The taboo conservatives refuse to confront



There has been a lot of panic, among the conservative commentariat especially, over the growing desire among younger white Americans to receive representation as a collective political bloc. At some level, that reaction is understandable. Race is not the healthiest fixation when it comes to identity.

But the way conservatives have responded to this trend is deeply misguided.

The only way to lower the salience of race is to stop importing ethnocentric cultures and to eliminate political carve-outs for minority communities already here.

For decades, whites have watched every other group in America successfully demand political action as a bloc from both the left and the right. Democrats build their entire coalition around racial grievance, but even conservatives regularly address the needs of minority communities as collective groups. Despite their hostility to “identity politics,” Republicans eagerly cater to it — just not for their core constituency, white Americans.

If conservatives genuinely worry about the rise of white identitarianism, they should stop lecturing young white Americans and start addressing the behavior of the communities they currently pander to.

First, it helps to define terms. “Race” and “ethnicity” are often treated as interchangeable, but they are not. Race is a broad macro category, while ethnicity operates at a more granular level. Swedes, Italians, Irish, and French are all considered white. Ethiopians, Nigerians, African Pygmies, and Somalis are all considered black.

These categories matter, but ethnos is often a more organic and useful way to understand group behavior.

Ironically ethnocentrism varies widely across populations and tends to be particularly low among white Europeans and their descendants. A society composed primarily of people of European extraction, even with some immigration, tends to be relatively tolerant and open. New arrivals who may initially carry ethnocentric instincts are less able to sustain them when they lack a large co-ethnic base.

Assimilation follows naturally under those conditions.

Identity is also not binary. It consists of nested loyalties that rise or fall in importance depending on scale. In small societies, tribe or ethnos dominates. As civilizations expand and absorb new members, identity shifts toward broader categories — often religion or nationality.

White Americans once lived in sharply defined ethnic enclaves. Irish, Italian, Dutch, and German neighborhoods were common. In some cases, the U.S. government actively broke up German-language communities, forcing children into English-speaking schools. Over time, those European ethnoses dissolved into a shared American identity.

That process breaks down when the government imports large, concentrated populations that share a common ethnicity and have not gone through the same scaling process. These groups face no incentive to abandon ethnocentrism because they can successfully deploy it. Co-ethnics ensure access to jobs, education, marriage, and community without assimilation.

In a system where one group must compete on pure individual merit while others are allowed to operate on collective ethnocentrism, tribalism wins. Once it proves effective, the salience of race explodes. When young whites see every other group using the winning strategy, the question becomes unavoidable: Why are we the only group forbidden from doing so?

The problem is not just that tribalism works. The system has been actively rigged against white males.

RELATED: How anti-fascism became the West’s civil religion

Blaze Media Illustration

Jacob Savage’s recent article “The Lost Generation” detailed the extent to which universities, media institutions, and corporations have systematically excluded white men. The piece gained attention partly because it came from the left, but conservatives like Jeremy Carl and Heather Mac Donald have been warning about the same dynamics for years.

Whites — especially young white men — are barred from advocating as a group. At the same time, they are punished as a group. Telling them identity politics is immoral while allowing explicit anti-white discrimination guarantees a predictable response.

The conservative establishment’s answer has been a vague denunciation of ethnocentrism that somehow applies only to whites. Conservatives pay lip service to opposing identity politics while courting explicitly racial organizations. They speak seriously to black, Indian, Hispanic, and Jewish advocacy groups and treat their leaders as legitimate representatives.

Donald Trump recently hosted the American Hindu-Jewish Congress at Mar-a-Lago to discuss combating bigotry. You will not see a dinner honoring representatives of a “White American Congress” to discuss anti-white discrimination — despite overwhelming evidence that such bias is widespread.

That double standard is too obvious for young whites to ignore forever.

If conservatives were serious about halting the rise of collective white identity politics, they would stop scolding young whites for noticing reality. They would confront systemic bias in academia and corporate hiring. To its credit, the Trump administration has signaled an intent to act — but far more is required.

RELATED: Culture’s great subversion machine has broken down at last

Blaze Media Illustration

A serious response would include an immigration moratorium and aggressive prosecution of ethnic cartels. And yes, every tech department staffed entirely by one ethnic group is not evidence that “there were no qualified white applicants.” Conservatives should lecture blacks, Indians, Hispanics, and Jews about ethnocentrism with the same intensity they reserve for whites.

