Appeals court delivers Trump a 'huge victory' in VOA layoffs suit, sets stage for additional wins



The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit delivered the Trump administration a "huge victory" on Saturday, blocking the order of a lesser court that required the reinstatement of over 1,000 Voice of America employees.

Kari Lake, senior adviser for the U.S. Agency for Global Media, which supervises Voice of America, the Office of Cuba Broadcasting, and a handful of other state-funded outfits including Radio Free Europe, called the ruling a "BIG WIN in our legal cases at USAGM & Voice of America. Huge victory for President Trump and Article II."

"Turns out the District Court judge will not be able to manage the agency as he seemed to want to," added Lake.

The appeals court's 2-1 ruling, which saw Trump-appointed Judges Gregory Katsas and Neomi Rao pitted against dissenting Obama-appointed Judge Cornelia Pillard, held that "the government is likely to succeed on the merits because the district court likely lacked subject-matter jurisdiction to enjoin USAGM's personnel actions and to compel the agency to restore RFA's and MBN's FY 2025 grants."

President Donald Trump signed an executive order on March 14 aimed at reducing various "unnecessary" elements of the federal bureaucracy "to the maximum extent consistent with applicable law." Among the entities targeted was the USAGM.

'Ensure that taxpayers are no longer on the hook for radical propaganda.'

In a corresponding fact sheet, the White House shared links to articles criticizing the quality and neutrality of the state media outfit's output, as well as a link to a write-up of the American Accountability Foundation's 2022 lawsuit alleging that VOA had "been infiltrated by anti-American, pro-Islamic state interests."

Blaze News previously reported that pursuant to the president's executive order, approximately 1,300 VOA journalists and other employees were placed on administrative leave, and funding was suspended to VOA's sister networks.

U.S. District Judge Royce Lamberth ruled against the administration on April 22, noting that its stated efforts to "ensure that taxpayers are no longer on the hook for radical propaganda" were "arbitrary and capricious" and "likely in direct violation of numerous federal laws," including the VOA's congressionally established charter in the International Broadcasting Act.

Lamberth ordered the administration to "take all necessary steps to return USAGM employees and contractors to their status" prior to Trump's March 14 EO; to restore VOA programming; and to restore fiscal year 2025 grants to Radio Free Asia and Middle East Broadcasting Networks. He also demanded that the administration provide him with monthly status reports "apprising the Court of the status of the defendants' compliance with this Order."

'The injunction threatens its prerogative to "speak with one voice" on behalf of the United States in foreign affairs.'

The appeals court said in its Saturday ruling that Lamberth "likely lacked jurisdiction over the USAGM's personnel decisions" as federal employees may not use the Administrative Procedure Act to challenge agency employee actions.

"Congress has instead established comprehensive statutory schemes for adjudicating employment disputes with the federal government," noted the court.

While the dissenting Obama judge on the appeals court expressed doubt that Congress' chosen administrative methods could properly process agency-wide claims for over 1,000 employees, the majority noted that "administrative agencies are not powerless to issue broad-reaching relief in large-scale personnel matters."

The court said that Lamberth similarly lacked jurisdiction to restore Radio Free Asia and Middle East Broadcasting Networks' grants for fiscal year 2025.

"If a claim against the United States is contractual 'at its essence,' district courts have no power to resolve it," wrote the majority. That authority belongs to the U.S. Court of Federal Claims.

The appeals court also recognized that Lamberth's order requiring the restoration of all employees and contractors is a harmful "intrusion" that implicates the Trump administration's foreign-affairs authority since USAGM is responsible for presenting the views of the government and supporting U.S. foreign policy.

"By depriving the Executive Branch of control over the individuals involved in its international broadcasting, the injunction threatens its prerogative to 'speak with one voice' on behalf of the United States in foreign affairs," said the court.

Margot Cleveland, senior legal correspondent at the Federalist, noted that this "conclusion should have wide-spread ramifications" because many of the legal challenges brought against the Trump administration "are about employment decisions which CONGRESS said are NOT for district courts to decide."

The appeals court's decision landed a day after the Department of Justice notified lawyers representing VOA workers that they could return to work this week.

In a letter obtained by The Hill sent to VOA staffers' lawyers, the DOJ wrote, "USAGM currently expects staff to begin to return to the office next week, as security, building space, and equipment issues require a phased return."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Liberals lose it after Trump announces Dan Bongino as deputy FBI director: 'Feels like a bad dream'



President Donald Trump announced Sunday evening that FBI Director Kash Patel has tapped former U.S. Secret Service agent and popular conservative commentator Dan Bongino to be his right-hand man.

The news that Bongino will serve as FBI deputy director was well received on the right and by members of the Trump administration. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, for instance, noted, "No better patriot or professional. Patel-Bongino atop the FBI is pure [fire]."

White House adviser Stephen Miller wrote, "Dan Bongino is the warrior America needs in this vital role."

On the left, however, there was weeping and gnashing of teeth — par for the course given that Democrats and liberal pundits were still in the process of melting down over Patel's Thursday confirmation.

Democratic Sen. Chris Murphy (Conn.) tweeted, "Trump has chosen grifters to lead the FBI. Kash Patel sells 'K$SH' branded merch, vaccine reversal pills. Dan Bongino's entire show is telling listeners the world is ending so they buy the dozens of survivalist products he sells."

Murphy, who recently humiliated himself by attacking Vice President JD Vance and the Trump family over a post from a Lara Trump fan account, added, "I know this feels like a bad dream. It isn't."

'The choice of Mr. Bongino is a radical and abrupt departure.'

The news feed on the liberal X knockoff Bluesky was crowded with similar complaints, which in many cases recycled the attacks previously used by establishmentarians against Hegseth, U.S. Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, Attorney General Pam Bondi, and Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

One self-identified member of the 2024 Kamala Harris team wrote, "Two of Trump's most devout sycophants have now been installed at the highest, most powerful echelons of the FBI — a law enforcement agency heretofore known for its tradition of independence," adding that the duo are "the least experienced leadership pair in the entire 117-year history of the FBI."

Adam Cohen, the vice chair of the anti-Trump group Lawyers for Good Government, similarly characterized Bongino as "unqualified," suggesting that the FBI deputy director's ideas "are generally ludicrous conspiracy theories, totally devoid of fact."

The New York Times was among the liberal publications that rushed to frame the choice, which requires no Senate confirmation, as unorthodox and "radical."

"In the past, F.B.I. directors have selected senior agents with extensive experience to essentially run the bureau's operations, a complex and grueling job that requires working closely with foreign partners and navigating sensitive investigations," said a Times piece on the announcement. "The choice of Mr. Bongino is a radical and abrupt departure from that practice and raises startling questions about how two people who have never served as F.B.I. agents will oversee the vast surveillance and investigative powers of an agency of 38,000 people and a budget of about $11 billion."

The Times further claimed that Bongino "often peddles rampant misinformation." Two of the examples that the Times provided of "conspiracy theories" advanced by Bongino were, however, fact-based — namely that masks were ineffective at preventing the spread of the coronavirus, which the Cochrane Collaboration's 2023 systematic review confirmed, and that Democrats spied on Trump's 2016 campaign.

MSNBC analyst Tim Miller was among the pundits who appeared to have trouble coping, writing, "What in the living f**k."

'Buckle up, America!'

According to the website for his unsuccessful 2012 U.S. Senate campaign, Bongino started as a police cadet with the New York Police Department in 1995 and became a full officer in 1997. After two years spent patrolling the streets of Brooklyn, he joined the Secret Service in 1999 as a special agent. The 50-year-old father of two who beat Hodgkin lymphoma during the pandemic joined the USSS' Presidential Protection Division in 2006 and remained on protective duty with former President Barack Obama.

In addition to penning best-selling books in the time since, including "Exonerated: The Failed Takedown of President Donald Trump by the Swamp," Bongino has long hosted a massively popular podcast that has consistently ranked high among the top political commentary shows.

"Great news for Law Enforcement and American Justice!" Trump wrote on Truth Social. "Dan Bongino, a man of incredible love and passion for our Country, has just been named the next DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF THE FBI, by the man who will be the best ever Director, Kash Patel."

"Dan has a Masters Degree in Psychology from C.U.N.Y., and an MBA from Penn State. He was a member of the New York Police Department (New York's Finest!), a highly respected Special Agent with the United States Secret Service, and is now one of the most successful Podcasters in the Country, something he is willing and prepared to give up in order to serve," added Trump.

Following Trump's announcement, Bongino thanked the president, Attorney General Pam Bondi, and FBI Director Kash Patel on X, then retweeted a post that said, "THE DREAM TEAM. KASH PATEL. DAN BONGINO. FAFO. Buckle up, America!" The acronym used in the message shared by the FBI deputy director, "FAFO," stands for "f**k around and find out."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Mitch McConnell’s birthday present to America: Bowing out of the Senate



Republican Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky is 83 years old, and he has finally decided – after 18 years — that he will not be running for re-election in 2026.

"Seven times my fellow Kentuckians have sent me to the Senate. Every day in between, I have been humbled by the trust they place in me to do their business, right here," he said in a speech on the Senate floor. "Representing our commonwealth has been the honor of a lifetime."

"I will not seek this honor for an eighth time," he continued. "My current term in the Senate will be my last."


His colleagues rose to their feet in a standing ovation, and Sara Gonzales of “Sara Gonzales Unfiltered” is having a hard time hiding her excitement as well.

“Donald Trump said he was eliminating DEI from all government agencies, so there will be no more turtle inclusion in the Senate,” Gonzales jokes.

“He was seven times elected longest-serving Senate party leader in United States history,” she continues. “He decided, you know, to celebrate his birthday, he would announce to the world that he would not be running for re-election. Which, honestly, was more of a present for us.”

“Lectern Guy” Adam Johnson isn’t convinced.

“Did he announce this himself? Or was this one of his staffers on Twitter. Does he know he’s retiring?” Johnson jokes.

“That’s a good question, because maybe it was like the Joe Biden coup where it wasn’t him that endorsed Kamala, it was like a random 20-year-old staffer who was in charge of his Twitter account,” Gonzales says, adding, “I like that theory.”

Want more from Sara Gonzales?

To enjoy more of Sara's no-holds-barred take to news and culture, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Deep-staters compare government efficiency push to 9/11, Holocaust on Reddit



The Trump administration is working diligently to eliminate bureaucratic bloat and save taxpayers money.

According to individuals identifying as bureaucrats in Reddit's top haunts for American federal workers, these efforts — long championed by a democratically elected president who presently enjoys record-high approval ratings — are apparently comparable to the Holocaust, to the 9/11 terrorist attacks in New York City, and to a "coup." One user stated in a post, again without a trace of irony, "We're at war."

Besides affording the American public a window into the kinds of derangement and delusion that plague elements of the federal workforce, the increasingly popular Reddit community r/fednews has furnished left-wing publications with supposed evidence of deep-staters' "fighting spirit" as well as with the hope that the "resistance" that undermined the first Trump administration is back.

It is clear from a closer look at the users, engagements, rhetoric, and strategy that appear on r/fednews — which at the time of publication had over 375,000 members — that if reflective of a broader resistance movement, the Trump administration likely has little to worry about this time around.

Cleaning house

President Donald Trump has expressed a desire for nearly a decade to "drain the swamp" in Washington. He revisited and campaigned on the proposal ahead of an election he won handily and is now delivering the goods.

Upon retaking office, Trump ended remote work for federal employees, which is expected to ultimately prompt a great many voluntary exits; took an ax to the federal DEI regime, shuttering race-obsessive offices nationwide and putting multitudes of bureaucrats on administrative leave; ordered a freeze on the hiring of federal civilian employees; and reinstated his 2020 executive order establishing the Schedule F employment category for federal employees, which makes it easier to remove insubordinate and useless bureaucrats from an estimated pool of 50,000 eligible candidates.

These steps alone had bureaucrats, Democratic lawmakers, and other establishmentarians throwing a conniption, but then the administration went a step further and offered buyouts to millions of federal workers in an effort to expedite the downsizing process.

Even though a Clinton-appointed federal judge recently imposed a restraining order against the buyout — which approximately 3% of the federal workforce reportedly had accepted by Feb. 10 — bureaucrats know that the writing is on the wall.

When pressed on how the administration is presently faring in its efforts to address bureaucratic bloat and inefficacy, Donald Devine, senior scholar at the Fund for American Studies and former director of the U.S. Office of Personnel Management during the Reagan administration, told Blaze News, "I think they are doing very well in the first phase, letting the employees know who is in charge."

Weeping and gnashing of teeth

While bureaucrats may not want to admit who is in charge, they appear to at the very least understand that it's no longer them. That has not, however, stopped federal workers from trying to undermine the Trump administration at every turn.

Some bureaucrats have begun plotting petty ways to impede the work undertaken by the Trump administration, particularly by members of the U.S. Department of Government Efficiency.

The Washington Post reported, for instance, that General Services Administration staffers created an encrypted chat where together they could scheme how to hide sensitive defense data. Other federal workers reportedly marked emails from the Trump administration as spam "just to piss them off."

Meanwhile, at r/fednews and r/feddiscussion, where paranoia about infiltrators and spies is rampant, there have been calls to:

  • "hold the line" and reject buyout packages;
  • kick theDOGE requests and orders up to senior management and then waste time waiting for approvals in writing;
  • "develop" medical conditions to get around return-to-work orders;
  • defecate in chairs;
  • shield probationary personnel from accountability or termination;
  • slow-walk communications and tasks; and
  • seek involvement in lawsuits challenging Trump's policies.

Other commentators who have taken the governmental house cleaning personally have proposed targeting Elon Musk and others in Trump's orbit with boycotts in hopes of teaching them a lesson.

For instance, one user who goes by Oldschoolfool22, a top commenter on the subreddit, implored his fellow travelers to abandon X, sell their Teslas or let them "self drive off a cliff," sell off Crypto, and avoid watching SpaceX videos "unless it is a crash."

'Punch the s*** out of their f***ing f*** faces.'

Another top commenter, Doubledsmcgee, indicated that she cannot sell off her Tesla but in an act of defiance put a small sticker on its back window condemning Elon Musk.

Doubledsmcgee appears to be one among a great number self-identified bureaucrats on the subreddit primarily outraged over the mandated return to work.

According to the user's comment history, she started work for the Department of the Interior as a grant specialist around 2022. The trouble is that she lives in California, thousands of miles away from her Virginia office where there is now an expectation she'll turn up.

While angry over a matter of personal inconvenience, Doubledsmcgee, like others on the subreddit, suggested that her fight to avoid leaving home is really about honor, stating, "We'll fight for our place because we know the service we provide and the steadfast dedication that we do it with. Civil service isn't always glamorous but it will forever be more respectable and honorable than what [M]usk, Trump and his supporters will ever do in life. Keep the faith."

'Most administrations give in too easily.'

A self-identified Internal Revenue Service employee and Kamala Harris voter who goes by titaniumlid is similarly upset about the return to work. While he alternatively suggested that he can manage the two-hour-and-fifteen-minute commute that it'll take to try to keep his job, he "will absolutely put up any and all posters / propaganda I can to fight this bulls*** if they make me come back and sit at my desk."

Not all self-identified feds on the subreddit appear to think of resistance in terms of poster campaigns and petty schemes.

A frequent poster in the bureaucratic haunt, Informal-Fig-7116, has referenced violent fantasies. When responding to a post by an apparent non-straight fed telling people not to quit, Informal-Fig-7116 wrote, "I'm ready to go back into the closet to sharpen my knife."

On another occasion, the user suggested that they put pictures of Elon Musk and "Comrade Amanda," a possible reference to Amanda Scales, the new chief of staff at the OPM, on a boxing bag "so I can punch the s*** out of their f***ing f*** faces."

Lawsuits, not Reddit fantasies

When asked about the prospect of another "resistance" and presented with some of the suggestions on r/fednews, Donald Devine, who helped cut 100,000 bureaucratic jobs while at the OPM and co-authored the Project 2025 "Mandate for Leadership" chapter on how to manage the bureaucracy, told Blaze News, "It is nothing new and Reagan faced as much and kept up the pressure."

"Most administrations give in too easily. Trump, Musk, [Office of Management and Budget Director Russell] Vought, the agency heads and the rest are proving they are the exception so far," added Devine.

Devine indicated that the greatest challenges in the weeks and the months ahead will be for the administration to "keep up the initial pressure," adding that the "unions are the biggest problem and they need a plan to confront them."

Thousands of bureaucrats have rushed to join the American Federation of Government Employees and other unions in recent weeks with the hope of securing some modicum of protection against accountability. Brimming with new members, the AFGE and other unions have filed lawsuits, trying to hamstring the Trump administration's efficiency push and corresponding policies.

In fact, the AFGE was among the unions whose lawsuit prompted U.S. District Judge George O'Toole Jr.'s restraining order against the federal buyout.

'Such behavior undermines democracy, as it enables government power to be wielded without accountability.'

Harrison Fields, White House principal deputy press secretary, said in a statement to Blaze News, "Slashing waste, fraud, and abuse, and becoming better stewards of the American taxpayer's hard-earned dollars might be a crime to Democrats, but it's not a crime in a court of law."

While the Trump administration has its fair share of court battles to fight, it continues to press forward on other fronts.

The OPM formally submitted draft regulations on Monday that will reportedly make it easier to can bureaucrats who push back against presidential orders.

"It is well documented that many career federal employees use their positions to advance their personal political or policy preferences instead of implementing the elected President’s agenda," said a copy of the draft text obtained by Politico. "Such behavior undermines democracy, as it enables government power to be wielded without accountability to the voters or their elected representatives."

The draft regulation would reportedly also strike at the heart of former President Joe Biden's efforts to shield deep-staters from losing their civil service protections should their positions be switched to an exempt category.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Trump fires Democratic FEC commissioner who repeatedly attacked him. Now she's refusing to leave.



Ellen Weintraub, a Democratic commissioner and chair on the Federal Election Commission, revealed Thursday night that President Donald Trump fired her last week. Weintraub, an outspoken Trump critic whose political bias and routine disparagement of Trump have long sparked controversy, suggested she won't leave her post.

Weintraub, who has served on the nation's civil campaign finance regulator since 2002 and previously worked at the Democratic-aligned firm Perkins Coie, shared an image of a Jan. 31 letter she claimed was from Trump, which stated, "You are hereby removed as a Member of the Federal Election Commission, effective immediately. Thank you for your service on the Commission."

Weintraub noted, "Received a letter from POTUS today purporting to remove me as Commissioner & Chair of FEC. There's a legal way to replace FEC commissioners — this isn't it."

Weintraub's six-year term — a term limit established by the Federal Election Campaign Act — expired nearly two decades ago, back when George W. Bush was still president. However, commissioners can continue in a holdover status. Evidently, the Democratic commissioner from New York wants to keep holding on.

"I've been lucky to serve the American people & stir up some good trouble along the way," continued the Democratic commissioner, who previously accused Trump of damaging American democracy and questioned the legitimacy of the Electoral College. "That's not changing anytime soon."

'Weintraub's statements indicate that she has prematurely judged matters that could come before the FEC, and that she radically rejects any legal perspective other than her own.'

It appears that in order to can a commissioner, the president must first nominate a replacement, then have him confirmed by the U.S. Senate. Accordingly, Weintraub can continue to haunt the commission until her replacement is named and approved.

Former Republican FEC commissioner Caroline Hunter noted in a 2019 op-ed that Weintraub's partisan hackery was "harming the legitimacy of the institution she purports to serve."

"Commissioners are meant to be independent and neutral arbiters of campaign finance law. Yet Weintraub's statements indicate that she has prematurely judged matters that could come before the FEC, and that she radically rejects any legal perspective other than her own," continued Hunter. "Not only that, she risks misleading the public about what the FEC does and what campaign finance law really says."

Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.), the Biden-pardoned chairman of the Jan. 6 committee, was among the Democrats who had a conniption upon learning that Trump was kicking Weintraub to the curb.

Thompson stated, "Donald Trump is methodically dismantling our democracy. He is firing every person with experience, expertise, character, and commitment to the Constitution in order to replace them with mindless yes-men who will give Donald Trump and Elon Musk carte blanche to break the law and rip off the American people."

The New York Times indicated that the White House had not responded to requests for comment.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Swamp starts draining itself as 20,000 deep-staters accept Trump buyout: Report



Back before his first term began eight years ago, President Donald Trump promised the American electorate that, once in office, he would work steadfastly to "drain the swamp" in Washington, D.C., ostensibly referencing the tens of thousands of nameless, faceless federal bureaucrats who have no direct accountability to the American people.

Now in February 2025, it appears the swamp has begun draining itself after Trump offered a buyout that some of them seemingly couldn't refuse.

According to a scoop from Axios, as of Tuesday, some 20,000 federal workers have already accepted the buyout, which was officially pitched a week ago. Those 20,000 employees represent approximately 1% of the federal workforce, a significant number, to be sure, but a far cry from the 5% to 10% of the workforce the Trump administration had originally projected.

'Whichever path you choose, we thank you for your service to the United States of America.'

The deadline to accept the buyout is still two days away, so officials are still expecting the number of resignations to increase, especially in light of the major shakeup at the U.S. Agency for International Development.

"We expect more to come," one official told Axios. "If you see what's happening at USAID, it's just one piece of the puzzle."

The terms of the buyout are indeed enticing. Those who accept it retain all existing benefits until the end of September without having to return to the office, so long as they complete "reasonable and customary tasks and processes to facilitate" their exit.

The process of accepting the offer is also remarkably easy. All that the people who wish to resign need to do is reply to the offer on their official government email account, type "resign" in the subject line, and hit "send."

By contrast, those who choose to stay must commit to working at the office five days a week and to upholding a culture based on merit rather than, say, seniority or identity. Those who remain also still run the risk of losing their positions to "restructurings, realignments, and reductions in force," though the Trump administration has pledged to honor all "relevant collective-bargaining agreements" during the restructuring process.

"Whichever path you choose, we thank you for your service to the United States of America," the buyout offer stated.

Axios further noted that on average, the annual attrition rate of the federal workforce is about 6%. So some of those who accepted the buyout may have left anyway.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Why some senators are so afraid of confirming Kash Patel and Tulsi Gabbard



For years, the FBI and CIA have run Congress like an op. Forget the “secret squirrel” stuff. Many of their top officials have committed felonies in broad daylight with no accountability. By nominating Kash Patel as FBI director and Tulsi Gabbard as director of national intelligence, President Donald Trump intends to change all that.

The shrill opposition to having tough, contrarian leaders clean out the intelligence community’s litter box has betrayed the secret. Some senators are afraid.

Congress has allowed the FBI and the rest of the intelligence community to become a state within a state that neither Congress nor the president can control.

For nearly half a century, Congress has shrugged off its duty to oversee the ever-growing central investigative and spy apparatus that it funded.

Senator Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) famously admitted in 2017 that any elected leader who challenges the intelligence community will be destroyed and that Trump, first assuming the presidency that month, was a fool even to try.

"Let me tell you, you take on the intelligence community, they have six ways from Sunday at getting back at you,” Schumer told MSNBC. “So even for a practical, supposedly hard-nosed businessman, he’s being really dumb to do this.”

Gabbard last week reminded the Senate of Schumer’s warning.

More than anyone in Washington, Schumer would know. He was elected to Congress before Tulsi Gabbard was born.

Schumer sat on the House Judiciary Committee with oversight of the FBI from 1981 to 1999. He has been on the Senate Judiciary Committee, also with FBI oversight, since 1999 and is now the panel’s ranking member. Since becoming his party’s leader, whether in the majority or minority, he has been an ex officio member of the Senate Intelligence Committee.

Schumer knows that by neglecting its constitutional authority, Congress has allowed the FBI and the intelligence community to become a fearful master — a state within a state beyond the control of both Congress and the president.

Everything the FBI and CIA did to Trump and his allies would fill lesser politicians with fear.

Escape from accountability

Some senators show backbone. One is Senator Mike Lee (R-Utah), who made two big revelations. He was first to confirm the report that some of his colleagues wanted to vote on Gabbard’s nomination in secret.

It wasn’t about a closed hearing to discuss classified matters, but to have the vote itself, including its final tally, a secret. The purpose, one can only presume, is to allow senators to escape any accountability for their vote.

Precedent for this does exist. Following the jihadist attacks of September 11, 2001, the Senate Intelligence Committee voted in secret, and concealed the tallies, on confirmation of nominees. It did this as a security measure because of fears that some would be targeted by terrorists.

The terrorism worry magically vanished in 2013, after the committee voted to confirm deep-stater John Brennan as director of the CIA. For some reason, establishmentarians were incensed that Brennan had any opposition at all. The committee released the tally, which was 12-3. But, as Roll Call reported, “the public had no official way of knowing which panel members voted against Brennan.”

Those three had to be exposed. One of them is still in office: Senator Jim Risch (R-Idaho).

Since then, the tallies of Senate Intelligence Committee votes have been public information.

Who, whom?

Now, with the push to hold the Gabbard confirmation vote in secret, who is afraid of whom? It isn’t Gabbard’s supporters who want a secret vote.

Real intelligence professionals will recall the Bolshevik question, “Kto kogo?” or “Who whom?”

It’s a slogan from Lenin’s 1921 musing, “The whole question is, who will overtake whom?”

Washington has become its own zero-sum power-and-money game. The uniparty members who tax and spend on the permanent bureaucracy, who issue the contracts to the industrial complexes, consider themselves “us.”

In true kto kogo spirit, everyone else — in other words, you and me — is actually “them.” The late great scholar of Russia Richard Pipes once said in a conversation with colleagues, “The FBI learned its worst lessons from the KGB.”

The uniparty loves the FBI as it has become. Retired FBI man Thomas J. Baker observed, “Big Brother is family now.”

Trump and his populist peasant movement want to hold Big Brother and his family accountable. Gabbard and Patel are the tip of the pitchfork.

So the secrecy of a vote on Gabbard — even to those who believe that reforms are overdue — appears driven by some senators’ primal fear of what will happen to them if they are caught helping to hold Big Brother accountable.

Ending the impunity

If Gabbard is confirmed, impunity is over.

“Every FBI director I’ve questioned has lied to me” in his 14 years on the Judiciary Committee, Senator Mike Lee told Kash Patel during his confirmation hearings last week.

Making any false statement to Congress is a felony. Lying under oath is another felony. Five years maximum for each. Four successive FBI directors committed federal felonies, by Lee’s account. They should have gotten 10 years in the slammer for each time they lied to Congress.

But they routinely got away with it.

So have the leakers throughout the intelligence community, who committed felonies every time they passed classified information. Many of those leaks were calculated to manipulate the Senate on who it would and would not confirm.

President Trump is ending the impunity. That’s why the fight against Gabbard and Patel is so vicious. The demons are howling at the exorcist. Some senators feel caught in the middle. That’s why they are so afraid.

GOP Senator Introduces Bill To Send One-Third Of Federal Workforce Packing Out Of DC

'The bureaucrat laptop class has been out of the office for far too long'

The GOP Establishment Is A Greater Threat To Trump’s Agenda Than Democrats

The defeat of Matt Gaetz’s nomination for attorney general shows that this time, Trump really does have to drain the swamp.