RFK Jr. drops COVID bombshell — and liberals are in meltdown



After years of the Biden administration’s attempts to convince the American public that COVID vaccines were safe and effective for pregnant women and children, RFK Jr. has announced they’re no longer being recommended to society’s most vulnerable.

“I couldn’t be more pleased to announce that as of today, the COVID vaccine for healthy children and healthy pregnant women has been removed from the CDC recommended immunization schedule,” RFK Jr. said alongside NIH Director Dr. Jay Bhattacharya and FDA Commissioner Dr. Marty Makary.

“Last year, the Biden administration urged healthy children to get yet another COVID shot, despite the lack of any clinical data to support the repeat booster strategy in children. That ends today,” he continued, adding, “We’re now one step closer to realizing President Trump’s promise to Make America Healthy Again.”


BlazeTV host Sara Gonzales is thrilled with the development but wishes it had come sooner.

“It should never have been recommended to children from the beginning. It should have never been recommended to pregnant women in the beginning. There were no reliable studies showing that this was not harmful to pregnant women,” Gonzales says on “Sara Gonzales Unfiltered.”

However, the left-leaning mainstream media are up in arms over the announcement out of fear that the move will end up harming women and children more than it helps.

“RFK Jr. announces vaccine bombshell as he restricts access for millions of Americans,” one Daily Mail headline reads.

“The idea that, I don’t know, RFK is now killing people because they’re removing it from the actual CDC recommended schedule is just complete and total hogwash. You are talking about children, pregnant women. I mean, these are the most vulnerable,” Gonzales says.

“You can’t just play guinea pig with these people,” she continues, adding, “They either are the next generation or carrying the next generation, and yet the prior administration was completely willing to not only do that but threaten your livelihood if you did not go along with this.”

Want more from Sara Gonzales?

To enjoy more of Sara's no-holds-barred take to news and culture, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

FDA launches major crackdown on toxic food dyes



Dr. Marty Makary with the FDA has announced that the government will be banning all petroleum-based chemicals from the American food supply — which will largely include food dyes.

“Today the FDA is taking action to remove petroleum-based food dyes from the U.S. food supply and from medications. For the last 50 years, American children have increasingly been living in a toxic soup of synthetic chemicals,” Makary said in a public statement.

“The scientific community has conducted a number of studies raising concerns about the correlation between petroleum-based synthetic dyes and several health conditions such as attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, obesity, diabetes, insulin resistance, cancer, genomic disruption, GI issues, as I’ve seen in the hospital, and allergic reactions,” he continues.


Sara Gonzales of “Sara Gonzales Unfiltered” couldn’t be happier, asking, “Oh, wow, we can trust the experts again?”

While she’s grateful, the move to ban these harmful chemicals is long overdue.

“The facts are, these dyes — they’re not just unnecessary. They’ve been proven harmful time and time again, especially to our children. And even though we have been consuming all of these for decades, people seemed to just not care — the people who were put in charge of making sure that we are safe,” Gonzales says.

“I mean, what the hell else is the Food and Drug Administration for? What the hell else is the CDC for? What the hell else are all these departments for, if not to make sure that they are overseeing that Americans are not consuming poison? And time and time again, we have seen that for decades they have been doing the exact opposite,” she continues.

“They have just been poisoning us, and they know it, and you know that they know it, because other countries have already been like, ‘Yeah, that’s a proven carcinogen. We’re removing it. Yeah, that’s proven to cause harm to children. We’re removing it,’” she adds.

Want more from Sara Gonzales?

To enjoy more of Sara's no-holds-barred take to news and culture, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

The C-section scam: 'It's manipulation'



Americans throughout the country are waking up to the possibility that the medical industry might not always have their best interest in mind, and surgeon Dr. Marty Makary is one of the men leading the charge.

Now, he’s sounding the alarm on the way women are treated while giving birth in the hospital and what it means for the future of their children.

“We’ve seen the group think and medicine downplay these best practices in childbirth that we now recognize have dramatic benefits,” Makary tells Allie Beth Stuckey of “Relatable.”

“A delayed clamping of the umbilical cord once the baby is born. That umbilical cord is pulsating healthy stem cells and fetal hemoglobin which binds oxygen really well, and it’s warm blood infused directly into the child’s circulation to keep the baby warm,” he explains.

However, as a medical student, Makary was taught to immediately cut the umbilical cord, the second the baby came out. Those in the medical industry are also taught to whisk the baby away from his mother after just minutes — but skin-to-skin contact for hours after birth leaves the baby with a normal heart rate and blood pressure, and the baby is less likely to need an ICU stay.

The baby also has a normal glucose level, because when the mom holds the baby, the stress hormones are not spiking as high, which changes glucose levels.

