Bill Gates reveals plan to save earth from farting cows



Bill Gates isn’t giving up on eradicating cow farts.

In a recent public appearance, Gates explained just how he plans to stop them.

“You know what happens with beef, my climate group Breakthrough Energy just announced, literally today, an investment in an Australian group called Rumin8, that helps cows not be so much a source of methane emissions,” Gates said.

“So, we have two paths to solving that, that’s 6% of global emissions are cows, who burp and fart methane to an extreme degree,” he continued to laughter from the crowd.

“You can either fix the cows to stop them from doing that, or you can make beef without the cow. And both of those you know will be pursued to see which one can lead to the best product in terms of taste, health, and cost,” he concluded.

Dave Rubin of “The Rubin Report,” who is himself on a form of the now-famous carnivore diet, isn’t pleased with Gates.

“It’s interesting to me that here’s the man who owns the largest amount of farmland in the United States, Bill Gates, who now wants to, as he said, do something to cows so that they either don’t burp or fart as much, or we’ll just get off meat all together,” Rubin says.

“Either way, I sense he’s going to profit a lot from one of those things,” he adds


Want more from Dave Rubin?

To enjoy more honest conversations, free speech, and big ideas with Dave Rubin, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

What you need to know about Ozempic according to Jillian Michaels



Ozempic has quickly become a household name in recent years due to its reputation as the newest miracle weight-loss drug.

The medication was first approved by the FDA in 2017 to treat individuals with Type 2 diabetes, but over time, it has become a popular method for anyone seeking to drop a few pounds — so popular that shortages in the United States have been an issue.

But how safe is Ozempic? And is it really as effective as it claims to be?

Dave Rubin, who suspects Ozempic “will not be on the market forever,” plays a clip of fitness expert and certified nutritionist Jillian Michaels explaining to Sage Steele the reality of a drug like Ozempic.

Here are her three takeaways:

“You will plateau on this drug,” she promised, calling the assertion a “fact.” The reason for this inevitable plateau is because Ozempic increases Glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1), which is a hormone the body produces naturally to regulate insulin.

However, “When you are giving the body a hormone exogenously, over time the body is like, ‘Oh I'm going to stop making this on my own, oh I’m going to develop a tolerance to this,”’ Michaels explained.

And when the drugs inevitably “stop working physiologically,” and you “get off of [Ozempic],” Michaels says, “You will gain all of the weight back,” meaning that “you’re handcuffed to this drug for the rest of your life.”

“All of the meta analyses show us this — Google it,” she told Steele.

If you do choose to get off of Ozempic, however, here’s what happens:

According to Dr. Peter Attia, a physician and researcher of longevity medicine who’s conducted studies on the effects of drugs like Ozempic, individuals who cease taking the drug experience “muscle loss at an alarming rate” and “compromised bone density.”

That means “your metabolism is going to be slower,” says Michaels. “You have been starving your body because you aren’t eating for such a long period of time that you will then lower your metabolic set point.”

What’s even more concerning is that, according to studies, “individuals who went through a period of famine” ended up “[passing] on a slower metabolism to their offspring” because to compensate for food scarcity, their bodies made “biochemical shifts” that “marked their epigenome.”

Bottom line: “There is a devastating rebound effect when people get off the drugs,” Michaels said.

Dave isn’t surprised a bit by Michaels’ reports.

“I will tell you just anecdotally I know a couple people that either were or are on Ozempic and have had insane weight loss ... it is so obvious to me that this cannot be good for your system,” he tells Dr. Jay Bhattacharya and Dr. Drew Pinsky.

“You're going to begin to hear about people who died on Ozempic,” says Dr. Pinsky, adding that Michaels “is 100% right in all of it.”

To learn more about the side effects of Ozempic, including bowel obstructions, paralysis of the stomach, and sarcopenia, watch the clip below.


Want more from Dave Rubin?

To enjoy more honest conversations, free speech, and big ideas with Dave Rubin, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

COVID Comeback, Depression Meds, & Alzheimer’s Scandal | Guest: Dr. Jay Bhattacharya | Ep 650

COVID Comeback, Depression Meds, & Alzheimer’s Scandal | Guest: Dr. Jay Bhattacharya | Ep 650

The Only People I Trust for Reliable Scientific Info (Pt. 1) | Ben Shapiro | POLITICS | Rubin Report

The Only People I Trust for Reliable Scientific Info (Pt. 1) | Ben Shapiro | POLITICS | Rubin Report

COVID-19 lockdowns are the 'biggest public health mistake we've ever made,' Stanford medical school prof says



A Stanford University Medical School professor has called COVID-19 lockdowns the "biggest public health mistake we've ever made."

Dr. Jay Bhattacharya — a medical doctor whose recent research "focuses on the epidemiology of COVID-19 as well as an evaluation of policy responses to the epidemic" — made his comment as part of a February interview with the Daily Clout, an outlet author Naomi Wolf founded "to help anyone, from any walk of life, use and affect democracy more powerfully." Bhattacharya's comments haven't been widely reported until this week.

What did the professor say?

Bhattacharya began the interview discussing the Great Barrington Declaration, which he co-authored. The document argues that COVID-19 lockdowns "are producing devastating effects on short and long-term public health. The results (to name a few) include lower childhood vaccination rates, worsening cardiovascular disease outcomes, fewer cancer screenings and deteriorating mental health – leading to greater excess mortality in years to come, with the working class and younger members of society carrying the heaviest burden. Keeping students out of school is a grave injustice." It adds that "keeping these measures in place until a vaccine is available will cause irreparable damage, with the underprivileged disproportionately harmed."

The declaration as of Thursday indicates that over 13,000 medical and public health scientists have signed it, along with over 41,000 medical practitioners.

With that, Bhattacharya told Wolf that the Great Barrington Declaration "comes from two basic facts."

"One is that people who are older have a much higher risk from dying from COVID than people who are younger ... So the first plank of the Great Barrington Declaration: let's protect the vulnerable," he said before adding that "the other idea is that the lockdowns themselves impose great harm on people. Lockdowns are not a natural normal way to live."

Bhattacharya also noted that "the lockdown harms are worse than COVID" and that "the harm to people is catastrophic." His reasoning is that "public health" means a whole lot more than protection from a virus, and that people need many more things in life in order to stay healthy — not only physically but also mentally and emotionally — such as interaction with friends and the ability to earn a living, which lockdowns have prevented.

The doctor's "biggest public health mistake we've ever made" comment comes at the 26:45 mark in the below video, but the entire interview is worth your time:

"Prof Jay Bhattacharya, Signatory of Gt Barrington Declaration: Why 'Lockdown' Will Kill Millions"youtu.be

Anything else?

Newsweek caught wind of Bhattacharya's comments, and the magazine said he stood by them in an email:

I stand behind my comment that the lockdowns are the single worst public health mistake in the last 100 years. We will be counting the catastrophic health and psychological harms, imposed on nearly every poor person on the face of the earth, for a generation.

At the same time, they have not served to control the epidemic in the places where they have been most vigorously imposed. In the US, they have — at best — protected the "non-essential" class from COVID, while exposing the essential working class to the disease. The lockdowns are trickle down epidemiology.

This isn't a new position for Bhattacharya, who declared last May that people are "mistaken" if they believe coronavirus lockdown policies will provide safety from COVID-19.

As for Wolf, she's also been in the news regarding the same subject, telling Fox News' Tucker Carlson late last month that America is turning into a "totalitarian state before everyone's eyes" amid our government's coronavirus lockdowns: