta. On Sept. 8, 2017, McCarthy, as majority leader, voted for and whipped for a debt ceiling suspension for nothing in return that got support from every single Democrat but garnered the opposition of 90 of the most conservative Republicans. Every single Democrat supported it in the Senate over the opposition of 18 Republicans. For more background, here is my column at the time.
  • In March 2018, McCarthy and Ryan shepherded through a massive omnibus bill for the remainder of fiscal year 2018 that funded every Democrat priority with increased funding, including the items Trump promised to eliminate completely. Although this bill did get a majority of the GOP conference on board, it passed with roughly the same ratio of Democrats supporting it, and 23 of the 32 no votes in the Senate were from Republicans opposing the Ryan-McCarthy-McConnell budget bill. For more background, here is my column at the time. After initially threatening to veto the bill, Trump reluctantly signed it but then promised he would “never sign another bill like this again.” But again, on September 26, 2018, Republicans passed a “Cromnibus bill” codifying the same spending priorities for the beginning of FY 2019. How bad was it? Only five Democrats opposed it, even though 56 Republicans voted no. Bernie Sanders was the only Democrat to oppose it in the Senate. For more background, here is my column at the time. Here are the details on the Cromnibus.
  • Because Republicans failed to use their leverage to build the wall and cut undesirable programs, including Obamacare, when they had control of Congress, they didn’t fight until the end of 2018, when they lost control of the House. There was a government shutdown throughout January 2019, primarily over the border crisis, and Congress passed the final bill on Feb. 14, 2019, which funded the government with Democrat priorities minus most of the border wall. The House was already under Democrat control, but Republicans still had leverage through control of the Senate and the presidency. Yet McCarthy voted for the bill that was supported by nearly every Democrat but opposed by the majority of Republicans. For more background, here is my column at the time.
  • Even after Republicans lost control of the House, they still maintained the Senate and the presidency in 2019 and 2020. McCarthy, as House minority leader, could have served as a voice urging Trump and McConnell to oppose the Democrat spending bills. Yet not only did he decline to whip against these bills, he actually voted for the December 2019 Democrat spending bill that was opposed by a majority of his conference but was supported by Democrats 218-7. This was literally the same week Democrats voted to impeach Trump. What a Christmas present for Democrats! Every single Democrat in the Senate supported the bill, while all the conservatives voted no. McCarthy’s voice could have been critical at that time. For more background, see my columns here and here.

Thus, who is the one who works with Democrats to pass the most critical bills? McCarthy was part of the leadership team that turned Trump’s critical years into the most Democrat-friendly bipartisan lovefest of any majority-control era ever.

McCarthy’s cheerleaders are trying to make the case that somehow he is a changed man and that somehow because of his oleaginous charm offensive with gullible conservative influencers, he is vastly better than McConnell. However, on the issues that matter, in the way they matter, and at the time they matter, he has not demonstrated even a little bit of a foxhole conversion. He refused to whip against the gay marriage bill in the House and to this day declines to publicly call on McConnell to oppose the omnibus bill in the Senate and give him control over the remainder of the FY 2023 budget process – literally a replica of what he did last time he was in the majority. Politico aptly describes his position as “hope yes, vote no.”

Furthermore, he has failed to even entertain any of the rules changes proposed by the Freedom Caucus, including the “majority of the majority” rule, which would prevent him from passing budgets with Democrat support. Most of these rules are not extreme right-wing demands, but basic ideas to decentralize power that would help augment the voices of Democrats and moderates as well.

Yet Donald Trump Jr. and the establishment are out pimping for McCarthy by accusing the Freedom Caucus members of somehow helping the Democrats by demanding a change in leadership from the man who turned Trump’s presidency into a Democrat lovefest:

\u201cSo in their quest to \u201cown the establishment\u201d by stopping Kevin McCarthy, Andy Biggs and others are actually in effect empowering those who impeached Donald Trump. This is a Democrat dream come true for a GOP Congress. \nGenius move guys. https://t.co/SKQ0Kjl6GC\u201d
— Donald Trump Jr. (@Donald Trump Jr.) 1670041361

The reality is that thanks to Don Jr.’s dad, McConnell, Ryan, and yes, Kevin McCarthy, Schumer bragged about winning every budget battle during Trump’s presidency. The only good outcomes under his presidency were the result of executive actions. The legislative front was a disaster, and McCarthy was in the thick of it.