If for no other reason, whites actually vote Republican. Most of the other groups do not.

If conservatives truly fear the rise of collective white politics, they should reduce the number of ethnocentric populations young whites are forced to compete against on pure merit. The only way to lower the salience of race is to stop importing ethnocentric cultures and to eliminate political carve-outs for minority communities already here.

In short, show young whites they can succeed without tribalism by actually punishing the tribalism practiced by everyone else. Summon the courage to confront the behavior you claim to fear — in the groups already practicing it.

Antifa may get a terrorist designation in Europe thanks to Trump: 'Enough is enough!'



President Donald Trump announced on Wednesday that he is designating "ANTIFA, A SICK, DANGEROUS, RADICAL LEFT DISASTER, AS A MAJOR TERRORIST ORGANIZATION."

The president noted further that he will strongly recommend that those caught funding this decentralized anarcho-communist militant group be "thoroughly investigated in accordance with the highest legal standards and practices."

Trump's renewed interest in cracking down on leftist terrorists has inspired some political leaders across the Atlantic to follow suit.

Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, who years ago passed a series of "Stop Soros" laws criminalizing the promotion and support of illegal immigration, noted on Friday, "We will take steps to designate Antifa as a terrorist organization in Hungary. They've attacked peaceful people in the streets, leaving some severely injured, then have the audacity to scold us from the European Parliament. This is unacceptable."

'Alignment with the United States — the world's leading actor in the fight against terrorism — is indispensable.'

Orbán was referring to the February 2023 attacks in which Antifa thugs, primarily from Germany, descended on Budapest and targeted numerous individuals who supposedly looked like members of the hard right.

While several of the leftist thugs responsible for the savage attacks were able to flee the country and avoid extradition, Italian national Ilaria Salis was captured by local police.

Salis dodged accountability because of her subsequent election as a member of the European Parliament in the Greens and Left Alliance. On Tuesday, the European Parliament's Committee on Legal Affairs will reportedly decide whether to waive Salis' political immunity and thereby enable Hungary to reopen her criminal case.

RELATED: Media tries to protect Antifa with tired al-Qaeda talking points

AMY OSBORNE/AFP via Getty Images

Orbán expressed gratitude to Trump "for taking the lead, calling them what they are: terrorists."

Péter Szijjártó, the Hungarian minister of foreign affairs, sent a letter on Saturday to Kaja Kallas, vice president of the European Commission, stressing that "the Antifa movement constitutes a grave threat to the security of the citizens of the European Union and its Member Sates. It is therefore our shared responsibility to strengthen our collective response."

Citing Trump's recognition of Antifa's terroristic nature, Szijjártó stressed that "Hungary is convinced that on an issue of such significance[,] alignment with the United States — the world's leading actor in the fight against terrorism — is indispensable."

Szijjártó urged the European Union to follow Trump's example by adding Antifa to the EU list of terrorist organizations and by imposing "the necessary restrictive measures on groups and individuals connected to it."

There have been other attempts in recent years to put Antifa on the EU terrorist list, but there appears to be greater momentum behind the initiative this time around.

Last week in the Netherlands, the Dutch parliament passed a motion requesting that the government recognize Antifa as a terrorist organization.

The motion, co-sponsored by Geert Wilders, chairman of the Party for Freedom, apparently noted that Antifa thugs "are also active in our country, threatening politicians, disrupting meetings, intimidating students and journalists, and not shying away from using violence."

Dutch politician Thierry Baudet, the leader of the right-leaning Forum for Democracy party, stated, "Enough is enough! The violent and criminal terrorist organisation that is Antifa, with chapters all over the world, will finally be OUTLAWED in the Netherlands. This is just the beginning."

Kyle Shideler, director and senior analyst at the Center for Security Policy, recently told Blaze News editor in chief Matthew Peterson on "Blaze News: The Mandate" that the optimal way forward for the Trump administration to effectively crack down on Antifa at home is to designate foreign Antifa groups as terrorists, link them to international Antifa networks, then target U.S.-based groups connected to the network.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

In Small-Town Michigan, True American Values Are As Strong As Ever

The world feels fragile in many ways, but in this small lakeshore town, I am reminded that such work begins at the most local level.

Racist Democrats Suddenly Oppose Immigration When Refugees Are White

'This notion that somehow we have to accept anyone who wants to come to the United States is absurd,' Secretary of State Marco Rubio said.

Dutch 'anti-globalist' politician viciously attacked 2 days before election



The self-described "anti-globalist" leader of a Dutch populist party was assaulted two days ahead of the country's general election.

Thierry Baudet, the 40-year-old leader of the Forum for Democracy party, was at an election meeting in a Groningen cafe when a teen smashed him over the head with a beer bottle.

According to the party, the populist leader was "hit on the back of the head with a beer bottle and was also hit on the edge of his temple just next to his eye," and a security guard was also injured. Baudet was taken to a hospital, where he was treated by a trauma surgeon.

Footage of the incident shows an individual sneak up on Baudet, smash the former academic repeatedly in the head, then get tackled by security.

— (@)

Following the attack, Baudet told the Dutch newspaper De Andere Krant that Antifa should be placed on the terror list.

"Now that it has become known that Antifa has claimed responsibility for the attack on me, we want Antifa to be immediately placed on the terror list. According to the [Dutch General Intelligence and Security Service], the greatest danger to our democracy is the so-called 'anti-institutional extremism', while left-wing activism is dismissed as a playful phenomenon," said Baudet.

Police spokesman Thijs de Jong suggested the attacker has been arrested and his motive is presently under investigation, reported the Washington Post.

Outgoing Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte wrote on X that it was "totally unacceptable that Thierry Baudet has been attacked again. I said it before and I'll repeat it now: stay away from politicians."

Last month, Baudet was attacked by another radical while on his way to speak at a conservative event at Ghent University in Belgium. The attacker of Ukrainian origin, whom Belgian police indicated will be prosecuted for "intentional assault and battery," reportedly said "no to fascism, no to Putinism," after slugging Baudet over the head with a weighty umbrella.

Extra to his criticism of globalism, mass immigration, LGBT activism, the European Union, and NATO, Baudet has proven a controversial figure over his apparent refusal to condemn the Russian invasion of Ukraine and corresponding suggestion that the conflict is the fault of the West.

— (@)

Baudet said Tuesday he and his team are "working very had behind the scenes to analyze how this could happen a second time, and what we should do about it," reported the NL Times.

"They say three times is a charm, but I'll skip that," he added.

A Monday night poll indicated that the Forum for Democracy party, polling at 2%, stands to possibly take five seats in the 150-seat lower house of the Dutch Parliament. Rutte's VVD party, now led by Turkish-Kurdish refugee Dilan Yeşilgöz, is leading in the polls with 18%, reported Politico.

The right-wing populist Party for Freedom, run by Islam critic Geert Wilders, has seen significant gains in the polls in recent weeks and now sits at 16%, tied with the leftist GorenLinks-PvdA coalition.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Archaeologists unearth 4,000-year-old 'Stonehenge of the Netherlands,' discover first-of-its-kind ornament at burial ground



Archaeologists have discovered a 4,000-year-old structure, which has been dubbed the "Stonehenge of the Netherlands." The site is said to be a first-of-its-kind discovery by experts because of a special ornament from thousands of miles away.

Dutch archaeologists announced this week that they had unearthed an ancient burial mound containing the remains of nearly 60 men, women, and children.

The Guardian reported, "Studying differences in clay composition and color, the scientists located three burial mounds on the excavations, a few miles from the banks of the Waal River."

The archaeologists believe that the historical site had been used as a solar calendar – much like Stonehenge, the prehistoric stone circle monument in Wiltshire, England.

The site was first discovered in November 2016 during construction at an industrial area in the town of Tiel, Netherlands. Since the initial discovery six years ago, archaeologists have reportedly excavated more than a million artifacts dating from the Stone Age, the Bronze Age, the Iron Age, the Roman Empire, and the Middle Ages.

"The shrine must have been an important place," the town of Tiel stated in a Facebook post. "People kept special days of the year, performed rituals, and buried their dead. The shrine had been in use for 800 years."

"This sanctuary must have been a highly significant place where people kept track of special days in the year, performed rituals, and buried their dead. Rows of poles stood along pathways used for processions," the town said in a statement, according to Reuters.

Fox News reported, "The sanctuary was four soccer fields long in total and contains three burial mounds with the largest one being about 65 feet in diameter, which served as a 'kind of solar calendar.'"

The 4,000-year-old site had several passages, which allowed the sun to shine through. The "Stonehenge of the Netherlands," which is roughly 40 miles east of Rotterdam, aligned with the sun on the summer and winter solstices to inform locals of the longest and shortest days of the year.

"A person, for example, a priest or priestess, stood on the hill, which was flat on top and on which probably stood a large pole. The priest then viewed the position of the sun from the fixed point of the pole. There were more posts around the hill as markers. They helped the priest determine the exact time of the year, a spokesperson for the archaeologists told De Telegraaf, the largest newspaper in the Netherlands.

"On certain days the sun shone straight through those passages on the hill," the spokesperson said. "Just like in Stonehenge, where the sun shines through the stones on important days."

The town of Tiel said on Facebook, "In the places where the sun shone straight through the openings, archaeologists also found sacrifices."

On the burial site, archaeologists discovered animal skeletons, human skulls, and valuable items. Archaeologists found a bronze spearhead and a single glass bead in the grave of a woman. The bead is significant, since it is likely from thousands of miles away, and experts believe the bead is the oldest one ever found in the Netherlands.

Chief researcher Cristian van der Linde said the glass bead is from Mesopotamia – present-day Iraq, approximately 3,000 miles away from the burial site in the Netherlands.

"Glass was not made here, so the bead must have been a spectacular item, as for people then it was an unknown material," said Stijn Arnoldussen, a professor at the University of Groningen.

"Things were already being exchanged in those times," Arnoldussen said. "The bead may have been above ground for hundreds of years before it reached Tiel, but of course, it didn’t have to be."

The statement from Tiel said, "This is the first time a site like this has been discovered in the Netherlands."

Some of the ancient artifacts will be showcased in a local museum in Tiel and at the Dutch National Museum of Antiquities.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Archaeologists unearth 4,000-year-old Stonehenge of the Netherlands www.youtube.com

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation-funded group trying to bury video of twisted interviews with little kids about sex and masturbation: 'Do you play with your ****?'



A Dutch organization funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is facing scrutiny over one of its videos featuring children as young as four being asked wildly inappropriate questions about sex and masturbation.

While the Rutgers Foundation is desperately trying to deep-six the video, the right-wing Dutch populist party Forum voor Democratie has drawn attention to its contents in an effort to expose what the group is really up to, reported Reduxx.

Rutgers, like Planned Parenthood in the U.S., claims to be in the business of educating and supporting young people in sexual matters but also advocates for gender ideology and abortion appreciation in schools with the help of other activist groups.

The group states on its website, "We want young people to be free to enjoy their sexuality and relationships, while respecting the rights of others in an inclusive society," admitting to advocating "for progressive language and norm-setting on sexuality education."

Rutgers kicked off an initiative targeting children on March 20 called "What do I like?" as part of a national "Spring Jitters Week" campaign to expand sexual education in primary schools.

"Learning about your body, talking about what you like and a positive self-image. This is the focus this year during the Week of Spring Jitters, an annual project week about relationships, sexuality and resilience in special and primary education," Rutgers wrote on its project page. "We want to make children think about what they like and teach them to express their wishes."

"When children in primary education learn about their bodies, relationships and sexuality from a positive message, they know better what they like and what they don't like," said Elsbeth Reitzema, a so-called sex education expert at Rutgers.

Atlantic staff writer Olga Khazan cited Reitzema and her work with Rutgers in an article last year in an effort to stand up her argument that contrary to the claims of conservatives, parental groups, and Republicans, talking to kids about graphic sex acts wasn't a matter of "grooming them to be abused by pedophiles."

Rutgers, along with Khazan's model sex-educator, went into Dutch elementary schools again this spring to provide children with an understanding of sexuality and sex acts from an early age so that they can be "better able to communicate ... their wishes and limits and learn to treat each other more respectfully."

