‘People Don’t Want This Anymore!’: Donna Brazile Shouts Down Reince Priebus Over Trump’s Record
'He represents a huge middle finger'
At 9 p.m. ET on Thursday, CNN will host the first interparty presidential debate of the 2024 election, a debate between President Joe Biden and former President Donald Trump, who have not yet even been officially certified as their respective partyies' nominees.
Their debates in 2020 were contentious, and Thursday promises to be no different. The network hosting the debate, CNN, will likely play a significant role as well, and if past presidential debates hosted by CNN are any indication, the network will likely run interference for Biden.
Here are three notable moments in which CNN operatives apparently assisted certain Democrat candidates:
On October 16, 2012, then-President Barack Obama joined current Republican Utah Sen. Mitt Romney for their second of three debates before the 2012 presidential election. CNN hosted the debate, and then-anchor Candy Crowley served as moderator.
A month prior to the debate, on the 11th anniversary of the September 11 attacks of 2001, Islamic terrorists stormed an American diplomatic compound and a nearby annex in Benghazi, Libya, and murdered four Americans: Ambassador Christopher Stevens, U.S. Foreign Service officer Sean Smith, and two CIA contractors, Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty.
Obama even then cheered on his teammate: 'Can you say that a little louder, Candy?'
In the days and weeks following, Obama, then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, then-U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice, and others blamed the attack on a YouTube video, created by an American, that criticized Muslims. "Based on the best information we have to date," Rice said at the time on "Face the Nation," "... [the attack] began spontaneously in Benghazi as a reaction to what had transpired some hours earlier in Cairo, where ... there was a violent protest outside our embassy sparked by this hateful video."
But the video had nothing to do with what turned out to have been another coordinated terrorist attack on Americans on September 11.
During the 2012 presidential debate, Crowley asked Obama about these events, and Obama insisted that within 24 hours, he called them "an act of terror." Romney then jumped in and asked Obama whether he had understood him correctly: "You said in the Rose Garden the day after the attack, it was an act of terror, it was not a spontaneous demonstration, is that what you’re saying?"
"I want to make sure we get that for the record," Romney continued, "because it took the president 14 days before he called the attack in Benghazi an act of terror."
Crowley then stepped out of her role as moderator and openly sided with Obama, claiming that Obama "did, in fact," call the Benghazi attacks an act of terror. Obama even then cheered on his teammate: "Can you say that a little louder, Candy?"
A few weeks later, Obama routed Romney and coasted to re-election, 332 electoral votes to Romney's 206.
Donna Brazile, who has bounced back and forth between Democrat campaign work and newsroom punditry for decades, was a powerful figure in the 2016 political landscape. By that point, Brazile had been making regular appearances on CNN as a Democrat strategist for years.
She had also spent years in DNC leadership roles. So when DNC Chair Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz abruptly resigned her DNC position in July 2016 following the explosive news from Julian Assange's WikiLeaks that the DNC had rigged the Democrat primary for Hillary Clinton against Sen. Bernie Sanders, Brazile immediately stepped in as interim DNC chair, even as she continued her contributor position at CNN.
'My job was to make all our Democratic candidates look good.'
However, the WikiLeaks scandal became much more personal for Brazile in October 2016 when leaked emails revealed that earlier that year, Brazile had shared with the Clinton campaign at least two questions Hillary Clinton would likely receive during an upcoming primary debate co-hosted by CNN.
One question related to fallout from the water crisis in Flint, Michigan. Another related to the death penalty:
Here's one that worries me about HRC.
DEATH PENALTY
19 states and the District of Columbia have banned the death penalty. 31 states, including Ohio, still have the death penalty. According to the National Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty, since 1973, 156 people have been on death row and later set free. Since 1976, 1,414 people have been executed in the U.S. That’s 11% of Americans who were sentenced to die, but later exonerated and freed. Should Ohio and the 30 other states join the current list and abolish the death penalty?
Sent from Donna's I Pad. Follow me on twitter @donnabrazile
That year, Brazile also apparently promised in an email to a Clinton surrogate that she would "send a few more" questions along as well.
Brazile vehemently denied feeding the Clinton campaign any CNN questions, even waxing indignant and claiming that she was a victim of Christian persecution during a particularly heated exchange with then-Fox News host Megyn Kelly, who pressed Brazile about the accusations. Despite her caterwauling, Brazile resigned from CNN just a few days later.
Donald Trump ultimately prevailed in the 2016 presidential election, and by March 2017, Brazile publicly admitted that she had, in fact, given Clinton's team the debate questions.
"In October, a subsequent release of emails revealed that among the many things I did in my role as a Democratic operative and D.N.C. Vice Chair prior to assuming the interim D.N.C. Chair position was to share potential town hall topics with the Clinton campaign," she wrote in an article published by Time.
"My job was to make all our Democratic candidates look good, and I worked closely with both campaigns to make that happen," she continued. "But sending those emails was a mistake I will forever regret."
Chris Wallace has spent the past two years of his storied journalistic career floundering about at CNN. He joined the network in early 2022 and was supposed to be the star host of CNN+, the network's streaming service that was launched and canceled within just a month.
But in fall 2020, Wallace was still with Fox News, the network that had been his home for more than 15 years. In late September that year, Wallace moderated a debate between then-President Donald Trump and current President Joe Biden. Trump was bombastic, repeatedly attempting to put Biden on the defensive about his son Hunter's involvement with Burisma and Ukraine.
'Mr. Vice President, you get the final word.'
Biden repeatedly stammered that his son had done nothing wrong and all the accusations against him had been "discredited," assertions that have since been proven false. The federal government even introduced Hunter Biden's infamous "laptop from hell" into evidence against him in his recent trial, noting that it had been authenticated as previously belonging to Hunter Biden.
Yet back in 2020, Joe Biden insisted that his son had been unfairly maligned, and Wallace seemed to help shield Biden from Trump's relentless attacks. "The mayor of Moscow's wife gave your son three and a half million dollars. What did he do to deserve it?" Trump asked Biden.
"It's not true. None of that is true," Biden stammered.
As Trump continued hammering Biden about the accusations about Hunter, Wallace repeatedly ordered Trump to back off. "Let him answer," Wallace interjected, though the cross-talk continued.
After another minute or so, Wallace told Biden: "Mr. Vice President, you get the final word." Biden then immediately replied, "Well, it's hard to get any word in with this clown."
Biden then pivoted, throwing out unspecified accusations about Trump's family members and attempting to talk about the American people, but Trump tried to steer the conversation back toward Hunter and Ukraine. At that point, Wallace ended the discussion.
When Trump asked rhetorically whether he could continue his line of questioning, Wallace raised his voice and replied, "The answer to the question is no." Wallace then demanded that the debate move on to another segment. Though he haphazardly requested that both participants stop interrupting one another, Wallace took particular aim at Trump. "I'm appealing to you, sir, to do that."
When Trump asked about Biden's behavior, Wallace retorted: "Well, frankly, you've been doing more interrupting."
Now, nearly four years later, Wallace views that debate as having sealed the election for Biden. "I actually think Donald Trump lost the presidency in that debate by his performance," Wallace said on an appearance on CNN's "The Source with Kaitlan Collins." "He dropped about four or five points. He never regained it."
Wallace also asserted that Trump "interrupted Joe Biden or me 145 times in 90 minutes," a statement that seems to situate himself with Biden and in opposition to Trump.
Wallace will not be hosting the debate on Thursday. Instead, the network has tapped for the role Wallace's colleague, Jake Tapper, who has repeatedly compared Trump to Adolf Hitler and characterized his presidency as a "nightmare."
Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!
An ABC News panel expressed shock on Sunday that President Joe Biden is not building any electoral lead over Donald Trump despite his predecessor's legal troubles.
Over the weekend, a new Wall Street Journal poll found that Trump and Biden are tied (46%) among registered voters. Not only are they tied, but Trump's standing with voters has improved compared to the same WSJ poll conducted in April. That survey found that Biden had a three-point lead over Trump. So not only is Trump gaining despite four criminal indictments, but Biden is slipping.
ABC News anchor George Stephanopoulos found the result "shocking."
"It is kind of shocking in a way that, despite all of the baggage that Donald Trump carries, he's tied with Joe Biden right now," Stephanopoulos said on ABC News' "This Week."
Democratic strategist Donna Brazile, the former chairwoman of the Democratic National Committee, admitted the poll seriously troubles her.
"George, when I looked at that recent poll, the Wall Street Journal, I said, 'Oh, this could keep me up at night,'" Brazile admitted, explaining that Biden and the Democratic Party are having trouble connecting with younger voters.
— (@)
Later in the segment, Brazile said Trump has orchestrated a political "movement" that demands "respect."
"I'm old enough to say this: I've seen two movements outside of the social justice movements in my life on the political side," Brazile said. "One was the Reagan movement. Reagan had a hold on his base. The country at large, they saw him as someone who was willing to stand up for American values, whatever that might have meant. Now I thought it was reactionary. The other movement I saw was Barack Obama, hope and change. That galvanized the American people.
"I’ve never seen anything like this with Donald Trump," she continued. "I mean, what doesn't kill you make you stronger? I mean, being indicted, that's making him stronger? Raising $10 million using an ugly mug shot to raise money? This is a movement.
"And anyone who thinks that you can apply the old political rules to try to defeat this candidate based on 'he's scary, he's ugly' — whatever you might want to call him — this is a movement. And we have to respect the fact that it's a movement," she admitted.
‘Shocking’: George Stunned By New Poll Showing Trump and Biden Deadlocked Despite Trump’s ‘Baggage’ www.youtube.com
Reihan Salam, president of the Manhattan Institute, also explained that Trump is "incredibly shrewd and disciplined when he’s focused on the political."