At some point, Republicans need to earn our votes, not demand them through scaremongering about the Democrats when they are the ones who agree with the Democrats on every issue that matters at the time it actually matters. “But the Democrats” has gotten old, given that echoing every important talking point of the left when the ball is actually in play is the GOP’s favorite pastime.

GOP Sen. Lisa Murkowski defeats Trump-backed challenger Kelly Tshibaka in Alaska



Incumbent Republican Sen. Lisa Murkowski has defeated Trump-backed GOP challenger Kelly Tshibaka in Alaska's U.S. Senate contest.

"Thank you, Alaska. I am honored that Alaskans – of all regions, backgrounds and party affiliations – have once again granted me their confidence to continue working with them and on their behalf in the U.S. Senate. I look forward to continuing the important work ahead of us," Murkowski tweeted on Wednesday.

"It's clear from the ranked choice tabulations that Sen. Lisa Murkowski has been re-elected, and I congratulate her on that," Tshibaka said in a statement. "The new election system has been frustrating to many Alaskans, because it was indisputably designed as an incumbent-protection program, and it clearly worked as intended."

\u201cI'm proud\u00a0of the race we ran and I will always stand up for Alaskans. Read my full statement below:\u201d
— Kelly Tshibaka \u2013 Text KELLY to 20903 (@Kelly Tshibaka \u2013 Text KELLY to 20903) 1669257339

Murkowski's win in the ranked choice contest came after none of the candidates had secured more than 50% based on people's first-choice votes.

"If a candidate gets 50% + 1 vote in round one, that candidate wins and the counting stops. If not, counting goes to Round Two," the Alaska Division of Elections explains. During round two, "The candidate with the fewest votes gets eliminated. If you voted for that candidate, your vote goes to your next choice and you still have a say in who wins. If your first choice candidate was not eliminated, your vote stays with them. Votes are counted again," the Alaska Division of Elections states. "This keeps happening in rounds until two candidates are left and the one with the most votes wins."

Murkowski, who has served in the U.S. Senate for nearly two decades, was one of the seven Republican senators who voted to convict former President Donald Trump last year after the House of Representatives voted to impeach the president during the tail end of his term. The Senate vote occurred after Trump had already departed from office, and Trump was ultimately acquitted since the total number of votes to convict fell short of the threshold required for a conviction.

Murkowski was one of the three GOP senators who voted to confirm Ketanji Brown Jackson to serve on the U.S. Supreme Court.

While Trump issued a full-throated endorsement of Tshibaka last year, he had previously said that he would back anyone with a a pulse who chose to run against Murkowski.

"Few people know where they’ll be in two years from now, but I do, in the Great State of Alaska (which I love) campaigning against Senator Lisa Murkowski," Trump tweeted in June 2020. "Get any candidate ready, good or bad, I don’t care, I'm endorsing. If you have a pulse, I'm with you!"

\u201c...Unrelated, I gave Alaska ANWR, major highways, and more. Get any candidate ready, good or bad, I don\u2019t care, I\u2019m endorsing. If you have a pulse, I\u2019m with you!\u201d
— Donald J. Trump (@Donald J. Trump) 1591313768

'Hello. Good night, everybody': Fetterman delivers incoherent debate performance highlighting health concerns and sending betting odds on Dr. Oz skyrocketing



John Fetterman, the Democratic candidate for a U.S. Senate seat in Pennsylvania, met with Republican Dr. Mehmet Oz on Tuesday night to debate the issues. Among the issues tackled, including abortion, immigration, and crime, the greatest issue Fetterman faced was assembling coherent sentences.

While the impact of Fetterman's disastrous performance in the debate will not be fully realized until November 8, one online prediction market has indicated it may be game over.

The debate

Fetterman began Tuesday's debate in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, with an awkward salutation: "Hi. Good night, everybody."

\u201cFetterman opens the debate: \n\n"Hi. Good night everybody."\u201d
— Greg Price (@Greg Price) 1666742744

After branding Oz a liar in his opening statement, Fetterman suggested that his opponent wouldn't let him forget that he had a stroke in May, for which he required a pacemaker implant along with a defibrillator.

The Democrat noted that he "might miss some words during this debate, mush two words together, but it knocked me down, and I am going to keep coming back up."

While Fetterman made sure to address "the elephant in the room," it still managed to trample the Democrat throughout the remainder of the debate.

On a number of occasions, Fetterman either contradicted himself or struggled to find a point.

One of his more challenging moments was when the moderator asked about his shifting stance on fracking.

The New York Post reported that Pennsylvania could lose up to 600,000 jobs if fracking is banned and take a GDP hit of nearly $261 billion. In 2016, Fetterman reportedly supported a moratorium on fracking, stating, "There's no such thing as a green fracker." Newsweek indicated he had also referred to fracking as a "stain."

Given his historic antipathy for fracking, the debate moderator pressed Fetterman on his apparent Tuesday-night pivot on the issue, saying, "You're saying tonight that you support fracking, that you've always supported fracking, but there is that 2018 interview that you said, quote, 'I don't support fracking at all,' so how do you square the two?"

Fetterman answered, "I do support fracking. And I don't, I don't. I support fracking, and I stand and I do support fracking."

\u201cFetterman is asked about previously saying he wanted to eliminate fracking: \n\n"I support fracking and I don't I support fracking and I stand and I do support fracking."\u201d
— Greg Price (@Greg Price) 1666744414

When asked about whether the Biden administration has spent too much money, Fetterman responded, "Here's what I think we have to fight about inflation here right now. That's we need to fight about: inflation right now." He then proceeded to attack Oz for owning multiple homes and having merchandise allegedly manufactured in China.

\u201cModerator: "Has the Biden administration overspent and, if so, where do you think [it] should be cut." You have 60 seconds."\n\n*Pause"\n\nFetterman: "Here's what I think we have to fight about inflation here right now. That's we need to fight about: inflation right now." #PASen\u201d
— Curtis Houck (@Curtis Houck) 1666743575

The moderator asked Fetterman why he has refused to release his stroke-related medical records. The Democrat answered, "My doctors believe I am ready to be served."

\u201cMod: "Why haven't you released your medical records?"\n\nFetterman: "My doctors believe I am ready to be served."\n\nMod: "Why won't you release the records?"\n\nFetterman: "My doctor believes I am fit to be serving and I believe that is where I am standing."\u201d
— Greg Price (@Greg Price) 1666744145

'The elephant in the room'

USA Today reported that Fetterman's campaign advisers had attempted to lower expectations on Monday, claiming, "This isn't John's format." After the debate, some are left wondering whether the U.S. Senate is Fetterman's format.

"Why the hell did Fetterman agree to this?" asked one Democrat lawmaker and Fetterman supporter, who told Axios, "This will obviously raise more questions than answers about John's health."

Republican Sen. Pat Toomey (R-Pa.) reportedly told CNN, "It's sad to see John Fetterman struggling so much. He should take more time to allow himself to fully recover."

Donald Trump Jr. tweeted, "It's worse than any of us could have ever imagined. At this point the moderator is filibustering to make sure he doesn't get any more Qs. ... Even today's partisan hack media can't cover for Fetterman being brain dead!"

\u201cOMG John Fetterman it\u2019s worse than any of us could have ever imagined. At this point the moderator is filibustering to make sure he doesn\u2019t get any more Qs. I think that\u2019s 4 in a row to @DrOz. Even today\u2019s partisan hack media can\u2019t cover for Fetterman being brain dead! #PASen\u201d
— Donald Trump Jr. (@Donald Trump Jr.) 1666744870

Ann Coulter quipped, at President Joe Biden's expense: "At least give Fetterman this: In 2022, a debate performance like that can accurately be called 'presidential'."

Glenn Greenwald intimated it is not "ableist" to admit that Fetterman might have a considerable problem.

\u201cAny decent human being - by definition - feels great empathy for Fetterman. It's likely we and/or our loved ones will be disabled by illness at some point.\n\nBut this attempt to invent a new rule that it's "ableist" to discuss the cognitive abilities of candidates is just pathetic\u201d
— Glenn Greenwald (@Glenn Greenwald) 1666792101

Dire predictions

PredictIt is an online prediction market owned by Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand. It enables people to make predictions on political races by buying shares via a continuous double auction.