According to Rutgers, "When children of primary school age reach out about sexuality, the conversations most often revolve around making love, fingering and jerking off, the first time, masturbation and kissing."

The teacher-facing page for the initiative contains various videos to show kids, including "giving permission for children" and "first times - cumming."

The specific video that piqued the interest of Dutch anti-groomer groups was entitled "Wat vind ik fijn," or "What do I like?"

Reduxx reported that the video features children as young as four being asked about their sexual proclivities.

In one scene, a 6-year-old boy named Loek appears alongside his gay guardians, one of whom asks, "Do you like it when someone is petting you?"

The boy shakes his head no, then the adult male asks, "And what about being tickled?"

After the boy answers in the affirmative, the man says, "Oh, we'll have to do that every night then before you sleep."

In another scene, a woman talks to a 9-year-old girl about ejaculation and the "nice feeling" she can attain via orgasm. The adult then describes the various parts of female genitalia to the little girl, emphasizing that she will get a "very nice feeling" from rubbing her "little button."

"You can rub it with your finger," stressed the woman.

A 4-year-old boy is pressed about his masturbation routine in another scene.

His alleged mother, asks him, "What about you? Do you ever play with your dick? Do you ever touch your willie?" ... How does that feel? And when do you do that?"

Despite the boy's confusion, the mother lays in with additional questions: "Do you do that when we're eating? ... Why don't you do that in class?"

Another little boy is told in the video to refer to sex as "f***ing or sucking."

\u201cA Dutch youth sexuality charity is under fire for releasing a video showing adults discussing sex and masturbation with young children. \n\nThe Rutgers Foundation has deleted the video and is threatening legal action against those who re-upload it.\n\nREAD: https://t.co/5jKJipuyvy\u201d
— REDUXX (@REDUXX) 1686236044

The video was reportedly taken down just 24 hours after it appeared on Twitter. Rutgers claimed it had removed the video because it had been taken "out of context."

"Unfortunately, there is quite a bit of fake news and misinformation ... going around at the moment," tweeted Rutgers. "We have also just taken a video offline, in which parents are talking to their child. The topics covered in the video are: learning about your body, talking about what you like and setting boundaries."

"We find that the video is being taken out of context by some people online and used to spread misinformation," wrote the organization, citing protection of the children involved as cause.

The right-wing populist part FVD spoke out against both Rutgers' initiative and its video in late March, calling the "sexualization and indoctrination" of children "disgusting."

\u201cJaarlijks ontvangt de Rutgers Stichting miljoenensubsidies voor de 'Week van de Lentekriebels'. Wat gebeurt er met al dat belastinggeld?\n\nOp basisscholen krijgen kinderen vanaf 4 (!) jaar deze hele week te maken met seksualisering en indoctrinatie. Walgelijk. #FVD #lentekriebels\u2026\u201d
— Forum voor Democratie (@Forum voor Democratie) 1679409114

Recognizing that Rutgers' deleted video was revelatory of the group's alleged sexualization of young children, FVD reposted the video to its own YouTube channel with the title, "Deleted video. Shocking sexualization of young children."

According to the Dutch publication Algemeen Dagblad, an FVD spokesman suggested in a voice-over at the end of the video that it was "obvious Rutgers feels caught" and is doing everything it can "to cover [its] dirty tracks," adding that it was matter of public interest to disclose what elementary-school children were being subjected to.

Rutgers reportedly attempted to get the video taken off YouTube, stating, "The parents and children have not given Forum permission to publish the images."

Reduxx reported the sex group is now threatening to sue the FVD unless the video is taken down. At the time of publication, the video was still on YouTube.

TheBlaze recently detailed Tucker Carlson's claims in his most recent Twitter video concerning the apparent societal effort to normalize child sexualization.

"One by one, with increasing speed, our old taboos have been struck down. Those that remain have lost their moral force. Stealing, flaunting your wealth, striking women, smoking marijuana on the street, shameless public hypocrisy, taking other people's money for not working — all of these things" were previously viewed as "unacceptable in America," Carlson said. "Not anymore."

Carlson emphasized that child molestation is now "teetering on the edge of acceptability."

\u201cEp. 2 Cling to your taboos!\u201d
— Tucker Carlson (@Tucker Carlson) 1686261625

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!