Not only does he take issue with those common practices, but he relays to Stuckey that C-sections and antibiotics are often unnecessary.

“Sixty percent of antibiotics are unnecessary, and an estimated 40% of C-sections are unnecessary,” he tells Stuckey. “Mothers are unfairly, inappropriately told there’s no difference. You can deliver vaginally or by C-section, your choice.”

However, the microbiome in the gut forms differently when the baby is born by C-section versus vaginally.

“The gut of a baby in utero is sterile. There’s no bacteria in there. How do we get our millions of different bacteria that live in this harmony and then are involved in digestion and immunity and mental health? Well, a baby passes through the birth canal and the bacteria of the vaginal canal seeds the microbiome, augmented by bacteria from breast milk, especially in the first hour from skin contact,” he explains.

Babies born by C-section also have higher rates of asthma, inflammatory bowel disease, colitis, Crohn’s disease, irritable bowel syndrome — and there may even be a connection between people born via C-section and higher rates of colon cancer.

“If you as a doctor tell a woman in labor anywhere in the world, a C-section might be safer for your baby, then 100% of women are going to say, 'Well then do it, right now,' right? It’s manipulation if it’s not based on good scientific data,” Makary explains.

Stuckey had C-sections with her first two births and delivered her last one vaginally.

“I was definitely, with my first birth, one of those people that was pressured in all different kinds of ways,” Stuckey says, adding, “They dropped the, ‘Oh, maybe you’ll have a stillborn baby thing.’ Which, there was no indication of that at all. She was perfectly healthy.”


Want more from Allie Beth Stuckey?

To enjoy more of Allie’s upbeat and in-depth coverage of culture, news, and theology from a Christian, conservative perspective, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Are CDC Scientists QUITTING Over Child Vaccine Policy? | 7/15/22
play icon

Are CDC Scientists QUITTING Over Child Vaccine Policy? | 7/15/22

Johns Hopkins physician criticizes ‘backwards’ vaccine mandates, pushes natural immunity



Dr. Marty Makary of Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine says blanket COVID-19 vaccine mandates are ruining people's lives, and says that natural immunity against the coronavirus is far more effective than vaccinated immunity.

What are the details?

Makary, who is editor-in-chief of MedPage Today, told The Daily Wire's "Morning Wire" on Thursday that studies have shown natural immunity against the coronavirus has shown to be 27 times more effective than vaccinated immunity.

“The data on natural immunity are now overwhelming," Makary insisted. “It turns out the hypothesis that our public health leaders had that vaccinated immunity is better and stronger than natural immunity was wrong. They got it backwards. And now we've got data from Israel showing that natural immunity is 27 times more effective than vaccinated immunity. And that supports 15 other studies."

Makary added that blanket mandates are ruining people's lives in that they are losing jobs for refusing the jabs.

"It's ruining the lives of people who are getting fired," he continued. "Nurses, who are heroes, are now getting laid off. Soldiers are getting dishonorably discharged. ... They've got immunity. It's just not the type that our public health officials have sanctioned."

Makary pointed out that this is "not a failure of science" — but a "failure of government."

"[H]ow about some flexibility?" he asked. "How about recognizing natural immunity and allowing those who have circulating antibodies to get credit? That's how they do it in parts of Europe, and that's how they do it in Israel."

Makary added that he believes immunity due to a previous coronavirus infection is helping the numbers of confirmed COVID-19 cases to decline.

"That decline is really natural immunity kicking in," he reasoned. "What we're seeing is that when a very few people in a population are susceptible, that is almost everybody has either had COVID or the vaccine. You do see this rapid decline. It's basically part of a herd immunity kicking in. ... I think we're done with the surges. What we may see is bumping cases, seasonally, depending on pockets of the country where there's low immunity rates. And remember: Breakthrough infections are real. They will happen, but they have downgraded COVID from a major public health threat to a mild, common, cold-like illness."

The outlet also pointed out that Makary stressed that vaccine-related health complications are "exceedingly rare."

"When I talked to doctors nationwide, it's pretty clear that the vaccine-related complications are exceedingly rare and the vaccines we have are safer than any other vaccine we've ever had in the past," he explained. "And I think if you if you're on the fence about getting vaccinated, you want to do it right now, like today, because we are getting to a point where it's so contagious, it's ripping through the population pretty quickly."

The Only People I Trust for Reliable Scientific Info (Pt. 1) | Ben Shapiro | POLITICS | Rubin Report
play icon

The Only People I Trust for Reliable Scientific Info (Pt. 1) | Ben Shapiro | POLITICS | Rubin Report

What Groupthink Caused The CDC To Get Wrong About COVID-19

On this episode of The Federalist Radio Hour, Dr. Marty Makary explains how the CDC did not want to listen to critical or dissenting opinions on COVID-19 protocols.