Share price corresponds to the market’s estimate of the probability of an event taking place. According the site, users should "Buy ‘Yes’ shares when the price is too low, when you think your fellow traders are underestimating this likelihood. Buy ‘No’ shares when you think they are too optimistic."

In this instance, the question posed was: "Which party will win the U.S. Senate election in Pennsylvania in 2022?"

On Sept. 28, it was 65 cents to bet "Yes" on Fetterman to win and only 37 cents to bet "Yes" on Oz.

This prediction market turned on Fetterman in a big way on Tuesday.

Although he had been ascribed higher value until October 18, confidence appears to have tanked on Oct. 25. A "Yes" buy for Oz went up from 53 cents to 65 cents. A "Yes" buy for Fetterman dropped from 50 cents the previous day to 39 cents.

JD Vance: Had Tim Ryan done his job on border security, 10-year-old Ohio girl wouldn't have been raped by illegal alien



Ohio Senate nominees J.D. Vance (R) and Rep. Tim Ryan (D) clashed in their first statewide debate in Cleveland on Monday night. Both men are vying for retiring Sen. Rob Portman's seat.

While Ryan, a 10-term Democrat congressman, frequently attacked Vance for his political associations, Vance, a best-selling author and venture capitalist, often responded both by pointing out major faults in the congressman's track record and indicating a better way forward for Ohioans.

After discussing the depredations committed against the homeland by the communist Chinese and President Joe Biden's responsibility for inflation, the debaters were asked about their support for the termination of babies in the womb.

Abortion

Ryan, who formerly claimed to be pro-life, said that he now supports "going back to Roe v. Wade."

Ryan also claimed that Ohio women who are impregnated by rape have to travel out of state, but "that's not good enough for J.D. Vance. He supports a national abortion ban in which he wants women to have to get a passport and go to Canada" to procure their abortions.

The proposed national abortion ban to which Ryan was referring, the "Protecting Pain-Capable Unborn Children from Late-Term Abortions Act," would not require rape victims to travel abroad to procure abortions, as they would be permitted to domestically terminate their pregnancies under the law.

Additionally, the rape victim to whom Ryan alluded and was purportedly unable to procure an abortion in Ohio was in fact able to do so, according to the state's attorney general.

In his response, Vance indicated that while each state should be able to fine-tune its own abortion laws, "some minimum national standard is totally fine with me," such as the 15-week national abortion ban introduced by Sen. Lindsey Graham (S.C.).

"We're talking about five-month-old babies," Vance added. "Fully formed babies who can feel pain. No civilized country in the world allows elective abortion that late in pregnancy. I don't think the United States should be an exception."

Vance highlighted how Ryan had voted both "for a piece of legislation that would have overturned Roe and required abortion on demand at 40 weeks for fully elective reasons" and "for a piece of legislation that would have prevented doctors from providing medical care to babies who survived botched abortions."

In 2019, Ryan indicated his support for killing the Hyde Amendment, which currently prohibits the federal funding of abortions. He voted accordingly last year. He also voted in 2021 in support of having American taxpayers pay for abortions around the world.

Convenient revisionism

Ryan suggested that Vance had called pregnancies resulting from rape an "inconvenience."

ABC News reported the original context of Vance's remarks, which did not comport with the Democrat congressman's framing.

When speaking to Spectrum News in 2021 about the inclusion of possible exceptions to pro-life laws, Vance said, "It's not whether a woman should be forced to bring a child to term; it’s whether a child should be allowed to live, even though the circumstances of that child’s birth are somehow inconvenient or a problem to the society."

Vance indicated that the birth of a human being, not its conception, may be perceived to be inconvenient or problematic if conceived as the result of a rape. In Monday's debate, he stressed that he "did not call rape inconvenient."

Tragic exceptions, Democrat rules

When both Ryan and the moderators revisited the story of the 10-year-old Ohio girl who was reportedly raped by 27-year-old Gershon Fuentes, Vance underlined how it was an "incredibly tragic situation" and reiterated his support for abortion in exceptional cases such as rape.