"When he's focused on the issues, he speaks in a very accessible way that could be meaningful in a general election," Salam said.
Salam further explained that Trump has "galvanized" voters who are suspicious of the "establishment." And fortunately for Trump, the number of American voters who are "more suspicious" and "less trusting" of the government is growing.
Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!
Democrat Donna Brazile tried on Sunday to paint Republicans as hypocrites for criticizing the potential forthcoming indictment of former President Donald Trump.
But Republican Chris Christie promptly shut it down.
While discussing Trump's potential indictment, Brazile claimed the response from some Republicans indicates they do not really support law enforcement, as they often claim.
"Look, this is a party that continues to say that they are for law and order when it suits them," she said. "But it doesn't suit them when the crime is gun violence, when the crime is — seeing this country suffer from the kind of violence and crime across the board."
Christie, the former New Jersey governor, immediately intervened.
"I'm not going to stand up for that," he said, highlighting the hypocrisy of Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, whose office is leading the criminal case into Trump.
"Let me tell you who doesn't enforce law and order when it comes to gun violence," he continued. "I go into New York City every week. It is a danger zone to go into Manhattan because Alvin Bragg is running a revolving door and not prosecuting gun crime, not prosecuting violent criminals. And if he does, he lets them out within four hours of when they're arrested to commit more crimes.
"So let's not get into that argument because Alvin Bragg has failed miserably," Christie explained. "And all of a sudden, he wants to get up on Donald Trump."
Mike Pence walking 'fine line' between the party and Trump: Mary Bruce l This Week youtu.be
Just days after taking office last year, Bragg announced progressive criminal justice policies that focus on so-called "restorative justice" that ultimately reduce punishment for many crimes.
In his first year as district attorney, more than half of all felony cases were downgraded to misdemeanor charges, Bragg's office requested bail is less than half of all felony cases, and his office won fewer cases in court, the New York Post reported.
Meanwhile, crime in New York City became exponentially worse last year, seeing an overall increase of 23.5% compared to 2021.
Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!
Former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie (R) delivered a much-needed reality check on Sunday, explaining on ABC News why the Jan. 6 committee hearings have not moved the needle with voters.
Impacting the 2022 midterm elections was, in fact, one the main purposes of the committee, which decided to air many of its hearings on prime-time TV.
In fact, the New York Times reported before the first hearing that House Democrats wanted to use the hearings "to refocus voters' attention on Jan. 6" by connecting "Republicans directly to an unprecedented plot to undermine democracy itself."
During a panel discussion on "This Week," Associated Press reporter Julie Pace observed that Democrats are not talking about the Jan. 6 committee hearings on the campaign trail because the hearings have not made an impact with voters.
Christie then suggested why the committee is not having an impact: It lacks credibility.
"I think the Jan 6. committee, despite some of the really good work they've done ... was resigned to having a credibility problem because of the membership of the committee and the way that was done," Christie said.
"So there are lots of Republicans across this country who just say, 'There's nobody there to argue the other side. [Reps. Adam] Kinzinger and [Liz] Cheney don't argue the other side,'" he added.
That's when the interruptions came. Moderator George Stephanopoulos interjected, "There's not another side," a point with which Democrat Donna Brazile agreed.
"What is the other side, Chris?" Brazile interrupted.
"I think that you can question a lot of these witnesses who came up and — and test their credibility, Donna," Christie responded.
"Bill Barr? You're going to test the credibility of the former attorney general? You're going to test the credibility of the people who were inside the Oval Office advising the president?" Brazile continued.
After a back-and-forth, Christie was finally permitted to speak. He said that by testing the credibility of witnesses, the Jan. 6 committee could have boosted its own credibility.
"But instead, it's a TV production," Christie pointed out.
"There are lots of people inside the White House who now have convenient memories about things that didn't have memories about them before," he explained. "You can ask questions about that."
ABC panel smacks down Chris Christie's attack on Jan. 6 Committee www.youtube.com
The second reason the Jan. 6 committee is not having an impact, Christie said, is because Trump is not on the ballot.
"In the end, what the Jan. 6 committee has made this all about is Donald Trump and his role in Jan. 6," Christie explained. "But when he's not on the ballot, it's very hard for Democrats to be able to make this a cutting issue, especially in the light of huge inflation, gas prices, crime in the streets, open borders, drug overdoses — those things are things that are affecting people's everyday lives, and they don't see it that way."
Interestingly, former President Barack Obama made a similar point in a podcast over the weekend, explaining that wasting energy on Trump increases the dissonance between Democrats and the issues Americans care about most.
"We spend enormous amounts of time and energy and resources pointing out the latest crazy thing he said," Obama said. "That’s probably not something that, in the minds of most voters, overrides their basic interests: Can I pay the rent? What are gas prices? How am I dealing with child care, etc."