While recognizing the tragic nature of the crime, Vance emphasized that it was wholly preventable, since the rapist who preyed upon the 10-year-old was allegedly an illegal alien.

"You voted so many times against border wall funding, so many times for amnesty, Tim," said Vance. "If you had done your job, she would never have been raped in the first place. Do your job on border security. Don't lecture me about opinions I don't actually have."

\u201cHoly shit, @JDVance1 just KO'd Tim Ryan!!!\n\n"You voted so many times against border wall funding...If you had done your job, she would have never been raped in the first place. Do your job on border security, don't lecture me about opinions I don't actually have." #OHSenDebate\u201d
— Donald Trump Jr. (@Donald Trump Jr.) 1665444413

Ryan has routinely supported incentives for illegal immigration and against border security measures.

For instance, he voted against or indicated he would not support the "Enforce the Law for Sanctuary Cities Act" (July 23, 2015); the amendment to prohibit undocumented immigrants from obtaining housing assistance in (June 9, 2015); and a bill expressing support for the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency (July 18, 2018).

Ryan also said that he did not support additional border wall funding while also supporting both the so-called "Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals" program and amnesty for over 11 million illegal aliens.

Of the 10,778 illegal aliens arrested for various crimes so far this year, 323 of those interdicted by U.S. Border Patrol had previously been convicted of sexual offenses. Last year, 488 illegal aliens were arrested for sex crimes.

Such crimes committed by illegal aliens surged last year and remain high after having declined under the Trump administration.

According U.S. Customs and Border Protection, 2,150,639 illegal aliens have already stolen into the United States over the southern border in 2022.

Full: Vance/Ryan debate youtu.be

'Bye bye Liz Cheney': Donald Trump Jr. EASILY triggers liberals​​​​​​ with just one silly tweet



Donald Trump Jr. celebrated Wyoming Republican Rep. Liz Cheney's humiliating defeat in her state's GOP primary by releasing a 30-second video that was clearly intended to trigger the never-Trumping liberals on Twitter — and, naturally, it worked like a charm.

Rep. Cheney was defeated by Trump-backed challenger Harriet Hageman on Tuesday in the Republican primary for Wyoming's at-large congressional district.

Don Jr. took to Twitter to poke fun at Cheney's loss by posting a video montage of his father, former President Donald Trump, gleefully dancing with the caption, "Bye bye @Liz_Cheney. On the bright side at least you won’t have to pretend to be from Wyoming anymore."

\u201cBye bye @Liz_Cheney. On the bright side at least you won\u2019t have to pretend to be from Wyoming anymore.\n\u201d
— Donald Trump Jr. (@Donald Trump Jr.) 1660702575

Hoo boy, talk about kicking the hornets' nest. The reactions on Twitter were so predictably full of vulgarity and low-brow name-calling that we can't share most of them here, but you've seen it all before.

Don Jr. has had an interesting couple of days on Twitter. Just yesterday he was actually vindicated by fact-checkers (yes, you read that right) who called BS on a widely circulated but completely fabricated tweet that made it look like he was bashing his father's supporters.

\u201cDear #Trump\u2019sters: He\u2019s not your friend. Doesn\u2019t care about you. Doesn\u2019t like you. Doesn\u2019t even want you near his home. He just lies to you & uses you. @Liz_Cheney\u2019s been straight up w/you for years. Fought for you. She\u2019s a true conservative & patriot. And she deserves your vote!\u201d
— Andy Ostroy (@Andy Ostroy) 1660574614
\u201cA supposed tweet from Donald Trump Jr. makes it appear he suggested Trump supporters aren\u2019t \u201cclean,\u201d but it was created by a parody account. https://t.co/Luntg5M9VT\u201d
— PolitiFact (@PolitiFact) 1660607786

Don Jr. joined Glenn Beck on the radio program Tuesday to weigh in on the FBI’s Mar-a-Lago raid and explain why he believes the Justice Department targeted his father and pedaled lies to justify it. He also gave his advice on what conservatives can do to peacefully and lawfully stand up against a system that's ignoring their rights.

Watch the video clip below. Can't watch? Download the podcast here.



Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis, and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.